/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q70 SE Shoveling is not exactly a high-... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Shoveling is not exactly a high-tech activity, but it will continue to be a required task even in our information age. The article "A Shovel with a Perforated Blade Reduces Energy Expenditure Required for Digging Wet Clay" (Human Factors, 2010: 492-502) reported on an experiment in which 13 workers were each provided with both a conventional shovel and a shovel whose blade was perforated with small holes. The authors of the cited article provided the following data on stable energy expenditure ((kcal/kg(subject)//b(clay)):

Worker : 1 2 3 4

Conventional : .0011 .0014 .0018 .0022

Perforated : .0011 .0010 .0019 .0013

Worker: 5 6 7

Conventional : .0010 .0016 .0028

Perforated : .0011 .0017 .0024

Worker 8 9 10

Conventional : .0020 .0015 .0014

Perforated : .0020 .0013 .0013

Worker: 11 12 13

Conventional : .0023 .0017 .0020

Perforated : .0017 .0015 .0013

a. Calculate a confidence interval at the 95 % confidence level for the true average difference between energy expenditure for the conventional shovel and the perforated shovel (the relevant normal probability plot shows a reasonably linear pattern). Based on this interval, does it appear that the shovels differ with respect to true average energy expenditure? Explain.

b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level .05 to see if true average energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) \((0.00002, 0.00038)\)

Shovels appear to differ with respect to the true average energy expenditure.

(b) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel.

Step by step solution

01

To Calculate a confidence interval at the 95 % confidence level for the true average difference between energy expenditure for the conventional shovel and the perforated shovel 

(a)

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}n = 13 \\c = 95\% = 0.95\end{array}\)

Determine the difference in value of each pair.

Determine the sample mean of the differences. The mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values.

\(\bar d = \frac{{0 + 0.0004 - 0.0001 + \ldots + 0.0006 + 0.0002 + 0.0007}}{{13}} \approx 0.0002\)

Determine the sample standard deviation of the differences:

\({s_d} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(0 - 0.0002)}^2} + \ldots + {{(0.0007 - 0.0002)}^2}}}{{13 - 1}}} \approx 0.0003\)

Determine the\({t_{\alpha /2}}\) using the Student's T distribution table in the appendix with\(df = n - 1 = 13 - 1 = 12\) :

\({t_{0.025}} = 2.179\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \times \frac{{{s_d}}}{{\sqrt n }} = 2.179 \times \frac{{0.0003}}{{\sqrt {13} }} \approx 0.00018\)

The endpoints of the confidence interval for\({\mu _d}\) are:

\(\begin{array}{l}\bar d - E = 0.0002 - 0.00018 = 0.00002\\\bar d + E = 0.0002 + 0.00018 = 0.00038\end{array}\)

Shovels appear to differ with respect to the true average energy expenditure, because 0 does not lie in the confidence interval.

02

To find test of hypotheses at significance level .05 to see if true average energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel.

(b)

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}n = 13 \\\alpha = 0.05\end{array}\)

Given claim: exceeds

The claim is either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis state the opposite of each other. The null hypothesis needs to contain the value mentioned in the claim.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _d} = 0\\{H_a}:{\mu _d} > 0\end{array}\)

Determine the difference in value of each pair.

Determine the sample mean of the differences. The mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values.

\(\bar d = \frac{{0 + 0.0004 - 0.0001 + \cdots + 0.0006 + 0.0002 + 0.0007}}{{13}} \approx 0.0002\)

Determine the sample standard deviation of the differences:

\({s_d} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(0 - 0.0002)}^2} + \ldots + {{(0.0007 - 0.0002)}^2}}}{{13 - 1}}} \approx 0.0003\)

Determine the value of the test statistic:

\(t = \frac{{\bar d}}{{{s_d}/\sqrt n }} = \frac{{0.0002}}{{0.0003/\sqrt {13} }} \approx 2.404\)

The P-value is the probability of obtaining the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. The P-value is the number (or interval) in the column title of the Student's T distribution in the appendix containing the t-value in the row\(df = n - 1 = 13 - 1 = 12\) :

\(0.01 < P < 0.025\)

If the P-value is less than the significance level, reject the null hypothesis.

\(P < 0.05 \Rightarrow Reject {H_0}\)

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How does energy intake compare to energy expenditure? One aspect of this issue was considered in the article 鈥淢easurement of Total Energy Expenditure by the Doubly Labelled Water Method in Professional Soccer Players鈥 (J. of Sports Sciences, 2002: 391鈥397), which contained the accompanying data (MJ/day).

Test to see whether there is a significant difference between intake and expenditure. Does the conclusion depend on whether a significance level of .05, .01, or .001 is used?

