/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q6 E An experiment to compare the ten... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

An experiment to compare the tension bond strength of polymer latex modified mortar (Portland cement mortar to which polymer latex emulsions have been added during mixing) to that of unmodified mortar resulted in \(\bar x = 18.12kgf/c{m^2}\)for the modified mortar \((m = 40)\) and \(\bar y = 16.87kgf/c{m^2}\) for the unmodified mortar \((n = 32)\). Let \({\mu _1}\) and \({\mu _2}\) be the true average tension bond strengths for the modified and unmodified mortars, respectively. Assume that the bond strength distributions are both normal.

a. Assuming that \({\sigma _1} = 1.6\) and \({\sigma _2} = 1.4\), test \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\) versus \({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 0\) at level . \(01.\)

b. Compute the probability of a type II error for the test of part (a) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1\).

c. Suppose the investigator decided to use a level \(.05\) test and wished \(\beta = .10\) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1. \). If \(m = 40\), what value of n is necessary?

d. How would the analysis and conclusion of part (a) change if \({\sigma _1}\) and \({\sigma _2}\) were unknown but \({s_1} = 1.6\)and \({s_7} = 1.4?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified

the solution is

a.Reject null hypothesis

\(\begin{array}{l}b. \beta (1) = 0.3085;\\c. n = 38; \end{array}\)

d. could not use the same test

Step by step solution

01

calculate p value

given

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\bar x = 18.12kgf/c{m^2};}&{m = 40}\\{\bar y = 16.87kgf/c{m^2};}&{n = 32}\end{array}\)

Assume that the bond strength distributions are normal.

a)

the null hypothesis is

\({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = {\Delta _0}\)

The test statistic value is based on the assumption of two normal population distributions with known \({\sigma _1}\) and \({\sigma _2}\) values, as well as two independent random samples.

\(z = \frac{{(\bar x - \bar y) - {\Delta _0}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{m} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{n}} }}\)

The \(P\) value is used to determine the sufficient area under the standard normal curve for the adequate alternative hypothesis.

The standard deviations' values are known.

\(\begin{array}{l}{\sigma _1} = 1.6\\{\sigma _2} = 1.4\end{array}\)

The \({\Delta _0} = 0\) and the alternative hypothesis is \({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 0\). The value of the test statistic is

\(z = \frac{{18.12 - 16.87}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{1.{6^2}}}{{40}} + \frac{{1.{4^2}}}{{32}}} }} = 3.53\)

The area under the standard normal curve to the right of \(z\) can be used to get the \(P\) value. The \(P\) value is calculated using the table in the appendix or software.

\(P = P(Z > 3.53) = 1 - P(Z \le 3.53) = 1 - 0.9998 = 0.0002\)

Since

\(P = 0.0002 < 0.01 = \alpha \)

The null hypothesis should be reject.

02

compute probability of type II error

depending on alternative hypothesis the type II error\(\beta \)when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = \Delta '\)

differs. The alternative hypothesis is \({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 0\) and \(\Delta ' = 1\), in this case the type II error is

\(\beta \left( {{\Delta ^}} \right) = \Phi \left( {{z_\alpha } - \frac{{{\Delta ^} - {\Delta _0}}}{\sigma }} \right)\)

Where

\(\sigma = \sqrt {\frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{m} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{n}} \)

The significance level is \(\alpha = 0.01,{z_\alpha } = {z_{0.01}} = 2.33, \)

\(\sigma = \sqrt {\frac{{1.{6^2}}}{{40}} + \frac{{1.{4^2}}}{{32}}} = 0.3539.\)

Finally, the type II error when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1\) is

\(\beta (1) = \Phi \left( {2.33 - \frac{{1 - 0}}{{0.3539}}} \right) = \Phi ( - 0.4) = 0.3085\)

03

use the table in the appendix

similarly as in (b), from

\(\beta \left( {\Delta '} \right) = \Phi \left( {{z_\alpha } - \frac{{\Delta ' - {\Delta _0}}}{\sigma }} \right)\)

For \(\Delta ' = 1,\beta (1) = 0.1{z_\alpha } = {z_{0.05}} = 1.645.\)using the fact

\(\Phi (1.28) = 0.1\)

Which was obtained from the table in the appendix in the book, the following holds

\(\begin{array}{l}\beta \left( {\Delta '} \right) = \Phi \left( {{z_\alpha } - \frac{{\Delta ' - {\Delta _0}}}{\sigma }} \right)\\0.1 = \Phi \left( {{z_\alpha } - \frac{{\Delta ' - {\Delta _0}}}{\sigma }} \right) and 0.1 = \Phi (1.28)\\\Phi (1.28) = \Phi \left( {{z_\alpha } - \frac{{\Delta ' - {\Delta _0}}}{\sigma }} \right)\end{array}\)

Because \(\Phi \)is cdf of standard normal distribution, the following is true

\(\begin{array}{l}{z_\alpha } - \frac{{\Delta ' - {\Delta _0}}}{\sigma } = 1.28\\2.33 - \frac{{1 - 0}}{\sigma } = 1.28\\{\sigma ^2} = \frac{1}{{{{(1.645 + 1.28)}^2}}}\end{array}\)

