/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q11E An experiment to compare the spr... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

An experiment to compare the spreading rates of five brands of yellow interior latex paint available in a particular area used \(4\)gallons \(\left( {J = 4} \right)\)of each paint. The sample average spreading rates \(\left( {f{t^2}/gal} \right)\) for the five brands were \(\,{\overline x _{1.}} = 462.3,\,{\overline x _{2.}} = 512.8,\,{\overline x _{3.}} = 437.5,\,{\overline x _{4.}} = 469.3\,and\,\,{\overline x _{5.}} = 532.1\,\) the computed value of F was found to be significant at level \(\alpha = .05.\) with MSE= \(272.8\)use Tukey鈥檚 procedure to investigate significant differences in the true average spreading rates between brands.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Tukey鈥 s procedure to investigate significant differences in the true average spreading rates between brands.

The T Method for Identifying Significantly Different 渭i 鈥檚

Find value \({Q_{\alpha ,}}{I_{\left( {j - 1} \right)}}\)at the Table A.10. in the appendix of the book for given \(\alpha \).

Compute and list the sample means in increasing order. Calculate

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,{\overline x _{3.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{1.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{4.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\\\underline {\,\,\,437.5\,\,\,\,\,\,\,462\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,469.3\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}\,{\overline x _{2.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{5.}}\\\underline {515.8\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,532.1\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)

Step by step solution

01

definition of mean

Two are more numbers of mathematical average called mean.

The T Method for Identifying Significantly Different 渭i 鈥檚

Find value \({Q_{\alpha ,}}{I_{\left( {j - 1} \right)}}\)at the Table A.10. in the appendix of the book for given \(\alpha \).

Compute and list the sample means in increasing order. Calculate

\(w = {Q_{\alpha ,}}{I_{\left( {j - 1} \right)}}.\sqrt {\frac{{MSE}}{J}} \)

and underline pairs of the sample means that differ by less than W . The pair of sample which are not underscored by the same line corresponding of population or treatment means that they are significantly different. From the mentioned table, and\(\alpha = 0.05\)

\({Q_{\alpha ,}}{I_{\left( {j - 1} \right)}} = {Q_{0.5,5,15,}}\)\( = 4.37\)

The value of

\(MSE = 278.8\)

Compute the w value as

\(w = {Q_{\alpha ,}}{I_{\left( {j - 1} \right)}}.\sqrt {\frac{{MSE}}{J}} = 4.37..\sqrt {\frac{{272.8}}{4}} = 36.09\)

First order the sample means

\({\overline x _{3.}} < {\overline x _{1.}}\,\,\, < {\overline x _{4.}}\,\, < {\overline x _{2.}} < {\overline x _{5.}}\)

The following table

Brand, i

Sample mean

\({\overline x _{i.}} - {\overline x _{3.}}\)

\({\overline x _{i.}} - {\overline x _{1.}}\)

\({\overline x _{i.}} - {\overline x _{4.}}\)

\({\overline x _{i.}} - {\overline x _{2.}}\)

\(3\)

\(437.5\)

\(1\)

\(462\)

\(24.5\)

\(4\)

\(469.3\)

\(31.8\)

\(7.3\)

\(2\)

\(515.8\)

\(78.3\)

\(53.8\)

\(46.5\)

\(5\)

\(532.1\)

\(94.6\)

\(70.1\)

\(62.8\)

\(16.3\)

The bold values are smaller than w

Start with mean third sample

\({\overline x _{1.}} - {\overline x _{3.}} = 462 - 437.5 = 24.5 < w = 36.09,\)

Indicated that pair \(\left( {3,1} \right)\)underline as pair:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{3.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{1.}}\\\underline {\,\,\,437.5\,\,\,\,\,\,\,462\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,} \,\end{aligned}\)

Do the same for all pairs

\({\overline x _{4.}} - {\overline x _{3.}} = \,469 - 437.5 = 31.8 < w = 36.09\)

So the pair \(\left( {4,3} \right)\) underline as a pair:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,{\overline x _{3.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{4.}}\\\underline {\,\,\,437.5\,\,\,\,\,\,\,469.3\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)

Next pair

\({\overline x _{2.}} - {\overline x _{3.}} = 515.8 - 469.3 = 78.3 > w = 36.09\)

02

each step underline

So the pair (3,2)should not underline together.

