/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q32SE The study reported in 鈥淕ait Pa... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The study reported in 鈥淕ait Patterns During Free Choice Ladder Ascents鈥 (Human Movement Sci., 1983: 187鈥195) was motivated by publicity concerning the increased accident rate for individuals climbing ladders. A number of different gait patterns were used by subjects climbing a portable straight ladder according to specified instructions. The ascent times for seven subjects who used a lateral gait and six subjects who used a four-beat diagonal gait are given.

Lateral 0.86 1.31 1.64 1.51 1.53 1.39 1.09

Diagonal 1.27 1.82 1.66 0.85 1.45 1.24

a. Carry out a test using a 5 .05 to see whether the data suggests any difference in the true average ascent times for the two gaits.

b. Compute a 95% CI for the difference between the true average gait times.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Solution for

a)Do not reject null hypothesis

b) \(\left( {{d_{ij\left( 8 \right)}},{d_{ij\left( {35} \right)}}} \right)\)=(-0.41, -0.29)

Step by step solution

01

testing null hypothesis for (a):

a)

When testing null hypothesis

Versus one of the alternative hypothesis, one could use test static value

\(w = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^m {{r_i}} \)

The P-value depends on the alternative hypothesis

Alternative hypothesis P-values

\(\begin{array}{l}{P_0}\left( {W \ge \omega } \right)\\{P_0}\left( {W \le \omega } \right) = {P_0}\left( {W \ge m\left( {m + n + 1} \right) - \omega } \right)\\2{P_0}\left( {{W_ + } \ge \max \left\{ {\omega ,m\left( {m + n + 1} \right) - \omega } \right\}} \right)\end{array}\)

02

solving further:

The test of interest is

\({H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 0\)

Versus alternative hypothesis

\({H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} \ne 0\)

The following table represents values required to compute the test statistic value

i

\({x_i}/{y_i}\)

\({r_i}\)

\(\sum {{r_i}} \)

1

0.86

2

48

2

1.31

6

3

1.64

11

4

1.51

9

5

1.53

10

6

1.39

7

n = 7

1.09

3

1

1.27

5

\(\omega \)=43

2

1.82

13

3

1.66

12

4

0.85

1

5

1.45

8

m=6

1.24

4

03

test static value:

The alternative ofP-value is,


\(2{P_0}\left( {W \ge \left\{ {\omega ,m\left( {m + n + 1} \right) - \omega } \right\}} \right) = 2{P_0}\left( {W \ge 43} \right)\)

In the table in the appendix one could find only particular values ; thus, for\(\alpha = 0.05\)use table to obtain

\(m\left( {m + n + 1} \right) - 56 = 28 < \omega = 43 < {W_{m,n.\alpha /2}} = 56\)

Do not reject null hypothesis

04

solving for (b):

Let,

\({d_{ij}} = {x_i} - {y_i}\)

Where\({x_1},{x_2},....,{x_m}\)and\({y_1},{y_2},...{y_n}\)are observed values of continuous distribution that only in the location but not in shap the general form of a\(100(1 - \alpha )\)confidence interval for\({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\)

Is,

\(\left( {{d_{ij\left( {mn - c + 1} \right)}},{d_{ij\left( c \right)}}} \right)\)

Where\({d_{ij\left( 1 \right)}},{d_{ij\left( 2 \right)}}...,{d_{ij\left( {mn} \right)}}\)are the ordered difference, use appendix values of c.

For m = 6, n = 7 and for 94.5% confidence interval, c = 35, the confidence interval is the form of

\(\left( {{d_{ij\left( {mn - c + 1} \right)}},{d_{ij\left( c \right)}}} \right) = \left( {{d_{ij\left( {6.7 - 35 + 1} \right)}},{d_{ij\left( {35} \right)}}} \right) = \left( {{d_{ij\left( 8 \right)}},{d_{ij\left( {35} \right)}}} \right)\)

Compute all difference, find 8th and 35th ordered difference values. The four smallest ordered difference are

The 8th and 35th ordered difference are -0.41 and 2.9, respectively; a 94.5% confidence interval is

\(\left( {{d_{ij\left( 8 \right)}},{d_{ij\left( {35} \right)}}} \right)\)=(-0.41, -0.29)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In an experiment to compare the bond strength of two different adhesives, each adhesive was used in five bondings of two surfaces, and the force necessary to separate the surfaces was determined for each bonding. For adhesive 1, the resulting values were , \(229,286,245\) , \(299\)and \(250\), whereas the adhesive 2 observations were , \(213,179,163,247\)and \(225\) . Let \({\mu _i}\) denote the true average bond strength of adhesive type . Use the Wilcoxon rank-sum test at level \(.05\) to test \({H_0}:{\mu _1} = {\mu _2}\) versus \({H_a}:{\mu _1} > {\mu _2}\).

Reconsider the situation described in Exercise 81 of Chapter 9 and the accompanying Minitab output (the Greek letter eta is used to denote a median).
Mann-Whitney Confidence Interval and Test

a. Verify that the value of Minitab's test statistic is correct.
b. Carry out an appropriate test of hypotheses using a significance level of .01.

Compute a \(99\% \) \(CI\) for \({\mu _1} - {\mu _2}\)using the data in Exercise \(12\).

In an experiment to study the way in which different anesthetics affect plasma epinephrine concentration, ten dogs were selected and concentration was measured while they were under the influence of the anesthetics isoflurane, halothane, and cyclopropane (鈥淪ympathoadrenal and Hemodynamic Effects of Isoflurane, Halothane, and Cyclopropane in Dogs,鈥 Anesthesiology, 1974: 465鈥470). Test at level .05 to see whether there is an anesthetic effect on concentration

Suppose we wish to test.

: the X and Y distributions are identical

versus

: the X distribution is less spread out than the Y

distribution

The accompanying figure pictures X and Y distributions for which is true. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test is not appropriate in this situation because when is true as pictured, the Y鈥檚 will tend to be at the extreme ends of the combined sample (resulting in small and large Y ranks), so the sum of X ranks will result in a W value that is neither large nor small.

Consider modifying the procedure for assigning ranks as follows: After the combined sample of m + n observations is ordered, the smallest observation is given rank 1, the largest observation is given rank 2, the second smallest is

given rank 3, the second largest is given rank 4, and so on. Then if is true as pictured, the X values will tend to be in the middle of the sample and thus receive large ranks. Let W鈥 denote the sum of the X ranks and consider an uppertailed test based on this test statistic. When is true, every possible set of X ranks has the same probability, so W鈥 has the same distribution as does W when H0 is true. The accompanying data refers to medial muscle thickness for arterioles from the lungs of children who died from sudden infant death syndrome (x鈥檚) and a control group of children (y鈥檚). Carry out the test of versus at level .05.

SIDS 4.0 4.4 4.8 4.9

Control 3.7 4.1 4.3 5.1 5.6

Consult the Lehmann book (in the chapter bibliography) for more information on this test, called the Siegel-Tukey test.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.