/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q34 E Consider the pooled\(t\)聽variab... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Consider the pooled\(t\)variable

\(T = \frac{{(\bar X - \bar Y) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{{S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} }}\)

which has a\(t\)distribution with\(m + n - 2\)df when both population distributions are normal with\({\sigma _1} = {\sigma _2}\)(see the Pooled\(t\)Procedures subsection for a description of\({S_p}\)).

a. Use this\(t\)variable to obtain a pooled\(t\)confidence interval formula for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\).

b. A sample of ultrasonic humidifiers of one particular brand was selected for which the observations on maximum output of moisture (oz) in a controlled chamber were\(14.0, 14.3, 12.2\), and 15.1. A sample of the second brand gave output values\(12.1, 13.6\),\(11.9\), and\(11.2\)("Multiple Comparisons of Means Using Simultaneous Confidence Intervals," J. of Quality Technology, \(1989: 232 - 241\)). Use the pooled\(t\)formula from part (a) to estimate the difference between true average outputs for the two brands with a\(95\% \)confidence interval.

c. Estimate the difference between the two\(\mu \)'s using the two-sample\(t\)interval discussed in this section, and compare it to the interval of part (b).

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) \((\bar X - \bar Y) \pm {t_{\alpha /2}}{S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} \)

(b) \(( - 0.2423,3.6423)\)

(c) \(( - 0.3407,3.7407)\)

This confidence interval is slightly wider than the confidence interval found in part (b).

Step by step solution

01

a)Step 1: Find the standard deviation

(a) Given:

\(T = \frac{{(\bar X - \bar Y) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{{S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} }}\)

The t-value is the test statistic decreased by the mean, divided by the standard deviation:

\(\begin{array}{l}E(\bar X - \bar Y) = {\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\\V(\bar X - \bar Y) = {S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} \end{array}\)

The boundaries of the confidence interval are then the test statistic decreased/increased by the product of the critical t-value and the variance of the test statistic:

\((\bar X - \bar Y) \pm {t_{\alpha /2}}{S_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} \)

02

b)Step 2: Find the mean and standard deviation

The mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = \frac{{14.0 + 14.3 + 12.2 + 15.1}}{4} \approx 13.9\\{{\bar x}_2} = \frac{{12.1 + 13.6 + 11.9 + 11.2}}{4} \approx 12.2\end{array}\)

The variance is the sum of squared deviations from the mean divided by\(n - 1\). The standard deviation is the square root of the variance: \(\begin{array}{l}{s_1} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(14.0 - 13.9)}^2} + \ldots . + {{(14.0 - 13.9)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}}} \approx 1.2247\\{s_2} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(12.1 - 12.2)}^2} + \ldots . + {{(11.2 - 12.2)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}}} \approx 1.0100\end{array}\)

03

Step 3:

Determine the pooled standard deviation:

\({s_p} = \sqrt {\frac{{\left( {{n_1} - 1} \right)s_1^2 + \left( {{n_2} - 1} \right)s_2^2}}{{{n_1} + {n_2} - 2}}} = \sqrt {\frac{{(4 - 1){{1.2247}^2} + (4 - 1){{1.0100}^2}}}{{4 + 4 - 2}}} \approx 1.1225\)

Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom \(df = {n_1} + {n_2} - 2 = 4 + 4 - 2 = 6\) and in the column with \(1 - \) \(c/2 = 0.025\) in the Student's t distribution table in the appendix:

\({t_{\alpha /2}} = 2.447\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \cdot {s_p}\sqrt {\frac{1}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{1}{{{n_2}}}} = 2.447 \cdot 1.1225\sqrt {\frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{4}} \approx 1.9423\)

The endpoints of the confidence interval for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\)are:

\(\begin{array}{l}\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - E = (13.9 - 12.2) - 1.9423 = 1.7 - 1.9423 = - 0.2423\\\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) + E = (13.9 - 12.2) + 1.9423 = 1.7 + 1.9423 = 3.6423\end{array}\)

04

C)Step 3: Determine the degree of freedom

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer):

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{{{1.2247}^2}}}{4} + \frac{{{{1.0100}^2}}}{4}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {{{1.2247}^2}/4} \right)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {{{1.0100}^2}/4} \right)}^2}}}{{4 - 1}}}} \approx 5\)

Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom\(df = 5\)and in the column with\(1 - c/2 = 0.025\)in the Student's distribution table in the appendix:

\({t_{\alpha /2}} = 2.571\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} = 2.571 \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{{{1.2247}^2}}}{4} + \frac{{{{1.0100}^2}}}{4}} \approx 2.0407\)

The endpoints of the confidence interval for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\)are:

\(\begin{array}{l}\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - E = (13.9 - 12.2) - 2.0407 = 1.7 - 2.0407 = - 0.3407\\\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) + E = (13.9 - 12.2) + 2.0407 = 1.7 + 2.0407 = 3.7407\end{array}\)

