/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 42 Use the following information to... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Use the following information to answer Exercise. Many surgeons play music in the operating room. Does the type of music played have an effect on the surgeons' performance? The report "Death Metal in the Operating Room" (NPR, December 24, 2009, www.npr.org, retrieved April 8,2017 ) describes an experiment in which surgeons used a simulator to perform a surgery. Some of the surgeons listened to music with vocal elements while performing the surgery, and others listened to music that did not have vocal elements. The researchers concluded that the average time to complete the surgery was greater when music with vocal elements is played than when music without vocal elements is played. Explain why it is important that the surgeons be assigned at random to the two music conditions in the experiment described above.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Random assignment is crucial in the experiment for ensuring internal validity, reducing selection bias, and increasing the generalizability of the results. It helps in minimizing the impact of confounding variables, ensuring that the observed differences in performance are caused by the type of music played and not by pre-existing differences among the surgeons. This will help the researchers draw a valid conclusion about the effect of the type of music played in the operating room on surgeons' performance.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the experiment

An experiment was conducted in which surgeons used a simulator to perform surgery while listening to two types of music: music with vocal elements and music without vocal elements. The purpose of the experiment is to determine if the type of music played has an effect on the surgeons' performance, specifically, the time taken to complete the surgery.
02

Importance of random assignment

Random assignment plays a critical role in experimental design. It refers to the practice of randomly assigning participants to different treatment groups to ensure that each participant has an equal chance of being exposed to each treatment. This helps in minimizing the impact of confounding variables, which are external factors that could affect the outcome of an experiment.
03

Reducing bias

Random assignment helps in reducing selection bias, which could otherwise invalidate the experiment's conclusion. Selection bias occurs when groups are composed of participants with different characteristics, which could lead to differences in outcomes not because of treatments but because of the characteristics of the participants. By assigning the surgeons randomly to the two music conditions, the researchers can reduce the likelihood that any differences in their performance are due to pre-existing differences among the surgeons.
04

Ensuring internal validity

Random assignment contributes to the internal validity of an experiment. Internal validity refers to how well the experiment's design can support the conclusion that the observed outcome was caused by the treatment. If the surgeons were not assigned randomly to the two music conditions, it might be harder to establish that the observed differences in performance were caused by the type of music played in the operating room.
05

Generalizability of results

Finally, random assignment increases the generalizability of the experiment's results. When participants are randomly assigned to treatment groups, the results can be generalized to the broader population, assuming that the experimental sample is representative of that population. By assigning the surgeons randomly to the two music conditions, the researchers can increase the likelihood that their conclusion will apply not only to the surgeons who participated in the study but also to other surgeons who might work under similar conditions. In conclusion, it is important that the surgeons be assigned randomly to the two music conditions in the experiment described above to reduce selection bias, ensure internal validity, and increase the generalizability of the results. This will help the researchers draw a valid conclusion about the effect of the type of music played in the operating room on surgeons' performance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Random Assignment
In an experiment, random assignment is like drawing lots to determine who goes where. It's a way to ensure that participants, like the surgeons in the music study, are placed into different groups purely by chance. This means that every surgeon had an equal opportunity to end up in either the vocal music or non-vocal music condition. Random assignment is crucial because it levels the playing field, ensuring that each group is likely to be similar in all respects before the experiment starts.
  • This randomness helps prevent favoritism or bias, making it a fair game for everyone involved.
  • By doing so, it helps isolate the effect being studied; in this case, whether vocal music really impacts surgical performance.
Without random assignment, any differences observed might be due to pre-existing conditions rather than the type of music played.
Internal Validity
Internal validity is all about confidence—specifically, confidence that the results of an experiment accurately reflect what you're trying to measure. In the music experiment, it's about being sure that the difference in surgery times was truly caused by the type of music. By using random assignment, the researchers can strengthen their assurance that the music, and not some other factor, led to any differences observed.
  • Random assignment reduces the risk that other variables, like a surgeon's experience or mood, sway the results.
  • This makes it possible to conclude that the type of music played caused any changes in the surgery time.
Maintaining high internal validity is essential for making trustworthy inferences from the study.
Selection Bias
Selection bias could spoil the results of an experiment. It happens when there are systematic differences between the groups being compared. Imagine if more skilled surgeons were placed in the non-vocal music group and less skilled ones in the vocal music group. Any difference in performance could be due to their skill levels, not the music.
  • Random assignment is a handy tool to combat selection bias.
  • It ensures any characteristic discrepancies are evenly spread out across all conditions.
By assigning surgeons randomly, the researchers can minimize the chance that differences in outcomes arise because of the participants rather than the impact of the music itself.
Generalizability
Generalizability is the ability to apply findings from an experiment to the general population, beyond just the study's participants. In this case, researchers wanted to know if the impact of vocal versus non-vocal music in surgery could apply to surgeons at large, not just those who participated.
  • Random assignment helps boost generalizability by ensuring the sample is representative of a broader population.
  • This leads to greater confidence that the findings are not just a fluke specific to the particular group studied.
Ultimately, enhancing generalizability means that the study's conclusions can be assumed to be applicable to a larger set of individuals, making the results more useful and impactful.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A study described in Food Network Magazine (January 2012) concluded that people who push a shopping cart at a grocery store are less likely to purchase junk food than those who use a hand-held basket. a. Do you think this study was an observational study or an experiment? b. Is it reasonable to conclude that pushing a shopping cart causes people to be less likely to purchase junk food? Explain why or why not.

