/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q34E The article 鈥淭he Responsivenes... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The article 鈥淭he Responsiveness of Food Sales to Shelf Space Requirements鈥 (J. Marketing Research, 1964: 63鈥67) reports the use of a Latin square design to investigate the effect of shelf space on food sales. The experiment was carried out over a 6-week period using six different stores, resulting in the following data on sales of powdered coffee cream (with shelf space index in parentheses):

\({X_{ij(k)}} = \mu + {\alpha _i} + {\beta _j} + {\partial _k} + {\`o _{ij(k)}},\quad i,j,k = 1,2, \ldots ,N\)

Construct the ANOVA table, and state and test at level .01 the hypothesis that shelf space does not affect sales against the appropriate alternative.

Short Answer

Expert verified

It appears that the shelf space does not affect sales.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1:Notations for totals and averages

Assume that two and three factor interaction effects are absent!

A Latin square design model equation is given by

\({\rm{\;where\;}}I = J = K = N{\rm{,\;}}\)

and the errors are independent and normally distributed with mean zero and variance \({\sigma ^2}\).The notations for totals and averages are

Obesrved values are denoted as x instead of big X.The notations without line over X are just the sums.

02

Step 2:Table with corresponding values

The folowing table needs to completed with corresponding values.

03

Step 3:Degrees of freedom

Sum of squares,for a Latin square experiment and the degree of freedom are given by

\(\)

With degrees of freedom respectively,

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{d{f_T} = {N^2} - 1}\\{d{f_A} = N - 1}\\{d{f_B} = N - 1}\\{d{f_C} = N - 1}\\{d{f_E} = (N - 1)(N - 2).}\end{aligned}\)

04

Step 4:Sum of measurements for factor A

The sum of measurements obtained when factor A is held at level i are

05

Step 5:Sum of measurements obtained for factor B

The Sum of measurements obtained for factor B at level j are

06

Sum of measurements obtained for factor C

The Sum of measurements obtained for factor C at level k are

The grand sum is

07

Step 7:Calculating SST

Every sum of square can be computed using the sums above.The SST is

The SSA is

The SSB is

The SSC is

08

Step 8:Fundamental Identity

\(SST = SSA + SSB + SSC + SSE.\)

By the Fundamental Identity,the error sum of square can be computed as follows

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{SSE = SST - (SSA + SSB + SSC)}\\{ = 8790.98 - 6475.81 - 529.48 - 508.48}\\{ = 1277.21.}\end{aligned}\)

The degrees of freedom are

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{d{f_T} = {N^2} - 1 = 35}\\{d{f_A} = N - 1 = 5}\\{d{f_B} = N - 1 = 5}\\{d{f_C} = N - 1 = 5}\\{d{f_E} = (N - 1)(N - 2) = (6 - 1)(6 - 2) = 20.}\end{aligned}\)

The mean squares are

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{MSA = \frac{1}{{d{f_A}}} \times SSA = \frac{1}{5} \times 6475.81 = 1295.16}\\{MSB = \frac{1}{{d{f_B}}} \times SSB = \frac{1}{5} \times 529.48 = 105.90}\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{MSC = \frac{1}{{d{f_C}}} \cdot SSC = \frac{1}{5} \cdot 508.48 = 101.70}\\{MSE = \frac{1}{{d{f_E}}} \cdot SSE = \frac{1}{{20}} \cdot 1277.21 = 63.86.}\end{aligned}\)

The corresponding f values are

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{{f_A} = \frac{{MSA}}{{MSE}} = \frac{{1295.16}}{{63.86}} = 20.28}\\{{f_B} = \frac{{MSB}}{{MSE}} = \frac{{105.90}}{{63.86}} = 1.66;}\\{{f_C} = \frac{{MSC}}{{MSE}} = \frac{{101.70}}{{63.86}} = 1.59.}\end{aligned}\)

09

Step 9:Calculating P values

The P value can be computed using a software.

