/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q36 E Consider the accompanying data o... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Consider the accompanying data on breaking load (\(kg/25\;mm\)width) for various fabrics in both an unabraded condition and an abraded condition (\(^6\)The Effect of Wet Abrasive Wear on the Tensile Properties of Cotton and Polyester-Cotton Fabrics," J. Testing and Evaluation, \(\;1993:84 - 93\)). Use the paired\(t\)test, as did the authors of the cited article, to test\({H_0}:{\mu _D} = 0\)versus\({H_a}:{\mu _D} > 0\)at significance level . \(01\)

Short Answer

Expert verified

Do not reject null hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

Test statistic value for testing the hypotheses

The Paired \(t\) Test:

When \(D = X - Y\) (difference between observations within a pair), \({\mu _D} = \)\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\) and null hypothesis

\({H_0}:{\mu _D} = {\Delta _0},\)

the test statistic value for testing the hypotheses is

\(t = \frac{{\bar d - {\Delta _0}}}{{{s_D}/\sqrt n }},\)

where\(\bar d\) and \({s_D}\) are the sample mean and the sample standard deviation of differences\({d_i}\), respectively. In order to use this test, assume that the differences\({D_i}\) are from a normal population. Depending on alternative hypothesis, the\(P\) value can be determined as the corresponding area under the \({t_{n - 1}}\) curve.

The hypotheses of interest are\({H_0}:{\mu _D} = 0\)versus\({H_a}:{\mu _D} > 0\). The following table represents the data for unabraded condition and abraded condition, as well as the difference between corresponding observed pairs: \(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}i&{{\rm{ Unabraded, }}{x_i}}&{{\rm{ Abraded, }}{y_i}}&{{\rm{ Difference, }}{d_i} = {x_i} - {y_i}}\\1&{36.4}&{28.5}&{7.9}\\2&{55}&{20}&{35}\\3&{51.5}&{46}&{5.5}\\4&{38.7}&{34.5}&{4.2}\\5&{43.2}&{36.5}&{6.7}\\6&{48.8}&{52.5}&{ - 3.7}\\7&{25.6}&{26.5}&{ - 0.9}\\8&{49.8}&{46.5}&{3.3}\\{}&{}&{}&{}\end{array}\)

02

Find the sample variance

The Sample Mean\(\bar x\)of observations\({x_1},{x_2}, \ldots ,{x_n}\)is given by

\(\bar x = \frac{{{x_1} + {x_2} + \ldots + {x_n}}}{n} = \frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{x_i}} \)

The sample mean\(\bar d\)for the differences is

\(\bar d = \frac{1}{8} \cdot (7.9 + 35 + \ldots + 3.3) = 7.25\)

Reminder:\({\mu _D}\)is the true average of the difference of breaking load for fabric in unabraded and abraded condition and\({\Delta _0} = 0\). The only missing value to compute the test statistic value is the sample standard deviation of differences\({d_i}\).

The Sample Variance\({s^2}\)is

\({s^2} = \frac{1}{{n - 1}} \cdot {S_{xx}}\)

Where

\({S_{xx}} = \sum {{{\left( {{x_i} - \bar x} \right)}^2}} = \sum {x_i^2} - \frac{1}{\infty } \cdot {\left( {\sum {{x_i}} } \right)^2}\)

The Sample Standard Deviation\(s\)is

\(s = \sqrt {{s^2}} = \sqrt {\frac{1}{{n - 1}} \cdot {S_{xx}}} \)

The sample variance is

\(s_D^2{\rm{ }} = \frac{1}{{8 - 1}} \cdot \left( {{{(7.9 - 7.25)}^2} + {{(35 - 7.25)}^2} + \ldots + {{(3.3 - 7.25)}^2}} \right) = 140.726\)

and the sample standard deviation\({s_D} = \sqrt {140.726} = 11.8628\)

03

Find the value of P

The test statistic value is

\(t = \frac{{\bar d - {\Delta _0}}}{{{s_D}/\sqrt n }} = \frac{{7.25 - 0}}{{11.8628/\sqrt 8 }} = 1.73\)

The test is one-sided where the alternative hypothesis is\({H_a}:{\mu _D} > 0\), therefore the\(P\)value is the area under the the\({t_{n - 1}} = {t_{8 - 1}} = {t_7}\)curve to the right of\(t\)value

\(P = P(T > 1.73) = 1 - P(T \le 1.73) = 1 - 0.936 = 0.064\)

Where\(T\)has student distribution with\(7\)degrees of freedom, and the probability as computed using software (you can use table in the appendix of the book). At significance level\(0.01\), because

\(P = 0.064 > 0.01\)

do not reject null hypothesis

at given significance level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Flexure of Concrete Beams Reinforced with Advanced Composite Orthogrids"\((J\). of Aerospace Engr., 1997: 7-15) gave the accompanying data on ultimate load\((kN)\)for two different types of beams.

