/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q22 E According to the article "Modeli... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

According to the article "Modeling and Predicting the Effects of Submerged Arc Weldment Process Parameters on Weldment Characteristics and Shape Profiles" (J. of Engr. Manuf., \(2012: 1230 - 1240\)), the submerged arc welding (SAW) process is commonly used for joining thick plates and pipes. The heat affected zone (HAZ), a band created within the base metal during welding, was of particular interest to the investigators. Here are observations on depth\((mm)\)of the HAZ both when the current setting was high and when it was lower.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{ Non - high }&{1.04}&{1.15}&{1.23}&{1.69}&{1.92}\\{}&{1.98}&{2.36}&{2.49}&{2.72}&{}\\{}&{1.37}&{1.43}&{1.57}&{1.71}&{1.94}\\{ High }&{2.06}&{2.55}&{2.64}&{2.82}&{}\\{}&{1.55}&{2.02}&{2.02}&{2.05}&{2.35}\\{}&{2.57}&{2.93}&{2.94}&{2.97}&{}\end{array}\)

a. Construct a comparative boxplot and comment on interesting features.

b. Is it reasonable to use the two-sample \(t\) test to test hypotheses about the difference between true average HAZ depths for the two conditions?

c. Does it appear that true average HAZ depth is larger for the higher current condition than for the lower condition? Carry out a test of appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of . \(01\).

Short Answer

Expert verified

a)Non-high: Roughly symmetric High: Strongly skewed.

b) Reasonable

C) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average HAZ depth is larger for the higher current condition than for the lower condition.

Step by step solution

01

a)Step 1: To find the quartile for Non high values

Given:

Non-high (sorted):\(1.04, 1.15, 1.23, 1.37, 1.43, 1.57, 1.69, 1.71, 1.92, 1.94, 1.98, 2.06, 2.36, 2.49, 2.55, 2.64, 2.72, 2.82\)

High: \(\;1.55,{\rm{ }}2.02,{\rm{ }}2.02,{\rm{ }}2.05,{\rm{ }}2.35,{\rm{ }}2.57,{\rm{ }}2.93,{\rm{ }}2.94,{\rm{ }}2.97\)

NON HIGH

The minimum is\(1.04\).

Since the number of data values is even, the median is the average of the two middle values of the sorted data set:

\(M = {Q_2} = \frac{{19.2 + 19.4}}{2} = 1.93\)

The first quartile is the median of the data values below the median (or at\(25\% \)of the data):

\({Q_1} = 1.43\)

The third quartile is the median of the data values above the median (or at\(75\% \)of the data):

\({Q_3} = 2.49\)

The maximum is \(2.82.\)

02

To find the quartile for High values

HIGH

The minimum is\(1.55.\)

Since the number of data values is odd, the median is the middle value of the sorted data set:

\(M = {Q_2} = 2.35\)

The first quartile is the median of the data values below the median (or at\(25\% \)of the data):

\({Q_1} = \frac{{2.02 + 2.02}}{2} = 2.02\)

The third quartile is the median of the data values above the median (or at\(75\% \)of the data):

\({Q_3} = \frac{{2.93 + 2.94}}{2} = 2.935\)

The maximum is \(2.97\).

03

Plot the graph

BOXPLOT

The whiskers of the boxplot are at the minimum and maximum value. The box starts at the first quartile, ends at the third quartile and has a vertical line at the median.

The first quartile is at \(25\% \)of the sorted data list, the median at \(50\% \)and the third quartile at \(75\% .\)

Because the box of the boxplot lies to the right in between the whiskers, the distribution of "High" is severely skewed.

Because the box of the boxplot lies nearly in the middle between the whiskers and the vertical line of the median in the box of the boxplot lies roughly in the middle of the box of the boxplot, the distribution of "Non-high" is roughly symmetric.

04

b)Step 4: To find the quartile for Non high values

Given:

Non-high (sorted):\(1.04,1.15,1.23,1.37,1.43,1.57,1.69,1.71,1.92,1.94,1.98,2.06,2.36,2.49,2.55,2.64,2.72,2.82\)

High: \(1.55,2.02,2.02,2.05,2.35,2.57,2.93,2.94,2.97\)

If we want to perform a two-sample\(t\)test, then we require that both sampling distributions of the sample mean are approximately normal.

NON HIGH

We will create a normal probability plot.

The data values are on the horizontal axis and the standardized normal scores are on the vertical axis.

If the data contains \(n\)data values, then the standardized normal scores are the z-scores in the normal probability table of the appendix corresponding to an area of\(\frac{{j - 0.5}}{n}\)(or the closest area) with\(j \in \{ 1,2,3, \ldots .,n\} \).

The smallest standardized score corresponds with the smallest data value, the second smallest standardized score corresponds with the second smallest data value, and so on.

05

To find the quartile for Non high values

HIGH

We will create a normal probability plot.

The data values are on the horizontal axis and the standardized normal scores are on the vertical axis.

