/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q14E The article "'Multimodal Versus ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The article "'Multimodal Versus Unimodal Instruction in a Complex Learning Environment" (J. of Experimental Educ., 2002: 215鈥239) described an experiment carried out to compare students' mastery of certain software learned in two different ways. The first learning method (multimodal instruction) involved the use of a visual manual. The second technique (unimodal instruction) employed a textual manual. Here are exam scores for the two groups at the end of the experiment (assignment to the groups was random):

Does the data suggest that the true average score depends on which learning method is used?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Therefore,

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average score depends on which learning method is used.

Step by step solution

01

Given.

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{m = 18 }}\\{\rm{n = 18}}\end{array}\)

Let us assume:

\(\alpha = 0.05\)

Given claim: Difference


The null hypothesis states that there is no difference.

The alternative hypothesis states the given claim:

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _1} = {\mu _2}\\{H_a}:{\mu _1} \ne {\mu _2}\end{array}\)

02

To determine the rank of every data value.

Determine the rank of every data value. The smallest value receives the rank 1, the second smallest value receives the rank 2 , the third smallest value receives the rank 3 , and so on. If multiple data values have the same value, then their rank is the average of the corresponding ranks.

Sample 1

Rank

Sample 2

Rank

\(44.85\)

\(4\)

\(51.95\)

\(15\)

\(46.59\)

\(6\)

\(46.54\)

\(5\)

\(47.6\)

\(7\)

\(57.4\)

\(20\)

\(51.08\)

\(14\)

\(57.6\)

\(21\)

\(52.2\)

\(16\)

\(61.16\)

\(24\)

\(56.87\)

\(17\)

\(39.91\)

\(1\)

\(57.03\)

\(18\)

\(42.01\)

\(2\)

\(57.07\)

\(19\)

\(43.58\)

\(3\)

\(60.35\)

\(22\)

\(48.83\)

\(8\)

\(60.82\)

\(23\)

\(49.07\)

\(9\)

\(67.3\)

\(27\)

\(49.48\)

\(10\)

\(70.15\)

\(29\)

\(49.57\)

\(11\)

\(70.77\)

\(30\)

\(49.63\)

\(12\)

\(75.21\)

\(32\)

\(50.75\)

\(13\)

\(75.28\)

\(33\)

\(64.55\)

\(25\)

\(76.6\)

\(34\)

\(65.31\)

\(26\)

\(80.3\)

\(35\)

\(68.59\)

\(28\)

\(81.23\)

\(36\)

\(72.4\)

\(31\)

Sum

\(402\)

Sum

\(264\)

03

To find P value.

\({W_1}\)is the sum of the ranks in the smaller sample:

\(w = 402\)

Determine the mean and standard deviation:

\(\begin{array}{l}\\{\mu _R} = \frac{{{n_1}\left( {{n_1} + {n_2} + 1} \right)}}{2}\\{\mu _R} = \frac{{18(18 + 18 + 1)}}{2}\\{\mu _R} = 333\\{\sigma _R} = \sqrt {\frac{{{n_1}{n_2}\left( {{n_1} + {n_2} + 1} \right)}}{{12}}} \\{\sigma _R} = \sqrt {\frac{{18(18)(18 + 18 + 1)}}{{12}}} \\{\sigma _R} = 3\sqrt {111} \\\end{array}\)

The\(z\)-score is then the value of the test statistic decreased by the mean, divided by the standard deviation:

\(\begin{array}{l}z = \frac{{R - {\mu _R}}}{{{\sigma _R}}}\\z = \frac{{402 - 333}}{{3\sqrt {111} }}\\z \approx 2.18\end{array}\)

The P-value is the probability of obtaining the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme, assuming that the null hypothesis is true.
Determine the P-value using the normal probability table in the appendix:

\(\begin{array}{l}P = P(Z < - 2.18{\rm{ or }}Z > 2.18)\\P = 2P(Z < - 2.18)\\P = 2(0.0146)\\P = 0.0292\end{array}\)

If the probability (P-value) is less than the significant level , then reject the null hypothesis:

\(P < 0.05 \Rightarrow \)Reject\({H_0}\)

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average score depends on which learning method is used.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The following observations are amounts of hydrocarbon emissions resulting from road wear of bias-belted tires under a \(522\;{\rm{kg}}\) load inflated at\(228{\rm{kPa}}\)and driven at \(64\;{\rm{km}}/{\rm{hr}}\) for \(6\) hours ("characterization of Tire Emissions Using an Indoor Test Facility," Rubber Chemistry and Technology, \(1978:7 - 25\)): \(.045,.117,\)\(.062\), and \(.072\). What confidence levels are achievable for this sample size using the signed-rank interval? Select an appropriate confidence level and compute the interval.

In an experiment to study the way in which different anesthetics affect plasma epinephrine concentration, ten dogs were selected and concentration was measured while they were under the influence of the anesthetics isoflurane, halothane, and cyclopropane (鈥淪ympathoadrenal and Hemodynamic Effects of Isoflurane, Halothane, and Cyclopropane in Dogs,鈥 Anesthesiology, 1974: 465鈥470). Test at level .05 to see whether there is an anesthetic effect on concentration

Here again is the data on expense ratio (%) for a sample of 20 large cap blended mutual funds introduced in Exercise 1.53:

1.03 1.23 1.10 1.64 1.30 1.27 1.25

.78 1.05 .64 .94 .86 1.05 .75

.09 0.79 1.61 1.26 .93 .84

A normal probability plot shows a distinctly nonlinear pattern, primarily because of the single outlier on each end of the data. But a dotplot and boxplot exhibit a reasonable amount of symmetry. Assuming a symmetric population distribution, does the data provide compelling evidence for concluding that the population mean expense ratio exceeds 1%? Use the Wilcoxon test at significance level .1. (Note: The mean expense ratio for the population of all 825 such funds is actually 1.08.)

The article "'A Study of Wood Stove Particulate Emissions" (J. of the Air Pollution Control Assoc., 1979:\({\rm{724 - 728}}\)) reports the following data on bum time (hours) for samples of oak and pine. Test at level .05 to see whether there is any difference in true average burn time for the two types of wood.

Suppose that observations X1, X2,鈥, Xn are made on a process at times 1, 2,鈥, n. On the basis of this data, we wish to test H0: the Xi鈥檚 constitute an independent and identically distributed sequence versus Ha: Xi11 tends to be larger than Xi for i =1,鈥, n (an increasing trend) Suppose the Xi鈥檚 are ranked from 1 to n. Then when Ha is true, larger ranks tend to occur later in the sequence, whereas if H0 is true, large and small ranks tend to be mixed together. Let Ri be the rank of Xi and consider the test statistic D = on i= 1(Ri = i)2.

Then small values of D give support to Ha (e.g., the smallest value is 0 for R1 = 10, R2 = 2,鈥, Rn= n). When H0 is true, any sequence of ranks has probability 1yn!. Use this to determine the P-value in the case n = 4, d= 2. (Hint: List the 4! rank sequences, compute d for each one, and then obtain the null distribution of D. See the Lehmann book (in the chapter bibliography), p. 290, for more information.).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.