/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q93 SE The article "Evaluating Variabil... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The article "Evaluating Variability in Filling Operations" (Food Tech., 1984: 51-55) describes two different filling operations used in a ground-beef packing plant. Both filling operations were set to fill packages with \(1400\;g\)of ground beef. In a random sample of size 30 taken from each filling operation, the resulting means and standard deviations were \(1402.24\;g\) and \(10.97\;g\) for operation 1 and \(1419.63\;g\) and \(9.96\;g\) for operation 2.

a. Using a .05 significance level, is there sufficient evidence to indicate that the true mean weight of the packages differs for the two operations?

b. Does the data from operation 1 suggest that the true mean weight of packages produced by operation 1 is higher than\(1400\;g\)? Use a \(.05\)significance level.

Short Answer

Expert verified

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{a}}{\rm{. Reject null hypothesis; }}\\{\rm{b}}{\rm{. Do not reject null hypothesis}}{\rm{. }}\end{array}\)

Step by step solution

01

To find the sufficient evidence to indicate that the true mean weight of the packages differs for the two operations

(a):

The hypotheses of interest are \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\)versus\({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} \ne 0\), where\({\mu _1}\), and \({\mu _2}\)are the true average weights for operations 1 and 2, respectively.

Given two normal distributions, the random variable (standardized)

\(T = \frac{{\bar X - \bar Y - \left( {{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{S_1^2}}{m} + \frac{{S_2^2}}{n}} }}\)

has approximately students t distribution with degrees of freedom\(\nu \), where \(\nu \) is

\(\nu = \frac{{\frac{{s_1^2}}{m} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{n}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/m} \right)}^2}}}{{m - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/n} \right)}^2}}}{{n - 1}}}}\)

has to be rounded down to the nearest integer.

The two-sample t test for testing \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = {\Delta _0}\)uses the following value of test statistic

\(t = \frac{{\bar x - \bar y - {\Delta _0}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{m} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{n}} }}\)

For the adequate alternative hypothesis the adequate area under the \({t_\nu }\)curve is the P value.

02

To find the degrees of freedom

The value of the test statistic is

\(t = \frac{{1402.24 - 1419.63 - 0}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{{{10.97}^2}}}{{30}} + \frac{{{{9.96}^2}}}{{30}}} }} = \frac{{ - 17.39}}{{\sqrt {4.0114 + 3.307} }} = - 6.43.\)

The degrees of freedom are

\(\nu = \frac{{\frac{{s_1^2}}{m} + \frac{s}{2}{{_2^2}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/m} \right)}^2}}}{{m - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/n} \right)}^2}}}{{n - 1}}}} = \frac{{\frac{{{{10.97}^2}}}{{30}} + {{\frac{{{{9.96}^2}}}{{30}}}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {{{10.97}^2}/30} \right)}^2}}}{{30 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {{{9.96}^2}/30} \right)}^2}}}{{30 - 1}}}} = 57.5,\)

and the round down to the nearest integer, which actually represent the degrees of freedom is

\(\nu = 57.\)

The P value is two times the area under the \({t_{58}}\)curve to the right of |t|

\(P = 2 \cdot P(T > 6.43) \approx 2 \cdot 0 = 0\)

which indicates to

Reject null hypothesis

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{at any reasonable significance level, as well as }}\alpha = 0.05.{\rm{ There is a statistically significant }}\\{\rm{difference in the means}}{\rm{. }}\end{array}\)

03

Step 3: To find the sufficient evidence to indicate that the true mean weight of the packages produced by operation 1 is higher than\(1400\;g\)

(b):

The one-sample t test should be used to the hypotheses \({H_0}:{\mu _1} = 1400\)versus\({H_a}:{\mu _1} > 1400\). The test statistic value is

\(\begin{array}{l}t = \frac{{\bar x - 1400}}{{{s_1}/\sqrt m }} = \frac{{1402.24 - 1400}}{{10.97/\sqrt {30} }}\\ = \frac{{2.24}}{2} = 1.1.\end{array}\)

The degrees of freedom are\(m - 1 = 30 - 1 = 29\). The P value is the area under \({t_{29}}\)curve to the right of t value

\(P = P(T > 1.1) = 0.14\)

where the value was computed using software (you can estimate it using table in the appendix). Since

\(P = 0.14 > 0.05\)

Do not reject null hypothesis

The true average does not exceed 1400.

