/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 46 A study described in Food Networ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 1: Problem 46

A study described in Food Network Magazine (January 2012) concluded that people who push a shopping cart at a grocery store are less likely to purchase junk food than those who use a hand-held basket. a. Do you think this study was an observational study or an experiment? b. Is it reasonable to conclude that pushing a shopping cart causes people to be less likely to purchase junk food? Explain why or why not.

Short Answer

Expert verified
This study was an observational study, as no variables were manipulated by researchers. It is not reasonable to conclude that pushing a shopping cart causes people to be less likely to purchase junk food based on this observational study alone, as there might be other confounding factors involved.

Step by step solution

01

Part A: Identifying the Type of Study

To determine whether this study was an observational study or an experiment, let's give a brief definition of each. - Observational Study: A study in which the researcher simply observes and records the behavior of participants without controlling any variables. No intervention is made, and no manipulation of factors is done. - Experiment: A study in which the researcher actively manipulates one or more factors or variables to see the effects on other characteristics. Now, based on the provided information, there's no mention of researchers manipulating any variables or interventions made to the shoppers. Therefore, we can infer that this study was an observational study.
02

Part B: Assessing the Causality

In order to see if it's reasonable to conclude that pushing a shopping cart causes people to be less likely to purchase junk food, we need to determine if there's a causal relationship between using a shopping cart and purchasing less junk food. An important rule in statistics is that "correlation does not imply causation," which means that just because two variables are related doesn't necessarily mean that one caused the other. Since the Food Network Magazine conducted an observational study and not an experiment, they didn't manipulate any variables to see the cause-and-effect relationship. It is possible that there are other factors or variables (called confounding factors) that could affect the purchase of junk food, such as health consciousness, budget constraints, or a store's layout. Moreover, it could be the case that people using shopping carts are shopping for larger families and have a different set of priorities than those using hand-held baskets. So, it is not reasonable to conclude that pushing a shopping cart causes people to be less likely to purchase junk food based on this observational study alone, as there might be other factors involved rather than just the type of shopping container used by the shoppers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Causality in Statistics
In statistics, causality refers to the relationship between two events where one event is the result of the occurrence of the other event. Essentially, it examines whether a cause-and-effect relationship exists. A cause is anything that directly produces an event, while an effect is the condition that arises from a particular cause.

Understanding causality helps in determining whether changes in one variable directly result in changes in another. This is crucial because assuming causation incorrectly can lead to misguided conclusions and decisions. For example, we might think using a shopping cart causes less junk food to be purchased, but this needs a rigorous check of cause and effect.

To establish causality, researchers typically need controlled experiments where specific variables can be manipulated to observe the effects. This is why experiments are often favored over observational studies when trying to determine causal relationships, as manipulation and control of variables help to rule out other influencing factors.
Correlation versus Causation
The phrase "correlation does not imply causation" is foundational in statistics and scientific research. Correlation indicates a relationship or association between two variables, meaning they tend to change together. However, it doesn't mean one causes the other to happen.

Let's think about pushing a shopping cart and purchasing junk food. We might notice that these two aspects are related. But just because fewer junk foods are bought by people with carts doesn't mean the cart is the cause of this behavior. It could be that people using carts have other reasons affecting their choices, such as shopping for a large family which may prioritize healthier options.

When analysing data, always be cautious about jumping to causal conclusions based on correlations alone. It is crucial to look for alternative explanations or perform further analysis through more controlled experiments.
Confounding Factors
Confounding factors are variables that can influence both the dependent and independent variables, potentially misleading the analysis of the relationship between them. These are factors that, if ignored, can suggest a false association or mask a true relationship.

In the scenario where shopping carts seem to be associated with buying less junk food, numerous confounding factors could be at play:
  • Health consciousness: Individuals using shopping carts may be more health-conscious and thus purchase less junk food overall.
  • Shopping purpose: Those with larger loads may be shopping for families and focusing on staple groceries over snacks.
  • Store environment: The layout or promotions of the store may influence how shoppers use baskets versus carts.

Identifying potential confounding factors is crucial in observational studies. Careful consideration of these factors ensures a more accurate interpretation of data and helps prevent erroneous conclusions about causality.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Does playing action video games provide more than just entertainment? The authors of the paper "Action-VideoGame Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision" (Psychological Science [2007]: 88-94) concluded that spatial resolution, an important aspect of vision, is improved by playing action video games. They based this conclusion on data from an experiment in which 32 volunteers who had not played action video games were "equally and randomly divided between the experimental and control groups." Subjects in each group played a video game for 30 hours over a period of 6 weeks. Those in the experimental group played Unreal Tournament 2004 , an action video game. Those in the control group played Tetris, a game that does not require the user to process multiple objects at once. Explain why it was important for the researchers to randomly assign the subjects to the two groups.

