/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q34 E Consider the pooled\(t\) variab... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider the pooled\(t\)variable

\(T = \frac{{(\bar X - \bar Y) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{{S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} }}\)

which has a\(t\)distribution with\(m + n - 2\)df when both population distributions are normal with\({\sigma _1} = {\sigma _2}\)(see the Pooled\(t\)Procedures subsection for a description of\({S_p}\)).

a. Use this\(t\)variable to obtain a pooled\(t\)confidence interval formula for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\).

b. A sample of ultrasonic humidifiers of one particular brand was selected for which the observations on maximum output of moisture (oz) in a controlled chamber were\(14.0, 14.3, 12.2\), and 15.1. A sample of the second brand gave output values\(12.1, 13.6\),\(11.9\), and\(11.2\)("Multiple Comparisons of Means Using Simultaneous Confidence Intervals," J. of Quality Technology, \(1989: 232 - 241\)). Use the pooled\(t\)formula from part (a) to estimate the difference between true average outputs for the two brands with a\(95\% \)confidence interval.

c. Estimate the difference between the two\(\mu \)'s using the two-sample\(t\)interval discussed in this section, and compare it to the interval of part (b).

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) \((\bar X - \bar Y) \pm {t_{\alpha /2}}{S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} \)

(b) \(( - 0.2423,3.6423)\)

(c) \(( - 0.3407,3.7407)\)

This confidence interval is slightly wider than the confidence interval found in part (b).

Step by step solution

01

a)Step 1: Find the standard deviation

(a) Given:

\(T = \frac{{(\bar X - \bar Y) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{{S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} }}\)

The t-value is the test statistic decreased by the mean, divided by the standard deviation:

\(\begin{array}{l}E(\bar X - \bar Y) = {\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\\V(\bar X - \bar Y) = {S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} \end{array}\)

The boundaries of the confidence interval are then the test statistic decreased/increased by the product of the critical t-value and the variance of the test statistic:

\((\bar X - \bar Y) \pm {t_{\alpha /2}}{S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} \)

02

b)Step 2: Find the mean and standard deviation

The mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = \frac{{14.0 + 14.3 + 12.2 + 15.1}}{4} \approx 13.9\\{{\bar x}_2} = \frac{{12.1 + 13.6 + 11.9 + 11.2}}{4} \approx 12.2\end{array}\)

The variance is the sum of squared deviations from the mean divided by\(n - 1\). The standard deviation is the square root of the variance: \(\begin{array}{l}{s_1} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(14.0 - 13.9)}^2} + \ldots . + {{(14.0 - 13.9)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}}} \approx 1.2247\\{s_2} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(12.1 - 12.2)}^2} + \ldots . + {{(11.2 - 12.2)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}}} \approx 1.0100\end{array}\)

03

Step 3:

Determine the pooled standard deviation:

\({s_p} = \sqrt {\frac{{\left( {{n_1} - 1} \right)s_1^2 + \left( {{n_2} - 1} \right)s_2^2}}{{{n_1} + {n_2} - 2}}} = \sqrt {\frac{{(4 - 1){{1.2247}^2} + (4 - 1){{1.0100}^2}}}{{4 + 4 - 2}}} \approx 1.1225\)

Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom \(df = {n_1} + {n_2} - 2 = 4 + 4 - 2 = 6\) and in the column with \(1 - \) \(c/2 = 0.025\) in the Student's t distribution table in the appendix:

\({t_{\alpha /2}} = 2.447\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \cdot {s_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{1}{{{n_2}}}} = 2.447 \cdot 1.1225\sqrt {\frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{4}} \approx 1.9423\)

The endpoints of the confidence interval for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\)are:

\(\begin{array}{l}\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - E = (13.9 - 12.2) - 1.9423 = 1.7 - 1.9423 = - 0.2423\\\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) + E = (13.9 - 12.2) + 1.9423 = 1.7 + 1.9423 = 3.6423\end{array}\)

04

C)Step 3: Determine the degree of freedom

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer):

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{{{1.2247}^2}}}{4} + \frac{{{{1.0100}^2}}}{4}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {{{1.2247}^2}/4} \right)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {{{1.0100}^2}/4} \right)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}}}} \approx 5\)

Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom\(df = 5\)and in the column with\(1 - c/2 = 0.025\)in the Student's distribution table in the appendix:

\({t_{\alpha /2}} = 2.571\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} = 2.571 \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{{{1.2247}^2}}}{4} + \frac{{{{1.0100}^2}}}{4}} \approx 2.0407\)

The endpoints of the confidence interval for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\)are:

\(\begin{array}{l}\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - E = (13.9 - 12.2) - 2.0407 = 1.7 - 2.0407 = - 0.3407\\\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) + E = (13.9 - 12.2) + 2.0407 = 1.7 + 2.0407 = 3.7407\end{array}\)

We note that this confidence interval is slightly wider than the confidence interval found in part (b).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An experiment was performed to compare the fracture toughness of high-purity \(18Ni\) maraging steel with commercial-purity steel of the same type (Corrosion Science, 1971: 723–736). For \(m = 32\)specimens, the sample average toughness was \(\overline x = 65.6\) for the high purity steel, whereas for \(n = 38\)specimens of commercial steel \(\overline y = 59.8\). Because the high-purity steel is more expensive, its use for a certain application can be justified only if its fracture toughness exceeds that of commercial purity steel by more than 5. Suppose that both toughness distributions are normal.

a. Assuming that \({\sigma _1} = 1.2\) and \({\sigma _2} = 1.1\), test the relevant hypotheses using \(\alpha = .001\).

b. Compute \(\beta \) for the test conducted in part (a) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 6.\)

Toxaphene is an insecticide that has been identified as a pollutant in the Great Lakes ecosystem. To investigate the effect of toxaphene exposure on animals, groups of rats were given toxaphene in their diet. The article "Reproduction Study of Toxaphene in the Rat" ( J. of Environ. Sci. Health, 1988: 101-126) reports weight gains (in grams) for rats given a low dose (4 ppm) and for control rats whose diet did not include the insecticide. The sample standard deviation for 23 female control rats was \(32\;g\) and for 20 female low-dose rats was\(54\;g\). Does this data suggest that there is more variability in low-dose weight gains than in control weight gains? Assuming normality, carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level .05.

Head ability is the ability of a cylindrical piece of material to be shaped into the head of a bolt, screw, or other cold-formed part without cracking. The article "New Methods for Assessing Cold Heading Quality" (Wire J. Intl., Oct. 1996: 66-72) described the result of a head ability impact test applied to 30 specimens of aluminum killed steel and 30 specimens of silicon killed steel. The sample mean head ability rating number for the steel specimens was 6.43, and the sample mean for aluminum specimens was 7.09. Suppose that the sample standard deviations were 1.08 and 1.19, respectively. Do you agree with the article's authors that the difference in head ability ratings is significant at the 5% level (assuming that the two head ability distributions are normal)?

The paper "'Quantitative Assessment of Glenohumeral Translation in Baseball Players" (The Amer.J. of Sports Med., 2004: 1711-1715) considered various aspects of shoulder motion for a sample of pitchers and another sample of position players [glenohumeral refers to the articulation between the humerus (ball) and the glenoid (socket)]. The authors kindly supplied the following data on anteroposterior translation (mm), a measure of the extent of anterior and posterior motion, both for the dominant arm and the nondominant arm.

a. Estimate the true average difference in translation between dominant and nondominant arms for pitchers in a way that conveys information about reliability and precision, and interpret the resulting estimate.

b. Repeat (a) for position players.

c. The authors asserted that "pitchers have greater difference in side-to-side anteroposterior translation of their shoulders compared with position players." Do you agree? Explain.

Information about hand posture and forces generated by the fingers during manipulation of various daily objects is needed for designing high-tech hand prosthetic devices. The article "Grip Posture and Forces During Holding Cylindrical Objects with Circular Grips" (Ergonomies, 1996: 1163-1176) reported that for a sample of 11 females, the sample mean four-finger pinch strength (N) was 98.1 and the sample standard deviation was 14.2. For a sample of 15 males, the sample mean and sample standard deviation were 129.2 and 39.1, respectively.

a. A test carried out to see whether true average strengths for the two genders were different resulted in t=2.51 and P-value =.019. Does the appropriate test procedure described in this chapter yield this value of t and the stated P-value?

b. Is there substantial evidence for concluding that true average strength for males exceeds that for females by more than 25 N ? State and test the relevant hypotheses.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.