/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q69 SE Is the response rate for questio... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Is the response rate for questionnaires affected by including some sort of incentive to respond along with the questionnaire? In one experiment, 110 questionnaires with no incentive resulted in 75 being returned, whereas 98 questionnaires that included a chance to win a lottery yielded 66 responses ("'Charities, No; Lotteries, No; Cash, Yes," Public Opinion Quarterly, 1996: 542–562). Does this data suggest that including an incentive increases the likelihood of a response? State and test the relevant hypotheses at significance level . 10 .

Short Answer

Expert verified

Do not reject null hypothesis, which means an incentive does not mean that there are going to be more responses.

Step by step solution

01

To find an incentive increases the likelihood of a response

The hypotheses of interest are \({H_0}:{p_1} - {p_2} = 0 versus {H_a}:{p_1} - {p_2} < 0 where {p_1}\) is the true proportion of returned questionnaires that include no incentive, and \({p_2}\) is the true proportion of returned questionnaires that includes an incentive.

The sample size is big enough, thus:

A Large-Sample Test Procedure:

The two proportion z statistic - Consider test in which\({H_0}:{p_1} - {p_2} = 0\). The test statistic value for the large samples is

\(z = \frac{{{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}}}{{\sqrt {\hat p\hat q \times \left( {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} \right)} }}\)

where

\(\hat p = \frac{m}{{m + n}} \times {\hat p_1} + \frac{n}{{m + n}} \times {\hat p_2}\)

Depending on alternative hypothesis, the P value can be determined as the corresponding area under the standard normal curve. The test should be used when \(m \times {\hat p_1},m \times {\hat q_1},n \times {\hat p_1} ,and n \times {\hat q_1} are atleast 10\)

02

To State and test the relevant hypotheses at significance level . 10 .

The estimates are

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\hat p}_1} = \frac{{75}}{{110}} = 0.682\\{{\hat p}_2} = \frac{{66}}{{98}} = 0.673\end{array}\)

Notice that in z value the numerator

\({\hat p_1} - {\hat p_2} > 0\)

which indicates that

\(z = \frac{{{{\hat p}_1} - {{\hat p}_2}}}{{\sqrt {\hat p\hat q \times \left( {\frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{n}} \right)} }} > 0\)

The test is lower tailed test, and the z value is positive, the P value has to be bigger than 0.5 because \(P(Z < z) > 0.5\)for all z>0.

For any reasonable significance level do not reject null hypothesis because \(P > 0.5 > \alpha \)

Thus, including an incentive does not mean that there are going to be more responses.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Toxaphene is an insecticide that has been identified as a pollutant in the Great Lakes ecosystem. To investigate the effect of toxaphene exposure on animals, groups of rats were given toxaphene in their diet. The article "Reproduction Study of Toxaphene in the Rat" ( J. of Environ. Sci. Health, 1988: 101-126) reports weight gains (in grams) for rats given a low dose (4 ppm) and for control rats whose diet did not include the insecticide. The sample standard deviation for 23 female control rats was \(32\;g\) and for 20 female low-dose rats was\(54\;g\). Does this data suggest that there is more variability in low-dose weight gains than in control weight gains? Assuming normality, carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level .05.

Return to the data on maximum lean angle given in Exercise 28 of this chapter. Carry out a test at significance level .10 to see whether the population standard deviations for the two age groups are different (normal probability plots support the necessary normality assumption).

To decide whether two different types of steel have the same true average fracture toughness values, n specimens of each type are tested, yielding the following results:

\(\begin{array}{l}\underline {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{ Type }&{ Sample Average }&{ Sample SD }\\1&{60.1}&{1.0}\\2&{59.9}&{1.0}\\{}&{}&{}\end{array}} \\\end{array}\)

Calculate the P-value for the appropriate two-sample \(z\) test, assuming that the data was based on \(n = 100\). Then repeat the calculation for \(n = 400\). Is the small P-value for \(n = 400\) indicative of a difference that has practical significance? Would you have been satisfied with just a report of the P-value? Comment briefly.a

Fusible interlinings are being used with increasing frequency to support outer fabrics and improve the shape and drape of various pieces of clothing. The article "Compatibility of Outer and Fusible Interlining Fabrics in Tailored Garments" (Textile Res. J., \(1997: 137 - 142\)) gave the accompanying data on extensibility\((\% )\)at\(100gm/cm\)for both high-quality (H) fabric and poor-quality (P) fabric specimens.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{r}}H&{1.2}&{.9}&{.7}&{1.0}&{1.7}&{1.7}&{1.1}&{.9}&{1.7}\\{}&{1.9}&{1.3}&{2.1}&{1.6}&{1.8}&{1.4}&{1.3}&{1.9}&{1.6}\\{}&{.8}&{2.0}&{1.7}&{1.6}&{2.3}&{2.0}&{}&{}&{}\\P&{1.6}&{1.5}&{1.1}&{2.1}&{1.5}&{1.3}&{1.0}&{2.6}&{}\end{array}\)

a. Construct normal probability plots to verify the plausibility of both samples having been selected from normal population distributions.

b. Construct a comparative boxplot. Does it suggest that there is a difference between true average extensibility for high-quality fabric specimens and that for poor-quality specimens?

c. The sample mean and standard deviation for the highquality sample are\(1.508\)and\(.444\), respectively, and those for the poor-quality sample are\(1.588\)and\(.530.\)Use the two-sample\(t\)test to decide whether true average extensibility differs for the two types of fabric.

Refer to Example 9.7. Does the data suggest that the standard deviation of the strength distribution for fused specimens is smaller than that for not-fused specimens? Carry out a test at significance level .01.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.