/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q61 E Return to the data on maximum le... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Return to the data on maximum lean angle given in Exercise 28 of this chapter. Carry out a test at significance level .10 to see whether the population standard deviations for the two age groups are different (normal probability plots support the necessary normality assumption).

Short Answer

Expert verified

Do not reject null hypothesis and there is no statistical significant difference between the two standard deviations.

Step by step solution

01

To Find the hypothesis

Testing null hypothesis \({H_0}:\sigma _1^2 = \sigma _2^2\) versus alternative hypothesis\({H_a}\), under the assumption that the two populations are normal and independent, can be performed using test statistic value

\(f = \frac{{s_1^2}}{{s_2^2}}\)

Depending on alternative hypothesis \({H_a}\) the \(P\)value is corresponding area under the \({F_{m - 1,n - 1}}\)curve.

The hypotheses of interest are \({H_0}:\sigma _1^2 = \sigma _2^2\)versus\({H_a}:\sigma _1^2 \ne \sigma _2^2\). The missing values to compute the \(f\) value are the sample standard deviations \({s_1}\)and \[{s_2}\]

The Sample Variance \[{s_2}\] is

\({s^2} = \frac{1}{{n - 1}} \cdot {S_{xx}}\)

where

\({S_{xx}} = \sum {{{\left( {{x_i} - \bar x} \right)}^2}} = \sum {x_i^2} - \frac{1}{n} \cdot {\left( {\sum {{x_i}} } \right)^2}\)

The Sample Standard Deviation\(s\)is

\(s = \sqrt {{s^2}} = \sqrt {\frac{1}{{n - 1}} \cdot {S_{xx}}} \)

Thus, since\(m = 10\)and\[n = 5,\]the sample standard deviations are

\({s_1}{\rm{ }} = \sqrt {\frac{1}{{10 - 1}} \cdot \left[ {\left( {{{29}^2} + {{34}^2} + \ldots + {{27}^2}} \right) - \frac{1}{{10}} \cdot {{(29 + 34 + \ldots + 27)}^2}} \right]} \)

\( = 2.75\)

and

\({s_1}{\rm{ }} = \sqrt {\frac{1}{{5 - 1}} \cdot \left[ {\left( {{{18}^2} + {{15}^2} + \ldots + {{12}^2}} \right) - \frac{1}{5} \cdot {{(18 + 15 + \ldots + 12)}^2}} \right]} \)

\( = 4.44\)

02

Computing the test statistic

Therefore, the\(f\)statistic value is

\(\begin{array}{c}f = \frac{{{{2.75}^2}}}{{{{4.44}^2}}}\\ = 0.384\end{array}\)

03

Finding P-value

The corresponding \(P\)value, because the alternative hypothesis is two sided, is

\(2 \cdot {\rm{min}}\left( {{A_R},{A_L}} \right)\)

Using software, it is easy to obtain the values to the left of\(f\)value

\({A_L} = P(F \le 0.384) = 0.107.\)

and to the right of\(f\)

\({A_R} = P(F > 0.384) = 0.893\)

Where\(f\)has Fisher's distribution with\(m - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9\)and\(n - 1 = 5 - 1 = 4\)degrees of freedom. The minimum value is\[{A_L},\]thus the\(P\)value is

\(\begin{array}{c}P = 2{A_L}\\ = 2 \times 0.107\\ = 0.214\end{array}\)

04

Decision rule and conclusion

The \(P\) value could be obtained using the table in the appendix but in a little harder way. First take reciprocal of \(f\), which is

\(\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{{0.384}} = 2.61\)

and the degrees of freedom are now \(4\) and \(9\) (opposite of before). From the table you can notice that the one tailed value is a little bigger than \(0.1\)(thus two tailed is twice as big) and nearly \(0.2\)(it is known that is is equal to \(0.214\)as mentioned before).

However, since

\(P = 0.214 > 0.1 = \alpha \)

Do not reject null hypothesis at the given significance level. There is no statistical significant difference between the two standard deviations.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

