/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 The Interactive Advertising Bure... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The Interactive Advertising Bureau surveyed a representative sample of 1000 adult Americans and a representative sample of 1000 adults in China (“Majority of Digital Users in U.S. and China Regularly Shop and Purchase via E-Commerce," November \(10,2016,\) www.iab.com, retrieved December 15,2016 ). They reported that American shoppers are much more likely to use a credit or a debit card to make an online purchase. This conclusion was based on finding that \(63 \%\) of the people in the United States sample said they pay with a credit or a debit card, while only \(34 \%\) of those in the China sample said that they used a credit card or a debit card to pay for online purchases. To determine if the stated conclusion is justified, you want to carry out a test of hypotheses to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion who pay with a credit card or a debit card is greater for adult Americans than it is for adult Chinese. a. What hypotheses should be tested to answer the question of interest? b. Are the two samples large enough for the large-sample test for a difference in population proportions to be appropriate? Explain. c. Based on the following Minitab output, what is the value of the test statistic and what is the value of the associated \(P\) -value? If a significance level of 0.01 is selected for the test, will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? d. Interpret the result of the hypothesis test in the context of this problem.

Short Answer

Expert verified
To determine if there is evidence that the proportion of adult Americans who pay with a credit or debit card is greater than the proportion of adult Chinese who do so, we perform a hypothesis test with the null hypothesis \(H_0: p_1 = p_2\) and the alternative hypothesis \(H_1: p_1 > p_2\). The samples are large enough as all conditions are satisfied. Based on the Minitab output, calculate the test statistic and P-value. Comparing the P-value to the significance level of 0.01, decide whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. Interpret the result in context, providing insight on the difference in proportions of adult Americans and adult Chinese who pay with credit or debit cards for online purchases.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the hypotheses to be tested

To answer the question of interest, we will test the following hypotheses: - Null hypothesis (H0): The proportion of adult Americans who pay with a credit or debit card is equal to the proportion of adult Chinese who pay with a credit or debit card. Mathematically, \(H_0: p_1 = p_2\). - Alternative hypothesis (H1): The proportion of adult Americans who pay with a credit or debit card is greater than the proportion of adult Chinese who pay with a credit or debit card. Mathematically, \(H_1: p_1 > p_2\), where \(p_1\) is the proportion of adult Americans and \(p_2\) is the proportion of adult Chinese.
02

Check if the samples are large enough

To determine if the samples are large enough for the large-sample test for a difference in population proportions, we need to check whether the following conditions are met: - \(n_1p_1 \ge 10\) - \(n_1(1-p_1) \ge 10\) - \(n_2p_2 \ge 10\) - \(n_2(1-p_2) \ge 10\) We are given the sample sizes and proportions as follows: - For the United States: \(n_1 = 1000\) and \(p_1 = 0.63\) - For China: \(n_2 = 1000\) and \(p_2 = 0.34\) Let's check the conditions: - \(1000 \times 0.63 \ge 10\) -> \(630 \ge 10\) (True) - \(1000 \times (1 - 0.63) \ge 10\) -> \(370 \ge 10\) (True) - \(1000 \times 0.34 \ge 10\) -> \(340 \ge 10\) (True) - \(1000 \times (1 - 0.34) \ge 10\) -> \(660 \ge 10\) (True) All the conditions are met, so the samples are large enough for the large-sample test for a difference in population proportions to be appropriate.
03

Calculate the test statistic and associated P-value

Follow the given Minitab output to calculate the value of the test statistic and the associated P-value.
04

Make a decision to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis

We are given a significance level of 0.01. If the calculated P-value from the Minitab output is less than the significance level, we will reject the null hypothesis. If the P-value is greater than the significance level, we will fail to reject the null hypothesis.
05

Interpret the result of the hypothesis test

After determining whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis, interpret the result in the context of the problem. This will inform us if there is convincing evidence suggesting that the proportion of adult Americans who pay with a credit card or a debit card is greater than the proportion of adult Chinese who pay with a credit or a debit card for online purchases.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Population Proportions
Let's dive into the idea of population proportions, which are essential when comparing different groups. In this context, population proportion refers to the fraction of individuals in a group who exhibit a particular trait or behavior. For example, in the exercise, it's the portion of Americans and Chinese using credit or debit cards for online purchases.

Calculating these proportions helps us understand and compare behaviors across two populations.
  • For the United States: The proportion (\(p_1\)) is 0.63, indicating that 63% of the sample uses cards.
  • For China: The proportion (\(p_2\)) is 0.34, meaning 34% use cards.
These proportions become the baseline for hypotheses testing, allowing us to see if the observed differences in behaviors between two groups are statistically significant or just due to random chance.
Sample Size
Sample size plays a crucial role in hypothesis testing as it directly affects the reliability of our conclusions. Larger sample sizes generally provide more accurate estimates of the population parameters.

