/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q11E An experiment to compare the spr... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

An experiment to compare the spreading rates of five brands of yellow interior latex paint available in a particular area used \(4\)gallons \(\left( {J = 4} \right)\)of each paint. The sample average spreading rates \(\left( {f{t^2}/gal} \right)\) for the five brands were \(\,{\overline x _{1.}} = 462.3,\,{\overline x _{2.}} = 512.8,\,{\overline x _{3.}} = 437.5,\,{\overline x _{4.}} = 469.3\,and\,\,{\overline x _{5.}} = 532.1\,\) the computed value of F was found to be significant at level \(\alpha = .05.\) with MSE= \(272.8\)use Tukey鈥檚 procedure to investigate significant differences in the true average spreading rates between brands.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Tukey鈥 s procedure to investigate significant differences in the true average spreading rates between brands.

The T Method for Identifying Significantly Different 渭i 鈥檚

Find value \({Q_{\alpha ,}}{I_{\left( {j - 1} \right)}}\)at the Table A.10. in the appendix of the book for given \(\alpha \).

Compute and list the sample means in increasing order. Calculate

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,{\overline x _{3.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{1.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{4.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\\\underline {\,\,\,437.5\,\,\,\,\,\,\,462\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,469.3\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}\,{\overline x _{2.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{5.}}\\\underline {515.8\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,532.1\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)

Step by step solution

01

definition of mean

Two are more numbers of mathematical average called mean.

The T Method for Identifying Significantly Different 渭i 鈥檚

Find value \({Q_{\alpha ,}}{I_{\left( {j - 1} \right)}}\)at the Table A.10. in the appendix of the book for given \(\alpha \).

Compute and list the sample means in increasing order. Calculate

\(w = {Q_{\alpha ,}}{I_{\left( {j - 1} \right)}}.\sqrt {\frac{{MSE}}{J}} \)

and underline pairs of the sample means that differ by less than W . The pair of sample which are not underscored by the same line corresponding of population or treatment means that they are significantly different. From the mentioned table, and\(\alpha = 0.05\)

\({Q_{\alpha ,}}{I_{\left( {j - 1} \right)}} = {Q_{0.5,5,15,}}\)\( = 4.37\)

The value of

\(MSE = 278.8\)

Compute the w value as

\(w = {Q_{\alpha ,}}{I_{\left( {j - 1} \right)}}.\sqrt {\frac{{MSE}}{J}} = 4.37..\sqrt {\frac{{272.8}}{4}} = 36.09\)

First order the sample means

\({\overline x _{3.}} < {\overline x _{1.}}\,\,\, < {\overline x _{4.}}\,\, < {\overline x _{2.}} < {\overline x _{5.}}\)

The following table

Brand, i

Sample mean

\({\overline x _{i.}} - {\overline x _{3.}}\)

\({\overline x _{i.}} - {\overline x _{1.}}\)

\({\overline x _{i.}} - {\overline x _{4.}}\)

\({\overline x _{i.}} - {\overline x _{2.}}\)

\(3\)

\(437.5\)

\(1\)

\(462\)

\(24.5\)

\(4\)

\(469.3\)

\(31.8\)

\(7.3\)

\(2\)

\(515.8\)

\(78.3\)

\(53.8\)

\(46.5\)

\(5\)

\(532.1\)

\(94.6\)

\(70.1\)

\(62.8\)

\(16.3\)

The bold values are smaller than w

Start with mean third sample

\({\overline x _{1.}} - {\overline x _{3.}} = 462 - 437.5 = 24.5 < w = 36.09,\)

Indicated that pair \(\left( {3,1} \right)\)underline as pair:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{3.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{1.}}\\\underline {\,\,\,437.5\,\,\,\,\,\,\,462\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,} \,\end{aligned}\)

Do the same for all pairs

\({\overline x _{4.}} - {\overline x _{3.}} = \,469 - 437.5 = 31.8 < w = 36.09\)

So the pair \(\left( {4,3} \right)\) underline as a pair:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,{\overline x _{3.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{4.}}\\\underline {\,\,\,437.5\,\,\,\,\,\,\,469.3\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)

Next pair

\({\overline x _{2.}} - {\overline x _{3.}} = 515.8 - 469.3 = 78.3 > w = 36.09\)

02

each step underline

So the pair (3,2)should not underline together.