Look at the first difference

\({\overline x _{1.}} - {\overline x _{3.}} = 469.3 - 462 = 7.3 < w = 36.09\)

So the pair \(\left( {1,4} \right)\) underline together:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,{\overline x _{1.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{4.}}\\\underline {\,\,\,462\,\,\,\,\,\,\,469.3\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)

Three pair where each pair is underline with another The group is:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,{\overline x _{3.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{1.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{4.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\\\underline {\,\,\,437.5\,\,\,\,\,\,\,462\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,469.3\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)

The next pair is\(\left( {1,2} \right)\)

\({\overline x _{2.}} - {\overline x _{1.}} = 515.8 - 462 = 53.8 > w = 36.09\)

So the pair \(\left( {1,2} \right)\)should not underlined together.

\({\overline x _{2.}} - {\overline x _{4.}} = 515.8 - 469.3 = 46.5 > w = 36.09\)

So the pair \(\left( {4,2} \right)\)should not underlined together.

\({\overline x _{5.}} - {\overline x _{2.}} = 532.1 - 515.8 = 16.3 > w = 36.09\)

So the pair \(\left( {2,5} \right)\)should underlined together.

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,{\overline x _{2.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{5.}}\\\underline {\,515.8\,\,\,\,\,\,\,532.1\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)

Basically two group have formed one group 1,3,4 and the other group 5:

The conclusion is that there are no significant differences within groups, between the group there is a significant difference in the brand.

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,{\overline x _{3.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{1.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{4.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\\\underline {\,\,\,437.5\,\,\,\,\,\,\,462\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,469.3\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,{\overline x _{2.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{5.}}\\\underline {515.8\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,532.1\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)

Hence,

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\,\,{\overline x _{3.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{1.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{4.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\\\underline {\,\,\,437.5\,\,\,\,\,\,\,462\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,469.3\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\) \(\begin{aligned}{l}\,{\overline x _{2.}}\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\overline x _{5.}}\\\underline {515.8\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,532.1\,\,\,\,\,\,} \end{aligned}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose the compression strength observation on the fourth type of box in Example \(10.1\)had been \(655.1,\,748.7,\,662.4,\,679.0,\,706.9,\,and\,640.0\) and (obtained by adding \(120\) to each previous \({x_{4j}}\)). Assuming no change in the remaining observations, carry out an F test with \(\alpha = 0.5.\)

Cortisol is a hormone that plays an important role in mediating stress. There is growing awareness that exposure of outdoor workers to pollutants may impact cortisol levels. The article 鈥淧lasma Cortisol Concentration and Lifestyle in a Population of Outdoor Workers鈥 (Intl. J. of Envir. Health Res., 2011: 62鈥71) reported on a study involving three groups of police officers: (1) traffic police (TP), (2) drivers (D), and (3) other duties (O). Here is summary data on cortisol concentration (ng/ml) for a subset of the officers who neither drank nor smoked.

Group

Sample Size

Mean

SD

TP

47

174.7

50.9

D

36

160.2

3702

O

50

153.5

45.9

Assuming that the standard assumptions for one-way ANOVA are satisfied, carry out a test at significance level .05 to decide whether true average cortisol concentration is different for the three groups. (Note: The investigators used more sophisticated statistical methodology (multiple regression) to assess the impact of age, length of employment, and drinking and smoking status on cortisol concentration; taking these factors into account, concentration appeared to be significantly higher in the TP group than in the other two groups.)

In an experiment to compare the tensile strengths of different type of\({\bf{I = 5}}\) copper wire, \({\bf{J = 4}}\) samples of each type were used. The between-samples and within- sample estimates of \({{\bf{\sigma }}^{\bf{2}}}\) were computed as \({\bf{MS}}{{\bf{T}}_{\bf{r}}}{\bf{ = 2673}}{\bf{.3}}\) and respectively. Use the F test at level. to test \({{\bf{H}}_{\bf{0}}}\,{\bf{:}}\,\,{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{1}}}{\bf{ = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{2}}}{\bf{ = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{3}}}{\bf{ = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{4}}}{\bf{ = }}{{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{5}}}\)versus \({{\bf{H}}_{\bf{a}}}{\bf{:}}\)at least two \({{\bf{\mu }}_{\bf{i}}}{\bf{'s}}\) are unequal.

In Exercise \(11\) suppose \({\overline x _{3.}} = 427.5.\) now which true average spreading rates differ significantly from one another? Be sure to use the method of underscoring to illustrate your conclusion, and write a paragraph summarizing your results.

An experiment was carried out to compare electrical resitivity for six different low-permeability concrete bridge deck mixtures. There were \(26\)measurements on concrete cylinders for each mixture; these were obtained days \(28\)after casting.The entries in the accompanying ANOVA table are based on information in the article 鈥淚n-place Resitivity of Bridge Deck Concrete Mixtures鈥(ACI Matrerials j.,2009: 114-122).Fill in the remaining entries and test appropriate hypothese.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.