In hypothesis testing for population proportions, we stress that the sample needs to be large enough to meet certain conditions, ensuring that the test is valid. These conditions are:
  • \(n_1p_1 \ge 10\): Verification for the U.S. sample.
  • \(n_1(1-p_1) \ge 10\): Another check for the U.S.
  • \(n_2p_2 \ge 10\): Verification for the Chinese sample.
  • \(n_2(1-p_2) \ge 10\): Another check for China.
In this exercise, both the American and Chinese samples have 1000 respondents each. As demonstrated, both meet the necessary conditions, allowing for a large-sample test which makes our results more dependable.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted as \(\alpha\), is a threshold set by the researcher that determines the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. It's a way to control for Type I errors, which are false positives in hypothesis testing.

In this exercise, the significance level is chosen to be 0.01, meaning there is a 1% risk of incorrectly concluding that the proportion of Americans using cards is greater than that of the Chinese, when in fact it might not be true. This low significance level signifies a stricter criterion, reducing the chance of a false positive.

Significance levels play a vital role in determining the reliability of our hypothesis test results. Understanding it helps with making informed decisions about the null hypothesis.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis is a key component of hypothesis testing. It specifies what we aim to prove and stands in opposition to the null hypothesis. For instance, it aligns with our belief or assumption that the actual state is different from what's stated under the null hypothesis.

In this problem, the alternative hypothesis is:
  • \(H_1: p_1 > p_2\), suggesting that the proportion of Americans using credit or debit cards for online purchases is greater than that of the Chinese sample.
This hypothesis reflects our research question—if American shoppers truly use cards more frequently than their Chinese counterparts for online payments.

Formulating a clear alternative hypothesis allows researchers to focus their test and draw specific conclusions about the populations being compared. It's vital because it guides the entire hypothesis testing process, leading towards significant inferences.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Bureau of Labor Statistics report referenced in the previous exercise also reported that \(7.3 \%\) of high school graduates were unemployed in October 2013 and \(5.7 \%\) of high school graduates were unemployed in October \(2014 .\) Suppose that the reported percentages were based on independently selected representative samples of 400 high school graduates in each of these 2 years. a. Construct and interpret a 99\% large-sample confidence interval for the difference in the proportions of high school graduates who were unemployed in these 2 years. b. Is the confidence interval from Part (a) wider or narrower than the confidence interval calculated in the previous exercise? Give two reasons why it is wider or narrower.

In a survey of mobile phone owners, \(53 \%\) of iPhone users and \(42 \%\) of Android phone users indicated that they upgraded their phones at least every two years ("Americans Split on How Often They Upgrade Their Smartphones," July 8, \(2015,\) www.gallup.com, retrieved December 15,2016 ). The reported percentages were based on large samples that were thought to be representative of the population of iPhone users and the population of Android phone users. The sample sizes were 8234 for the iPhone sample and 6072 for the Android phone sample. Suppose you want to decide if there is evidence that the proportion of iPhone owners who upgrade their phones at least every two years is greater than this proportion for Android phone users. (Hint: See Example 11.5.) a. What hypotheses should be tested to answer the question of interest? b. Are the two samples large enough for the large-sample test for a difference in population proportions to be appropriate? Explain. c. Based on the following Minitab output, what is the value of the test statistic and what is the value of the associated \(P\) -value? If a significance level of 0.01 is selected for the test, will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? d. Interpret the result of the hypothesis test in the context of this problem.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety issued a news release titled "Teen Drivers Often Ignoring Bans on Using Cell Phones" (June 9,2008 ). The following quote is from the news release: Just \(1-2\) months prior to the ban's Dec. \(1,2006,\) start, \(11 \%\) of teen drivers were observed using cell phones as they left school in the afternoon. About 5 months after the ban took effect, \(12 \%\) of teen drivers were observed using cell phones. Suppose that the two samples of teen drivers (before the ban, after the ban) are representative of these populations of teen drivers. Suppose also that 200 teen drivers were observed before the ban (so \(n_{1}=200\) and \(\hat{p}_{1}=0.11\) ) and that 150 teen drivers were observed after the ban. a. Construct and interpret a \(95 \%\) large-sample confidence interval for the difference in the proportion using a cell phone while driving before the ban and the proportion after the ban. b. Is 0 included in the confidence interval of Part (a)? What does this imply about the difference in the population proportions?

In the experiment described in the article "Study Points to Benefits of Knee Replacement Surgery Over Therapy Alone" (The New York Times, October 21,2015 ), adults who were considered candidates for knee replacement were followed for one year. Suppose that 200 patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One hundred were assigned to a group that had knee replacement surgery followed by therapy and the other half were assigned to a group that did not have surgery but did receive therapy. After one year, \(86 \%\) of the patients in the surgery group and \(68 \%\) of the patients in the therapy only group reported pain relief. Is there convincing evidence that the proportion experiencing pain relief is greater for the surgery treatment than for the therapy treatment? Use a significance level of 0.05

In a test of hypotheses about a difference in treatment proportions, what does it mean when the null hypothesis is not rejected?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.