\( - 7.0944\)

a. Assuming that the underlying distributions are normal, calculate and interpret a\(99\% \)CI for the difference between true average load for the fiberglass beams and that for the carbon beams.

b. Does the upper limit of the interval you calculated in part (a) give a\(99\% \)upper confidence bound for the difference between the two\(\mu \)'s? If not, calculate such a bound. Does it strongly suggest that true average load for the carbon beams is more than that for the fiberglass beams? Explain.

Refer to Example 9.7. Does the data suggest that the standard deviation of the strength distribution for fused specimens is smaller than that for not-fused specimens? Carry out a test at significance level .01.

Quantitative noninvasive techniques are needed for routinely assessing symptoms of peripheral neuropathies, such as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The article "A Gap Detection Tactility Test for Sensory Deficits Associated with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome" (Ergonomics, \(1995: 2588 - 2601\)) reported on a test that involved sensing a tiny gap in an otherwise smooth surface by probing with a finger; this functionally resembles many work-related tactile activities, such as detecting scratches or surface defects. When finger probing was not allowed, the sample average gap detection threshold for\(m = 8\)normal subjects was\(1.71\;mm\), and the sample standard deviation was\(.53\); for\(n = 10\)CTS subjects, the sample mean and sample standard deviation were\(2.53\)and\(.87\), respectively. Does this data suggest that the true average gap detection threshold for CTS subjects exceeds that for normal subjects? State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of\(.01\).

Example\(7.11\)gave data on the modulus of elasticity obtained\(1\)minute after loading in a certain configuration. The cited article also gave the values of modulus of elasticity obtained\(4\)weeks after loading for the same lumber specimens. The data is presented here. \(1\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{Observation}&{1 min}&{4 weeks}&{Difference}\\1&{10,490}&{9,110}&{1380}\\2&{16,620}&{13,250}&{3370}\\3&{17,300}&{14,720}&{2580}\\4&{15,480}&{12,740}&{2740}\\5&{12,970}&{10,120}&{2850}\\6&{17,260}&{14,570}&{2690}\\7&{13,400}&{11,220}&{2180}\\8&{13,900}&{11,100}&{2800}\\9&{13,630}&{11,420}&{2210}\\{10}&{13,260}&{10,910}&{2350}\\{11}&{14,370}&{12,110}&{2260}\\{12}&{11,700}&{8,620}&{3080}\\{13}&{15,470}&{12,590}&{2880}\\{14}&{17,840}&{15,090}&{2750}\\{15}&{14,070}&{10,550}&{3520}\\{16}&{14,760}&{12,230}&{2530}\end{array}\)

Calculate and interpret an upper confidence bound for the true average difference between\(1\)-minute modulus and\(4\)-week modulus; first check the plausibility of any necessary assumptions.

Pilates is a popular set of exercises for the treatment of individuals with lower back pain. The method has six basic principles: centering, concentration, control, precision, flow, and breathing. The article 鈥淓fficacy of the Addition of Modified Pilates Exercises to a Minimal Intervention in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial鈥 (Physical Therapy, \(2013:309 - 321\)) reported on an experiment involving \(86\) subjects with nonspecific low back pain. The participants were randomly divided into two groups of equal size. The first group received just educational materials, whereas the second group participated in \(6\) weeks of Pilates exercises. The sample mean level of pain (on a scale from \(0\) to \(10\)) for the control group at a \(6\)-week follow-up was \(5.2\) and the sample mean for the treatment group was \(3.1\); both sample standard deviations were \(2.3\).

a. Does it appear that true average pain level for the control condition exceeds that for the treatment condition? Carry out a test of hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\) (the cited article reported statistical significance at this a, and a sample mean difference of \(2.1\) also suggests practical significance)

b. Does it appear that true average pain level for the control condition exceeds that for the treatment condition by more than \(1\)? Carry out a test of appropriate hypotheses

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.