/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q18 E Which way of dispensing champagn... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Which way of dispensing champagne, the traditional vertical method or a tilted beer-like pour,preserves more of the tiny gas bubbles that improve flavor and aroma? The following data was reported in the article 鈥淥n the Losses of Dissolved \(C{O_2}\) during Champagne Serving鈥 (J. Agr. Food Chem., 2010: 8768鈥8775)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{ Temp \left( {^^\circ C} \right)}&{ Type of Pour }&n&{ Mean (g/L)}&{ SD }\\{18}&{ Traditional }&4&{4.0}&{.5}\\{18}&{ Slanted }&4&{3.7}&{.3}\\{12}&{ Traditional }&4&{3.3}&{.2}\\{12}&{ Slanted }&4&{2.0}&{.3}\\{}&{}&{}&{}&{}\end{array}\)

Assume that the sampled distributions are normal.

a. Carry out a test at significance level \(.01\) to decide whether true average\(C{O_2}\)loss at \(1{8^o}C\) for the traditional pour differs from that for the slanted pour.

b. Repeat the test of hypotheses suggested in (a) for the \(1{2^o}\) temperature. Is the conclusion different from that for the \(1{8^o}\) temperature? Note: The \(1{2^o}\) result was reported in the popular media

Short Answer

Expert verified

the solution is

a)There is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour differs from the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour at \(1{8^^\circ }C\).

b) There is sufficient evidence to support the allegation that the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour differs from the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour at \(1{2^^\circ }C\).

Step by step solution

01

given

given

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = 4.0\\{{\bar x}_2} = 3.7\\{s_1} = 0.5\\{s_2} = 0.3\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = {n_2} = 4\\\alpha = 0.01\end{array}\)

Claim differs

Either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis is the assertion. The null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis are diametrically opposed. The value given in the claim must be included in the null hypothesis.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _1} = {\mu _2}\\{H_a}:{\mu _1} \ne {\mu _2}\end{array}\)

02

determine degree of freedom

determine the test static

\(t = \frac{{{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }} = \frac{{4.0 - 3.7}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{0.{5^2}}}{4} + \frac{{0.{3^2}}}{4}} }} \approx 1.029\)

Determine degree of freedom

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{0.{5^2}}}{4} + \frac{{0.{3^2}}}{4}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {0.{5^2}/4} \right)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {0.{3^2}/4} \right)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}}}} \approx 4\)

The P-value is the chance of getting the test statistic's result, or a number that is more severe. The P-value in the appendix containing the t-value in the row \(df = 4\) is the number (or interval) in the column title of Student's T distribution:

\(P > 2 \times 0.10 = 0.20\)

The null hypothesis is rejected if the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level:

\(P > 0.01 \Rightarrow Fail to reject {H_0}\)

There is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour differs from the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour at \(1{8^^\circ }C\).

03

b)

given

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = 3.3\\{{\bar x}_2} = 2.0\\{s_1} = 0.2\\{s_2} = 0.3\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = {n_2} = 4\\\alpha = 0.01\end{array}\)

Claim differs

Either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis is the assertion. The null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis are diametrically opposed. The value given in the claim must be included in the null hypothesis.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _1} = {\mu _2}\\{H_a}:{\mu _1} \ne {\mu _2}\end{array}\)

04

determine degree of freedom

determine the test static

\(t = \frac{{{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }} = \frac{{3.3 - 2.0}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{0.{2^2}}}{4} + \frac{{0.{3^2}}}{4}} }} \approx 7.211\)

Determine degree of freedom

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{0.{2^2}}}{4} + \frac{{0.{3^2}}}{4}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {0.{2^2}/4} \right)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {0.{3^2}/4} \right)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}}}} \approx 5\)

The P-value is the chance of getting the test statistic's result, or a number that is more severe. The P-value in the appendix containing the t-value in the row \({\rm{d f = 5}}\) is the number (or interval) in the column title of Student's T distribution

\(P < 2 \times 0.0005 = 0.001\)

The null hypothesis is rejected if the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level:

\(P < 0.01 \Rightarrow Reject {H_0}\)

There is sufficient evidence to support the allegation that the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour differs from the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour at \(1{2^^\circ }C\).

