/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q72 SE The following summary data on be... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The following summary data on bending strength (lb-in/in) of joints is taken from the article "Bending Strength of Corner Joints Constructed with Injection Molded Splines" (Forest Products J., April, 1997: 89-92).

Type Sample size Sample mean sample SD

Without side coating 10 80.95 9.59

With side coating 10 63.23 5.96

a. Calculate a 95 % lower confidence bound for true average strength of joints with a side coating.

b. Calculate a 95 % lower prediction bound for the strength of a single joint with a side coating.

c. Calculate an interval that, with 95 % confidence, includes the strength values for at least 95 % of the population of all joints with side coatings.

d. Calculate a 95 % confidence interval for the difference between true average strengths for the two types of joints.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) 59.7753

(b) 51.7721

(c) (76.6868,85.2132)

(d) (10.1111,25.3289)

Step by step solution

01

To Calculate a 95 % lower confidence bound for true average strength of joints with a side coating.

(a)

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = 80.95\\{s_1} = 9.59\\{{\bar x}_2} = 63.23\\{s_2} = 5.96\\{n_1} = {n_2} = 10\\c = 95\% = 0.95\end{array}\)

Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom $d\(f = n - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9\)and in the column with\(\alpha = 1 - c = 0.05\)in the table of the Student's T distribution:

\({t_\alpha } = 1.833\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \times \frac{s}{{\sqrt n }} = 1.833 \times \frac{{5.96}}{{\sqrt {10} }} \approx 3.4547\)

The boundaries of the confidence interval then become:

\(\bar x - E = 63.23 - 3.4547 = 59.7753\)

Thus the 95 % lower confidence bound is 59.7753.

02

To Calculate a 95 % lower prediction bound for the strength of a single joint with a side coating.

(b)

Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom \(df = n - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9\) and in the column with \(\alpha = 1 - c = 0.05\) in the table of the Student's T distribution:

\({t_\alpha } = 1.833\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \times s\sqrt {1 + \frac{1}{n}} = 1.833 \times 5.96\sqrt {1 + \frac{1}{{10}}} \approx 11.4579\)

The boundaries of the prediction interval then become:

\(\bar x - E = 63.23 - 11.4579 = 51.7721\)

Thus the 95 % lower prediction bound is 51.7721.

03

To . Calculate an interval that, with 95 % confidence, includes the strength values for at least 95 % of the population of all joints with side coatings

(c)

Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom\(df = n - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9\)and in the column with\(\alpha = 1 - c/2 = 0.025\)in the table of the Student's T distribution:

\({t_\alpha } = 2.262\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \times \frac{s}{{\sqrt n }} = 2.262 \times \frac{{5.96}}{{\sqrt {10} }} \approx 4.2632\)

The boundaries of the confidence interval then become:

\(\begin{array}{l}\bar x - E = 80.95 - 4.2632 = 76.6868\\\\\bar x + E = 80.95 + 4.2632 = 85.2132\end{array}\)

04

To Calculate a 95 % confidence interval for the difference between true average strengths for the two types of joints.

(d)

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer):

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{9.5{9^2}}}{{10}} + \frac{{5.9{6^2}}}{{10}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {9.5{9^2}/10} \right)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {5.9{6^2}/10} \right)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}}}} \approx 15\)

Determine the t-value by looking in the row starting with degrees of freedom df=15 and in the column with\(\alpha = 1 - c/2 = 0.025\) in the Student's t distribution table in the appendix:

\({t_{\alpha /2}} = 2.131\)

The margin of error is then:

\(E = {t_{\alpha /2}} \times \sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} = 2.131 \times \sqrt {\frac{{9.5{9^2}}}{{10}} + \frac{{5.9{6^2}}}{{10}}} \approx 7.6089\)

The endpoints of the confidence interval for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\)are:

\(\begin{array}{l}\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) - E = (80.95 - 63.23) - 7.6089 = 17.72 - 7.6089 = 10.1111\\\\\left( {{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}} \right) + E = (80.95 - 63.23) + 7.6089 = 17.72 + 7.6089 = 25.3289\end{array}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a psychiatric condition leading to substantial weight loss among women who are fearful of becoming fat. The article "Adipose Tissue Distribution After Weight Restoration and Weight Maintenance in Women with Anorexia Nervosa" (Amer. J. of ClinicalNutr., 2009: 1132-1137) used whole-body magnetic resonance imagery to determine various tissue characteristics for both an AN sample of individuals who had undergone acute weight restoration and maintained their weight for a year and a comparable (at the outset of the study) control sample. Here is summary data on intermuscular adipose tissue (IAT; kg).

