/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 62 The student senate at a college ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The student senate at a college with 15,000 students is interested in the proportion of students who favor a change in the grading system to allow for plus and minus grades (for example, \(\mathrm{B}+, \mathrm{B}, \mathrm{B}-\) rather than just \(\mathrm{B}\) ). Two hundred students are interviewed to determine their attitude toward this proposed change. What is the population of interest? What group of students constitutes the sample in this problem?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The population of interest in this problem is the 15,000 students at the college, as we want to study their opinions on the proposed grading system change. The sample group consists of the 200 students who were interviewed to determine their attitude toward the proposed change.

Step by step solution

01

The population of interest is the group of individuals whose opinions or characteristics we want to study. In this case, we are interested in the opinions of all the students at the college regarding the change in the grading system. So, the population of interest here is the college students. There are 15,000 students in total at the college. #Step 2: Identify the sample group#

The sample group is a smaller group of individuals selected from the population of interest to study their opinions or characteristics. In this exercise, 200 students are interviewed to determine their attitude toward the proposed change in the grading system. Therefore, the sample group consists of these 200 students who were interviewed. So, the population of interest consists of 15,000 students, and the sample group consists of 200 students who were interviewed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Population of Interest
Understanding the population of interest is crucial in any statistical study. It's the entire set of individuals or objects about which information is desired. In the context of the college exercise, the population of interest refers to the 15,000 students enrolled at the college. When considering changes to the grading system, it's essential to take into account the views of the entire student body, as any changes implemented will affect all of them. Ideally, we'd gather data from every single student, but practically, that's often not feasible due to constraints such as time, cost, and resources.
Sample Group
A sample group is a subset of the population that is surveyed or studied to make inferences about the entire population. In our college example, 200 students form the sample group. They were selected to represent the broader student population's opinions on the grading system proposal. The quality of this sample—how well it represents the larger population—is vital. A sample should be as representative as possible, which means it should mirror the variations within the entire population. This includes ensuring diversity in terms of academic standing, majors, demographics, and any other factor that might influence a student’s opinion on the grading system.
Statistical Sampling
Statistical sampling is the process of selecting a subset of individuals from the population to estimate characteristics of the whole group. There are various sampling methods, such as random sampling, stratified sampling, or cluster sampling, each with its own advantages and pitfalls. For the grading system evaluation, it's not detailed how the 200 students were selected, but if the sampling was random, every student would have an equal chance of being chosen. This method helps to reduce biases and ensure that the sample is representative of the population. If the sampling method isn't random, the resulting data could be skewed, potentially leading to incorrect conclusions about the population’s overall attitude toward grading changes.
Grading System Evaluation
Evaluating a college grading system involves gauging student satisfaction, comprehension, and the effectiveness of the system in reflecting student performance. When the student senate is considering the introduction of plus and minus grades, they need to understand if this change would be received favorably by the student population. Through statistical sampling—like interviewing 200 students—the senate aims to gather opinions which they can analyze to guide their decision. It's important for this evaluation not only to quantify the level of support but also to understand the reasons behind students’ preferences. By doing so, any decision on the grading system will be informed, democratic, and in line with the broader preferences of the student community.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Heartfelt Thanks to Fido" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, July 5,2003 ) summarized a study that appeared in the American Journal of Cardiology (March 15, 2003). In this study, researchers measured heart rate variability (a measure of the heart's ability to handle stress) in patients who had recovered from a heart attack. They found that heart rate variability was higher (which is good and means the heart can handle stress better) for those who owned a dog than for those who did not. a. Based on this study, is it reasonable to conclude that owning a dog causes higher heart rate variability? Explain. b. Is it reasonable to generalize the results of this study to all adult Americans? Explain why or why not.

