/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 61 For each of the following, deter... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For each of the following, determine whether the statistical study described is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation of your choice. a. Can choosing the right music make wine taste better? This question was investigated by a researcher at a university in Edinburgh (www.decanter.com/wine-news /montes-music-makes-wine-reach-parts-it-otherwise -couldnt-reach-82325/, retrieved April 8,2017 ). Each of 250 volunteers was assigned at random to one of five rooms where they were asked to taste and rate a glass of wine. No music was playing in one of the rooms, and a different style of music was playing in each of the other four rooms. The researcher concludedFor each of the following, determine whether the statistical study described is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation of your choice. a. Can choosing the right music make wine taste better? This question was investigated by a researcher at a university in Edinburgh (www.decanter.com/wine-news /montes-music-makes-wine-reach-parts-it-otherwise -couldnt-reach-82325/, retrieved April 8,2017 ). Each of 250 volunteers was assigned at random to one of five rooms where they were asked to taste and rate a glass of wine. No music was playing in one of the rooms, and a different style of music was playing in each of the other four rooms. The researcher concluded that cabernet sauvignon is rated more highly when bold music is played than when no music is played. b. The article "Display of Health Risk Behaviors on MySpace by Adolescents" (Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine [2009]: 27-34) described a study of 500 publically accessible MySpace web profiles posted by 18 -year- olds. The content of each profile was analyzed and the researchers concluded that those who indicated involvement in sports or a hobby were less likely to have references to risky behavior (such as sexual references or references to substance abuse or violence). c. USA TODAY (January 29,2003 ) reported that in a study of affluent Americans (defined as those with incomes of \$ 75,000\( or more per year) \)57 \%$ indicated that they would rather have more time than more money. d. The article "Acupuncture for Bad Backs: Even Sham Therapy Works" (Time, May 12,2009 ) summarized a study conducted by researchers at the Group Health Center for Health Studies in Seattle. In this study, 638 adults with back pain were randomly assigned to one of four groups. People in group 1 received the usual care for back pain. People in group 2 received acupuncture at a set of points tailored specifically for each individual. People in group 3 received acupuncture at a standard set of points typically used in the treatment of back pain. Those in group 4 received fake acupuncture- they were poked with a toothpick at the same set of points used for the people in group 3 . Two notable conclusions from the study were: (1) patients receiving real or fake acupuncture experienced a greater reduction in pain than those receiving usual care; and (2) there was no significant difference in pain reduction between those who received real acupuncture (groups 2 and 3 ) and those who received fake acupuncture toothpick pokes.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Study a. Music and Wine Tasting: This study is an experiment since the researcher controlled the music conditions and randomly assigned volunteers to different rooms with different conditions. Study b. MySpace Health Risk Behaviors: This is an observational study because the researchers did not manipulate any factors; they only observed and recorded existing data on the MySpace web profiles. Study c. Time vs. Money Affluent Americans Survey: This is an observational study because the researchers only gathered data from respondents about their preferences, without controlling or manipulating any factors. Study d. Acupuncture and Back Pain: This study is an experiment because participants were randomly assigned to different treatment groups, and the researchers actively controlled the type of treatment given.

Step by step solution

01

Study a. Music and Wine Tasting

In this research study, the volunteers were randomly assigned to one of five rooms with different music conditions. The responses of participants (taste and rating of wine) were then recorded and analyzed. This is an example of an experiment, as the researcher controlled the music conditions and randomly assigned volunteers to these different conditions.
02

Study b. MySpace Health Risk Behaviors

In this study, researchers analyzed the content of 500 publicly accessible MySpace web profiles posted by 18-year-olds. They observed and recorded information on the profiles and looked for patterns between sports/hobby involvement and risky behavior display. This is an observational study because the researchers did not manipulate or control any factors or conditions; they simply observed existing data on the web profiles.
03