Look at the first difference

\({\overline x _{1.}} - {\overline x _{3.}} = 469.3 - 462 = 7.3 < w = 36.09\)

So the pair \(\left( {1,4} \right)\) underline together:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,{\overline x _{1.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{4.}}\\\underline {\,\,\,462\,\,\,\,\,\,\,469.3\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)

Three pair where each pair is underline with another The group is:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,{\overline x _{3.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{1.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{4.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\\\underline {\,\,\,437.5\,\,\,\,\,\,\,462\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,469.3\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)

The next pair is\(\left( {1,2} \right)\)

\({\overline x _{2.}} - {\overline x _{1.}} = 515.8 - 462 = 53.8 > w = 36.09\)

So the pair \(\left( {1,2} \right)\)should not underlined together.

\({\overline x _{2.}} - {\overline x _{4.}} = 515.8 - 469.3 = 46.5 > w = 36.09\)

So the pair \(\left( {4,2} \right)\)should not underlined together.

\({\overline x _{5.}} - {\overline x _{2.}} = 532.1 - 515.8 = 16.3 > w = 36.09\)

So the pair \(\left( {2,5} \right)\)should underlined together.

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,{\overline x _{2.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{5.}}\\\underline {\,515.8\,\,\,\,\,\,\,532.1\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)

Basically two group have formed one group 1,3,4 and the other group 5:

The conclusion is that there are no significant differences within groups, between the group there is a significant difference in the brand.

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,{\overline x _{3.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{1.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{4.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\\\underline {\,\,\,437.5\,\,\,\,\,\,\,462\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,469.3\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,{\overline x _{2.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{5.}}\\\underline {515.8\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,532.1\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)

Hence,

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,{\overline x _{3.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{1.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{4.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\\\underline {\,\,\,437.5\,\,\,\,\,\,\,462\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,469.3\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}\,{\overline x _{2.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{5.}}\\\underline {515.8\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,532.1\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In an experiment to compare the tensile strengths of different type of\({\bf{I = 5}}\) copper wire, \({\bf{J = 4}}\) samples of each type were used. The between-samples and within- sample estimates of \({{\bf{\sigma }}^{\bf{2}}}\) were computed as \({\bf{MS}}{{\bf{T}}_{\bf{r}}}{\bf{ = 2673}}{\bf{.3}}\) and respectively. Use the F test at level. to test \({{\bf{H}}_{\bf{0}}}\,{\bf{:}}\,\,{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{ = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{2}}}{\bf{ = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{3}}}{\bf{ = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{4}}}{\bf{ = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{5}}}\)versus \({{\bf{H}}_{\bf{a}}}{\bf{:}}\)at least two \({{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{i}}}{\bf{'s}}\) are unequal.

it is common practice in many countries to destroy (shred)refrigerators at the end of their usefull lives.In this process material from insulating foam may be released into the atmosphere.The article 鈥淩elease of fluorocarbons from Insulation foam in Home Appliances During shredding鈥(J.of the Air and waste Mgmt.Assoc.,2007:1452-1460)gave the following data on foam density(g/L)For each of two refrigerators produced by four different manufactures:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}1.30.4,\,29.2\,\,\,\,\,2.27.7,27.1\\3.27.1,24.8\,\,\,\,\,\,4.25.5,28.8\end{aligned}\)

Does it appear that true average foam density is not the same for all these manufacture?carry out an appropriate test of hypotheses by obtaining as much p-value information as possible,and summarize your analysis in an ANOVA table.

Repeat Exercise supposing that \(\,\,{\overline x _{2.}} = 502.8\)in addition to\(\,\,{\overline x _{3.}} = 427.5.\)

consider the following summary data on the modulus of elasticity\(\left( {x\,\,{{10}^{6\,}}psi} \right)\)for lumber of three different grades (in close agreement with values in the article 鈥淏ending strength stiffness of second-Growth Douglas-fir Dimension Lumber鈥 (Forest products J., 1991:35-43), except that the sample size there were larger):

Use this data and a significance level of to test the null hypothesis of no difference in mean modulus of elasticity for the three grades.

Simplify E(MSTr) for the random effects model when\({J_1} = {J_2} = \ldots = {J_I} = J.\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.