\({P_A} = P\left( {F > {f_A}} \right) = P(F > 20.28) = 0.00\)

P-value is the area under the \({F_{N - 1,(N - 1)(N - 2)}}{\rm{\;curve to the right of the test statistic value\;}}{f_A}{\rm{.\;}}\)

\({P_B} = P\left( {F > {f_B}} \right) = P(F > 1.66) = 0.19\)

P-value is the area under the \({F_{N - 1,(N - 1)(N - 2))}}{\rm{\;curve to the right of the test statistic value\;}}{f_B}{\rm{.\;}}\)

\({P_C} = P\left( {F > {f_C}} \right) = P(F > 1.59) = 0.21\)

P-value is the area under the \({F_{N - 1,(N - 1)(N - 2)}}{\rm{\;curve to the right of the test statistic value\;}}{f_C}\)

\({F_{0.01,5,20}} = 4.1\)

10

Step 10:ANOVA Table

Finally, ANOVA Table becomes

11

Step 11:Hypothesis of interests

The Hypothesis of interests are

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{{H_{0A}}:{\alpha _1} = {\alpha _2} = \ldots = {\alpha _I} = 0}&{{\rm{\;versus\;}}}&{{H_{aA}}:{\rm{\;at least one\;}}{\alpha _ - }i \ne 0}\\{{H_{0B}}:{\beta _1} = {\beta _2} = \ldots = {\beta _J} = 0}&{{\rm{\;versus\;}}}&{{H_{aB}}:{\rm{\;at least one\;}}{\beta _ - }j \ne 0}\\{{H_{0C}}:{\delta _1} = {\delta _2} = \ldots = {\delta _K} = 0}&{{\rm{\;versus\;}}}&{{H_{aC}}:{\rm{\;at least one\;}}{\delta _ - }i \ne 0}\end{aligned}\)

\({\rm{\;When testing hypotheses\;}}{H_{0A}}{\rm{\;versus\;}}{H_{aA}}\),the test statistics value is

\({f_A} = \frac{{MSA}}{{MSE}}\)

And the p-value is the area under the \({F_{N - 1,(N - 1)(N - 2)}}\)curve to the right of the test statistic value \({f_A}\)

\({\rm{\;When testing hypotheses\;}}{H_{0B}}{\rm{\;versus\;}}{H_a}{B_{{\rm{.\;}}}}\), the test statistics value is

\({f_B} = \frac{{MSB}}{{MSE}}\)

And the p-value is the area under the \({F_{N - 1,(N - 1)(N - 2)}}\) curve to the right of the test statistic value \({f_B}\)

\({\rm{\;When testing hypotheses\;}}{H_{0C}}{\rm{\;versus\;}}{H_{aC}}\), the test statistics value is

\({f_C} = \frac{{MSC}}{{MSE}}\)

And the p-value is the area under the \({F_{N - 1,(N - 1)(N - 2)}}\) curve to the right of the test statistic value \({f_C}.\)

12

The shelf space does not affect sales is shown

For factor A

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{{F_{0.01,5,20}} = 4.1 < 20.28 = {f_A}}\\{{P_A} = 0.00 < 0.01 = \alpha }\end{aligned}\)

\({\rm{\;reject null hypothesis\;}}{H_{0A}}\)

\({\rm{\;at given significance level\;}}\alpha {\rm{. Factor (main effect)\;}}\)A is statiscally significant.

For factor B

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{{F_{0.01,5,20}} = 4.1 > 1.66 = {f_B}}\\{{P_B} = 0.19 > 0.01 = \alpha }\end{aligned}\)

\({\rm{\;do not reject null hypothesis\;}}{H_{0B}}\)

\({\rm{\;at given significance level\;}}\alpha {\rm{. Factor (main effect)\;}}\)B is statiscally significant.

For factor C

\(\begin{aligned}{*{20}{c}}{{F_{0.01,5,20}} = 4.1 > 1.59 = {f_C}}\\{{P_C} = 0.21 > 0.01 = \alpha }\end{aligned}\)

\({\rm{\;do not reject null hypothesis\;}}{H_{0C}}\)

\({\rm{\;at given significance level\;}}\alpha {\rm{. Factor (main effect)\;}}\)C is not statiscally significant.