The National Health Statistics Reports dated Oct. \(22,2008\), included the following information on the heights (in.) for non-Hispanic white females:

Sample sample Std. Error

Age Size Mean Mean

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{20 - 39}&{866}&{64.9}&{.09}\\{60 and older }&{934}&{63.1}&{.11}\\{}&{}&{}&{}\end{array}\)

  1. Calculate and interpret a confidence interval at confidence level approximately \(95\% \) for the difference between population mean height for the younger women and that for the older women.
  2. Let \({\mu _1}\) denote the population mean height for those aged \(20 - 39\) and \({\mu _2}\) denote the population mean height for those aged 60 and older. Interpret the hypotheses \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1 and {H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 1,\) and then carry out a test of these hypotheses at significance level \(.001\)
  3. Based on the \(p\)-value calculated in (b) would you reject the null hypothesis at any reasonable significance level? Explain your reasoning.
  4. What hypotheses would be appropriate if \({\mu _1}\) referred to the older age group, \({\mu _2}\) to the younger age group, and you wanted to see if there was compelling evidence for concluding that the population mean height for younger women exceeded that for older women by more than \(1\)in.?

Scientists and engineers frequently wish to compare two different techniques for measuring or determining the value of a variable. In such situations, interest centers on testing whether the mean difference in measurements is zero. The article "Evaluation of the Deuterium Dilution Technique Against the Test Weighing Procedure for the Determination of Breast Milk Intake" (Amer: J. of Clinical Nutr., \(1983: 996 - 1003\)) reports the accompanying data on amount of milk ingested by each of\(14\)randomly selected infants.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;Infant\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;}\\{\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;1\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;2\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;3\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;4\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;5}\\{D method\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;1509\;\;\;\;\;1418\;\;\;\;\;1561\;\;\;\;\;1556\;\;\;\;\;2169}\\{W method\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;1498\;\;\;\;\;1254\;\;\;\;\;1336\;\;\;\;\;1565\;\;\;\;\;2000}\\{jifference\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;11\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;164\;\;\;\;\;\;\;225\;\;\;\;\;\;\; - 9\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;169}\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{}&{Infant}&{}&{}&{}&{}\\{}&6&7&8&9&{10}\\{DD method}&{1760}&{1098}&{1198}&{1479}&{1281}\\{TW method}&{1318}&{1410}&{1129}&{1342}&{1124}\\{Difference}&{442}&{ - 312}&{69}&{137}&{157}\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{}&{Infant}&{}&{}&{}\\{}&{11}&{12}&{13}&{14}\\{DD method}&{1414}&{1954}&{2174}&{2058}\\{TW method}&{1468}&{1604}&{1722}&{1518}\\{Difference}&{ - 54}&{350}&{452}&{540}\end{array}\)

a. Is it plausible that the population distribution of differences is normal?

b. Does it appear that the true average difference between intake values measured by the two methods is something other than zero? Determine the\(P\)-value of the test, and use it to reach a conclusion at significance level . \(05\).

Olestra is a fat substitute approved by the FDA for use in snack foods. Because there have been anecdotal reports of gastrointestinal problems associated with olestra consumption, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment was carried out to compare olestra potato chips to regular potato chips with respect to GI symptoms ("Gastrointestinal Symptoms Following Consumption of Olestra or Regular Triglyceride Potato Chips," J. of the Amer. Med. Assoc., 1998: 150-152). Among 529 individuals in the TG control group, 17.6 % experienced an adverse GI event, whereas among the 563 individuals in the olestra treatment group, 15.8 % experienced such an event.

a. Carry out a test of hypotheses at the 5 % significance level to decide whether the incidence rate of GI problems for those who consume olestra chips according to the experimental regimen differs from the incidence rate for the TG control treatment.

b. If the true percentages for the two treatments were 15 % and 20 %, respectively, what sample sizes

\((m = n\)) would be necessary to detect such a difference with probability 90?

Consider the pooled\(t\)variable

\(T = \frac{{(\bar X - \bar Y) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{{S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} }}\)

which has a\(t\)distribution with\(m + n - 2\)df when both population distributions are normal with\({\sigma _1} = {\sigma _2}\)(see the Pooled\(t\)Procedures subsection for a description of\({S_p}\)).

a. Use this\(t\)variable to obtain a pooled\(t\)confidence interval formula for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\).

b. A sample of ultrasonic humidifiers of one particular brand was selected for which the observations on maximum output of moisture (oz) in a controlled chamber were\(14.0, 14.3, 12.2\), and 15.1. A sample of the second brand gave output values\(12.1, 13.6\),\(11.9\), and\(11.2\)("Multiple Comparisons of Means Using Simultaneous Confidence Intervals," J. of Quality Technology, \(1989: 232 - 241\)). Use the pooled\(t\)formula from part (a) to estimate the difference between true average outputs for the two brands with a\(95\% \)confidence interval.

c. Estimate the difference between the two\(\mu \)'s using the two-sample\(t\)interval discussed in this section, and compare it to the interval of part (b).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.