/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 42 Use the following information to... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Use the following information to answer Exercise. Many surgeons play music in the operating room. Does the type of music played have an effect on the surgeons' performance? The report "Death Metal in the Operating Room" (NPR, December 24, 2009, www.npr.org, retrieved April 8,2017 ) describes an experiment in which surgeons used a simulator to perform a surgery. Some of the surgeons listened to music with vocal elements while performing the surgery, and others listened to music that did not have vocal elements. The researchers concluded that the average time to complete the surgery was greater when music with vocal elements is played than when music without vocal elements is played. Explain why it is important that the surgeons be assigned at random to the two music conditions in the experiment described above.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Random assignment is crucial in the experiment for ensuring internal validity, reducing selection bias, and increasing the generalizability of the results. It helps in minimizing the impact of confounding variables, ensuring that the observed differences in performance are caused by the type of music played and not by pre-existing differences among the surgeons. This will help the researchers draw a valid conclusion about the effect of the type of music played in the operating room on surgeons' performance.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the experiment

An experiment was conducted in which surgeons used a simulator to perform surgery while listening to two types of music: music with vocal elements and music without vocal elements. The purpose of the experiment is to determine if the type of music played has an effect on the surgeons' performance, specifically, the time taken to complete the surgery.
02

Importance of random assignment

Random assignment plays a critical role in experimental design. It refers to the practice of randomly assigning participants to different treatment groups to ensure that each participant has an equal chance of being exposed to each treatment. This helps in minimizing the impact of confounding variables, which are external factors that could affect the outcome of an experiment.
03

Reducing bias

Random assignment helps in reducing selection bias, which could otherwise invalidate the experiment's conclusion. Selection bias occurs when groups are composed of participants with different characteristics, which could lead to differences in outcomes not because of treatments but because of the characteristics of the participants. By assigning the surgeons randomly to the two music conditions, the researchers can reduce the likelihood that any differences in their performance are due to pre-existing differences among the surgeons.
04

Ensuring internal validity

Random assignment contributes to the internal validity of an experiment. Internal validity refers to how well the experiment's design can support the conclusion that the observed outcome was caused by the treatment. If the surgeons were not assigned randomly to the two music conditions, it might be harder to establish that the observed differences in performance were caused by the type of music played in the operating room.
05

Generalizability of results

Finally, random assignment increases the generalizability of the experiment's results. When participants are randomly assigned to treatment groups, the results can be generalized to the broader population, assuming that the experimental sample is representative of that population. By assigning the surgeons randomly to the two music conditions, the researchers can increase the likelihood that their conclusion will apply not only to the surgeons who participated in the study but also to other surgeons who might work under similar conditions. In conclusion, it is important that the surgeons be assigned randomly to the two music conditions in the experiment described above to reduce selection bias, ensure internal validity, and increase the generalizability of the results. This will help the researchers draw a valid conclusion about the effect of the type of music played in the operating room on surgeons' performance.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Random Assignment
In an experiment, random assignment is like drawing lots to determine who goes where. It's a way to ensure that participants, like the surgeons in the music study, are placed into different groups purely by chance. This means that every surgeon had an equal opportunity to end up in either the vocal music or non-vocal music condition. Random assignment is crucial because it levels the playing field, ensuring that each group is likely to be similar in all respects before the experiment starts.
  • This randomness helps prevent favoritism or bias, making it a fair game for everyone involved.
  • By doing so, it helps isolate the effect being studied; in this case, whether vocal music really impacts surgical performance.
Without random assignment, any differences observed might be due to pre-existing conditions rather than the type of music played.
Internal Validity
Internal validity is all about confidence—specifically, confidence that the results of an experiment accurately reflect what you're trying to measure. In the music experiment, it's about being sure that the difference in surgery times was truly caused by the type of music. By using random assignment, the researchers can strengthen their assurance that the music, and not some other factor, led to any differences observed.
  • Random assignment reduces the risk that other variables, like a surgeon's experience or mood, sway the results.
  • This makes it possible to conclude that the type of music played caused any changes in the surgery time.
Maintaining high internal validity is essential for making trustworthy inferences from the study.
Selection Bias
Selection bias could spoil the results of an experiment. It happens when there are systematic differences between the groups being compared. Imagine if more skilled surgeons were placed in the non-vocal music group and less skilled ones in the vocal music group. Any difference in performance could be due to their skill levels, not the music.
  • Random assignment is a handy tool to combat selection bias.
  • It ensures any characteristic discrepancies are evenly spread out across all conditions.
By assigning surgeons randomly, the researchers can minimize the chance that differences in outcomes arise because of the participants rather than the impact of the music itself.
Generalizability
Generalizability is the ability to apply findings from an experiment to the general population, beyond just the study's participants. In this case, researchers wanted to know if the impact of vocal versus non-vocal music in surgery could apply to surgeons at large, not just those who participated.
  • Random assignment helps boost generalizability by ensuring the sample is representative of a broader population.
  • This leads to greater confidence that the findings are not just a fluke specific to the particular group studied.
Ultimately, enhancing generalizability means that the study's conclusions can be assumed to be applicable to a larger set of individuals, making the results more useful and impactful.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A survey of Arizona drivers is described in the article "Study Claims Safety Should Be Made Law" (Red Rock News, August 21,2015\()\). The following statement is from the article: According to the annual survey, which aims to gauge the opinions and concerns of the motoring public across the state regarding traffic safety, Arizona drivers want better traffic safety laws. The survey showed that nine in 10 Arizonans -91 percent \(-\) favor a statewide ban on texting while driving for all drivers, and about two-thirds -64 percent \(-\) favor a primary seat belt law. The article also describes how the data for this survey were collected. A survey was mailed to 2500 randomly selected AAA Arizona members (AAA Arizona is an automobile club that provides services to approximately 860,000 members in Arizona). The article did not indicate how many of the surveys were actually returned. The results of this survey were generalized to all Arizona drivers. Answer the following four questions for this observational study. (Hint: Reviewing Examples 1.4 and 1.5 might be helpful.) a. What is the population of interest? b. Was the sample selected in a reasonable way? c. Is the sample likely to be representative of the population of interest? d. Are there any obvious sources of bias?

