/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q55 E In medical investigations, the r... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In medical investigations, the ratio \(\theta = {p_1}/{p_2}\)is often of more interest than the difference \({p_1} - {p_2}\)(e.g., individuals given treatment 1 are how many times as likely to recover as those given treatment\(2?)\). Let\(\hat \theta = {\hat p_1}/{\hat p_2}\). When \(m\)and n are both large, the statistic \(ln(\theta )\)has approximately a normal distribution with approximate mean value \(ln(\theta )\)and approximate standard deviation \({[(m - x)/(mx) + (n - y)/(ny)]^{1/2}}.\)

  1. Use these facts to obtain a large-sample 95 % CI formula for estimating\(ln(\theta )\), and then a CI for \(\theta \)itself.
  2. Return to the heart-attack data of Example 1.3, and calculate an interval of plausible values for \(\theta \)at the 95 % confidence level. What does this interval suggest about the efficacy of the aspirin treatment?

Short Answer

Expert verified

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{ a}}{\rm{. }}\ln \hat \theta \pm {z_{\alpha /2}} \times \sqrt {\frac{{m - x}}{{mx}} + \frac{{n - y}}{{ny}}} ;\exp \;\;\;\ln \hat \theta \pm {z_{\alpha /2}} \times \sqrt {\frac{{m - x}}{{mx}} + \frac{{n - y}}{{ny}}} ;{\rm{ }}\\{\rm{ a}}{\rm{. }}(1.43,2.32)\end{array}\)

b) \(\hat \theta = \frac{{0.0171}}{{0.0094}} = 1.818\)

Aspirin appears to be beneficial.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1:To obtain a 95% large sample confidence intervalfor estimating the \(ln(\theta )\)and\(\theta \)

(a):

In order to obtain a 95% large sample confidence interval you need to use facts that the standard deviations of a normally distributed random variable \(\ln \hat \theta \)

\(\begin{array}{l}is{\rm{ }}\sigma = \sqrt {\frac{{m - x}}{{mx}} + \frac{{n - y}}{{ny}}} {\rm{ and the mean value is }}\mu = \ln \theta \cdot {\rm{ }}\\{\rm{When }}\end{array}\)

Alpha=0.05, at 95 %

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{ confidence interval can be obtained from }}P\left( {{z_1} < \ln \hat \theta < {z_2}} \right) = 1 - \alpha {\rm{ }}\\{\rm{ and the mentioned facts above as }}\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{c}P\left( {{z_1} < \ln \hat \theta < {z_2}} \right) = P\;\;\left( {\;\frac{{{z_1} - \mu }}{\sigma } < \frac{{\ln \hat \theta - \mu }}{\sigma } < \frac{{{z_2} - \mu }}{\sigma }} \right)\\ = P\;\;\left( {\;\frac{{{z_1} - \mu }}{\sigma } < Z < \frac{{{z_2} - \mu }}{\sigma }} \right) = 0.95\end{array}\)

Where,

Z is standard normal distribution and the upper and lower bounds are

\[\begin{array}{l}\frac{{{z_2} - \mu }}{\sigma } = {z_{\alpha /2}}\\\frac{{{z_1} - \mu }}{\sigma } = - {z_{\alpha /2}}\end{array}\]

Thus, upper bound for a 95 % large sample confidence interval for \(\ln \theta \)is

\(\begin{array}{l}\frac{{{z_2} - \mu }}{\sigma } = {z_{\alpha /2}}\\{z_2} - \mu = {z_{\alpha /2}} \times \sigma \\{z_2} = \mu + {z_{\alpha /2}} \times \sigma \\{z_2} = \ln \hat \theta + {z_{\alpha /2}} \times \sqrt {\frac{{m - x}}{{mx}} + \frac{{n - y}}{{ny}}} \end{array}\)

and the lower bound is

\(\begin{array}{l}\frac{{{z_1} - \mu }}{\sigma } = - {z_{\alpha /2}}\\{z_1} - \mu = - {z_{\alpha /2}} \times \sigma \\{z_1} = \mu - {z_{\alpha /2}} \times \sigma \\{z_1} = \ln \hat \theta - {z_{\alpha /2}} \times \sqrt {\frac{{m - x}}{{mx}} + \frac{{n - y}}{{ny}}} \end{array}\)

