/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q82 SE Acrylic bone cement is commonly ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Acrylic bone cement is commonly used in total joint arthroplasty as a grout that allows for the smooth transfer of loads from a metal prosthesis to bone structure. The paper "Validation of the Small-Punch Test as a Technique for Characterizing the Mechanical Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement" U. of Engr. in Med., 2006: 11-21) gave the following data on breaking force (N) :

Temp Medium \(n \) \( \bar x \) \( s\)

\(2{2^\circ }\) Dry 6 170.60 39.08

\(3{7^\circ }\) Dry 6 325.73 34.97

\(2{2^\circ }\) Wet 6 366.36 34.82

\(3{7^\circ }\) Wet 6 306.09 41.97

Assume that all population distributions are normal.

a. Estimate true average breaking force in a dry medium at \(3{7^\circ }\) in a way that conveys information about reliability and precision, and interpret your estimate.

b. Estimate the difference between true average breaking force in a dry medium at \(3{7^\circ }\) and true average force at the same temperature in a wet medium, and do so in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability. Then interpret your estimate.

c. Is there strong evidence for concluding that true average force in a dry medium at the higher temperature exceeds that at the lower temperature by more than 100 N ?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) (289.0253,362.4347)

(b) (-30.8080,70.088)

(c) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average force in a dry medium at the higher temperature exceeds that at the lower temperature by more than 100 N.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1: To Estimate true average breaking force in a dry medium at \(3{7^\circ }\) in a way that conveys information about reliability and precision, and interpret your estimate.

(a)

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}\bar x = 325.73\\\\s = 34.97\\\\ n = 6\end{array}\)

I will estimate using a 95% confidence interval. Other confidence levels can be obtained similarly.

\(c = 95\% = 0.95\)

Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom\(df = n - 1 = 6 - 1 = 5\)and in the column with\(\alpha = 1 - c/2 = 0.025\)in the table of the Student's T distribution:

\({t_\alpha } = 2.571\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \times \frac{s}{{\sqrt n }} = 2.571 \times \frac{{34.97}}{{\sqrt 6 }} \approx 36.7047\)

The boundaries of the confidence interval then become:

\(\begin{array}{l}\bar x - E = 325.73 - 36.7047 = 289.0253\\\bar x + E = 325.73 + 36.7047 = 362.4347\end{array}\)

We are 95 % confident that the true average breaking force in a dry medium at \(3{7^\circ }\) is between 289.0253 and 362.4347

02

Step 2: To Estimate the difference between true average breaking force in a dry medium at \(3{7^\circ }\)  and true average force at the same temperature in a wet medium 

(b)

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = 325.73\\{s_1} = 34.97\\ {{\bar x}_2} = 306.09\\{s_2} = 41.97\\{n_1} = {n_2} = 6\end{array}\)

I will estimate using a 95% confidence interval. Other confidence levels can be obtained similarly.

\(c = 95\% = 0.95\)

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer):

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{34.9{7^2}}}{6} + \frac{{41.9{7^2}}}{6}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {34.9{7^2}/6} \right)}^2}}}{{6 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {41.9{7^2}/6} \right)}^2}}}{{6 - 1}}}} \approx 9 \)

Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom $d f=9$ and in the column with\(\alpha = 1 - c/2 = 0.025\)in the Student's t distribution table in the appendix:

\({t_{\alpha /2}} = 2.262\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \times \sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} = 2.262 \times \sqrt {\frac{{34.9{7^2}}}{6} + \frac{{41.9{7^2}}}{6}} \approx 50.4480\)

The endpoints of the confidence interval for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\)are:

\(\begin{array}{l}\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - E = (325.73 - 306.09) - 50.4480 = 19.64 - 50.4480 = - 30.8080 \\\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) + E = (325.73 - 306.09) + 50.4480 = 19.64 + 50.4480 = 70.0880\end{array}\)

03

Step 3: To find dry medium at the higher temperature exceeds that at the lower temperature by more than 100 N

(c)

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = 325.73\\{s_1} = 34.97\\{{\bar x}_2} = 170.60\\{s_2} = 39.08\\{n_1} = {n_2} = 6\end{array}\)

Let us assume:\(\alpha = 0.01\)

Given claim: Exceeds by more than 100

The claim is either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis the alternative hypothesis state the opposite of each other. The null hypothesis needs to contain an equality.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 100\\{H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 100\end{array}\)

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer):

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{34.9{7^2}}}{6} + \frac{{39.0{8^2}}}{6}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {34.9{7^2}/6} \right)}^2}}}{{6 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {39.0{8^2}/6} \right)}^2}}}{{6 - 1}}}} \approx 9\)

Determine the test statistic:

\(t = \frac{{\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }} = \frac{{325.73 - 170.60 - 100}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{34.9{7^2}}}{6} + \frac{{39.0{8^2}}}{6}} }} \approx 2.575\)

The P-value is the probability of obtaining the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme. The P-value is the number (or interval) in the column title of Student's T distribution in the appendix containing the t-value in the row df=9 :

\(0.01 < P < 0.025\)

If the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, then the null hypothesis is rejected:

\(P < 0.05 \Rightarrow Reject {H_0}\)

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average force in a dry medium at the higher temperature exceeds that at the lower temperature by more than 100 N.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following summary data on bending strength (lb-in/in) of joints is taken from the article "Bending Strength of Corner Joints Constructed with Injection Molded Splines" (Forest Products J., April, 1997: 89-92).

Type Sample size Sample mean sample SD

Without side coating 10 80.95 9.59

With side coating 10 63.23 5.96

a. Calculate a 95 % lower confidence bound for true average strength of joints with a side coating.

b. Calculate a 95 % lower prediction bound for the strength of a single joint with a side coating.

c. Calculate an interval that, with 95 % confidence, includes the strength values for at least 95 % of the population of all joints with side coatings.

d. Calculate a 95 % confidence interval for the difference between true average strengths for the two types of joints.

Which way of dispensing champagne, the traditional vertical method or a tilted beer-like pour,preserves more of the tiny gas bubbles that improve flavor and aroma? The following data was reported in the article 鈥淥n the Losses of Dissolved \(C{O_2}\) during Champagne Serving鈥 (J. Agr. Food Chem., 2010: 8768鈥8775)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{ Temp \left( {^^\circ C} \right)}&{ Type of Pour }&n&{ Mean (g/L)}&{ SD }\\{18}&{ Traditional }&4&{4.0}&{.5}\\{18}&{ Slanted }&4&{3.7}&{.3}\\{12}&{ Traditional }&4&{3.3}&{.2}\\{12}&{ Slanted }&4&{2.0}&{.3}\\{}&{}&{}&{}&{}\end{array}\)

Assume that the sampled distributions are normal.

a. Carry out a test at significance level \(.01\) to decide whether true average\(C{O_2}\)loss at \(1{8^o}C\) for the traditional pour differs from that for the slanted pour.

b. Repeat the test of hypotheses suggested in (a) for the \(1{2^o}\) temperature. Is the conclusion different from that for the \(1{8^o}\) temperature? Note: The \(1{2^o}\) result was reported in the popular media

The article "Evaluating Variability in Filling Operations" (Food Tech., 1984: 51-55) describes two different filling operations used in a ground-beef packing plant. Both filling operations were set to fill packages with \(1400\;g\)of ground beef. In a random sample of size 30 taken from each filling operation, the resulting means and standard deviations were \(1402.24\;g\) and \(10.97\;g\) for operation 1 and \(1419.63\;g\) and \(9.96\;g\) for operation 2.

a. Using a .05 significance level, is there sufficient evidence to indicate that the true mean weight of the packages differs for the two operations?

b. Does the data from operation 1 suggest that the true mean weight of packages produced by operation 1 is higher than\(1400\;g\)? Use a \(.05\)significance level.

The article "Effect of Internal Gas Pressure on the Compression Strength of Beverage Cans and Plastic Bottles" (J. of Testing and Evaluation, \(1993: 129 - 131\)) includes the accompanying data on compression strength (lb) for a sample of\(12 - oz\)aluminum cans filled with strawberry drink and another sample filled with cola. Does the data suggest that the extra carbonation of cola results in a higher average compression strength? Base your answer on a\(P\)-value. What assumptions are necessary for your analysis?

\(\begin{array}{l}BeverageSampleSizeSampleMeanSampleSD\\Strawberrydrink1554021\\Cola1555415\end{array}\)

Olestra is a fat substitute approved by the FDA for use in snack foods. Because there have been anecdotal reports of gastrointestinal problems associated with olestra consumption, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment was carried out to compare olestra potato chips to regular potato chips with respect to GI symptoms ("Gastrointestinal Symptoms Following Consumption of Olestra or Regular Triglyceride Potato Chips," J. of the Amer. Med. Assoc., 1998: 150-152). Among 529 individuals in the TG control group, 17.6 % experienced an adverse GI event, whereas among the 563 individuals in the olestra treatment group, 15.8 % experienced such an event.

a. Carry out a test of hypotheses at the 5 % significance level to decide whether the incidence rate of GI problems for those who consume olestra chips according to the experimental regimen differs from the incidence rate for the TG control treatment.

b. If the true percentages for the two treatments were 15 % and 20 %, respectively, what sample sizes

\((m = n\)) would be necessary to detect such a difference with probability 90?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.