A survey of Arizona drivers is described in the article "Study Claims Safety Should Be Made Law" (Red Rock News, August 21,2015\()\). The following statement is from the article: According to the annual survey, which aims to gauge the opinions and concerns of the motoring public across the state regarding traffic safety, Arizona drivers want better traffic safety laws. The survey showed that nine in 10 Arizonans -91 percent \(-\) favor a statewide ban on texting while driving for all drivers, and about two-thirds -64 percent \(-\) favor a primary seat belt law. The article also describes how the data for this survey were collected. A survey was mailed to 2500 randomly selected AAA Arizona members (AAA Arizona is an automobile club that provides services to approximately 860,000 members in Arizona). The article did not indicate how many of the surveys were actually returned. The results of this survey were generalized to all Arizona drivers. Answer the following four questions for this observational study. (Hint: Reviewing Examples 1.4 and 1.5 might be helpful.) a. What is the population of interest? b. Was the sample selected in a reasonable way? c. Is the sample likely to be representative of the population of interest? d. Are there any obvious sources of bias?

Does playing action video games provide more than just entertainment? The authors of the paper "Action-VideoGame Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision" (Psychological Science [2007]: 88-94) concluded that spatial resolution, an important aspect of vision, is improved by playing action video games. They based this conclusion on data from an experiment in which 32 volunteers who had not played action video games were "equally and randomly divided between the experimental and control groups." Subjects in each group played a video game for 30 hours over a period of 6 weeks. Those in the experimental group played Unreal Tournament 2004 , an action video game. Those in the control group played Tetris, a game that does not require the user to process multiple objects at once. Explain why it was important for the researchers to randomly assign the subjects to the two groups.

The article "Bicyclists and Other Cyclists" (Annals of Emergency Medicine [2010]: 426) reported that in 2008 , 716 bicyclists were killed on public roadways in the United States and that the average age of the cyclists killed was 41 years. These figures were based on an analysis of the records of all traffic-related deaths of bicyclists on U.S. public roadways (this information is kept by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration). a. Does the group of 716 bicycle fatalities represent a census or a sample of the bicycle fatalities in 2008 ? b. If the population of interest is bicycle traffic fatalities in 2008 , is the given average age of 41 years a statistic or a population characteristic?

"Should You Get a Flu Shot? Your Physical and Financial Health Is on the Line" is the title of an article that appears in a blog on the WalletHub web site (December 20 , 2013, wallethub.com/blog/flu-shot-survey/1303/, retrieved September 25,2016 ). The author reported that an infectious disease expert from a top medical school in each of the 50 states was asked if he or she would recommend that the average person get a flu shot. Based on the 50 responses, it was reported that \(94 \%\) would recommend a flu shot. a. Suppose that the purpose of this survey was to estimate the percentage of all doctors who would recommend a flu shot. Would this sample be a simple random sample, a stratified sample, a systematic sample, or a convenience sample? Explain. b. Explain why an estimate of the percentage who would recommend a flu shot that was based on data from this sample should not be generalized to all doctors.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.