Finally, the formula for a 95 % large sample confidence interval is

\(\ln \hat \theta \pm {z_{\alpha /2}} \times \sqrt {\frac{{m - x}}{{mx}} + \frac{{n - y}}{{ny}}} \)

The value needed to obtain confidence interval is the natural log

\(\begin{array}{c}\ln \hat \theta = \ln 1.818\\ \approx 0.598\end{array}\)

Remember that\({z_{\alpha /2}} = {z_{0.025}} = 1.96\)from the table in the appendix of the book. Now, the 95% confidence interval for\(\ln \theta \)is

\(\begin{array}{c}\ln \hat \theta \pm {z_{\alpha /2}} \times \sqrt {\frac{{m - x}}{{mx}} + \frac{{n - y}}{{ny}}} \\ = 0.598 \pm 1.96 \times \sqrt {\frac{{11,034 - 189}}{{11,034 \cdot 189}} + \frac{{11,037 - 104}}{{11,037 \cdot 104}}} \\ = 0.598 \pm 1.96 \times 0.1213\\ = (0.36,0.84).\end{array}\)

Taking the anti-logs of the computed\({\rm{Cl}}\), the 95 % confidence interval for \(\theta \)is\((1.43,2.32)\)

There is 95% confident that individuals who do not take aspirin treatment is about \(1.43\) to \(2.32\) times more likely to have a heart attack than from those from control group. This means that the aspirin therapy is good to reduce number of people who have heart attack.

02

To obtain the interval suggest about the efficacy of the aspirin treatment

b).

From the example \(1.4\) (in example 1.3 there are no aspirin treatments thus assume that there is a typing mistake), the given are

\(m = 11,034,n = 11,037,x = 189,y = 104\)

Wherem stands for control group, n stands for aspirin group,x is number of people who had heart attack from control group, and y is number of people who had heart attack from aspirin group. From

\(\hat \theta = \frac{{{{\hat p}_1}}}{{{{\hat p}_2}}}\)

Where

\({\hat p_1} = \frac{{189}}{{11,034}} = 0.017129\)

And

\({\hat p_2} = \frac{{104}}{{11,037}} = 0.009423\)

Thus the estimate is\(\hat \theta = \frac{{0.0171}}{{0.0094}} = 1.818\)

03

Final conclusion

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{ a}}{\rm{. }}\ln \hat \theta \pm {z_{\alpha /2}} \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{m - x}}{{mx}} + \frac{{n - y}}{{ny}}} ;\exp \;\;\;\ln \hat \theta \pm {z_{\alpha /2}} \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{m - x}}{{mx}} + \frac{{n - y}}{{ny}}} ;{\rm{ }}\\{\rm{ a}}{\rm{. }}(1.43,2.32)\end{array}\)

b) \(\hat \theta = \frac{{0.0171}}{{0.0094}} = 1.818\)

Aspirin appears to be beneficial.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to Exercise\(33\)in Section\(7.3\). The cited article also gave the following observations on degree of polymerization for specimens having viscosity times concentration in a higher range:

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{429}&{430}&{430}&{431}&{436}&{437}\\{440}&{441}&{445}&{446}&{447}&{}\end{array}\)

a. Construct a comparative boxplot for the two samples, and comment on any interesting features.

b. Calculate a\(95\% \)confidence interval for the difference between true average degree of polymerization for the middle range and that for the high range. Does the interval suggest that\({\mu _1}\)and\({\mu _2}\)may in fact be different? Explain your reasoning.