Assume that both samples were selected from normal distributions.

a. Calculate an estimate for true average IAT under the described AN protocol, and do so in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the estimation.

b. Calculate an estimate for the difference between true average AN IAT and true average control IAT, and do so in a way that conveys information about the reliability and precision of the estimation. What does your estimate suggest about true average AN IAT relative to true average control IAT?

Shoveling is not exactly a high-tech activity, but it will continue to be a required task even in our information age. The article "A Shovel with a Perforated Blade Reduces Energy Expenditure Required for Digging Wet Clay" (Human Factors, 2010: 492-502) reported on an experiment in which 13 workers were each provided with both a conventional shovel and a shovel whose blade was perforated with small holes. The authors of the cited article provided the following data on stable energy expenditure ((kcal/kg(subject)//b(clay)):

Worker : 1 2 3 4

Conventional : .0011 .0014 .0018 .0022

Perforated : .0011 .0010 .0019 .0013

Worker: 5 6 7

Conventional : .0010 .0016 .0028

Perforated : .0011 .0017 .0024

Worker 8 9 10

Conventional : .0020 .0015 .0014

Perforated : .0020 .0013 .0013

Worker: 11 12 13

Conventional : .0023 .0017 .0020

Perforated : .0017 .0015 .0013

a. Calculate a confidence interval at the 95 % confidence level for the true average difference between energy expenditure for the conventional shovel and the perforated shovel (the relevant normal probability plot shows a reasonably linear pattern). Based on this interval, does it appear that the shovels differ with respect to true average energy expenditure? Explain.

b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level .05 to see if true average energy expenditure using the conventional shovel exceeds that using the perforated shovel.

The paper "'Quantitative Assessment of Glenohumeral Translation in Baseball Players" (The Amer.J. of Sports Med., 2004: 1711-1715) considered various aspects of shoulder motion for a sample of pitchers and another sample of position players [glenohumeral refers to the articulation between the humerus (ball) and the glenoid (socket)]. The authors kindly supplied the following data on anteroposterior translation (mm), a measure of the extent of anterior and posterior motion, both for the dominant arm and the nondominant arm.

a. Estimate the true average difference in translation between dominant and nondominant arms for pitchers in a way that conveys information about reliability and precision, and interpret the resulting estimate.

b. Repeat (a) for position players.

c. The authors asserted that "pitchers have greater difference in side-to-side anteroposterior translation of their shoulders compared with position players." Do you agree? Explain.

Antipsychotic drugs are widely prescribed for conditions such as schizophrenia and bipolar disease. The article "Cardiometabolic Risk of SecondGeneration Antipsychotic Medications During First-Time Use in Children and Adolescents"\((J\). of the Amer. Med. Assoc., 2009) reported on body composition and metabolic changes for individuals who had taken various antipsychotic drugs for short periods of time.

a. The sample of 41 individuals who had taken aripiprazole had a mean change in total cholesterol (mg/dL) of\(3.75\), and the estimated standard error\({s_D}/\sqrt n \)was\(3.878\). Calculate a confidence interval with confidence level approximately\(95\% \)for the true average increase in total cholesterol under these circumstances (the cited article included this CI).

b. The article also reported that for a sample of 36 individuals who had taken quetiapine, the sample mean cholesterol level change and estimated standard error were\(9.05\)and\(4.256\), respectively. Making any necessary assumptions about the distribution of change in cholesterol level, does the choice of significance level impact your conclusion as to whether true average cholesterol level increases? Explain. (Note: The article included a\(P\)-value.)

c. For the sample of 45 individuals who had taken olanzapine, the article reported\(99\% CI\)as a\(95\% \)CI for true average weight gain\((kg)\). What is a $\(99\% CI\)?

To decide whether two different types of steel have the same true average fracture toughness values, n specimens of each type are tested, yielding the following results:

\(\begin{array}{l}\underline {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{ Type }&{ Sample Average }&{ Sample SD }\\1&{60.1}&{1.0}\\2&{59.9}&{1.0}\\{}&{}&{}\end{array}} \\\end{array}\)

Calculate the P-value for the appropriate two-sample \(z\) test, assuming that the data was based on \(n = 100\). Then repeat the calculation for \(n = 400\). Is the small P-value for \(n = 400\) indicative of a difference that has practical significance? Would you have been satisfied with just a report of the P-value? Comment briefly.a

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.