04

Final proof

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{a}}{\rm{. Reject null hypothesis; }}\\{\rm{b}}{\rm{. Do not reject null hypothesis}}{\rm{. }}\end{array}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An experimenter wishes to obtain a CI for the difference between true average breaking strength for cables manufactured by company I and by company II. Suppose breaking strength is normally distributed for both types of cable with s1 5 30 psi and s2 5 20 psi.

  1. If costs dictate that the sample size for the type I cable should be three times the sample size for the type II cable, how many observations are required if the 99% CI is to be no wider than 20 psi?
  2. Suppose a total of 400 observations is to be made. How many of the observations should be made on type I cable samples if the width of the resulting interval is to be a minimum?

Suppose \({\mu _1}\) and \({\mu _2}\) are true mean stopping distances at \(50mph\) for cars of a certain type equipped with two different types of braking systems. Use the two-sample t test at significance level

t test at significance level \(.01\) to test \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = - 10\) versus \({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} < - 10\) for the following data: \(m = 6,\;\;\;\bar x = 115.7,{s_1} = 5.03,n = 6,\bar y = 129.3,\;\)and \({s_2} = 5.38.\)

Fusible interlinings are being used with increasing frequency to support outer fabrics and improve the shape and drape of various pieces of clothing. The article "Compatibility of Outer and Fusible Interlining Fabrics in Tailored Garments" (Textile Res. J., \(1997: 137 - 142\)) gave the accompanying data on extensibility\((\% )\)at\(100gm/cm\)for both high-quality (H) fabric and poor-quality (P) fabric specimens.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{r}}H&{1.2}&{.9}&{.7}&{1.0}&{1.7}&{1.7}&{1.1}&{.9}&{1.7}\\{}&{1.9}&{1.3}&{2.1}&{1.6}&{1.8}&{1.4}&{1.3}&{1.9}&{1.6}\\{}&{.8}&{2.0}&{1.7}&{1.6}&{2.3}&{2.0}&{}&{}&{}\\P&{1.6}&{1.5}&{1.1}&{2.1}&{1.5}&{1.3}&{1.0}&{2.6}&{}\end{array}\)

a. Construct normal probability plots to verify the plausibility of both samples having been selected from normal population distributions.

b. Construct a comparative boxplot. Does it suggest that there is a difference between true average extensibility for high-quality fabric specimens and that for poor-quality specimens?

c. The sample mean and standard deviation for the highquality sample are\(1.508\)and\(.444\), respectively, and those for the poor-quality sample are\(1.588\)and\(.530.\)Use the two-sample\(t\)test to decide whether true average extensibility differs for the two types of fabric.

The article "Pine Needles as Sensors of Atmospheric Pollution" (Environ. Monitoring, 1982: 273-286) reported on the use of neutron-activity analysis to determine pollutant concentration in pine needles. According to the article's authors, "These observations strongly indicated that for those elements which are determined well by the analytical procedures, the distribution of concentration is lognormal. Accordingly, in tests of significance the logarithms of concentrations will be used." The given data refers to bromine concentration in needles taken from a site near an oil-fired steam plant and from a relatively clean site. The summary values are means and standard deviations of the log-transformed observations.

Site Sample Size Mean Log Concentration SD of Log Concentration

Steamplant 8 18.0 4.9

Clean 9 11.0 4.6

Let \(\mu _1^*\) be the true average log concentration at the first site, and define \(\mu _2^*\) analogously for the second site.

a. Use the pooled t test (based on assuming normality and equal standard deviations) to decide at significance level .05 whether the two concentration distribution means are equal.

b. If \(\sigma _1^8\) and \(\sigma _2^*\) (the standard deviations of the two log concentration distributions) are not equal, would \({\mu _1} and {\mu _2}\) (the means of the concentration distributions) be the same if \(\mu _1^* = \mu _2^*\) ? Explain your reasoning.

Recent incidents of food contamination have caused great concern among consumers. The article "How Safe Is That Chicken?" (Consumer Reports, Jan. 2010: 19-23) reported that 35 of 80 randomly selected Perdue brand broilers tested positively for either campylobacter or salmonella (or' both), the leading bacterial causes of food-borne disease, whereas 66 of 80 Tyson brand broilers tested positive.

  1. Does it appear that the true proportion of noncontaminated Perdue broilers differs from that for the Tyson brand? Carry out a test of hypotheses using a significance level .01.
  2. If the true proportions of non-contaminated chickens for the Perdue and Tyson brands are .50 and .25, respectively, how likely is it that the null hypothesis of equal proportions will be rejected when a .01 significance level is used and the sample sizes are both 80?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.