/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q62 E Refer to Example 9.7. Does the d... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Refer to Example 9.7. Does the data suggest that the standard deviation of the strength distribution for fused specimens is smaller than that for not-fused specimens? Carry out a test at significance level .01.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Do not reject null hypothesis and variances are equal’

Step by step solution

01

To find the hypothesis

Testing null hypothesis \({H_0}:\sigma _1^2 = \sigma _2^2\)versus alternative hypothesis\({H_a}\), under the assumption that the two populations are normal and independent

Depending on alternative hypothesis \({H_a}\)the \(P\)value is corresponding area under the \({F_{m - 1,n - 1}}\)curve.

The hypotheses of interest are \(H:0:{\sigma _1} = \sigma _2^2\) versus\({H_a}:\sigma _1^2 > \sigma _2^2\), where \({\sigma _1},{\sigma _2}\) denote the variance of the not fused population and fused population, respectively. The test is one sided (upper).

From the exercise 9.7, page 376, the corresponding sample standard deviations are \({s_1} = 277.3\) and\({s_2} = 205.9\). The degrees of freedom are \(m - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9\)and\(n - 1 = 8 - 1 = 7\).

02

Finding test statistic

Thus, the value of the statistic is

\(\begin{array}{c}f = \frac{{s_1^2}}{{s_2^2}}\\ = \frac{{{{277.3}^2}}}{{{{205.9}^2}}}\\ = 1.814\end{array}\)

\(\)

03

Decision rule and conclusion

At significance level\(\alpha = 0.01\), and mentioned degrees of freedom, value \({F_{0.01,9,7}}\) is

\({F_{0.01,9,7}} = 6.72\)

From the table in the appendix (or you could use a software which is better).

The test is upper sided, and

\({F_{0.01,9,7}} = 6.72 > 1.814 = f\)

Hence do not reject null hypothesis at given significance level.

P-value approach:

For the upper sided test, the\(P\)value is

\(\begin{array}{c}P = P(F > 1.814)\\ = 0.2223\end{array}\)

Where \(F\) has Fisher's distribution with degrees of freedom \({\nu _1} = 9\)and \({\nu _2} = 7.\)The value was computed using a software. The \(P\) value is large, and

\(P = 0.2223 > 0.05 = \alpha \)

Thus. do not reject null hypothesis at any reasonable significance level. The variances are equal.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Determine the number of degrees of freedom for the two-sample t test or CI in each of the following.

\(\begin{array}{l}a. m = 10, n = 10, {s_1} = 5.0, {s_2} = 6.0\\b. m = 10, n = 15,{s_1} = 5.0, {s_2} = 6.0\\c. m = 10, n = 15, {s_1} = 2.0, {s_2} = 6.0\\d. m = 12, n = 24, {s_1} = 5.0, {s_2} = 6.0\\\\\end{array}\)

Arsenic is a known carcinogen and poison. The standard laboratory procedures for measuring arsenic \(concentration (\mu g/L)\) in water are expensive. Consider the accompanying summary data and Minitab output for comparing a laboratory method to a new relatively quick and inexpensive field method (from the article "Evaluation of a New Field Measurement Method for Arsenic in Drinking Water Samples," J. of Emvir. Engr., 2008: 382-388).

Two-Sample T-Test and CI

Sample N Mean StDev SE Mean

1 3 19.70 1.10 0.65

2 3 10.90 0.60 0.35

Estimate for difference: 8.800

95% CI for difference: 6.498,11.102

T -Test of difference =0 (vs not = ):

T -Value =12.1 P -Value =0.001 DF=3

What conclusion do you draw about the two methods, and why? Interpret the given confidence interval. (Note: One of the article's authors indicated in private communication that they were unsure why the two methods disagreed.)

Researchers sent 5000 resumes in response to job ads that appeared in the Boston Globe and Chicago Tribune. The resumes were identical except that 2500 of them had "white sounding" first names, such as Brett and Emily, whereas the other 2500 had "black sounding" names such as Tamika and Rasheed. The resumes of the first type elicited 250 responses and the resumes of the second type only 167 responses (these numbers are very consistent with information that appeared in a Jan. 15. 2003, report by the Associated Press). Does this data strongly suggest that a resume with a "black" name is less likely to result in a response than is a resume with a "white" name?

The accompanying data consists of prices (\$) for one sample of California cabernet sauvignon wines that received ratings of 93 or higher in the May 2013 issue of Wine Spectator and another sample of California cabernets that received ratings of 89 or lower in the same issue.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{ \ge 93:}&{100}&{100}&{60}&{135}&{195}&{195}&{}\\{}&{125}&{135}&{95}&{42}&{75}&{72}&{}\\{ \le 89:}&{80}&{75}&{75}&{85}&{75}&{35}&{85}\\{}&{65}&{45}&{100}&{28}&{38}&{50}&{28}\end{array}\)

Assume that these are both random samples of prices from the population of all wines recently reviewed that received ratings of at least 93 and at most 89 , respectively.

a. Investigate the plausibility of assuming that both sampled populations are normal.

b. Construct a comparative boxplot. What does it suggest about the difference in true average prices?

c. Calculate a confidence interval at the\(95\% \)confidence level to estimate the difference between\({\mu _1}\), the mean price in the higher rating population, and\({\mu _2}\), the mean price in the lower rating population. Is the interval consistent with the statement "Price rarely equates to quality" made by a columnist in the cited issue of the magazine?

In an experiment to compare bearing strengths of pegs inserted in two different types of mounts, a sample of 14 observations on stress limit for red oak mounts resulted in a sample mean and sample standard deviation of \(8.48MPa\) and .79 MPa, respectively, whereas a sample of 12 observations when Douglas fir mounts were used gave a mean of \(9.36\) and a standard deviation of \(1.52\) ('Bearing Strength of White Oak Pegs in Red Oak and Douglas Fir Timbers," J. of Testing and Evaluation, 1998, 109-114). Consider testing whether or not true average stress limits are identical for the two types of mounts. Compare df's and P-values for the unpooled and pooled t tests.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.