/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q9E Six samples of each of four type... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Six samples of each of four types of cereal grain grown in a certain region were analyzed to determine thiamin content, resulting in the following data \((\mu g/g):\)

Wheat \(5.2\) \(4.5\) \(6.0\) \(6.1\) \(6.7\) \(5.8\)

Barley \(6.5\) \(8.0\) \(6.1\) \(7.5\) \(5.9\) \(5.6\)

Maize \(5.8\) \(4.7\) \(6.4\) \(4.9\) \(6.0\) \(5.2\)

Oats \(8.3\) \(6.1\) \(7.8\) \(7.0\) \(5.5\) \(7.2\)

Does this data suggest that at least two of the grains differ with respect to true average thiamin content? Use a level \(\alpha = .05\)

Short Answer

Expert verified

Six samples of each of four types of cereal grain grown in a certain region.

This table summarizes everything needed to carry out F teat. Here is explanation How to obtain those values.

\(I = 4\) Column-treatments

And

\(J = 6\)Row,

Reject null hypothesis at any reasonable significance level.

Step by step solution

01

definition of hypotheses

Hypotheses are typically written in the form of if/then statements, such as if someone consumes a lot of sugar, they will develop cavities in their teeth.

Given,

The data is given table.

Sample No

Wheat

Barley

Maize

oats

\(1\)

\(5.2\)

\(6.5\)

\(5.8\)

\(8.3\)

\(2\,\)

\(4.5\)

\(8\)

\(4.7\)

\(6.1\)

\(3\)

\(6\)

\(6.1\)

\(6.4\)

\(7.8\)

\(4\,\)

\(6.1\)

\(7.5\)

\(4.9\)

\(7\)

\(5\)

\(6.7\)

\(5.9\)

\(6\)

\(5.5\)

\(6\)

\(5.8\)

\(5.6\)

\(5.2\)

\(7.2\)

\({x_{i.}}\)

\(34.3\)

\(39.6\)

\(33\)

\(41.9\)

\(\overline {{x_{i.}}} \)

\(5.72\)

\(6.60\)

\(5.50\)

\(6.98\)

\(\overline {{x_{..}}} = 6.2\) \({x_{..}} = 148.8\)

This table summarizes everything needed to carry out F teat. Here is explanation How to obtain those values.

\(I = 4\) Column-treatments

And

\(J = 6\)Row,

The following table needs to be filled with corresponding values:

Source of variation

Df

Sum of squares

Mean squre

F

Treatments

\(I - 1\)

\(SSTr\)

MSTr

MSTr/MSE

Error

\(I.\left( {J - 1} \right)\)

\(SSE\)

MSE

Total

\(I\,\,.\,J - 1\)

\(SST\)

The degrees of freedom are

\(\begin{aligned}{l}I - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3\\I.\left( {J - 1} \right)4.\left( {6.1} \right) = 36\\I\,\,.\,J - 1 = 4.6 - 1 = 23\end{aligned}\)

Denote with

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{x_{i.}}\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij.}}} \\{x_{..}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^J {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij.}}} } \end{aligned}\)

The total sum of squares

\(\left( {SST} \right),\)

And treatment sum of squares

\(\left( {SSTr} \right)\),

And Error sum of squares

\({\rm{ }}\left( {SSE} \right)\)are given by

\(SST = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {{x_{ij}} - \overline x ..} \right)}^2}} = } \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x^2}_{ij} - \frac{1}{{I\,\,.\,J}}} {x^2}_{..;}} \)

\(SSTr = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {\overline {{x_{i.}}} - \overline x ..} \right)}^2}} = \frac{1}{J}.} \sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x^2}_{i.} - \frac{1}{{I\,\,.\,J}}{x^2}_{..;}} \)

\(SSE = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {{{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {\left( {{x_{ij}} - \overline {{x_{i.}}} } \right)} }^2}} .\)

The mean squares are

\(\begin{aligned}{l}MSTr = \frac{1}{{I - 1}}.SSTr;\\MSE = \frac{1}{{I.\left( {J - 1} \right)}}.SSE.\end{aligned}\)

F is ratio of the two mean

\(F = \frac{{MSTr}}{{MSE}}.\)

Compute all value:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{X_{1.}} = 5.2 + 4.5 + ... + 5.8 = 34.3\\{X_{2.}} = 6.5 + 8 + ... + 5.6 = 39.6\\{X_{3.}} = 5.8 + 4.7 + ... + 5.2 = 33\\{X_{4.}} = 8.3 + 6.1 + ... + 7.2 = 41.9\end{aligned}\)

