/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q63 E Toxaphene is an insecticide that... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Toxaphene is an insecticide that has been identified as a pollutant in the Great Lakes ecosystem. To investigate the effect of toxaphene exposure on animals, groups of rats were given toxaphene in their diet. The article "Reproduction Study of Toxaphene in the Rat" ( J. of Environ. Sci. Health, 1988: 101-126) reports weight gains (in grams) for rats given a low dose (4 ppm) and for control rats whose diet did not include the insecticide. The sample standard deviation for 23 female control rats was \(32\;g\) and for 20 female low-dose rats was\(54\;g\). Does this data suggest that there is more variability in low-dose weight gains than in control weight gains? Assuming normality, carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level .05.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Reject null hypothesis and there is more variability in the low dose weight gains.

Step by step solution

01

To find the hypothesis

Testing null hypothesis \({H_0}:\sigma _1^2 = \sigma _2^2\)versus alternative hypothesis \({H_a}\)under the assumption that the two populations are normal and independent

Depending on alternative hypothesis \({H_a}\)the \(P\)value is corresponding area under the \({F_{m - 1,n - 1}}\)curve.

The hypotheses of interest are \(H:0:{\sigma _1} = \sigma _2^2\) versus\({H_a}:\sigma _1^2 > \sigma _2^2\), where \({\sigma _1},{\sigma _2}\)denote the variance in weight pain for low-dose treatment and variance in weight gain for control condition, respectively.

The corresponding sample standard deviations are \({s_1} = 54\)and \({s_2} = 32.\)The degrees of freedom are \(m - 1 = 20 - 1 = 19\)and \(n - 1 = 23 - 1 = 22.\)

02

Finding test statistic

The test statistic is,

\(f = \frac{{s_1^2}}{{s_2^2}}\)

Thus, the value of the statistic is

\(\begin{array}{c}f = \frac{{{{54}^2}}}{{{{32}^2}}}\\ = 2.85\end{array}\)

At significance level \(\alpha = 0.01,\)and mentioned degrees of freedom, value \({F_{0.01,19,22}}\) is

\({F_{0.01,19,22}} = 2.0837\)

03

Decision rule and conclusion

The test is upper sided, and \({F_{0.05,19,22}} = 2.0837 < 2.85 = f\)

Hence reject null hypothesis at given significance level.

The \(P\)value could have been used as well. For the upper sided test, the \(P\) value is

\(\begin{array}{c}P = P(F > 2.85)\\ = 0.010036\end{array}\)

Where \(F\)has Fisher's distribution with degrees of freedom \({\nu _1} = 19\)and\({\nu _2} = 22\). The value was computed using a software (you can use table estimate the value as mentioned above). Since for the \(P\)the following holds

\(P = 0.010036 < 0.05 = \alpha \)

Reject null hypothesis at any given significance level. Hence there is more variability in the low dose weight gains.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Reconsider the data of Example \(9.6\), and calculate a \(95\% \)upper confidence bound for the ratio of the standard deviation of the triacetate porosity distribution to that of the cotton porosity distribution.

In medical investigations, the ratio \(\theta = {p_1}/{p_2}\)is often of more interest than the difference \({p_1} - {p_2}\)(e.g., individuals given treatment 1 are how many times as likely to recover as those given treatment\(2?)\). Let\(\hat \theta = {\hat p_1}/{\hat p_2}\). When \(m\)and n are both large, the statistic \(ln(\theta )\)has approximately a normal distribution with approximate mean value \(ln(\theta )\)and approximate standard deviation \({[(m - x)/(mx) + (n - y)/(ny)]^{1/2}}.\)

  1. Use these facts to obtain a large-sample 95 % CI formula for estimating\(ln(\theta )\), and then a CI for \(\theta \)itself.
  2. Return to the heart-attack data of Example 1.3, and calculate an interval of plausible values for \(\theta \)at the 95 % confidence level. What does this interval suggest about the efficacy of the aspirin treatment?

Consider the accompanying data on breaking load (\(kg/25\;mm\)width) for various fabrics in both an unabraded condition and an abraded condition (\(^6\)The Effect of Wet Abrasive Wear on the Tensile Properties of Cotton and Polyester-Cotton Fabrics," J. Testing and Evaluation, \(\;1993:84 - 93\)). Use the paired\(t\)test, as did the authors of the cited article, to test\({H_0}:{\mu _D} = 0\)versus\({H_a}:{\mu _D} > 0\)at significance level . \(01\)

Use the data of Exercise 19 to calculate a \(95\% CI\) for the difference between true average stopping distance for cars equipped with system \(1\) and cars equipped with system \(2\). Does the interval suggest that precise information about the value of this difference is available?

Determine the number of degrees of freedom for the two-sample t test or CI in each of the following.

\(\begin{array}{l}a. m = 10, n = 10, {s_1} = 5.0, {s_2} = 6.0\\b. m = 10, n = 15,{s_1} = 5.0, {s_2} = 6.0\\c. m = 10, n = 15, {s_1} = 2.0, {s_2} = 6.0\\d. m = 12, n = 24, {s_1} = 5.0, {s_2} = 6.0\\\\\end{array}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.