The SurveyMonkey Blog (February } 11,2015, retrieved September 25,2016\()\) includes an article titled "5 Common Survey Question Mistakes That'll Ruin Your Data." Read this short article, which can be found at the following website, and then answer the following questions. Www.surveymonkey.com/blog/2015/02/11/5 -common-survey-mistakes-ruin-your-data/ a. One of the recommendations in the article is "Don't write leading questions." Give an example of a leading question that is different from the two examples given in the article. Explain why you think the question is a leading question and then suggest a better way to word the question. b. Select one of the other four recommendations and give an example of a bad question related to that recommendation. Then suggest a better way to word the question.

The article "Rethinking Calcium Supplements" (U.S. Airways Magazine, October 2010) describes a study investigating whether taking calcium supplements increases the risk of heart attack. Consider the following four study descriptions. For each study, answer the following five questions: Question 1: Is the study described an observational study or an experiment? Question 2: Did the study use random selection from some population? Question 3: Did the study use random assignment to experimental groups? Question 4: Based on the study description, would it be reasonable to conclude that taking calcium supplements is the cause of the increased risk of heart attack? Question 5: Would it be reasonable to generalize conclusions from this study to some larger population? If so, what population? Study 1: Every heart attack patient and every patient admitted for an illness other than heart attack during the month of December, 2010 , at a large urban hospital was asked if he or she took calcium supplements. The proportion of heart attack patients who took calcium supplements was significantly higher than the proportion of patients admitted for other illnesses who took calcium supplements. Study 2: Two hundred people were randomly selected from a list of all people living in Minneapolis who receive Social Security. Each person in the sample was asked whether or not they took calcium supplements. These people were followed for 5 years, and whether or not they had had a heart attack during the 5-year period was noted. The proportion of heart attack victims in the group taking calcium supplements was significantly higher than the proportion of heart attack victims in the group not taking calcium supplements. Study 3: Two hundred people were randomly selected from a list of all people living in Minneapolis who receive Social Security. Each person was asked to participate in a statistical study, and all agreed to participate. Those who had no previous history of heart problems were instructed not to take calcium supplements. Those with a previous history of heart problems were instructed to take calcium supplements. The participants were followed for 5 years, and whether or not they had had a heart attack during the 5 -year period was noted. The proportion of heart attack victims in the calcium supplement group was significantly higher than the proportion of heart attack victims in the no calcium supplement group. Study 4: Four hundred people volunteered to participate in a 10-year study. Each volunteer was assigned at random to either group 1 or group \(2 .\) Those in group 1 took a daily calcium supplement. Those in group 2 did not take a calcium supplement. The proportion who suffered a heart attack during the 10 -year study period was noted for each group. The proportion of heart attack victims in group 1 was significantly higher than the proportion of heart attack victims in group 2

Use the following information to answer. The paper "Turning to Learn: Screen Orientation and Reasoning from Small Devices" (Computers in Human Behavior [2011]\(: 793-797)\) describes a study that investigated whether cell phones with small screens are useful for gathering information. The researchers wondered if the ability to reason using information read on a small screen was affected by the screen orientation. The researchers assigned 33 undergraduate students who were enrolled in a psychology course at a large public university to one of two groups at random. One group read material that was displayed on a small screen in portrait orientation, and the other group read material on the same size screen but turned to display the information in landscape orientation (see the following figure). The researchers found that performance on a reasoning test based on the displayed material was better for the group that read material in the landscape orientation. Is the conclusion that reasoning using information displayed on a small screen is improved by turning the screen to landscape orientation appropriate, given the study design described above? Explain.

Use the following information to answer Exercise. Many surgeons play music in the operating room. Does the type of music played have an effect on the surgeons' performance? The report "Death Metal in the Operating Room" (NPR, December 24, 2009, www.npr.org, retrieved April 8,2017 ) describes an experiment in which surgeons used a simulator to perform a surgery. Some of the surgeons listened to music with vocal elements while performing the surgery, and others listened to music that did not have vocal elements. The researchers concluded that the average time to complete the surgery was greater when music with vocal elements is played than when music without vocal elements is played. Explain why it is important that the surgeons be assigned at random to the two music conditions in the experiment described above.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.