According to the article "Modeling and Predicting the Effects of Submerged Arc Weldment Process Parameters on Weldment Characteristics and Shape Profiles" (J. of Engr. Manuf., \(2012: 1230 - 1240\)), the submerged arc welding (SAW) process is commonly used for joining thick plates and pipes. The heat affected zone (HAZ), a band created within the base metal during welding, was of particular interest to the investigators. Here are observations on depth\((mm)\)of the HAZ both when the current setting was high and when it was lower.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Non - high }&{1.04}&{1.15}&{1.23}&{1.69}&{1.92}\\{}&{1.98}&{2.36}&{2.49}&{2.72}&{}\\{}&{1.37}&{1.43}&{1.57}&{1.71}&{1.94}\\{ High }&{2.06}&{2.55}&{2.64}&{2.82}&{}\\{}&{1.55}&{2.02}&{2.02}&{2.05}&{2.35}\\{}&{2.57}&{2.93}&{2.94}&{2.97}&{}\end{array}\)

a. Construct a comparative boxplot and comment on interesting features.

b. Is it reasonable to use the two-sample \(t\) test to test hypotheses about the difference between true average HAZ depths for the two conditions?

c. Does it appear that true average HAZ depth is larger for the higher current condition than for the lower condition? Carry out a test of appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of . \(01\).

the article 鈥樷檈valuation of a ventilation strategy to prevent barotrauma in patients at high risk for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome鈥 (New Engl. J. of Med., \(1998:355 - 358)\) reported on an experiment in which \(120\) patients with similar clinical features were randomly divided into a control group and a treatment group, each consisting of \(60\) patients. The sample mean ICU stay (days) and sample standard deviation for the treatment group were \(19.9\) and\(39.1\), respectively, whereas these values for the control group were \(13.7\) and \(15.8\).

a) Calculate a point estimate for the difference between true average ICU stay for the treatment and control groups. Does this estimate suggest that there is a significant difference between true average stays under the two conditions?

b) Answer the question posed in part (a) by carrying out a formal test of hypotheses. Is the result different from what you conjectured in part (a)?

c)Does it appear that ICU stay for patients given the ventilation treatment is normally distributed? Explain your reasoning9. The article 鈥淓valuation of a Ventilation Strategy to Prevent Barotrauma in Patients at High Risk for

d)Estimate true average length of stay for patients given the ventilation treatment in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability

The following observations are on time (h) for a AA 1.5volt alkaline battery to reach a \(0.8\)voltage ("Comparing the Lifetimes of Two Brands of Batteries," J. of Statistical Educ., 2013, online):

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Energizer: }&{8.65}&{8.74}&{8.91}&{8.72}&{8.85}\\{ Ultracell: }&{8.76}&{8.81}&{8.81}&{8.70}&{8.73}\\{ Energizer: }&{8.52}&{8.62}&{8.68}&{8.86}&{}\\{ Ultracell: }&{8.76}&{8.68}&{8.64}&{8.79}&{}\end{array}\)

Normal probability plots support the assumption that the population distributions are normal. Does the data suggest that the variance of the Energizer population distribution differs from that of the Ultra cell population distribution? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of .05. (Note: The two-sample \(t\)test for equality of population means gives a \(P - \)value of .763.) The Energizer batteries are much more expensive than the Ultra cell batteries. Would you pay the extra money?

a. Show for the upper-tailed test with \({\sigma _1}\) and \({\sigma _2}\)known that as either\(m\) or\(n\) increases, \(\beta \)decreases when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > {\Delta _0}\).

b. For the case of equal sample sizes \(\left( {m = n} \right)\)and fixed \(\alpha \),what happens to the necessary sample size \(n\) as \(\beta \) is decreased, where \(\beta \) is the desired type II error probability at a fixed alternative?

Shoveling is not exactly a high-tech activity, but it will continue to be a required task even in our information age. The article "A Shovel with a Perforated Blade Reduces Energy Expenditure Required for Digging Wet Clay" (Human Factors, 2010: 492-502) reported on an experiment in which 13 workers were each provided with both a conventional shovel and a shovel whose blade was perforated with small holes. The authors of the cited article provided the following data on stable energy expenditure ((kcal/kg(subject)//b(clay)):

Worker : 1 2 3 4

Conventional : .0011 .0014 .0018 .0022

Perforated : .0011 .0010 .0019 .0013

Worker: 5 6 7

Conventional : .0010 .0016 .0028

Perforated : .0011 .0017 .0024

Worker 8 9 10

Conventional : .0020 .0015 .0014

Perforated : .0020 .0013 .0013

Worker: 11 12 13

Conventional : .0023 .0017 .0020

Perforated : .0017 .0015 .0013

a. Calculate a confidence interval at the 95 % confidence level for the true average difference between energy expenditure for the conventional shovel and the perforated shovel (the relevant normal probability plot shows a reasonably linear pattern). Based on this interval, does it appear that the shovels differ with respect to true average energy expenditure? Explain.

b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level .05 to see if true average energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.