/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q91 SE Researchers sent 5000 resumes in... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Researchers sent 5000 resumes in response to job ads that appeared in the Boston Globe and Chicago Tribune. The resumes were identical except that 2500 of them had "white sounding" first names, such as Brett and Emily, whereas the other 2500 had "black sounding" names such as Tamika and Rasheed. The resumes of the first type elicited 250 responses and the resumes of the second type only 167 responses (these numbers are very consistent with information that appeared in a Jan. 15. 2003, report by the Associated Press). Does this data strongly suggest that a resume with a "black" name is less likely to result in a response than is a resume with a "white" name?

Short Answer

Expert verified

\({\rm{ Reject null hypothesis}}{\rm{. }}\)

Step by step solution

01

To obtain a large- sample test procedure for the hypothesis

A Large-Sample Test Procedure:

The two proportion z statistic - Consider test in which\({H_0}:{p_1} - {p_2} = 0\). The test statistic value for the large samples is

\(z = \frac{{{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}}}{{\sqrt {\hat p\hat q \cdot \frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} }}\)

where

\(\hat p = \frac{m}{{m + n}} \cdot {\hat p_1} + \frac{n}{{m + n}} \cdot {\hat p_2}\)

Depending on alternative hypothesis, the P value can be determined as the corresponding area under the standard normal curve. The test should be used when\(m \cdot {\hat p_1},m \cdot {\hat q_1},n \cdot {\hat p_1}\), and \(n \cdot {\hat q_1}\) are at least 10.

The hypotheses of interest are \({H_0}:{p_1} - {p_2} = 0\)versus\({H_a}:{p_1} - {p_2} > 0\). From the given values, the estimates are

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\hat p}_1} = \frac{{250}}{{2500}} = 0.1\\{{\hat p}_2} = \frac{{167}}{{2500}} = 0.0668\end{array}\)

02

Final proof

Also, the \(\hat p\)is

\(\begin{array}{l}\hat p = \frac{m}{{m + n}} \cdot {{\hat p}_1} + \frac{n}{{m + n}} \cdot {{\hat p}_2} = \frac{{250}}{{250 + 167}} \cdot \frac{{250}}{{2500}} + \frac{{167}}{{250 + 167}} \cdot \frac{{167}}{{2500}}\\ = 0.0834\end{array}\)

The z statistic value is

\(\begin{array}{l} = \frac{{{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}}}{{\sqrt {\hat p\hat q \cdot \frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} }} = \frac{{0.1 - 0.0668}}{{\sqrt {0.0834 \cdot (1 - 0.0834) \cdot (1/250 + 1/167)} }}\\ = 4.2.\end{array}\)

The P values is two times the area of the z curve to the right of the |z| value; thus

\(P = 2 \cdot P(Z > 4.2) = 2 \cdot (1 - P(Z \le 4.2)) = 2 \cdot 0 = 0 < \alpha \)

so

Reject null hypothesis

in any reasonable level. Based on this experiment, it is more likely for a white name to get a response than for a black name.

.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Wait staff at restaurants have employed various strategies to increase tips. An article in the Sept. 5, 2005, New Yorker reported that 鈥淚n one study a waitress received 50% more in tips when she introduced herself by name than when she didn鈥檛.鈥 Consider the following (fictitious) data on tip amount as a percentage of the bill:

Introduction: \({\bf{m = 50,}}\overline {\bf{x}} {\bf{ = 22}}{\bf{.63,}}{{\bf{s}}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{ = 7}}{\bf{.82}}\)

No introduction: \({\bf{n = 50,}}\overline {\bf{y}} {\bf{ = 14}}{\bf{.15,}}{{\bf{s}}_{\bf{2}}}{\bf{ = 6}}{\bf{.10}}\)

Does this data suggest that an introduction increases tips on average by more than 50%? State and test the relevant hypotheses. (Hint: Consider the parameter \({\bf{\theta = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{ - 1}}{\bf{.5}}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{2}}}\)

The level of monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity in blood platelets (nm/mg protein/h) was determined for each individual in a sample of \(43\) chronic schizophrenics, resulting in \(\bar x = 2.69\) and \({s_1} = 2.30,\), as well as for \(45\) normal subjects, resulting in \(\bar y = 6.35\) and \({s_2} = 4.03.\). Does this data strongly suggest that true average MAO activity for normal subjects is more than twice the activity level for schizophrenics? Derive a test procedure and carry out the test using \(\alpha = .01\)

. (Hint: \({H_0}\) and \({H_a}\) here have a different form from the three standard cases. Let \({\mu _1}\) and \({\mu _2}\) refer to true average MAO activity for schizophrenics and normal subjects, respectively, and consider the parameter \(\theta = 2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\). Write \({H_0}\) and \({H_a}\) in terms of \(\theta \), estimate \(\theta \), and derive \({\hat \sigma _{\tilde \theta }}\) (鈥淩educed Monoamine Oxidase Activity in Blood Platelets from Schizophrenic Patients,鈥 Nature, July 28, 1972: 225鈥226).) \(\alpha = .01\)

A study was carried out to compare two different methods, injection and nasal spray, for administering flu vaccine to children under the age of 5. All 8000 children in the study were given both an injection and a spray. However, the vaccine given to 4000 of the children actually contained just saltwater, and the spray given to the other 4000 children also contained just saltwater. At the end of the flu season, it was determined that 3.9% of the children who received the real vaccine via nasal spray contracted the flu, whereas 8.6% of the 4000 children receiving the real vaccine via injection contracted the flu.

(a). Why do you think each child received both an injection and a spray?

(b). Does one method for delivering the vaccine appear to be superior to the other? Test the appropriate hypotheses. [Note: The study was described in the article 鈥淪pray Flu Vaccine May Work Better Than Injections for Tots,鈥 San Luis Obispo Tribune, May 2, 2006..

Consider the following two questions designed to assess quantitative literacy:

a. What is \[15\% \]of 1000?

b. A store is offering an \[15\% \]off sale on all TVs. The most popular television is normally priced at $1000. How much money would a customer save on the television during this sale?

Suppose the first question is asked of 200 randomly selected college students, with 164 answering correctly; the second one is asked of a different random sample of 200 college students, resulting in 140 correct responses (the sample percentages agree with those given in the article "Using the Right Yardstick: Assessing Financial Literacy Measures by Way of Financial Well-Being," J. of Consumer Affairs, 2013: 243-262; the investigators found that those who answered such questions correctly, particularly questions with context, were significantly more successful in their investment decisions than those who did not answer correctly). Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level 0.05 to decide if the true proportion of correct responses to the question without context exceeds that for the one with context.

Quantitative noninvasive techniques are needed for routinely assessing symptoms of peripheral neuropathies, such as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The article "A Gap Detection Tactility Test for Sensory Deficits Associated with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome" (Ergonomics, \(1995: 2588 - 2601\)) reported on a test that involved sensing a tiny gap in an otherwise smooth surface by probing with a finger; this functionally resembles many work-related tactile activities, such as detecting scratches or surface defects. When finger probing was not allowed, the sample average gap detection threshold for\(m = 8\)normal subjects was\(1.71\;mm\), and the sample standard deviation was\(.53\); for\(n = 10\)CTS subjects, the sample mean and sample standard deviation were\(2.53\)and\(.87\), respectively. Does this data suggest that the true average gap detection threshold for CTS subjects exceeds that for normal subjects? State and test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of\(.01\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.