/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q31 E Refer to Exercise \(33\) in Se... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Refer to Exercise\(33\)in Section\(7.3\). The cited article also gave the following observations on degree of polymerization for specimens having viscosity times concentration in a higher range:

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{429}&{430}&{430}&{431}&{436}&{437}\\{440}&{441}&{445}&{446}&{447}&{}\end{array}\)

a. Construct a comparative boxplot for the two samples, and comment on any interesting features.

b. Calculate a\(95\% \)confidence interval for the difference between true average degree of polymerization for the middle range and that for the high range. Does the interval suggest that\({\mu _1}\)and\({\mu _2}\)may in fact be different? Explain your reasoning.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Both distributions are roughly symmetric

(b) \(( - 7.8733,9.5525)\)

Step by step solution

01

a)Step 1: Find the quartile of the first data set

Given:

DATA SET 1: \(:{\rm{ }}418,{\rm{ }}421,{\rm{ }}421,{\rm{ }}422,{\rm{ }}425,{\rm{ }}427,{\rm{ }}431,{\rm{ }}434,{\rm{ }}437,{\rm{ }}439,{\rm{ }}446,{\rm{ }}447,{\rm{ }}448,{\rm{ }}453,{\rm{ }}454,{\rm{ }}463,{\rm{ }}465\)

DATA SET 2: \(429,{\rm{ }}430,{\rm{ }}430,{\rm{ }}431,{\rm{ }}436,{\rm{ }}437,{\rm{ }}440,{\rm{ }}441,{\rm{ }}445,{\rm{ }}446,{\rm{ }}447\)

(a) FIRST DATA SET

The minimum is \(418{\rm{ }}.\)

Since the number of data values is odd, the median is the middle value of the sorted data set:

\(M = {Q_2} = 437\)The first quartile is the median of the data values below the median (or at \(25\% \)of the data):

\({Q_1} = \frac{{422 + 425}}{2} = 423.5\)

The third quartile is the median of the data values above the median (or at \(75\% \)of the data):

\({Q_3} = \frac{{448 + 453}}{2} = 450.5\)

The maximum is\(465.\)

02

Find the quartile of the second data set

SECOND DATA SET

The minimum is\(429.\)

Since the number of data values is odd, the median is the middle value of the sorted data set:

\(M = {Q_2} = 437\)

The first quartile is the median of the data values below the median (or at \(25\% \) of the data):

\({Q_1} = 430\)

The third quartile is the median of the data values above the median (or at\(75\% \)of the data):

\({Q_3} = 445\)

The maximum is \(447.\)

03

Mapping the graph

The whiskers of the boxplot are at the minimum and maximum value. The box starts at the first quartile, ends at the third quartile and has a vertical line at the median.

The first quartile is at\(25\% \)of the sorted data list, the median at\(50\% \)and the third quartile at\(75\% \).

The two distributions appear to be roughly symmetric, because the boxed lie roughly in the middle between the whiskers and the vertical line of the median in the box of the boxplots lie roughly in the middle of the box.

04

B)Step 4: Find the mean and standard deviation

(b)Given:

\(c = 95\% = 0.95\)

The mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = \frac{{418 + 421 + 421 + \ldots + 454 + 463 + 465}}{{17}} \approx 438.2941\\{{\bar x}_2} = \frac{{429 + 430 + 430 + \ldots + 445 + 446 + 447}}{{11}} \approx 437.4545\end{array}\)

The variance is the sum of squared deviations from the mean divided by\(n - 1\). The standard deviation is the square root of the variance:

\(\begin{array}{l}{s_1} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(418 - 438.2941)}^2} + \ldots . + {{(465 - 438.2941)}^2}}}{{17 - 1}}} \approx 15.1442\\{s_2} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(429 - 437.4545)}^2} + \ldots .. + {{(447 - 437.4545)}^2}}}{{11 - 1}}} \approx 6.8317\end{array}\)

05

Find the endpoint of confidence interval

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer):

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{{{15.1442}^2}}}{{17}} + \frac{{{{6.8317}^2}}}{{11}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {{{15.1442}^2}/17} \right)}^2}}}{{17 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {{{6.8317}^2}/11} \right)}^2}}}{{11 - 1}}}} \approx 23\)

Determine the\(t\)-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom\(df = 23\)and in the column with\(1 - c/2 = 0.025\)in the Student's\(t\)distribution table in the appendix:

\({t_{\alpha /2}} = 2.069\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} = 2.069 \cdot \sqrt {\frac{{{{15.1442}^2}}}{{17}} + \frac{{{{6.8317}^2}}}{{11}}} \approx 8.7129\)

The endpoints of the confidence interval for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\)are:

\(\begin{array}{l}\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - E = (438.2941 - 437.4545) - 8.7129 = 0.8396 - 8.7129 = - 7.8733\\\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) + E = (438.2941 - 437.4545) + 8.7129 = 0.8396 + 8.7129 = 9.5525\end{array}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the accompanying data on breaking load (\(kg/25\;mm\)width) for various fabrics in both an unabraded condition and an abraded condition (\(^6\)The Effect of Wet Abrasive Wear on the Tensile Properties of Cotton and Polyester-Cotton Fabrics," J. Testing and Evaluation, \(\;1993:84 - 93\)). Use the paired\(t\)test, as did the authors of the cited article, to test\({H_0}:{\mu _D} = 0\)versus\({H_a}:{\mu _D} > 0\)at significance level . \(01\)

