/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q20E Refer to Exercise \(19\) and sup... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Refer to Exercise \(19\) and suppose\(\overline {{X_{1.}}} = 10,\,\overline {{X_{2.}}} = 15,\overline {{X_{3.}}} = 20\) can you now find a values of SSE that produces such a contradiction between the F test and Tukey鈥檚 procedure?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Find a values of SSE that produces such a contradiction between the F test and Tukey鈥檚 procedure.

Denote with,

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{x_{i.}}\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij.}}} \\{x_{..}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^J {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij.}}} } \end{aligned}\)

The answer can be any real number SSE which satisfies the following

\(422.16 < SSE < 385.6.\)

Step by step solution

01

definition of denote

Denote The total sum of squares And treatment sum of squares And Error sum of squares.

Denote with,

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{x_{i.}}\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij.}}} \\{x_{..}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^J {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij.}}} } \end{aligned}\)

The total sum of squares

\(\left( {SST} \right),\)

And treatment sum of squares

\(\left( {SSTr} \right)\),

And Error sum of squares

\({\rm{ }}\left( {SSE} \right)\)are given by

\(SST = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {{x_{ij}} - \overline x ..} \right)}^2}} = } \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x^2}_{ij} - \frac{1}{{I\,\,.\,J}}} {x^2}_{..;}} \)

\(SSTr = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {\overline {{x_{i.}}} - \overline x ..} \right)}^2}} = \frac{1}{J}.} \sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x^2}_{i.} - \frac{1}{{I\,\,.\,J}}{x^2}_{..;}} \)

\(SSE = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {{{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {\left( {{x_{ij}} - \overline {{x_{i.}}} } \right)} }^2}} .\)

The mean squares are

\(\begin{aligned}{l}MSTr = \frac{1}{{I - 1}}.SSTr;\\MSE = \frac{1}{{I.\left( {J - 1} \right)}}.SSE.\end{aligned}\)

F is ratio of the two mean

\(F = \frac{{MSTr}}{{MSE}}.\)

Compute all value:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}I = 3;\\J = 5;\\\overline {{X_{1.}}} = 10;\\\overline {{X_{2.}}} = 15;\\\overline {{X_{3.}}} = 20.\end{aligned}\)

The degree f freedom of the F Statistic is tested using single Factor ANOVA are

\(\begin{aligned}{l}I - 1 = 2\\I(J - 1) = 12\end{aligned}\)

First compute SSTr

\(\begin{aligned}{l}SSTr = \frac{1}{J}.\sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {{x^2}_{i.} - \frac{1}{{I\,\,.\,J}}{x^2}..} \\ = \frac{1}{J}\left( {{x_{1.}}^2 + {x_{2.}}^2 + {x_{3.}}^2} \right) + \frac{1}{{I\,\,.\,J}}{x^2}..\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{l} = \frac{1}{J} + \left( {{J^2}.{x_{1.}}^2 + {J^2}.{x_{2.}}^2 + {J^2}.{x_{3.}}^2} \right) + \frac{1}{{I\,\,.\,J}}{\left( {{x_{1.}} + {x_{2.}} + {x_{3.}}} \right)^2}\\ = \frac{1}{5} + \left( {{5^2}{{.10}^2} + {5^2}{{.12}^2} + {5^2}{{.20}^2}} \right) + \frac{1}{{3\,.\,5}}\left( {5.10 + 5.15 + 5.20} \right)\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{l} = \frac{1}{5}\left( {2500 + 5625 + 10,000} \right) - 3375\\ = 250\end{aligned}\)

02

Apply the Conditions

Now, the MSTr is

\(MSTr = \frac{1}{{I - 1}}.SSTr = \frac{1}{2}.250 = 125.\)

The f value is

\(f = \frac{{MSTr}}{{MSE}} = \frac{{125}}{{SSE/12}} = \frac{{1500}}{{SSE}}\)

First condition is

\(f > {F_{0.05,2,12}}\)

Where \({F_{0.05,2,12}} = 3.89\)which can be obtained using the table in the appendix; thus

\(\frac{{1500}}{{SSE}} > 3.89\)

or equally

\(SSE < 385.6\)

However, be careful, this is not the only condition! Remember the following:

The T Method for Identifying Significantly Different 渭i 鈥檚

Find value \({Q_{\alpha .I,I(J - 1)}}\)at the Table A.10. in the appendix of the book for given 伪 .

Compute and a list the sample means in increasing order. Calculate

\(w = {Q_{\alpha ,}}I,{I_{\left( {j - 1} \right)}}.\sqrt {\frac{{MSE}}{J}} \)

And underline pairs of the sample means that differ by less than . The pair of sample which are not underscored by the same line corresponding of population or treatment means that they are significantly different.

