/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 A hotel chain is interested in e... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A hotel chain is interested in evaluating reservation processes. Guests can reserve a room by using either a telephone system or an online system that is accessed through the hotel's web site. Independent random samples of 80 guests who reserved a room by phone and 60 guests who reserved a room online were selected. Of those who reserved by phone, 57 reported that they were satisfied with the reservation process. Of those who reserved online, 50 reported that they were satisfied. Based on these data, is it reasonable to conclude that the proportion who are satisfied is greater for those who reserve a room online? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(0.05 .\) (Hint: See Example \(11.4 .)\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
We performed a hypothesis test comparing the proportions of satisfied customers in the online and phone reservation groups, using a significance level of 0.05. Our test statistic z was approximately 1.634, which is less than the critical value of 1.645. As a result, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, meaning there is insufficient evidence to conclude that a significantly greater proportion of guests are satisfied with online reservations compared to phone reservations.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

We want to test if the proportion of satisfied customers who reserved online is greater than those who reserved by phone. Let's define the proportion of satisfied customers who reserved online as \(p_1\) and the proportion of satisfied customers who reserved by phone as \(p_2\). Based on this, our null hypothesis \((H_0)\) and alternative hypothesis \((H_a)\) are: \(H_0: p_1 - p_2 \le 0\) \(H_a: p_1 - p_2 > 0\)
02

Compute the Observed Proportions

From the data provided, we can calculate the observed proportions of satisfied guests in both groups: For phone reservations: Sample size, \(n_2 = 80\) Number of satisfied customers, \(x_2 = 57\) So, the observed proportion, \(\hat{p_2} = \frac{x_2}{n_2} = \frac{57}{80}\) For online reservations: Sample size, \(n_1 = 60\) Number of satisfied customers, \(x_1 = 50\) So, the observed proportion, \(\hat{p_1} = \frac{x_1}{n_1} = \frac{50}{60}\)
03

Calculate the Pooled Proportion

The pooled proportion is calculated under the null hypothesis that there's no difference between the two groups. This proportion considers both groups as one single group: \(pooled \ proportion = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{n_1 + n_2}\) Substitute the sample sizes and the number of satisfied customers: \(pooled \ proportion = \frac{50 + 57}{60 + 80} = \frac{107}{140}\)
04

Compute the Test Statistic

We will use a one-sample z-test for proportions to compare the two sample proportions. The test statistic is given by the formula: \(z = \frac{(\hat{p_1} - \hat{p_2}) - 0}{\sqrt{\frac{pooled \ proportion(1-pooled \ proportion)}{n_1}+\frac{pooled \ proportion(1-pooled \ proportion)}{n_2}}}\) Plug in the observed proportions, pooled proportion, and sample sizes: \(z = \frac{(\frac{50}{60} - \frac{57}{80})}{\sqrt{\frac{\frac{107}{140}(1-\frac{107}{140})}{60}+\frac{\frac{107}{140}(1-\frac{107}{140})}{80}}}\) Compute the z-value using a calculator or software: \(z \approx 1.634\)
05

Find the Critical Value and Make a Decision

Since we are conducting a one-tailed test with a significance level of 0.05, we need to find the z-critical value that corresponds to an area of 0.95 in the standard normal distribution. Using a z-table or calculator: \(z_{critical} = 1.645\) Now, let's compare the test statistic with the critical value: z < z_critical (1.634 < 1.645) Since the z-value is less than the critical value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)). This means that we don't have enough evidence to conclude that a greater proportion of guests who reserved a room online are satisfied compared to those who reserved by phone.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportion Test
When analyzing categorical data, particularly when we want to compare the likelihood or frequency of a certain event or characteristic across two different groups, we use what is known as a proportion test. This type of hypothesis test is crucial for determining whether observed differences between the proportions of two groups are statistically significant or could have occurred by chance.

In the given exercise, the hotel chain wishes to understand if their new online reservation system leads to a higher satisfaction rate compared to the traditional telephone system. The proportion test here is used to compare the satisfaction rates—proportions of satisfied customers—between guests who reserved online and those who reserved by phone.

Improving Clarity in Proportion Tests

When attempting to clarify the methodology of proportion tests for students, it's important to communicate the context of the data. Make sure they understand what the populations are (in this case, online and telephone reservation customers) and what the specific characteristic is (satisfaction with the reservation process). Additionally, outline step-by-step calculations and discuss the purpose of each computation, such as determining if the observed proportion difference is due to random sampling variation or a genuine difference in satisfaction levels.
Statistical Significance
The concept of statistical significance is at the heart of hypothesis testing. It helps researchers determine whether the results of their study can be attributed to a specific cause or if they are likely the result of random chance. In the context of the hotel's inquiry, they're testing whether the difference in satisfaction rates is meaningful or might just be coincidence.

Statistical significance is usually determined by a p-value or a comparison of a test statistic (like the Z-score in our example) to a critical threshold. A significance level, denoted as \(\alpha\), is chosen before the test begins; it represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it's, in fact, true (a type I error). If the p-value is less than \(\alpha\) or if the test statistic exceeds the critical value, the result is deemed statistically significant.

Essential Elements in Conveying Significance

When explaining statistical significance to students, emphasize the selection of the significance level and its implications. The students should comprehend that choosing a smaller \(\alpha\) requires stronger evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Instruct them on how to use tables or software to find critical values and, importantly, interpret these findings beyond just the numbers—to understand what they mean for the research question at hand.
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
Clear definitions of the null and alternative hypotheses set the stage for any hypothesis testing procedure. The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) represents a statement of no effect or no difference, and is what we assume to be true until the evidence suggests otherwise. The alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\) or \(H_1\)), on the other hand, is a statement indicating the presence of an effect or a difference.