Thus,the shelf space does not affect sales

\(\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Because of potential variability in aging due to different castings and segments on the castings, a Latin square design with N 5 7 was used to investigate the effect of heat treatment on aging. With A 5 castings, B 5 segments, C 5 heat treatments, summary statistics include x??? 5 3815.8, oxi 2 ?? 5 297,216.90, ox?j? 2 5 297,200.64, ox??k 2 5 297,155.01, and ooxijskd 2 5 297,317.65. Obtain the ANOVA table and test at level .05 the hypothesis that heat treatment has no effect on aging.

In an experiment to assess the effects of curing time (factor A ) and type of mix (factor B ) on the compressive strength of hardened cement cubes, three different curing times were used in combination with four different mixes, with three observations obtained for each of the 12 curing time-mix combinations. The resulting sums of squares were computed to be \(SSA = 30,763.0,SSB = 34,185.6,SSE = 97,436.8,\;and SST\; = 205,966.6\)

a. Construct an ANOVA table.

b. Test at level .05 the null hypothesis \({H_{0AB}}:\;all\;{\gamma _{ij}}\;'s\; = 0\) (no interaction of factors) against \({H_{0AB}}\)at least one

c. Test at level .05 the null hypothesis \({H_{0A}}:{\alpha _1} = {\alpha _2} = {\alpha _3} = 0\) (factor A main effects are absent) against \({H_{0A}}\)at least one

d. Test\({H_{0B}}:{\beta _1} = {\beta _2} = {\beta _3} = {\beta _4} = 0\;versus\;{H_{aB}}:\) at least one using a level .05 test.

e. The values of the\({\bar x_{i = \;'s }},{\bar x_{1L}} = 4010.88,{\bar x_{2L}} = 4029.10,\;and\;{\bar x_{3..}} = 3960.02\). Use Turkey鈥檚 procedure to investigate significant differences among the three curing times.

The accompanying data was obtained in an experiment to investigate whether compressive strength of concrete cylinders depends on the type of capping material used or variability in different batches (" The Effect of Type of Capping Material on the Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinders, Proceedings ASTM, 1958: 11661186). Each number is a cell total based on K=3 observations.

The accompanying data resulted from an experiment to investigate whether yield from a certain chemical process depended either on the formulation of a particular input or on mixer speed.

A statistical computer package gave \(SS(\;Form\;) = 2253.44SS(\;Speed\;) = 230.81,\quad SS(\;Form*Speed\;) = 18.58, andSSE = 71.87\;\)

a. Does there appear to be interaction between the factors?

b. Does yield appear to depend on either formulation or speed?

c. Calculate estimates of the main effects.

d. The fitted values are\({\hat x_{ijk}} = \hat \mu + {\hat \alpha _i} + {\hat \beta _j} + {\hat \gamma _{ij}}\), and the residuals are \({x_{ijk}} - {\hat x_{ij{k^*}}}\)Verify that the residuals \(are.23, - .87,.63,4.50, - 1.20, - 3.30, - 2.03,1.97.07, - 1.10, - .30,1.40,.67, - 1.23,.57, - 3.43, - .13,\;\;and 3.57.\;\)e. Construct a normal probability plot from the residuals given in part (d). Do they \({ \in _{ijk}}\;'s\;\)appear to be normally distributed?

An investigation of the machinability of beryllium-copper alloy using two different dielectric mediums and four different working currents resulted in the following data on material removal rate (this is a subset of the data that appeared in the article 鈥淪tatistical Analysis and Optimization Study on the Machinability of Beryllium Copper Alloy in Electro Discharge Machining,鈥 J. of Engr. Manufacture, 2012: 1847鈥1861).

a. After constructing an ANOVA table, test at level .05 both the hypothesis of no medium effect against the appropriate alternative and the hypothesis of no working current effect against the appropriate alternative.

b. Use Tukey鈥檚 procedure to investigate differences in expected material removal rate due to different working currents (Q.05,4,3 = 6.825).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.