/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q83 SE In an experiment to compare bear... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In an experiment to compare bearing strengths of pegs inserted in two different types of mounts, a sample of 14 observations on stress limit for red oak mounts resulted in a sample mean and sample standard deviation of \(8.48MPa\) and .79 MPa, respectively, whereas a sample of 12 observations when Douglas fir mounts were used gave a mean of \(9.36\) and a standard deviation of \(1.52\) ('Bearing Strength of White Oak Pegs in Red Oak and Douglas Fir Timbers," J. of Testing and Evaluation, 1998, 109-114). Consider testing whether or not true average stress limits are identical for the two types of mounts. Compare df's and P-values for the unpooled and pooled t tests.

Short Answer

Expert verified

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{Un pooled:df}} = 15{\rm{,P - value}} \simeq 0.092\\{\rm{Pooled : df}} = 24{\rm{,P - value; = }} \simeq 0.070\\{\rm{Un pooled(df) < Pooled(df)}}\\{\rm{Un pooled(P - value) > Pooled(P - value)}}\end{array}\)

Step by step solution

01

To Find the Unpooled test

The hypotheses of interest here are\({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\)versus\({H_1}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} \ne 0\), where\({\mu _1},{\mu _2}\)are the true averages of the stress limits.

Unpooled test:

Given two normal distributions, the random variable (standardized)

\(t = \frac{{\overline x - \overline y - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{m} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{n}} }}\)

has approximately students t distribution with degrees of freedom\(\nu \),

\(\nu = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{m} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{n}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/m} \right)}^2}}}{{m - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/n} \right)}^2}}}{{n - 1}}}}\)

has to be rounded down to the nearest integer.

The two-sample t test for testing\({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = {\Delta _0}\)uses the following value of test statistic

For the adequate alternative hypothesis the adequate area under the\({t_\nu }\)curve is the P value.

The test statistic t value is

\(\begin{array}{c}t = \frac{{8.48 - 9.36 - 0}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{{{0.79}^2}}}{{14}} + \frac{{{{1.52}^2}}}{{12}}} }}\\ = \frac{{ - 0.88}}{{0.3869}}\\ = - 1.81\end{array}\)

02

Find the t value

Compute the degrees of freedom now in order to find the P value. From the formula, the following is true

\(\begin{array}{c}\nu = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{{{0.79}^2}}}{{14}} + \frac{{{{1.52}^2}}}{{12}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {{{0.79}^2}/14} \right)}^2}}}{{14 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {{{1.52}^2}/12} \right)}^2}}}{{12 - 1}}}}\\ = 15.95\end{array}\)

and when you round down to the nearest integer you get 15 which is the degrees of freedom. Thus, \(\nu = 15\)

The test is two sided which means that the P value is two times the area under the\({t_{15}}\)curve to the right of\(|t|\). The P value is

\(\begin{array}{c}P = 2 \times P(T > 1.81)\\ = 2 \times 0.046\\ = 0.092\end{array}\)

The value was computed using a software, you can find it or estimate it from the table in the appendix. Random variable T has students distribution with 15 degrees of freedom. It is not needed to draw conclusions about the hypothesis, you just need to compare the pooled and unpooled tests.

03

To Find the pooled test

Pooled test:

The pooled t test for testing\({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = {\Delta _0}\)uses the following t value

\(t = \frac{{\bar x - \bar y - {\Delta _0}}}{{{s_p} \times \sqrt {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} }}\)

where the corresponding T statistic has students distribution with m+n-2degrees of freedom, and\({s_p}\)is

\({s_p} = \sqrt {\frac{{(m - 1)s_1^2 + (n - 1)s_2^2}}{{m + n - 2}}} \)

The pooled standard deviation\({s_p}\)is

\(\begin{array}{c}{s_p} = \sqrt {\frac{{(m - 1)s_1^2 + (n - 1)s_2^2}}{{m + n - 2}}} \\ = \sqrt {\frac{{(14 - 1) \times {{0.79}^2} + (12 - 1) \times {{1.52}^2}}}{{14 + 12 - 2}}} \\ = \sqrt {1.3970} \\ = 1.181\end{array}\)

The t statistic value for the pooled test is

\(\begin{array}{c}t = \frac{{8.48 - 9.36 - 0}}{{1.181 \times \sqrt {1/14 + 1/12} }}\\ = \frac{{ - 0.88}}{{0.456}}\\ = - 1.89\end{array}\)

The degrees of freedom\(\nu \)are

\(\begin{array}{c}\nu = m + n - 2\\ = 14 + 12 - 2\\ = 24\end{array}\)

04

To Find the P value

The alternative test hypothesis is\({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} \ne 0\); thus the P value is corresponding area under the\({t_{24}}\)curve (the same way as for the pooled test)

\(\begin{array}{c}P = 2 \times P(T > 1.89)\\ = 2 \times 0.035\\ = 0.07\end{array}\)

The value was computed using a software, you can find it or estimate it from the table in the appendix. Random variable T has students distribution with 24 degrees of freedom.