Many freeways have service (or logo) signs that give information on attractions, camping, lodging, food, and gas services prior to off-ramps. These signs typically do not provide information on distances. The article "Evaluation of Adding Distance Information to Freeway-Specific Service (Logo) Signs" \((J\). of Transp. Engr., 2011: 782-788) reported that in one investigation, six sites along Virginia interstate highways where service signs are posted were selected. For each site, crash data was obtained for a three-year period before distance information was added to the service signs and for a one-year period afterward. The number of crashes per year before and after the sign changes were as follows:

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{Before:\;\;15\;26\;66\;115\;62\;64}\\{After:\;\;\;\;\;16\;24\;42\;80\;\;78\;73}\end{array}\)

a. The cited article included the statement "A paired\(t\)test was performed to determine whether there was any change in the mean number of crashes before and after the addition of distance information on the signs." Carry out such a test. (Note: The relevant normal probability plot shows a substantial linear pattern.)

b. If a seventh site were to be randomly selected among locations bearing service signs, between what values would you predict the difference in number of crashes to lie?

The article "'The Effects of a Low-Fat, Plant-Based Dietary Intervention on Body Weight, Metabolism, and Insulin Sensitivity in Postmenopausal Women" (Amer. J. of Med., \(2005: 991 - 997\)) reported on the results of an experiment in which half of the individuals in a group of\(64\)postmenopausal overweight women were randomly assigned to a particular vegan diet, and the other half received a diet based on National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. The sample mean decrease in body weight for those on the vegan diet was\(5.8\;kg\), and the sample SD was\(3.2\), whereas for those on the control diet, the sample mean weight loss and standard deviation were\(3.8\)and\(2.8\), respectively. Does it appear the true average weight loss for the vegan diet exceeds that for the control diet by more than\(1\;kg\)? Carry out an appropriate test of hypotheses at significance level .05.

The following summary data on bending strength (lb-in/in) of joints is taken from the article "Bending Strength of Corner Joints Constructed with Injection Molded Splines" (Forest Products J., April, 1997: 89-92).

Type Sample size Sample mean sample SD

Without side coating 10 80.95 9.59

With side coating 10 63.23 5.96

a. Calculate a 95 % lower confidence bound for true average strength of joints with a side coating.

b. Calculate a 95 % lower prediction bound for the strength of a single joint with a side coating.

c. Calculate an interval that, with 95 % confidence, includes the strength values for at least 95 % of the population of all joints with side coatings.

d. Calculate a 95 % confidence interval for the difference between true average strengths for the two types of joints.

Adding computerized medical images to a database promises to provide great resources for physicians. However, there are other methods of obtaining such information, so the issue of efficiency of access needs to be investigated. The article "The Comparative Effectiveness of Conventional and Digital Image Libraries" J. of Audiovisual Media in Medicine, 2001: 8-15) reported on an experiment in which 13 computerproficient medical professionals were timed both while retrieving an image from a library of slides and while retrieving the same image from a computer database with a Web front end.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\;Subject\;\;\;\;\;1\;\;\;2\;\;3\;\;\;4\;\;\;5\;\;\;6\;\;\;\;\;7}\\{\;Slide\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;30\;35\;40\;25\;20\;30\;\;35}\\{\;Digital\;\;\;\;\;\;\;25\;16\;15\;15 10\;20\;\;\;7}\\{\;Difference\;\;5\;19\;25\;10\;10\;10\;28}\\{\;Subject\;\;\;\;\;8\;\;9\;\;10\;11\;12\;13}\\{\;Slide\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;62\;40\;51\;25\;42\;33\;}\\{Digital\;\;\;\;\;\;\;16\;15\;13\;11\;19\;19}\\{Difference\;46\;25\;38\;14\;23\;14}\end{array}\)

a. Construct a comparative boxplot of times for the two types of retrieval, and comment on any interesting features.

b. Estimate the difference between true average times for the two types of retrieval in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability. Be sure to check the plausibility of any assumptions needed in your analysis. Does it appear plausible that the true average times for the two types of retrieval are identical? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.