Study c. Time vs. Money Affluent Americans Survey

The USA TODAY survey collected data from affluent Americans (those with incomes of $75,000 or more per year) and recorded their preferences for more time or more money. This is an observational study because the researchers did not manipulate or control any factors; they only gathered data from respondents about their preferences.
04

Study d. Acupuncture and Back Pain

In this study, 638 adults with back pain were randomly assigned to one of four groups with different treatments for their back pain (usual care, individualized acupuncture points, standard acupuncture points, or fake acupuncture with a toothpick). This is an example of an experiment because the researchers actively assigned participants to different treatment groups and controlled the type of treatment given.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Observational Study
In an observational study, researchers meticulously collect data without actively interfering with the study subjects. Participants' behaviors or outcomes are observed as they naturally occur, allowing for the study of real-world dynamics. For instance, the analysis of MySpace profiles in regards to health risk behaviors falls into this category. Researchers gathered insights from the existing content, making this a passive approach to understanding the relationship between hobbies and risky behaviors. Observational studies are integral in fields such as epidemiology and social sciences, where manipulating the environment can be ethically or practically impossible.

However, a major limitation of these studies is that they can't establish causality definitively. Since researchers do not control variables, they can't be certain that observed relationships aren't influenced by unseen factors. This is why these studies are excellent for generating hypotheses but less so for confirming them directly.
Experiment
By contrast, an experiment is characterized by the active manipulation of variables. It's designed to test hypotheses under controlled conditions, which allows researchers to draw conclusions about cause and effect. For example, the wine tasting study that played different music in each room and the acupuncture research with various treatment groups are examples of experiments. By randomly assigning participants to different conditions and directly influencing their experiences, researchers gain the power to make stronger assertions about how one variable impacts another.

Experiments can be conducted in both natural settings and laboratories, with the aim of applying treatments or interventions consistently across groups. For education, this method is pivotal in scientifically exploring the efficacy of different teaching techniques or learning tools in improving student outcomes.
Random Assignment
Random assignment is a powerful tool within an experimental design that helps ensure that each participant has an equal chance of being placed in any treatment group. It's the lottery system of research, crucial for eliminating biases. The wine tasting and acupuncture studies utilized this technique, thereby minimizing preexisting differences among participants that could influence the outcome. By randomizing who receives which treatment—whether it's a type of music or an acupuncture intervention—researchers can be more confident that the results are due to the treatment itself rather than some other variable.

When used effectively, random assignment can enhance a study's internal validity, increasing the likelihood that the findings are trustworthy and accurately represent the effects of the treatments being tested.
Treatment Control
Finally, treatment control is an essential aspect of experimental design, referring to the regulation of variables other than the independent variable. Such control allows for a clear measurement of the effect a specific treatment has. In the acupuncture study, for example, the inclusion of fake acupuncture acts as a control that helps delineate the effects of real acupuncture from the placebo effect. By comparing different levels of treatment—standard care, individualized acupuncture, standard acupuncture points, and no acupuncture—we gain insights into what aspects of treatment (if any) are effective.

Effective control of treatments is vital as it contributes to the study's external validity, which is how well the results of the study can be generalized to the broader population. The more controlled and consistent the treatment application, the more confident one can be in replicating the study with similar results.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The paper "Effect of a Nutritional Supplement on Hair Loss in Women" (Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology \([2015]: 76-82)\) describes an experiment to see if a dietary supplement consisting of Omega \(3,\) Omega \(6,\) and antioxidants could reduce hair loss in women with stage 1 hair loss. One hundred twenty women volunteered to participate in the study and were randomly assigned to either the supplement group or a control group. The women in the supplement group took the supplement for 6 months. Photos of the top of the head were taken of all the women at the beginning of the study and 6 months later at the end of the study. The two photos of each woman were evaluated by an independent expert who visually determined the change in hair density. The expert who determined the change in hair density did not know which of the women had taken the supplement. Answer the following seven questions for the described experiment. (Hint: Reviewing Examples 1.6 and 1.7 might be helpful.) 1\. What question is the experiment trying to answer? 2\. What are the experimental conditions (treatments) for this experiment? 3\. What is the response variable? 4\. What are the experimental units and how were they selected? 5\. Does the design incorporate random assignment of experimental units to the different experimental conditions? If not, are there potentially confounding variables that would make it difficult to draw conclusions based on data from the experiment? 6\. Does the experiment incorporate a control group and/ or a placebo group? If not, would the experiment be improved by including one or both of these? 7\. Does the experiment involve blinding? If not, would the experiment be improved by making it single- or double-blind?