We note that this confidence interval is slightly wider than the confidence interval found in part (b).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Example\(7.11\)gave data on the modulus of elasticity obtained\(1\)minute after loading in a certain configuration. The cited article also gave the values of modulus of elasticity obtained\(4\)weeks after loading for the same lumber specimens. The data is presented here. \(1\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{Observation}&{1 min}&{4 weeks}&{Difference}\\1&{10,490}&{9,110}&{1380}\\2&{16,620}&{13,250}&{3370}\\3&{17,300}&{14,720}&{2580}\\4&{15,480}&{12,740}&{2740}\\5&{12,970}&{10,120}&{2850}\\6&{17,260}&{14,570}&{2690}\\7&{13,400}&{11,220}&{2180}\\8&{13,900}&{11,100}&{2800}\\9&{13,630}&{11,420}&{2210}\\{10}&{13,260}&{10,910}&{2350}\\{11}&{14,370}&{12,110}&{2260}\\{12}&{11,700}&{8,620}&{3080}\\{13}&{15,470}&{12,590}&{2880}\\{14}&{17,840}&{15,090}&{2750}\\{15}&{14,070}&{10,550}&{3520}\\{16}&{14,760}&{12,230}&{2530}\end{array}\)

Calculate and interpret an upper confidence bound for the true average difference between\(1\)-minute modulus and\(4\)-week modulus; first check the plausibility of any necessary assumptions.

Olestra is a fat substitute approved by the FDA for use in snack foods. Because there have been anecdotal reports of gastrointestinal problems associated with olestra consumption, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment was carried out to compare olestra potato chips to regular potato chips with respect to GI symptoms ("Gastrointestinal Symptoms Following Consumption of Olestra or Regular Triglyceride Potato Chips," J. of the Amer. Med. Assoc., 1998: 150-152). Among 529 individuals in the TG control group, 17.6 % experienced an adverse GI event, whereas among the 563 individuals in the olestra treatment group, 15.8 % experienced such an event.

a. Carry out a test of hypotheses at the 5 % significance level to decide whether the incidence rate of GI problems for those who consume olestra chips according to the experimental regimen differs from the incidence rate for the TG control treatment.

b. If the true percentages for the two treatments were 15 % and 20 %, respectively, what sample sizes

\((m = n\)) would be necessary to detect such a difference with probability 90?

Shoveling is not exactly a high-tech activity, but it will continue to be a required task even in our information age. The article "A Shovel with a Perforated Blade Reduces Energy Expenditure Required for Digging Wet Clay" (Human Factors, 2010: 492-502) reported on an experiment in which 13 workers were each provided with both a conventional shovel and a shovel whose blade was perforated with small holes. The authors of the cited article provided the following data on stable energy expenditure ((kcal/kg(subject)//b(clay)):

Worker : 1 2 3 4

Conventional : .0011 .0014 .0018 .0022

Perforated : .0011 .0010 .0019 .0013

Worker: 5 6 7

Conventional : .0010 .0016 .0028

Perforated : .0011 .0017 .0024

Worker 8 9 10

Conventional : .0020 .0015 .0014

Perforated : .0020 .0013 .0013

Worker: 11 12 13

Conventional : .0023 .0017 .0020

Perforated : .0017 .0015 .0013

a. Calculate a confidence interval at the 95 % confidence level for the true average difference between energy expenditure for the conventional shovel and the perforated shovel (the relevant normal probability plot shows a reasonably linear pattern). Based on this interval, does it appear that the shovels differ with respect to true average energy expenditure? Explain.

b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level .05 to see if true average energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel.

How does energy intake compare to energy expenditure? One aspect of this issue was considered in the article 鈥淢easurement of Total Energy Expenditure by the Doubly Labelled Water Method in Professional Soccer Players鈥 (J. of Sports Sciences, 2002: 391鈥397), which contained the accompanying data (MJ/day).

Test to see whether there is a significant difference between intake and expenditure. Does the conclusion depend on whether a significance level of .05, .01, or .001 is used?

Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a psychiatric condition leading to substantial weight loss among women who are fearful of becoming fat. The article "Adipose Tissue Distribution After Weight Restoration and Weight Maintenance in Women with Anorexia Nervosa" (Amer. J. of ClinicalNutr., 2009: 1132-1137) used whole-body magnetic resonance imagery to determine various tissue characteristics for both an AN sample of individuals who had undergone acute weight restoration and maintained their weight for a year and a comparable (at the outset of the study) control sample. Here is summary data on intermuscular adipose tissue (IAT; kg).

Assume that both samples were selected from normal distributions.

a. Calculate an estimate for true average IAT under the described AN protocol, and do so in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the estimation.

b. Calculate an estimate for the difference between true average AN IAT and true average control IAT, and do so in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the estimation. What does your estimate suggest about true average AN IAT relative to true average control IAT?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.