For each of the following, determine whether the statistical study described is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation of your choice. a. Can choosing the right music make wine taste better? This question was investigated by a researcher at a university in Edinburgh (www.decanter.com/wine-news /montes-music-makes-wine-reach-parts-it-otherwise -couldnt-reach-82325/, retrieved April 8,2017 ). Each of 250 volunteers was assigned at random to one of five rooms where they were asked to taste and rate a glass of wine. No music was playing in one of the rooms, and a different style of music was playing in each of the other four rooms. The researcher concludedFor each of the following, determine whether the statistical study described is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation of your choice. a. Can choosing the right music make wine taste better? This question was investigated by a researcher at a university in Edinburgh (www.decanter.com/wine-news /montes-music-makes-wine-reach-parts-it-otherwise -couldnt-reach-82325/, retrieved April 8,2017 ). Each of 250 volunteers was assigned at random to one of five rooms where they were asked to taste and rate a glass of wine. No music was playing in one of the rooms, and a different style of music was playing in each of the other four rooms. The researcher concluded that cabernet sauvignon is rated more highly when bold music is played than when no music is played. b. The article "Display of Health Risk Behaviors on MySpace by Adolescents" (Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine [2009]: 27-34) described a study of 500 publically accessible MySpace web profiles posted by 18 -year- olds. The content of each profile was analyzed and the researchers concluded that those who indicated involvement in sports or a hobby were less likely to have references to risky behavior (such as sexual references or references to substance abuse or violence). c. USA TODAY (January 29,2003 ) reported that in a study of affluent Americans (defined as those with incomes of \$ 75,000\( or more per year) \)57 \%$ indicated that they would rather have more time than more money. d. The article "Acupuncture for Bad Backs: Even Sham Therapy Works" (Time, May 12,2009 ) summarized a study conducted by researchers at the Group Health Center for Health Studies in Seattle. In this study, 638 adults with back pain were randomly assigned to one of four groups. People in group 1 received the usual care for back pain. People in group 2 received acupuncture at a set of points tailored specifically for each individual. People in group 3 received acupuncture at a standard set of points typically used in the treatment of back pain. Those in group 4 received fake acupuncture- they were poked with a toothpick at the same set of points used for the people in group 3 . Two notable conclusions from the study were: (1) patients receiving real or fake acupuncture experienced a greater reduction in pain than those receiving usual care; and (2) there was no significant difference in pain reduction between those who received real acupuncture (groups 2 and 3 ) and those who received fake acupuncture toothpick pokes.

According to the article "Rubbing Hands Together Under Warm Air Dryers Can Counteract Bacteria Reduction" (Infectious Disease News, September 22,2010 ), washing your hands isn't enough-good "hand hygiene" also includes drying hands thoroughly. The article described an experiment to compare bacteria reduction for three different hand-drying methods. In this experiment, subjects handled uncooked chicken for 45 seconds, then washed their hands with a single squirt of soap for 60 seconds, and then used one of the three hand-drying methods. The bacteria count on their hands was then measured. Suppose you want to carry out a similar experiment with 30 subjects who are willing to participate. Describe the steps in a process you might use to randomly assign each of the 30 subjects to one of the hand-drying methods.

For each of the statistical studies described, indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice. A paper appearing in The Journal of Pain (March 2010 , 199-209) described a study to determine if meditation has an effect on sensitivity to pain. Study participants were assigned to one of three groups. One group meditated for 20 minutes; one group performed a distraction task (working math problems!) for 20 minutes; and one group practiced a relaxation technique for 20 minutes. Sensitivity to pain was measured both before and after the 20 -minute session.

Does playing action video games provide more than just entertainment? The authors of the paper "Action-VideoGame Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision" (Psychological Science [2007]: 88-94) concluded that spatial resolution, an important aspect of vision, is improved by playing action video games. They based this conclusion on data from an experiment in which 32 volunteers who had not played action video games were "equally and randomly divided between the experimental and control groups." Subjects in each group played a video game for 30 hours over a period of 6 weeks. Those in the experimental group played Unreal Tournament 2004 , an action video game. Those in the control group played Tetris, a game that does not require the user to process multiple objects at once. Explain why it was important for the researchers to randomly assign the subjects to the two groups.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.