Can moving their hands help children learn math? This is the question investigated by the authors of the paper "Gesturing Gives Children New Ideas about Math" (Psychological Science [2009]: 267-272). An experiment was conducted to compare two different methods for teaching children how to solve math problems of the form \(3+2+8=\underline{ }+8\). One method involved having students point to the \(3+2\) on the left side of the equal sign with one hand and then point to the blank on the right side of the equal sign before filling in the blank to complete the equation. The other method did not involve using these hand gestures. The paper states that the study used children ages 9 and 10 who were given a pretest containing six problems of the type described. Only children who answered all six questions incorrectly became subjects in the experiment. There were a total of 128 subjects. To compare the two methods, the 128 children were assigned at random to the two experimental conditions. Children in one group were taught a method that used hand gestures, and children in the other group were taught a similar strategy that did not involve hand gestures. Each child then took a test with six problems and received a score based on the number correct. From the resulting data, the researchers concluded that the average score for children who used hand gestures was significantly higher than the average score for children who did not use hand gestures. a. Answer the following seven questions for the experiment described above. (Hint: Reviewing Examples 1.6 and 1.7 might be helpful.) 1\. What question is the experiment trying to answer? 2\. What are the experimental conditions (treatments) for this experiment? 3\. What is the response variable? 4\. What are the experimental units and how were they selected? 5\. Does the design incorporate random assignment of experimental units to the different experimental conditions? If not, are there potentially confounding variables that would make it difficult to draw conclusions based on data from the experiment? 6\. Does the experiment incorporate a control group and/ or a placebo group? If not, would the experiment be improved by including them? 7\. Does the experiment involve blinding? If not, would the experiment be improved by making it single-or double-blind? b. Based on the study design, do you think that the conclusions are reasonable?

For each of the statistical studies described, indicate whether the study is an observational study or an experiment. Give a brief explanation for your choice. The following conclusion from a statistical study appeared in the article "Smartphone Nation" (AARP Bulletin, September 2009): "If you love your smartphone, you're far from alone. Half of all boomers sleep with their cell phone within arm's length. Two of three people ages 50 to 64 use a cell phone to take photos, according to a 2010 Pew Research Center report."

An article titled "Guard Your Kids Against Allergies: Get Them a Pet" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, August 28,2002\()\) described a study that led researchers to conclude that "babies raised with two or more animals are about half as likely to have allergies by the time they turned six." Explain why it is not reasonable to conclude that being raised with two or more animals is the cause of the observed lower allergy rate.

Use the following information to answer. The paper "Turning to Learn: Screen Orientation and Reasoning from Small Devices" (Computers in Human Behavior [2011]\(: 793-797)\) describes a study that investigated whether cell phones with small screens are useful for gathering information. The researchers wondered if the ability to reason using information read on a small screen was affected by the screen orientation. The researchers assigned 33 undergraduate students who were enrolled in a psychology course at a large public university to one of two groups at random. One group read material that was displayed on a small screen in portrait orientation, and the other group read material on the same size screen but turned to display the information in landscape orientation (see the following figure). The researchers found that performance on a reasoning test based on the displayed material was better for the group that read material in the landscape orientation. Is the conclusion that reasoning using information displayed on a small screen is improved by turning the screen to landscape orientation appropriate, given the study design described above? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.