Values of

\(\overline {{x_{i.}}} = \frac{1}{J}.{x_{i.}}\)

Are given by

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\overline {{x_{1.}}} = \frac{1}{6}.34.3 = 5.72\\\overline {{x_{2.}}} = \frac{1}{6}.39.6 = 6.06\\\overline {{x_{3.}}} = \frac{1}{6}.33 = 5.50\\\overline {{x_{4.}}} = \frac{1}{6}.41.9 = 6.98\end{aligned}\)

The grand mean is

\(\overline {x..} = \frac{1}{{I\,\,.\,\,J}}.x.. = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij}}} = \frac{1}{{4.6}}.\left( {5.2 + 6.5 + ... + 5.2 + 7.2} \right)} \)

And

\(x.. = \sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x_{ij}} = } \left( {5.2 + 6.5 + ... + 5.2 + 7.2} \right)\)\( = 148.8\)

Total sum square

\(SST = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {\overline {{x_{ij}}} . - \overline {x..} } \right)}^2}} = } \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{x^2}_{ij}} } - \frac{1}{{I\,\,.\,J}}{x^2}..\)

\(\begin{aligned}{l} = \left( {{{5.2}^2} + {{6.5}^2} + ... + {{5.2}^2} + {{7.2}^2}} \right) - \frac{1}{{4\,.\,6}}{.148.8^2}\\ = 946.68 - 922.56\\ = 24.12\end{aligned}\)

02

The treatment sum of square

The treatment sum of square is

\(SSTr = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^J {{{\left( {\overline {{x_i}} . - \overline {x..} } \right)}^2}} = \frac{1}{J}.} {\rm{ }}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {{x_{i.}}^2 - \frac{1}{{I - J}}{x^2}..} \)

\(\begin{aligned}{l} = \frac{1}{6}.\left( {{{34.3}^2} + {{39.6}^2} + {{33}^2} + {{41.9}^2}} \right) - \frac{1}{{4.\,6}}{.148.8^2}\\ = 931.54 - 922.56\\ = 8.98\end{aligned}\)

Fundamental Identify

SST = SSTr + SSE.

Error sum of squares is

\(SSE = SST - SSTr = 24.12 - 8.98 = 15.14\)

The mean computed

\(\begin{aligned}{l}MSTr = \frac{1}{{I - 1}}.SSTr = \frac{1}{3}.8.98 = 2.99\\MSE = \frac{1}{{I\,.\left( {J - 1} \right)}}.SSE = \frac{1}{{4.\left( {6 - 1} \right)}}.15.14 = 0.757\end{aligned}\)

The value of F statistic is

\(f = \frac{{MSTr}}{{MSE}} = \frac{{2.99}}{{0.757}} = 3.95\)

ANOVA table now

Source of variation

Df

Sum of squares

Mean sqaure

F

Treatments

\(3\)

\(8.98\)

\(2.99\)

\(3.95\)

Error

\(20\)

\(15.14\)

\(0.757\)

Total

\(\,23\)

\(24.12\)

As for usual tests, you can either make conclusion about the hypotheses look at the F critical value or a p value. Remember that the hypotheses of interest are

\({H_0}\,:\,{\mu _i} = {\mu _j},i \ne j\,\)

versus alternative hypothesis

\({H_a}:\)at least two of the are different

The p value is the area to the right of f value under the F curve where F has Fisher's distribution with degrees of freedom \(4\) and \(30\) ; thus

\(P = P\left( {F > f} \right) = P\left( {33.95} \right) = 0.023\)

which was computed using software

\({\rm{P = 0}}{\rm{.023 < 0}}{\rm{.05 = }}\alpha \)

Reject null hypothesis at given significance level. There is no statistically significance difference in true averages among the four types of iron formation.

Using the table, you could use e.g. \({F_{0,05,3,20}}\,\)value for which the area under the curve to the right \({F_{0,05,3,20}}\,\,is\,0.05\)of. The value is

\({F_{0,05,3,30}} = 3.1 < 3.95 = f\)

And value \({F_{0,05,3,20}}\) for which the area under the F curve to the right

\({F_{0,05,3,20}} = 4.94 < 3.95 = f\)

Following holds

The p value is between \(0.01\)and\(0.05\)which indicates to reject null hypothesis

Significance level\(0.05\)

Hence,

Reject null hypothesis at any reasonable significance level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Cortisol is a hormone that plays an important role in mediating stress. There is growing awareness that exposure of outdoor workers to pollutants may impact cortisol levels. The article 鈥淧lasma Cortisol Concentration and Lifestyle in a Population of Outdoor Workers鈥 (Intl. J. of Envir. Health Res., 2011: 62鈥71) reported on a study involving three groups of police officers: (1) traffic police (TP), (2) drivers (D), and (3) other duties (O). Here is summary data on cortisol concentration (ng/ml) for a subset of the officers who neither drank nor smoked.