05

Final proof

Comparison:

The P value for the pooled test is smaller than the P value for the unpooled test Also, the pooled test has more degrees of freedom (24) than the unpooled test (15).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Cushing's disease is characterized by muscular weakness due to adrenal or pituitary dysfunction. To provide effective treatment, it is important to detect childhood Cushing's disease as early as possible. Age at onset of symptoms and age at diagnosis (months) for 15 children suffering from the disease were given in the article "Treatment of Cushing's Disease in Childhood and Adolescence by Transphenoidal Microadenomectomy" (New Engl. J. of Med., 1984: 889). Here are the values of the differences between age at onset of symptoms and age at diagnosis:

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ - 24}&{ - 12}&{ - 55}&{ - 15}&{ - 30}&{ - 60}&{ - 14}&{ - 21}\\{ - 48}&{ - 12}&{ - 25}&{ - 53}&{ - 61}&{ - 69}&{ - 80}&{}\end{array}\)

a. Does the accompanying normal probability plot cast strong doubt on the approximate normality of the population distribution of differences?

b. Calculate a lower\(95\% \)confidence bound for the population mean difference, and interpret the resulting bound.

c. Suppose the (age at diagnosis) - (age at onset) differences had been calculated. What would be a\(95\backslash \% \)upper confidence bound for the corresponding population mean difference?

To decide whether two different types of steel have the same true average fracture toughness values, n specimens of each type are tested, yielding the following results:

\(\begin{array}{l}\underline {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{ Type }&{ Sample Average }&{ Sample SD }\\1&{60.1}&{1.0}\\2&{59.9}&{1.0}\\{}&{}&{}\end{array}} \\\end{array}\)

Calculate the P-value for the appropriate two-sample \(z\) test, assuming that the data was based on \(n = 100\). Then repeat the calculation for \(n = 400\). Is the small P-value for \(n = 400\) indicative of a difference that has practical significance? Would you have been satisfied with just a report of the P-value? Comment briefly.a

Is the response rate for questionnaires affected by including some sort of incentive to respond along with the questionnaire? In one experiment, 110 questionnaires with no incentive resulted in 75 being returned, whereas 98 questionnaires that included a chance to win a lottery yielded 66 responses ("'Charities, No; Lotteries, No; Cash, Yes," Public Opinion Quarterly, 1996: 542–562). Does this data suggest that including an incentive increases the likelihood of a response? State and test the relevant hypotheses at significance level . 10 .

Olestra is a fat substitute approved by the FDA for use in snack foods. Because there have been anecdotal reports of gastrointestinal problems associated with olestra consumption, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment was carried out to compare olestra potato chips to regular potato chips with respect to GI symptoms ("Gastrointestinal Symptoms Following Consumption of Olestra or Regular Triglyceride Potato Chips," J. of the Amer. Med. Assoc., 1998: 150-152). Among 529 individuals in the TG control group, 17.6 % experienced an adverse GI event, whereas among the 563 individuals in the olestra treatment group, 15.8 % experienced such an event.

a. Carry out a test of hypotheses at the 5 % significance level to decide whether the incidence rate of GI problems for those who consume olestra chips according to the experimental regimen differs from the incidence rate for the TG control treatment.

b. If the true percentages for the two treatments were 15 % and 20 %, respectively, what sample sizes

\((m = n\)) would be necessary to detect such a difference with probability 90?

The invasive diatom species Didymosphenia geminata has the potential to inflict substantial ecological and economic damage in rivers. The article "Substrate Characteristics Affect Colonization by the BloomForming Diatom Didymosphenia geminata" (Acquatic Ecology, 2010:\(33 - 40\)) described an investigation of colonization behavior. One aspect of particular interest was whether the roughness of stones impacted the degree of colonization. The authors of the cited article kindly provided the accompanying data on roughness ratio (dimensionless) for specimens of sandstone and shale.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Sandstone: }&{5.74}&{2.07}&{3.29}&{0.75}&{1.23}\\{}&{2.95}&{1.58}&{1.83}&{1.61}&{1.12}\\{}&{2.91}&{3.22}&{2.84}&{1.97}&{2.48}\\{}&{3.45}&{2.17}&{0.77}&{1.44}&{3.79}\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Shale: }&{.56}&{.84}&{.40}&{.55}&{.36}&{.72}\\{}&{.29}&{.47}&{.66}&{.48}&{.28}&{}\\{}&{.72}&{.31}&{.35}&{.32}&{.37}&{.43}\\{}&{.60}&{.54}&{.43}&{.51}&{}&{}\end{array}\)

Normal probability plots of both samples show a reasonably linear pattern. Estimate the difference between true average roughness for sandstone and that for shale in a way that provides information about reliability and precision, and interpret your estimate. Does it appear that true average roughness differs for the two types of rocks (a formal test of this was reported in the article)? (Note: The investigators concluded that more diatoms colonized the rougher surface than the smoother surface.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.