/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q29SE High-pressure sales tactics or d... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

High-pressure sales tactics or door-to-door salespeople can be quite offensive. Many people succumb to such tactics, sign a purchase agreement, and later regret their actions. In the mid-1970s, the Federal Trade Commission implemented regulations clarifying and extending the rights of purchasers to cancel such agreements. The accompanying data is a subset of that given in the article 鈥淓valuating the FTC Cooling-Off Rule鈥 (J. of Consumer Affairs, 1977: 101鈥106). Individual observations are cancellation rates for each of nine sales people during each of 4 years. Use an appropriate test at level .05 to see whether true average cancellation rate depends on the year.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Reject null hypothesis

Step by step solution

01

Friedman’s test:

The Friedman鈥檚 test for rendomized block experiment

Test for teststatistic is

\(\begin{array}{l}{F_r} = \frac{{12J}}{{I\left( {I + 1} \right)}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {{{\left( {{{\bar R}_i} - \frac{{I + 1}}{2}} \right)}^2}} \\ = \frac{{12J}}{{IJ\left( {I + 1} \right)}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\bar R_i^2 - 3J} \left( {I + 1} \right)\end{array}\)

When the null hypothesis is true test statistic \({F_r}\), has approximately chi-squared distribution with I-1 degrees of freedom.

02

solving further:

Two table goes together- point\({x_{ij}}\)in the first table corresponds to the\({r_{ij}}\)rank in the second table.

I

Blocks

1973

2.8

5.9

3.3

4.4

1.7

3.8

6.6

3.1

0

1974

3.6

1.7

5.1

2.2

2.1

4.1

4.7

2.7

1.3

1975

1.4

0.9

1.1

3.2

0.8

1.5

2.8

1.4

0.5

1976

2

2.2

0.9

1.1

0.5

1.2

1.4

3.5

1.2

I

Ranks

\({r_i}\)

\(r_i^2\)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1973

3

4

3

4

3

3

4

3

1

28

784

1974

4

2

4

2

4

4

3

2

4

29

841

1975

1

1

2

3

2

2

2

1

2

16

256

1976

2

3

1

1

1

1

1

4

3

17

289

03

testing static value:

The test statistic value is,

\(\begin{array}{l}{f_r} = \frac{{12J}}{{I\left( {I + 1} \right)}}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\left( {{{\bar R}_i} - \frac{{I - 1}}{2}} \right)} ^2}\\ = \frac{{12}}{{IJ\left( {I + 1} \right)}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^I {\bar R_i^2} - 3J\left( {I + 1} \right)\\ = \frac{{12}}{{9 \cdot 4 \cdot 5}} \cdot \left( {784 + 841 + 256 + 289} \right) - 3 \cdot 9 \cdot 5\\ = 9.62\end{array}\)

Degrees of freedom are

\(df = I - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3\)

Critical value at significant level 0.05 is


\(\begin{array}{l}X_{0.05,3}^2 = 7.815\\X_{0.05,3}^2 = 7.815 < 9.62 = {f_r}\end{array}\)

reject null hypothesis

Hence, reject null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In an experiment to study the way in which different anesthetics affect plasma epinephrine concentration, ten dogs were selected and concentration was measured while they were under the influence of the anesthetics isoflurane, halothane, and cyclopropane (鈥淪ympathoadrenal and Hemodynamic Effects of Isoflurane, Halothane, and Cyclopropane in Dogs,鈥 Anesthesiology, 1974: 465鈥470). Test at level .05 to see whether there is an anesthetic effect on concentration

In a test to determine whether soil pretreated with small amounts of Basic-H makes the soil more permeable to water, soil samples were divided into blocks, and each block received each of the four treatments under study. The treatments were (A) water with .001% Basic-H flooded on control soil, (B) water without Basic-H on control soil, (C) water with Basic-H flooded on soil pretreated with Basic-H, and (D) water without Basic-H on soil pretreated with Basic-H. Test at level .01 to see whether there are any effects due to the different treatments.

The study reported in 鈥淕ait Patterns During Free Choice Ladder Ascents鈥 (Human Movement Sci., 1983: 187鈥195) was motivated by publicity concerning the increased accident rate for individuals climbing ladders. A number of different gait patterns were used by subjects climbing a portable straight ladder according to specified instructions. The ascent times for seven subjects who used a lateral gait and six subjects who used a four-beat diagonal gait are given.

Lateral 0.86 1.31 1.64 1.51 1.53 1.39 1.09

Diagonal 1.27 1.82 1.66 0.85 1.45 1.24

a. Carry out a test using a 5 .05 to see whether the data suggests any difference in the true average ascent times for the two gaits.

b. Compute a 95% CI for the difference between the true average gait times.

The given data on phosphorus concentration in topsoil for four different soil treatments appeared in the article 鈥淔ertilisers for Lotus and Clover Establishment on a Sequence of Acid Soils on the East Otago Uplands鈥 (N. Zeal. J. of Exptl. Ag., 1984: 119鈥129). Use a distributionfree procedure to test the null hypothesis of no difference in true mean phosphorus concentration (mg/g) for the four soil treatments.

I 8.1 5.9 7.0 8.0 9.0

II 11.5 10.9 12.1 10.3 11.9

III 15.3 17.4 16.4 15.8 16.0

IV 23.0 33.0 28.4 24.6 27.7

The article "'Multimodal Versus Unimodal Instruction in a Complex Learning Environment" (J. of Experimental Educ., 2002: 215鈥239) described an experiment carried out to compare students' mastery of certain software learned in two different ways. The first learning method (multimodal instruction) involved the use of a visual manual. The second technique (unimodal instruction) employed a textual manual. Here are exam scores for the two groups at the end of the experiment (assignment to the groups was random):

Does the data suggest that the true average score depends on which learning method is used?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.