/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q14 E The level of monoamine oxidase (... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The level of monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity in blood platelets (nm/mg protein/h) was determined for each individual in a sample of \(43\) chronic schizophrenics, resulting in \(\bar x = 2.69\) and \({s_1} = 2.30,\), as well as for \(45\) normal subjects, resulting in \(\bar y = 6.35\) and \({s_2} = 4.03.\). Does this data strongly suggest that true average MAO activity for normal subjects is more than twice the activity level for schizophrenics? Derive a test procedure and carry out the test using \(\alpha = .01\)

. (Hint: \({H_0}\) and \({H_a}\) here have a different form from the three standard cases. Let \({\mu _1}\) and \({\mu _2}\) refer to true average MAO activity for schizophrenics and normal subjects, respectively, and consider the parameter \(\theta = 2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\). Write \({H_0}\) and \({H_a}\) in terms of \(\theta \), estimate \(\theta \), and derive \({\hat \sigma _{\tilde \theta }}\) (鈥淩educed Monoamine Oxidase Activity in Blood Platelets from Schizophrenic Patients,鈥 Nature, July 28, 1972: 225鈥226).) \(\alpha = .01\)

Short Answer

Expert verified

the solution is

There is insufficient evidence to support the idea that normal people' genuine average MAO activity is more than twice that of schizophrenics.

Step by step solution

01

find mean and variance

given

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = 2.69\\{{\bar x}_2} = 6.35\\{s_1} = 2.30\\{s_2} = 4.03\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = 43\\{n_2} = 45\\\alpha = 0.01\end{array}\)

The sampling distribution of the sample mean \(\mu \) and standard deviation \(\frac{\sigma }{{\sqrt n }}:\)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{r}}{E\left( {{{\bar X}_1}} \right) = {\mu _1}}\\{E\left( {{{\bar X}_2}} \right) = {\mu _2}}\\{V\left( {{{\bar X}_1}} \right) = \frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{{{n_1}}}}\\{V\left( {{{\bar X}_2}} \right) = \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{{{n_2}}}}\end{array}\)

For linear combination \(W = a {X_1} + b {X_2}\) the following properties hold for the mean and variance:

\(E(W) = aE\left( {{X_1}} \right) + bE\left( {{X_1}} \right)\)

\(V(W) = {a^2}E\left( {{X_1}} \right) + {b^2}E\left( {{X_1}} \right)\left( { If {X_ - }1 and {X_ - }2} \right.\)are independent)

Let us define the statistic \(c\hat \theta = 2{\bar X_1} - {\bar X_2}\) for the parameter \(\theta = 2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\).

Determine its mean and variance

\(\begin{array}{l}E(\hat \theta ) = E\left( {2{{\bar X}_1} - {{\bar X}_2}} \right) = 2E\left( {{{\bar X}_1}} \right) - E\left( {{{\bar X}_2}} \right) = 2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\\V(\hat \theta ) = V\left( {2{{\bar X}_1} - {{\bar X}_2}} \right) = {2^2}V\left( {{{\bar X}_1}} \right) + {( - 1)^2}V\left( {{{\bar X}_2}} \right) = 4\frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{{{n_2}}}\end{array}\)

The standard deviation is the square root of the variance:

\({\sigma _{\hat \theta }} = \sqrt {4\frac{{\sigma _1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{\sigma _2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \)

02

determine probability

Because the sample sizes are high, the sampling distributions of the sample means are about normal (by the central limit theorem), and so the sampling distribution of \(\hat \theta \) is also approximately normal.

We can utilize the \(z\)-test because the samples are large \(\left( {n > 30} \right)\). (instead of a t-test).

More for the normal subjects, according to the assertion \({X_2}\).

Either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis is the assertion. The null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis are diametrically opposed. An equality must be present in the null hypothesis.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\\{H_a}:2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} < 0\end{array}\)

The test statistic's value is the statistic's value multiplied by its standard deviation divided by its mean:

\(z = \frac{{2{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2} - \left( {2{\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{4s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }} = \frac{{2(2.69) - 6.35 - 0}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{4 \times 2.3{0^2}}}{{43}} + \frac{{4.0{3^2}}}{{45}}} }} \approx - 1.05\)

If the null hypothesis is true, the P-value is the chance of getting a value that is more extreme or equal to the standardized test statistic \(z\). Using the usual probability table, calculate the probability.

\({\rm{P = P(Z < - 1}}{\rm{.05) = 0}}{\rm{.1469}}\)

If the p-value is smaller than the significance level \(\alpha \), then the null hypothesis is rejected.

\(P > 0.01 \Rightarrow Fail to reject {H_0}\)

There is insufficient evidence to support the idea that normal people' genuine average MAO activity is more than twice that of schizophrenics.

