/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q92 SE McNemar's test, developed in Exe... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

McNemar's test, developed in Exercise 56, can also be used when individuals are paired (matched) to yield n pairs and then one member of each pair is given treatment 1 and the other is given treatment 2 . Then \({X_1}\)is the number of pairs in which both treatments were successful, and similarly for\({H_0}\)\({X_2},{X_3}\), and\({X_4}\). The test statistic for testing equal efficacy of the two treatments is given by\(\left( {{X_2} - {X_3}} \right)/\sqrt {\left( {{X_2} + {X_3}} \right)} \), which has approximately a standard normal distribution when \({H_0}\)is true. Use this to test whether the drug ergotamine is effective in the treatment of migraine headaches.

The data is fictitious, but the conclusion agrees with that in the article "Controlled Clinical Trial of Ergotamine Tartrate" (British Med, J., 1970: 325-327).

Short Answer

Expert verified

reject the null hypothesis

Step by step solution

01

Step 1: to find the test whether the drug ergotamine is effective in the treatment of migraine headaches

Given values are\({x_1} = 44,{x_2} = 34,{x_3} = 46,{x_4} = 30\). Using this, the test statistic value (given in the exercise) is

\(z = \frac{{34 - 46}}{{\sqrt {34 + 46} }} = - 1.34\)

The hypotheses of interest are\({H_0}:{p_2} = {p_3}\)versus\({H_a}:{p_2} < {p_3}\); thus the P value is the area under the z curve to the left of z

\(P = P(Z < - 1.34) = 0.0901\)

where the value was computed using software (you can use table in the appendix). Because

\(P = 0.0901 > 0.05 > 0.01\)

Reject the null hypothesis

Drug ergotamine is not effective in the treatment of migraine headaches. NOTE: perhaps you could have used two-sided test.

02

Final proof

Finally we get,

Reject the null hypothesis

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An experiment to compare the tension bond strength of polymer latex modified mortar (Portland cement mortar to which polymer latex emulsions have been added during mixing) to that of unmodified mortar resulted in \(\bar x = 18.12kgf/c{m^2}\)for the modified mortar \((m = 40)\) and \(\bar y = 16.87kgf/c{m^2}\) for the unmodified mortar \((n = 32)\). Let \({\mu _1}\) and \({\mu _2}\) be the true average tension bond strengths for the modified and unmodified mortars, respectively. Assume that the bond strength distributions are both normal.

a. Assuming that \({\sigma _1} = 1.6\) and \({\sigma _2} = 1.4\), test \({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\) versus \({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 0\) at level . \(01.\)

b. Compute the probability of a type II error for the test of part (a) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1\).

c. Suppose the investigator decided to use a level \(.05\) test and wished \(\beta = .10\) when \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 1. \). If \(m = 40\), what value of n is necessary?

d. How would the analysis and conclusion of part (a) change if \({\sigma _1}\) and \({\sigma _2}\) were unknown but \({s_1} = 1.6\)and \({s_7} = 1.4?\)

Researchers sent 5000 resumes in response to job ads that appeared in the Boston Globe and Chicago Tribune. The resumes were identical except that 2500 of them had "white sounding" first names, such as Brett and Emily, whereas the other 2500 had "black sounding" names such as Tamika and Rasheed. The resumes of the first type elicited 250 responses and the resumes of the second type only 167 responses (these numbers are very consistent with information that appeared in a Jan. 15. 2003, report by the Associated Press). Does this data strongly suggest that a resume with a "black" name is less likely to result in a response than is a resume with a "white" name?

Determine the number of degrees of freedom for the two-sample t test or CI in each of the following.

\(\begin{array}{l}a. m = 10, n = 10, {s_1} = 5.0, {s_2} = 6.0\\b. m = 10, n = 15,{s_1} = 5.0, {s_2} = 6.0\\c. m = 10, n = 15, {s_1} = 2.0, {s_2} = 6.0\\d. m = 12, n = 24, {s_1} = 5.0, {s_2} = 6.0\\\\\end{array}\)

The article "Quantitative MRI and Electrophysiology of Preoperative Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in a Female Population" (Ergonomics, 1997: 642-649) reported that (-473.13,1691.9) was a large-sample 95 % confidence interval for the difference between true average thenar muscle volume \(\left( {m{m^3}} \right.)\) for sufferers of carpal tunnel syndrome and true average volume for nonsufferers. Calculate and interpret a 90 % confidence interval for this difference.

The invasive diatom species Didymosphenia geminata has the potential to inflict substantial ecological and economic damage in rivers. The article "Substrate Characteristics Affect Colonization by the BloomForming Diatom Didymosphenia geminata" (Acquatic Ecology, 2010:\(33 - 40\)) described an investigation of colonization behavior. One aspect of particular interest was whether the roughness of stones impacted the degree of colonization. The authors of the cited article kindly provided the accompanying data on roughness ratio (dimensionless) for specimens of sandstone and shale.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Sandstone: }&{5.74}&{2.07}&{3.29}&{0.75}&{1.23}\\{}&{2.95}&{1.58}&{1.83}&{1.61}&{1.12}\\{}&{2.91}&{3.22}&{2.84}&{1.97}&{2.48}\\{}&{3.45}&{2.17}&{0.77}&{1.44}&{3.79}\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Shale: }&{.56}&{.84}&{.40}&{.55}&{.36}&{.72}\\{}&{.29}&{.47}&{.66}&{.48}&{.28}&{}\\{}&{.72}&{.31}&{.35}&{.32}&{.37}&{.43}\\{}&{.60}&{.54}&{.43}&{.51}&{}&{}\end{array}\)

Normal probability plots of both samples show a reasonably linear pattern. Estimate the difference between true average roughness for sandstone and that for shale in a way that provides information about reliability and precision, and interpret your estimate. Does it appear that true average roughness differs for the two types of rocks (a formal test of this was reported in the article)? (Note: The investigators concluded that more diatoms colonized the rougher surface than the smoother surface.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.