/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q41SE Four laboratories \(\left( {1 - ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Four laboratories \(\left( {1 - 4} \right)\)are randomly selected from a large population, and each is asked to make three determinations of the percentage of methyl alcohol in specimens of a compound taken from a single batch. Based on the accompanying data, the difference among laboratories a source of variation in the percentage of methyl alcohol? State and test the relevant hypothesis using significance level \(.0.5\)

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{1:}&{85.06}&{85.25}&{84.87}\\{2:}&{84.99}&{84.28}&{84.88}\\{3:}&{84.48}&{84.72}&{85.10}\\{4:}&{84.10}&{84.55}&{84.05}\end{aligned}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified

The value is \({F_{0.05,3,8}} = 4.07 > 3.958 = f\)which indicates not to reject the null hypothesis at significance level \(0.05\).

Step by step solution

01

Calculating the degree of freedom

The hypothesis of interest are\({H_0}:{\sigma _A} = 0\)versus alternative hypothesis\({H_a}:{\sigma _A} > 0\)

The summarized data given in the table is,

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{No}&{1:}&{2:}&{3:}&{4:}\\1&{85.06}&{84.99}&{84.48}&{84.1}\\2&{85.25}&{84.28}&{84.72}&{84.55}\\3&{84.87}&{84.88}&{85.1}&{84.05}\\{{x_i}}&{255.18}&{254.15}&{254.30}&{252.7}\end{aligned}\\\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{\overline {{x_i}} \,\,\,\,\,\,}&{85.06}&{84.72}&{84.77}\end{aligned}\,\,\,\,\,\,84.23\\{\overline x _{..}} = 1016.33\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{x_{...}} = 84.69\end{aligned}\)

The above table gives us everything needed to carry out\(F\)test.

Let us notice that in first place is,

\(I = 4\), columns- treatment and

\(J = 3\), rows-sample of each type.

The following table needs to be filled with the corresponding values,

Source of Variation

df

Sum of Squares

Mean Square

f

Treatments

\(I - 1\)

SSTr

MSTr

MSTr/MSE

Error

\(I \times \left( {J - 1} \right)\)

SSE

MSE

Total

\(I \times J - 1\)

SST

The degrees of freedom are,

\(\begin{aligned}{l}I - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3;\\I \times \left( {J - 1} \right) = 4 \times \left( {3 - 1} \right) = 8;\\I \times J - 1 = 4 \times 3 - 1 = 11.\end{aligned}\)

02

Calculating the SST,SSTr,SSE

Let us denote with

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{x_i} = \int\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij}}} \\{x_{..}} = \int\limits_{i = 1}^I {\int\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij}}} } \end{aligned}\)

The total sum of squares\(\left( {SST} \right)\), the treatment sum of squares\(\left( {SSTr} \right)\), the error sum of squares\(\left( {SSE} \right)\)are given by,

\(\begin{aligned}{l}SST = {\int\limits_{i = 1}^I {\int\limits_{j = 1}^J {\left( {{x_{ij}} - \overline x ..} \right)} } ^2} = \int\limits_{i = 1}^I {\int\limits_{j = 1}^J \begin{aligned}{l}{x_{ij}}^2 - \frac{1}{{I \times J}}{x_{..}}^2;\\\end{aligned} } \\SSTr = \int\limits_{i = 1}^I {\int\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {{{\overline x }_i} - {{\overline x }_{..}}} \right)}^2} = \frac{1}{J} \times \int\limits_{i = 1}^I {{x^2}_i - \frac{1}{{I \times J}}{x_{..}}^2;} } } \\SSE = \int\limits_{i = 1}^I {\int\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {{x_{ij}} - {{\overline x }_{i.}}} \right)}^2}} } \end{aligned}\)

The mean square are,

\(\begin{aligned}{l}MSTr = \frac{1}{{I - 1}} \times SSTr;\\MSE = \frac{1}{{I \times \left( {J - 1} \right)}} \times SSE\end{aligned}\)

\(F\)is the ratio of the two mean square,

\(F = \frac{{MSTr}}{{MSE}}\)

03

Calculating the grand mean

Calculate all the values one by one. By summing corresponding column, value of \({x_i}\)are,

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{x_1} = 85.06 + 85.25 + 84.87 = 255.18;\\{x_2} = 84.99 + 84.28 + 84.88 = 254.15;\\{x_3} = 84.48 + 84.72 + 85.1 = 254.30;\\{x_4} = 84.1 + 84.55 + 84.05 = 252.70.\end{aligned}\)

The value of \({\overline x _i} = \frac{1}{J} \times {x_i}\) are given by,

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{\overline x _1} = \frac{1}{3} \times 255.18 = 85.06;\\{\overline x _2} = \frac{1}{3} \times 254.15 = 84.72;\\{\overline x _3} = \frac{1}{3} \times 254.30 = 84.77;\\{\overline x _4} = \frac{1}{3} \times 252.70 = 84.23.\end{aligned}\)

The grand mean \({\overline x _{..}}\)is,

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{\overline x _{..}} = \frac{1}{{I \times J}} \times {x_{..}} = \frac{1}{{I \times J}}\int\limits_{i = 1}^I {\int\limits_{j = 1}^J \begin{aligned}{l}{x_{ij}} = \frac{1}{{4 \times 3}} \times \left( {85.06 + 84.99 + .. + 85.1 + 84.05} \right) = 84.69,\\\end{aligned} } \\{x_{..}} = \int\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij}} = 85.06 + 84.99 + ... + 85.1 + 84.05 = 1016.33} \end{aligned}\)