05

conclusion

a)There is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour differs from the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour at \(1{8^^\circ }C\).

b) There is sufficient evidence to support the allegation that the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour differs from the true average \(C{O_2}\) loss for the traditional pour at \(1{2^^\circ }C\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An experimenter wishes to obtain a CI for the difference between true average breaking strength for cables manufactured by company I and by company II. Suppose breaking strength is normally distributed for both types of cable with s1 5 30 psi and s2 5 20 psi.

  1. If costs dictate that the sample size for the type I cable should be three times the sample size for the type II cable, how many observations are required if the 99% CI is to be no wider than 20 psi?
  2. Suppose a total of 400 observations is to be made. How many of the observations should be made on type I cable samples if the width of the resulting interval is to be a minimum?

The article "Flexure of Concrete Beams Reinforced with Advanced Composite Orthogrids"\((J\). of Aerospace Engr., 1997: 7-15) gave the accompanying data on ultimate load\((kN)\)for two different types of beams.

\( - 7.0944\)

a. Assuming that the underlying distributions are normal, calculate and interpret a\(99\% \)CI for the difference between true average load for the fiberglass beams and that for the carbon beams.

b. Does the upper limit of the interval you calculated in part (a) give a\(99\% \)upper confidence bound for the difference between the two\(\mu \)'s? If not, calculate such a bound. Does it strongly suggest that true average load for the carbon beams is more than that for the fiberglass beams? Explain.

Construct a paired data set for which\(t = \infty \), so that the data is highly significant when the correct analysis is used, yet \(t\) for the two-sample \(t\)test is quite near zero, so the incorrect analysis yields an insignificant result.

The degenerative disease osteoarthritis most frequently affects weight-bearing joints such as the knee. The article "Evidence of Mechanical Load Redistribution at the Knee Joint in the Elderly When Ascending Stairs and Ramps" (Annals of Biomed. Engr., \(2008: 467 - 476\)) presented the following summary data on stance duration (ms) for samples of both older and younger adults.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{Age\;\;\;\;\;\;\;Sample Size\;\;Sample Mean\;\;Sample SD}\\{\;Older\;\;\;\;\;28\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;801\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;117}\\{Younger\;16\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;780\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;72}\end{array}\)

Assume that both stance duration distributions are normal.

a. Calculate and interpret a\(99\% \)CI for true average stance duration among elderly individuals.

b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level\(.05\)to decide whether true average stance duration is larger among elderly individuals than among younger individuals.

Adding computerized medical images to a database promises to provide great resources for physicians. However, there are other methods of obtaining such information, so the issue of efficiency of access needs to be investigated. The article "The Comparative Effectiveness of Conventional and Digital Image Libraries" J. of Audiovisual Media in Medicine, 2001: 8-15) reported on an experiment in which 13 computerproficient medical professionals were timed both while retrieving an image from a library of slides and while retrieving the same image from a computer database with a Web front end.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\;Subject\;\;\;\;\;1\;\;\;2\;\;3\;\;\;4\;\;\;5\;\;\;6\;\;\;\;\;7}\\{\;Slide\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;30\;35\;40\;25\;20\;30\;\;35}\\{\;Digital\;\;\;\;\;\;\;25\;16\;15\;15 10\;20\;\;\;7}\\{\;Difference\;\;5\;19\;25\;10\;10\;10\;28}\\{\;Subject\;\;\;\;\;8\;\;9\;\;10\;11\;12\;13}\\{\;Slide\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;62\;40\;51\;25\;42\;33\;}\\{Digital\;\;\;\;\;\;\;16\;15\;13\;11\;19\;19}\\{Difference\;46\;25\;38\;14\;23\;14}\end{array}\)

a. Construct a comparative boxplot of times for the two types of retrieval, and comment on any interesting features.

b. Estimate the difference between true average times for the two types of retrieval in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability. Be sure to check the plausibility of any assumptions needed in your analysis. Does it appear plausible that the true average times for the two types of retrieval are identical? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.