In this exercise, the null hypothesis posits there is no difference or that the proportion of satisfied customers online is less than or equal to the telephone system (\(p_1 - p_2 \le 0\)). The alternative hypothesis reflects the hotel's belief that the online system leads to a greater proportion of satisfied customers (\(p_1 - p_2 > 0\)). Students should learn that hypotheses are formulated before any testing begins and guide the entire testing process.

Teaching Hypotheses Formulation and Usage

One improvement in teaching this concept is providing real-world examples that resonate with students. Also, students should be encouraged to think critically about the implications of each hypothesis and how they translate to the test statistics and conclusions drawn. Practice formulating and interpreting both hypotheses in various contexts to solidify their understanding of these foundational components of hypothesis testing.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (www.bls.gov/opub \(/ \mathrm{ted} / 2014 / \mathrm{ted}_{-} 20141112 . \mathrm{htm},\) retrieved December \(\left.13,2016\right)\) reported that \(3.8 \%\) of college graduates were unemployed in October 2013 and \(3.1 \%\) of college graduates were unemployed in October 2014 . Suppose that the reported percentages were based on independently selected representative samples of 500 college graduates in each of these two years. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the proportions of college graduates who were unemployed in these 2 years.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau (www.census.gov), the percentage of U.S. residents living in poverty in 2015 was \(12.2 \%\) for men and \(14.8 \%\) for women. These percentages were estimates based on data from large representative samples of men and women. Suppose that the sample sizes were 1200 for men and 1000 for women. You would like to use the survey data to estimate the difference in the proportion living in poverty in 2015 for men and women. (Hint: See Example \(11.2 .\).) a. Answer the four key questions (QSTN) for this problem. What method would you consider based on the answers to these questions? b. Use the five-step process for estimation problems \(\left(\mathrm{EMC}^{3}\right)\) to calculate and interpret a \(90 \%\) large- sample confidence interval for the difference in the proportion living in poverty in 2015 for men and women.

As part of a study described in the report "I Can't Get My Work Done!" (harmon.ie/blog/i-cant-get-my-work \- done-how-collaboration-social-tools-drain-productivity, 2011, retrieved May 6,2017 ), people in a sample of 258 cell phone users ages 20 to 39 were asked if they use their cell phones to stay connected while they are in bed, and 168 said "yes." The same question was also asked of each person in a sample of 129 cell phone users ages 40 to \(49,\) and 61 said "yes." You might expect the proportion who stay connected while in bed to be higher for the 20 to 39 age group than for the 40 to 49 age group, but how much higher? a. Construct and interpret a \(90 \%\) large-sample confidence interval for the difference in the population proportions of cell phone users ages 20 to 39 and those ages 40 to 49 who say that they sleep with their cell phones. Interpret the confidence interval in context. Note that the sample sizes in the two groups - cell phone users ages 20 to 39 and those ages 40 to 49 -are large enough to satisfy the conditions for a large-sample test and a large-sample confidence interval for two population proportions. Even though the sample sizes are large enough, you can still use simulation-based methods. b. Use the output below to identify a \(90 \%\) bootstrap confidence interval for the difference in the population proportions of cell phone users ages 20 to 39 and those ages 40 to 49 who say that they sleep with their cell phones. c. Compare the confidence intervals you computed in Parts (a) and (b). Would your interpretation change using the bootstrap confidence interval compared with the large-sample confidence interval? Explain.

Some fundraisers believe that people are more likely to make a donation if there is a relatively quick deadline given for making the donation. The paper "Now or Never! The Effect of Deadlines on Charitable Giving: Evidence from Two Natural Field Experiments" (Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics [2016]: \(1-10\) ) describes an experiment to investigate the influence of deadlines. In this experiment, \(1.2 \%\) of those who received an e-mail request for a donation that had a three-day deadline to make a donation and \(0.8 \%\) of those who received the same e-mail request but without a deadline made a donation. The people who received the e-mail request were randomly assigned to one of the two groups (e-mail with deadline and e-mail without deadline). Suppose that the given percentages are based on sample sizes of 2000 (the actual sample sizes in the experiment were much larger). Use a \(90 \%\) confidence interval to estimate the difference in the proportion who donate for the two different treatments.

The Interactive Advertising Bureau surveyed a representative sample of 1000 adult Americans and a representative sample of 1000 adults in China (“Majority of Digital Users in U.S. and China Regularly Shop and Purchase via E-Commerce," November \(10,2016,\) www.iab.com, retrieved December 15,2016 ). They reported that American shoppers are much more likely to use a credit or a debit card to make an online purchase. This conclusion was based on finding that \(63 \%\) of the people in the United States sample said they pay with a credit or a debit card, while only \(34 \%\) of those in the China sample said that they used a credit card or a debit card to pay for online purchases. To determine if the stated conclusion is justified, you want to carry out a test of hypotheses to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion who pay with a credit card or a debit card is greater for adult Americans than it is for adult Chinese. a. What hypotheses should be tested to answer the question of interest? b. Are the two samples large enough for the large-sample test for a difference in population proportions to be appropriate? Explain. c. Based on the following Minitab output, what is the value of the test statistic and what is the value of the associated \(P\) -value? If a significance level of 0.01 is selected for the test, will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? d. Interpret the result of the hypothesis test in the context of this problem.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.