04

Calculating the mean square MSTr,MSE

The total sum of square is,

\(\begin{aligned}{l}SST = \int\limits_{i = 1}^I {\int\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {{x_{ij}} - {{\overline x }_{..}}} \right)}^2} = \int\limits_{i = 1}^I {\int\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x^2}_{ij}} } } } - \frac{1}{{I \times J}}{x_{..}}^2\\ = {85.06^2} + {84.99^2} + .. + {85.1^2} + {84.05^2} - \frac{1}{{4 \times 3}} \times {1016.33^2}\\ = 86078.99 - 86077.22\\ = 1.77\end{aligned}\)

The treatment sum of square is,

\(\begin{aligned}{l}SSTr = \int\limits_{i = 1}^I {\int\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {{{\overline x }_i} - {{\overline x }_{..}}} \right)}^2} = \frac{1}{J} \times \int\limits_{i = 1}^I {{x^2}_i - \frac{1}{{I \times J}}{x_{..}}^2} } } \\ = \frac{1}{3} \times {255.18^2} + {254.15^2} + {254.30^2} + {252.70^2} - \frac{1}{{4 \times 5}} \times {1016.33^3}\\ = 86078.28 - 86077.22\\ = 1.06\end{aligned}\)

Fundamental Identity : \(SST = SSTr + SSE\)

Error sum of square is \(\begin{aligned}{l}SSE = SST - SSTr\\ = 1.77 - 1.06 = 0.71\end{aligned}\)

The mean square is computed as,

\(\begin{aligned}{l}MSTr = \frac{1}{{I - 1}} \times SSTr = \frac{1}{3} \times 1.06 = 0.352;\\MSE = \frac{1}{{I \times \left( {J - 1} \right)}} \times SSE = \frac{1}{{4 \times \left( {3 - 1} \right)}} \times 0.71 = 0.089\end{aligned}\)

05

The value of \(F\)statistics

The value of \(F\)statistics is,

\(f = \frac{{MSTr}}{{MSE}} = \frac{{0.352}}{{0.089}} = 3.958\)

The ANOVA table now becomes,

Source of Variation

df

Sum of Squares

Mean Square

f

Treatments

\(3\)

\(1.06\)

\(0.352\)

\(3.958\)

Error

\(8\)

\(0.71\)

\(0.089\)

Total

\(11\)

\(1.77\)

For the usual test, you can either make conclusion about the hypothesis look at the \(F\)critical value or a \(P\)value.

The interest of hypothesis are \({H_0}:{\sigma _A} = 0\)versus alternative hypothesis\({H_a}:{\sigma _A} > 0\)

The\(P\)value is the area to the right of \(f\)value under \(F\)curve where \(F\)has Fisher鈥檚 distribution with degree of freedom \(3and8\),

\(P = P\left( {F > f} \right) = P\left( {F > 3.958} \right) = 0.053\)which was computed using the software.

Because, \(P = 0.053 > 0.05 = \alpha \)

So donot reject null hypotheses at significance level. There is no statistically difference in true averages among the four different laboratories.

Using the table, we could use e.g. value \({F_{0.05,3,8}}\)for which the area under the \(F\) curve to the right of \({F_{0.05,3,8}}\)is \(0.05\). The value is

\({F_{0.05,3,8}} = 4.07 > 3.958 = f\)

Which indicates not to reject the null hypothesis at significance level \(0.05\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to Exercise \(5\) compute a t CI For \(95\% \)\({\raise0.7ex\hbox{\(1\)} \!\mathord{\left/

{\vphantom {1 2}}\right.\kern-\nulldelimiterspace}

\!\lower0.7ex\hbox{\(2\)}}\left( {{\mu _1} + {\mu _2}} \right) - {\mu _3}\)

In an experiment to compare the tensile strengths of different type of\({\bf{I = 5}}\) copper wire, \({\bf{J = 4}}\) samples of each type were used. The between-samples and within- sample estimates of \({{\bf{\sigma }}^{\bf{2}}}\) were computed as \({\bf{MS}}{{\bf{T}}_{\bf{r}}}{\bf{ = 2673}}{\bf{.3}}\) and respectively. Use the F test at level. to test \({{\bf{H}}_{\bf{0}}}\,{\bf{:}}\,\,{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{ = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{2}}}{\bf{ = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{3}}}{\bf{ = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{4}}}{\bf{ = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{5}}}\)versus \({{\bf{H}}_{\bf{a}}}{\bf{:}}\)at least two \({{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{i}}}{\bf{'s}}\) are unequal.

Six samples of each of four types of cereal grain grown in a certain region were analyzed to determine thiamin content, resulting in the following data \((\mu g/g):\)

Wheat \(5.2\) \(4.5\) \(6.0\) \(6.1\) \(6.7\) \(5.8\)

Barley \(6.5\) \(8.0\) \(6.1\) \(7.5\) \(5.9\) \(5.6\)

Maize \(5.8\) \(4.7\) \(6.4\) \(4.9\) \(6.0\) \(5.2\)

Oats \(8.3\) \(6.1\) \(7.8\) \(7.0\) \(5.5\) \(7.2\)

Does this data suggest that at least two of the grains differ with respect to true average thiamin content? Use a level \(\alpha = .05\)

Refer to Exercise \(19\) and suppose\(\overline {{X_{1.}}} = 10,\,\overline {{X_{2.}}} = 15,\overline {{X_{3.}}} = 20\) can you now find a values of SSE that produces such a contradiction between the F test and Tukey鈥檚 procedure?

An experiment was carried out to compare electrical resitivity for six different low-permeability concrete bridge deck mixtures. There were \(26\)measurements on concrete cylinders for each mixture; these were obtained days \(28\)after casting.The entries in the accompanying ANOVA table are based on information in the article 鈥淚n-place Resitivity of Bridge Deck Concrete Mixtures鈥(ACI Matrerials j.,2009: 114-122).Fill in the remaining entries and test appropriate hypothese.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.