From this, another condition can be obtain so when the Turkey's procedure is applied none of the averages are statistically different from one another. From the table

\({Q_{0.05,3,12}} = 3.77\)

hence, another condition for SSE can be obtained from

\(\begin{aligned}{l}w = {Q_{\alpha ,I,I\left( {J - 1} \right)}}.\sqrt {\frac{{MSE}}{J}} \\ = 3.77.\,\sqrt {\frac{{SSE/\left( {12} \right)}}{5}} \\ = 3.77.\,\sqrt {\frac{{SSE}}{{60}}} \\ = 0.4867.\sqrt {SSE.} \end{aligned}\)

It is required that all mean differences are smaller than W it is enough to take maximum value of the mean differences and make it bigger than that value. The maximum difference is

\({\overline x _{3.\,\,\,\,}} - {\overline x _{1.\,\,\,}} = 20 - 10 = 10\)

Therefore, the second condition is

\(w > 10\)

or equally

\(0.4867.\sqrt {SSE} > 10\)

or finally

\(SSE > 422.16\)

The answer can be any real number SSE which satisfies the following

\(422.16 < SSE < 385.6.\)

Hence,

\(422.16 < SSE < 385.6.\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A study of the properties of mental plate 鈥揷onnected trusses used for roof support (鈥淢odeling joints made with Light-Gauge metal connector plates,鈥 Forest products J., 1979:39-44) yielded the following observations on axial-stiffness index(kips/in.) for plate lengths \(4,6,8.10,12\)in:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}4:309.2\\6:402.1\\8:392.4\\10:346.7\\12:407.4\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}409.5\\347.2\\366.2\\452.9\\441.8\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}311.0\\361.0\\351.0\\461.4\\419.9\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}326.5\\404.5\\357.1\\433.1\\410.7\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}316.8\\331.0\\409.9\\410.6\\473.4\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}349.8\\348.9\\367.3\\384.2\\441.2\end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}309.7\\381.7\\382.0\\362.6\\465.8\end{aligned}\)

Does variation in plate length have any effect on true average axial stiffness? state and test the relevant hypotheses using analysis of variance with Display your results in an ANOVA table.(Hint : \({\sum x ^2}_{ij.} = 5,241,420.79.)\)

The following data refers to yield of tomatoes (kg/plot) for four different levels of salinity. Salinity level here refers to electrical conductivity (EC), where the chosen levels were EC = 1.6, 3.8, 6.0, and 10.2 nmhos/cm.

Use the F test at level\(\alpha \)=.05 to test for any differences in true average yield due to the different salinity levels.

When sample sizes are equal\(\left( {{J_i} = J} \right)\), the parameters\({\alpha _1},{\alpha _2},...{\alpha _I}\,\)of the alternative parameterization are restricted by\(\Sigma {\alpha _i} = 0\). For unequal sample sizes, the most natural restriction is\(\Sigma {J_i}{\alpha _i} = 0\). Use this to show that

\(E\left( {MSTr} \right) = {\alpha ^2} + \frac{1}{{I - 1}}\Sigma {J_i}\alpha _i^2\)

What is\(E\left( {MSTr} \right)\)when\({H_0}\)is true? (This expectation is correct if\(\Sigma {J_i}{\alpha _i} = 0\,\)is replaced by the restriction\(\Sigma {\alpha _i} = 0\)(or any other single linear restriction on the ai 鈥檚 used to reduce the model to I independent parameters), but\(\Sigma {J_i}{\alpha _i} = 0\)simplifies the algebra and yields natural estimates for the model parameters (in particular,\({\mathop {\,\,\,\,\alpha }\limits^{\,\,\,\,\,\^} _i} = {\mathop X\limits^\_ _i}\, - \,\mathop X\limits^\_ ..\,\,\,\,{H_0}\)).)

it is common practice in many countries to destroy (shred)refrigerators at the end of their usefull lives.In this process material from insulating foam may be released into the atmosphere.The article 鈥淩elease of fluorocarbons from Insulation foam in Home Appliances During shredding鈥(J.of the Air and waste Mgmt.Assoc.,2007:1452-1460)gave the following data on foam density(g/L)For each of two refrigerators produced by four different manufactures:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}1.30.4,\,29.2\,\,\,\,\,2.27.7,27.1\\3.27.1,24.8\,\,\,\,\,\,4.25.5,28.8\end{aligned}\)

Does it appear that true average foam density is not the same for all these manufacture?carry out an appropriate test of hypotheses by obtaining as much p-value information as possible,and summarize your analysis in an ANOVA table.

Refer to Exercise 38. What is b for the test when true average DNA content is identical for three of the diets and falls below this common value by 1 standard deviation (s) for the other two diets?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.