Hexavalent chromium has been identified as an inhalation carcinogen and an air toxin of concern in a number of different locales. The article "Airborne Hexavalent Chromium in Southwestern Ontario"(J . of Air and Waste Mgmnt. Assoc., \(1997: 905 - 910\)) gave the accompanying data on both indoor and outdoor concentration (nanograms\(/{m^3}\)) for a sample of houses selected from a certain

House

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;1\;\;\;\;\;\;2\;\;\;\;\;3\;\;\;\;\;\;\;4\;\;\;\;\;5\;\;\;\;\;\;\;6\;\;\;\;\;\;\;7\;\;\;\;\;\;\;8\;\;\;\;\;\;\;9}\\{Indoor\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;.07\;\;\;\;.08\;\;\;\;.09\;\;\;\;.12\;\;\;\;.12\;\;\;\;.12\;\;\;\;.13\;\;\;\;.14\;\;\;\;.15}\\{Outdoor\;\;\;\;\;\;.29\;\;\;\;.68\;\;\;\;.47\;\;\;\;.54\;\;\;\;.97\;\;\;\;.35\;\;\;\;.49\;\;\;\;.84\;\;\;\;.86}\end{array}\)

House

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;10\;\;\;\;\;11\;\;\;\;\;12\;\;\;\;\;13\;\;\;\;\;14\;\;\;\;\;15\;\;\;\;\;16\;\;\;\;\;17}\\{Indoor\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;.15\;\;\;\;.17\;\;\;\;.17\;\;\;\;.18\;\;\;\;.18\;\;\;\;.18\;\;\;\;.18\;\;\;\;.19}\\{Outdoor\;\;\;\;\;\;.28\;\;\;\;.32\;\;\;\;.32\;\;\;\;1.55\;\;\;.66\;\;\;\;.29\;\;\;\;.21\;\;\;\;1.02}\end{array}\)

House

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{}&{18}&{19}&{20}&{21}&{22}&{23}&{24}&{25}\\{Indoor}&{.20}&{.22}&{.22}&{.23}&{.23}&{.25}&{.26}&{.28}\\{Outdoor}&{1.59}&{.90}&{.52}&{.12}&{.54}&{.88}&{.49}&{1.24}\end{array}\)

House

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{}&{26}&{27}&{28}&{29}&{30}&{31}&{32}&{33}\\{Indoor}&{.28}&{.29}&{.34}&{.39}&{.40}&{.45}&{.54}&{.62}\\{Outdoor}&{.48}&{.27}&{.37}&{1.26}&{.70}&{.76}&{.99}&{.36}\end{array}\)

a. Calculate a confidence interval for the population mean difference between indoor and outdoor concentrations using a confidence level of\(95\% \), and interpret the resulting interval.

b. If a\(34\)th house were to be randomly selected from the population, between what values would you predict the difference in concentrations to lie?region.

Cushing's disease is characterized by muscular weakness due to adrenal or pituitary dysfunction. To provide effective treatment, it is important to detect childhood Cushing's disease as early as possible. Age at onset of symptoms and age at diagnosis (months) for 15 children suffering from the disease were given in the article "Treatment of Cushing's Disease in Childhood and Adolescence by Transphenoidal Microadenomectomy" (New Engl. J. of Med., 1984: 889). Here are the values of the differences between age at onset of symptoms and age at diagnosis:

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ - 24}&{ - 12}&{ - 55}&{ - 15}&{ - 30}&{ - 60}&{ - 14}&{ - 21}\\{ - 48}&{ - 12}&{ - 25}&{ - 53}&{ - 61}&{ - 69}&{ - 80}&{}\end{array}\)

a. Does the accompanying normal probability plot cast strong doubt on the approximate normality of the population distribution of differences?

b. Calculate a lower\(95\% \)confidence bound for the population mean difference, and interpret the resulting bound.

c. Suppose the (age at diagnosis) - (age at onset) differences had been calculated. What would be a\(95\backslash \% \)upper confidence bound for the corresponding population mean difference?

Olestra is a fat substitute approved by the FDA for use in snack foods. Because there have been anecdotal reports of gastrointestinal problems associated with olestra consumption, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment was carried out to compare olestra potato chips to regular potato chips with respect to GI symptoms ("Gastrointestinal Symptoms Following Consumption of Olestra or Regular Triglyceride Potato Chips," J. of the Amer. Med. Assoc., 1998: 150-152). Among 529 individuals in the TG control group, 17.6 % experienced an adverse GI event, whereas among the 563 individuals in the olestra treatment group, 15.8 % experienced such an event.

a. Carry out a test of hypotheses at the 5 % significance level to decide whether the incidence rate of GI problems for those who consume olestra chips according to the experimental regimen differs from the incidence rate for the TG control treatment.

b. If the true percentages for the two treatments were 15 % and 20 %, respectively, what sample sizes

\((m = n\)) would be necessary to detect such a difference with probability 90?

Head ability is the ability of a cylindrical piece of material to be shaped into the head of a bolt, screw, or other cold-formed part without cracking. The article "New Methods for Assessing Cold Heading Quality" (Wire J. Intl., Oct. 1996: 66-72) described the result of a head ability impact test applied to 30 specimens of aluminum killed steel and 30 specimens of silicon killed steel. The sample mean head ability rating number for the steel specimens was 6.43, and the sample mean for aluminum specimens was 7.09. Suppose that the sample standard deviations were 1.08 and 1.19, respectively. Do you agree with the article's authors that the difference in head ability ratings is significant at the 5% level (assuming that the two head ability distributions are normal)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.