Group

Sample Size

Mean

SD

TP

47

174.7

50.9

D

36

160.2

3702

O

50

153.5

45.9

Assuming that the standard assumptions for one-way ANOVA are satisfied, carry out a test at significance level .05 to decide whether true average cortisol concentration is different for the three groups. (Note: The investigators used more sophisticated statistical methodology (multiple regression) to assess the impact of age, length of employment, and drinking and smoking status on cortisol concentration; taking these factors into account, concentration appeared to be significantly higher in the TP group than in the other two groups.)

In Exercise \(11\) suppose \({\overline x _{3.}} = 427.5.\) now which true average spreading rates differ significantly from one another? Be sure to use the method of underscoring to illustrate your conclusion, and write a paragraph summarizing your results.

Let \({c_1},{c_2},...{c_l}\) be numbers satisfying \(\sum {{c_i} = 0} \). Then \(\sum {{c_i}{\mu _i} = {c_1}{\mu _1} + .. + {c_l}{\mu _l}} \) is called a contrast in the \({\mu _i}'s\). Notice that with \({c_1} = 1,{c_2} = - 1,{c_3} = ... = {c_1} = 0,\sum {{c_{i{\mu _i}}} = {\mu _1} - {\mu _2}} \)which implies that every pairwise difference between \({\mu _i}'s\)is a contrast. A method attributed to Scheffe鈥檚 gives simultaneous CI鈥檚 with simultaneous confidence level \(100\left( {1 - \alpha } \right)\% \) for all possible contrast. The interval for \(\sum {{c_i}{\mu _i}} \)is

\({\sum {{c_i}{{\overline x }_{i.}} \pm \left( {\sum {{\raise0.7ex\hbox{\({{c_i}^2}\)} \!\mathord{\left/

{\vphantom {{{c_i}^2} {{J_i}}}}\right.\kern-\nulldelimiterspace}

\!\lower0.7ex\hbox{\({{J_i}}\)}}} } \right)} ^{{\raise0.7ex\hbox{\(1\)} \!\mathord{\left/

{\vphantom {1 2}}\right.\kern-\nulldelimiterspace}

\!\lower0.7ex\hbox{\(2\)}}}} \times {\left( {\left( {I - 1} \right) \times MSE \times {F_{\alpha ,I - 1,n - I}}} \right)^{{\raise0.7ex\hbox{\(1\)} \!\mathord{\left/

{\vphantom {1 2}}\right.\kern-\nulldelimiterspace}

\!\lower0.7ex\hbox{\(2\)}}}}\)

Using the critical flicker frequency data of Exercise \(42\), calculate the Scheffe interval for the contrast \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2},{\mu _1} - {\mu _3},{\mu _2} - {\mu _3}and5{\mu _1} + 5{\mu _2} - {\mu _3}\). Which contrast appear to differ significantly from \(0\), and why?

An experiment to compare the spreading rates of five brands of yellow interior latex paint available in a particular area used \(4\)gallons \(\left( {J = 4} \right)\)of each paint. The sample average spreading rates \(\left( {f{t^2}/gal} \right)\) for the five brands were \(\,{\overline x _{1.}} = 462.3,\,{\overline x _{2.}} = 512.8,\,{\overline x _{3.}} = 437.5,\,{\overline x _{4.}} = 469.3\,and\,\,{\overline x _{5.}} = 532.1\,\) the computed value of F was found to be significant at level \(\alpha = .05.\) with MSE= \(272.8\)use Tukey鈥檚 procedure to investigate significant differences in the true average spreading rates between brands.

The lumen output was determined for each of \(I = 3\)different brands of light bulbs having the same wattage, with \(J = 8\) bulbs of each brand tested. The sums of squares were computed as \(SSE = 4773.3\,and\,SS{T_r} = 591.2.\)state hypothese of intrest (including word definitions of parameters),and use the F test of ANOVA \(\left( {\alpha = .05} \right)\)to decide whether there are any differences in true average lumen outputs among the three brands for this type of bulb by obtaining as much information as possible about the p-values.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.