Remember that

\(\begin{array}{l}\sigma = \sqrt {\frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{m} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{n}} \\{\sigma ^2} = \frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{m} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{n} = \frac{{1.{6^2}}}{{40}} + \frac{{1.{4^2}}}{n}\end{array}\)

04

conclusion of part (a)

by substituting this, the following is true

\(\begin{array}{l}\frac{{1.{6^2}}}{{40}} + \frac{{1.{4^2}}}{n} = \frac{1}{{{{(1.645 + 1.28)}^2}}}\\\frac{{1.{6^2}}}{{40}} + \frac{{1.{4^2}}}{n} = 0.1169\\\frac{{1.96}}{n} = 0.0529\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{l}n = 37.06\\{\rm{n = 38}}\end{array}\)

d)

The sample size \(n = 32\) is insufficient for the large sample test to be used. This question is a "bait" to get you to say:

When there is a null hypothesis.

\({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = {\Delta _0}\)

The test statistic value

\(z = \frac{{(\bar x - \bar y) - {\Delta _0}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{m} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{n}} }}.\)

The \(P\) value is derived for the acceptable alternative hypothesis by calculating the adequate area under the standard normal curve. When both \(m > 40 and n > 40\) are true, this test can be applied.

However, because \(n\) is insufficient, the \(t\) test from section \(9.2\) should be applied.

05

conclusion

  1. Reject null hypothesis

\(\begin{array}{l}b. \beta (1) = 0.3085;\\c. n = 38; \end{array}\)

d. could not use the same test

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which way of dispensing champagne, the traditional vertical method or a tilted beer-like pour,preserves more of the tiny gas bubbles that improve flavor and aroma? The following data was reported in the article 鈥淥n the Losses of Dissolved \(C{O_2}\) during Champagne Serving鈥 (J. Agr. Food Chem., 2010: 8768鈥8775)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{ Temp \left( {^^\circ C} \right)}&{ Type of Pour }&n&{ Mean (g/L)}&{ SD }\\{18}&{ Traditional }&4&{4.0}&{.5}\\{18}&{ Slanted }&4&{3.7}&{.3}\\{12}&{ Traditional }&4&{3.3}&{.2}\\{12}&{ Slanted }&4&{2.0}&{.3}\\{}&{}&{}&{}&{}\end{array}\)

Assume that the sampled distributions are normal.

a. Carry out a test at significance level \(.01\) to decide whether true average\(C{O_2}\)loss at \(1{8^o}C\) for the traditional pour differs from that for the slanted pour.

b. Repeat the test of hypotheses suggested in (a) for the \(1{2^o}\) temperature. Is the conclusion different from that for the \(1{8^o}\) temperature? Note: The \(1{2^o}\) result was reported in the popular media

The article "Evaluating Variability in Filling Operations" (Food Tech., 1984: 51-55) describes two different filling operations used in a ground-beef packing plant. Both filling operations were set to fill packages with \(1400\;g\)of ground beef. In a random sample of size 30 taken from each filling operation, the resulting means and standard deviations were \(1402.24\;g\) and \(10.97\;g\) for operation 1 and \(1419.63\;g\) and \(9.96\;g\) for operation 2.

a. Using a .05 significance level, is there sufficient evidence to indicate that the true mean weight of the packages differs for the two operations?

b. Does the data from operation 1 suggest that the true mean weight of packages produced by operation 1 is higher than\(1400\;g\)? Use a \(.05\)significance level.

Construct a paired data set for which\(t = \infty \), so that the data is highly significant when the correct analysis is used, yet \(t\) for the two-sample \(t\)test is quite near zero, so the incorrect analysis yields an insignificant result.

Cushing's disease is characterized by muscular weakness due to adrenal or pituitary dysfunction. To provide effective treatment, it is important to detect childhood Cushing's disease as early as possible. Age at onset of symptoms and age at diagnosis (months) for 15 children suffering from the disease were given in the article "Treatment of Cushing's Disease in Childhood and Adolescence by Transphenoidal Microadenomectomy" (New Engl. J. of Med., 1984: 889). Here are the values of the differences between age at onset of symptoms and age at diagnosis:

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ - 24}&{ - 12}&{ - 55}&{ - 15}&{ - 30}&{ - 60}&{ - 14}&{ - 21}\\{ - 48}&{ - 12}&{ - 25}&{ - 53}&{ - 61}&{ - 69}&{ - 80}&{}\end{array}\)

a. Does the accompanying normal probability plot cast strong doubt on the approximate normality of the population distribution of differences?

b. Calculate a lower\(95\% \)confidence bound for the population mean difference, and interpret the resulting bound.

c. Suppose the (age at diagnosis) - (age at onset) differences had been calculated. What would be a\(95\backslash \% \)upper confidence bound for the corresponding population mean difference?

Consider the accompanying data on breaking load (\(kg/25\;mm\)width) for various fabrics in both an unabraded condition and an abraded condition (\(^6\)The Effect of Wet Abrasive Wear on the Tensile Properties of Cotton and Polyester-Cotton Fabrics," J. Testing and Evaluation, \(\;1993:84 - 93\)). Use the paired\(t\)test, as did the authors of the cited article, to test\({H_0}:{\mu _D} = 0\)versus\({H_a}:{\mu _D} > 0\)at significance level . \(01\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.