03

conclusion

There is insufficient evidence to support the idea that normal people' genuine average MAO activity is more than twice that of schizophrenics.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Effect of Internal Gas Pressure on the Compression Strength of Beverage Cans and Plastic Bottles" (J. of Testing and Evaluation, \(1993: 129 - 131\)) includes the accompanying data on compression strength (lb) for a sample of\(12 - oz\)aluminum cans filled with strawberry drink and another sample filled with cola. Does the data suggest that the extra carbonation of cola results in a higher average compression strength? Base your answer on a\(P\)-value. What assumptions are necessary for your analysis?

\(\begin{array}{l}BeverageSampleSizeSampleMeanSampleSD\\Strawberrydrink1554021\\Cola1555415\end{array}\)

How does energy intake compare to energy expenditure? One aspect of this issue was considered in the article 鈥淢easurement of Total Energy Expenditure by the Doubly Labelled Water Method in Professional Soccer Players鈥 (J. of Sports Sciences, 2002: 391鈥397), which contained the accompanying data (MJ/day).

Test to see whether there is a significant difference between intake and expenditure. Does the conclusion depend on whether a significance level of .05, .01, or .001 is used?

Reliance on solid biomass fuel for cooking and heating exposes many children from developing countries to high levels of indoor air pollution. The article 鈥淒omestic Fuels, Indoor Air Pollution, and Children鈥檚 Health鈥 (Annals of the N.Y. Academy of Sciences, \(2008:209 - 217\)) presented information on various pulmonary characteristics in samples of children whose households in India used either biomass fuel or liquefied petroleum gas (\(LPG\)). For the \(755\) children in biomass households, the sample mean peak expiratory flow (a person鈥檚 maximum speed of expiration) was \(3.30L/s\), and the sample standard deviation was \(1.20\). For the \(750\) children whose households used liquefied petroleum gas, the sample mean \(PEF\) was \(4.25\) and the sample standard deviation was \(1.75\).

a. Calculate a confidence interval at the \(95\% \) confidence level for the population mean \(PEF\) for children in biomass households and then do likewise for children in \(LPG\) households. What is the simultaneous confidence level for the two intervals?

b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level \(.01\) to decide whether true average \(PEF\) is lower for children in biomass households than it is for children in \(LPG\) households (the cited article included a P-value for this test)

c. \(FE{V_1}\), the forced expiratory volume in \(1\) second, is another measure of pulmonary function. The cited article reported that for the biomass households the sample mean FEV1 was \(2.3L/s\) and the sample standard deviation was \(.5L/s\). If this information is used to compute a \(95\% \) \(CI\) for population mean \(FE{V_1}\), would the simultaneous confidence level for this interval and the first interval calculated in (a) be the same as the simultaneous confidence level determined there? Explain

Shoveling is not exactly a high-tech activity, but it will continue to be a required task even in our information age. The article "A Shovel with a Perforated Blade Reduces Energy Expenditure Required for Digging Wet Clay" (Human Factors, 2010: 492-502) reported on an experiment in which 13 workers were each provided with both a conventional shovel and a shovel whose blade was perforated with small holes. The authors of the cited article provided the following data on stable energy expenditure ((kcal/kg(subject)//b(clay)):

Worker : 1 2 3 4

Conventional : .0011 .0014 .0018 .0022

Perforated : .0011 .0010 .0019 .0013

Worker: 5 6 7

Conventional : .0010 .0016 .0028

Perforated : .0011 .0017 .0024

Worker 8 9 10

Conventional : .0020 .0015 .0014

Perforated : .0020 .0013 .0013

Worker: 11 12 13

Conventional : .0023 .0017 .0020

Perforated : .0017 .0015 .0013

a. Calculate a confidence interval at the 95 % confidence level for the true average difference between energy expenditure for the conventional shovel and the perforated shovel (the relevant normal probability plot shows a reasonably linear pattern). Based on this interval, does it appear that the shovels differ with respect to true average energy expenditure? Explain.

b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level .05 to see if true average energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel.

Olestra is a fat substitute approved by the FDA for use in snack foods. Because there have been anecdotal reports of gastrointestinal problems associated with olestra consumption, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment was carried out to compare olestra potato chips to regular potato chips with respect to GI symptoms ("Gastrointestinal Symptoms Following Consumption of Olestra or Regular Triglyceride Potato Chips," J. of the Amer. Med. Assoc., 1998: 150-152). Among 529 individuals in the TG control group, 17.6 % experienced an adverse GI event, whereas among the 563 individuals in the olestra treatment group, 15.8 % experienced such an event.

a. Carry out a test of hypotheses at the 5 % significance level to decide whether the incidence rate of GI problems for those who consume olestra chips according to the experimental regimen differs from the incidence rate for the TG control treatment.

b. If the true percentages for the two treatments were 15 % and 20 %, respectively, what sample sizes

\((m = n\)) would be necessary to detect such a difference with probability 90?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.