In an experiment to compare two different surgical procedures for hernia repair ("A Single-Blinded, Randomized Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Hernia Repair in Children," Pediatrics [2009]: 332-336), 89 children were assigned at random to one of the two surgical methods. The methods studied were laparoscopic repair and open repair. In laparoscopic repair, three small incisions are made, and the surgeon works through these incisions with the aid of a small camera that is inserted through one of the incisions. In the open repair, a larger incision is used to open the abdomen. One of the response variables was the amount of medication given after the surgery to control pain and nausea. The paper states, "For postoperative pain, rescue fentanyl ( \(1 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{kg}\) ) and for nausea, ondansetron \((0.1 \mathrm{mg} / \mathrm{kg})\) were given as judged necessary by the attending nurse blinded to the operative approach." a. Why do you think it was important that the nurse who administered the medications did not know which type of surgery was performed? b. Explain why it was not possible for this experiment to be double-blind.

The supervisors of a rural county are interested in the proportion of property owners who support the construction of a sewer system. Because it is too costly to contact all 7000 property owners, a survey of 500 owners (selected at random) is undertaken. Describe the population and the sample for this problem.

The article "Rethinking Calcium Supplements" (U.S. Airways Magazine, October 2010) describes a study investigating whether taking calcium supplements increases the risk of heart attack. Consider the following four study descriptions. For each study, answer the following five questions: Question 1: Is the study described an observational study or an experiment? Question 2: Did the study use random selection from some population? Question 3: Did the study use random assignment to experimental groups? Question 4: Based on the study description, would it be reasonable to conclude that taking calcium supplements is the cause of the increased risk of heart attack? Question 5: Would it be reasonable to generalize conclusions from this study to some larger population? If so, what population? Study 1: Every heart attack patient and every patient admitted for an illness other than heart attack during the month of December, 2010 , at a large urban hospital was asked if he or she took calcium supplements. The proportion of heart attack patients who took calcium supplements was significantly higher than the proportion of patients admitted for other illnesses who took calcium supplements. Study 2: Two hundred people were randomly selected from a list of all people living in Minneapolis who receive Social Security. Each person in the sample was asked whether or not they took calcium supplements. These people were followed for 5 years, and whether or not they had had a heart attack during the 5-year period was noted. The proportion of heart attack victims in the group taking calcium supplements was significantly higher than the proportion of heart attack victims in the group not taking calcium supplements. Study 3: Two hundred people were randomly selected from a list of all people living in Minneapolis who receive Social Security. Each person was asked to participate in a statistical study, and all agreed to participate. Those who had no previous history of heart problems were instructed not to take calcium supplements. Those with a previous history of heart problems were instructed to take calcium supplements. The participants were followed for 5 years, and whether or not they had had a heart attack during the 5 -year period was noted. The proportion of heart attack victims in the calcium supplement group was significantly higher than the proportion of heart attack victims in the no calcium supplement group. Study 4: Four hundred people volunteered to participate in a 10-year study. Each volunteer was assigned at random to either group 1 or group \(2 .\) Those in group 1 took a daily calcium supplement. Those in group 2 did not take a calcium supplement. The proportion who suffered a heart attack during the 10 -year study period was noted for each group. The proportion of heart attack victims in group 1 was significantly higher than the proportion of heart attack victims in group 2

Use the following information to answer Exercise. Many surgeons play music in the operating room. Does the type of music played have an effect on the surgeons' performance? The report "Death Metal in the Operating Room" (NPR, December 24, 2009, www.npr.org, retrieved April 8,2017 ) describes an experiment in which surgeons used a simulator to perform a surgery. Some of the surgeons listened to music with vocal elements while performing the surgery, and others listened to music that did not have vocal elements. The researchers concluded that the average time to complete the surgery was greater when music with vocal elements is played than when music without vocal elements is played. Explain why it is important that the surgeons be assigned at random to the two music conditions in the experiment described above.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Pure Maths

Read Explanation

Probability and Statistics

Read Explanation

Decision Maths

Read Explanation

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation

Geometry

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.