If the data contains\(n\)data values, then the standardized normal scores are the z-scores in the normal probability table of the appendix corresponding to an area of\(\frac{{j - 0.5}}{n}\)(or the closest area) with\(j \in \{ 1,2,3, \ldots ,n\} \).

The smallest standardized score corresponds with the smallest data value, the second smallest standardized score corresponds with the second smallest data value, and so on.

If the pattern in the normal probability plot is roughly linear and does not contain strong The population distribution is approximated normal if the pattern in the normal probability plot is generally linear and does not contain substantial curvature.

Because neither probability map has a lot of curvature and is roughly linear, both population distributions are roughly normal.

The sampling distribution of the sample mean(s) \(\bar x\) is similarly nearly normal since the population distributions are approximately normal. As a result, the two-sample test is suitable.

06

c)Step 6: Determine the standard deviation

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = 18\\{n_2} = 9\\\alpha = 0.01\end{array}\)

The mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = \frac{{1.04 + 1.15 + 1.23 + \ldots + 2.55 + 2.64 + 2.82}}{{18}} \approx 1.9261\\{{\bar x}_2} = \frac{{1.55 + 2.02 + 2.02 + \ldots + 2.93 + 2.94 + 2.97}}{9} \approx 2.3778\end{array}\)

The variance is the sum of squared deviations from the mean divided by\(n - 1\). The standard deviation is the square root of the variance:

\(\begin{array}{l}{s_1} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(1.04 - 1.9261)}^2} + \ldots . + {{(2.82 - 1.9261)}^2}}}{{18 - 1}}} \approx 0.5694\\{s_2} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(1.55 - 2.3778)}^2} + \ldots . + {{(2.97 - 2.3778)}^2}}}{{9 - 1}}} \approx 0.5072\end{array}\)

Given claim: larger the the higher current condition.

The claim is either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis state the opposite of each other. The null hypothesis needs to contain the value mentioned in the claim.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _1} = {\mu _2}\\{H_a}:{\mu _1} < {\mu _2}\end{array}\)

07

Find the test statistic

Determine the test statistic:

\(t = \frac{{{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }} = \frac{{1.9261 - 2.3778}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{{{0.5694}^2}}}{{18}} + \frac{{{{0.5072}^2}}}{9}} }} \approx - 2.093\)

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer):

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{{{0.5694}^2}}}{{18}} + \frac{{{{0.5072}^2}}}{9}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {{{0.5694}^2}/18} \right)}^2}}}{{18 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {{{0.5072}^2}/9} \right)}^2}}}{{9 - 1}}}} \approx 17\)

The P-value is the probability of obtaining the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme. The P-value is the number (or interval) in the column title of Student's T distribution in the appendix containing the t-value in the row\(df = 17\):

\(0.025 < P < 0.05\)

If the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, then the null hypothesis is rejected:

\(P > 0.01 \Rightarrow {\rm{ Fail to reject }}{H_0}\)

There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average HAZ depth is larger for the higher current condition than for the lower condition.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The article "Effect of Internal Gas Pressure on the Compression Strength of Beverage Cans and Plastic Bottles" (J. of Testing and Evaluation, \(1993: 129 - 131\)) includes the accompanying data on compression strength (lb) for a sample of\(12 - oz\)aluminum cans filled with strawberry drink and another sample filled with cola. Does the data suggest that the extra carbonation of cola results in a higher average compression strength? Base your answer on a\(P\)-value. What assumptions are necessary for your analysis?

\(\begin{array}{l}BeverageSampleSizeSampleMeanSampleSD\\Strawberrydrink1554021\\Cola1555415\end{array}\)

Recent incidents of food contamination have caused great concern among consumers. The article "How Safe Is That Chicken?" (Consumer Reports, Jan. 2010: 19-23) reported that 35 of 80 randomly selected Perdue brand broilers tested positively for either campylobacter or salmonella (or' both), the leading bacterial causes of food-borne disease, whereas 66 of 80 Tyson brand broilers tested positive.

  1. Does it appear that the true proportion of noncontaminated Perdue broilers differs from that for the Tyson brand? Carry out a test of hypotheses using a significance level .01.
  2. If the true proportions of non-contaminated chickens for the Perdue and Tyson brands are .50 and .25, respectively, how likely is it that the null hypothesis of equal proportions will be rejected when a .01 significance level is used and the sample sizes are both 80?

Example\(7.11\)gave data on the modulus of elasticity obtained\(1\)minute after loading in a certain configuration. The cited article also gave the values of modulus of elasticity obtained\(4\)weeks after loading for the same lumber specimens. The data is presented here. \(1\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{Observation}&{1 min}&{4 weeks}&{Difference}\\1&{10,490}&{9,110}&{1380}\\2&{16,620}&{13,250}&{3370}\\3&{17,300}&{14,720}&{2580}\\4&{15,480}&{12,740}&{2740}\\5&{12,970}&{10,120}&{2850}\\6&{17,260}&{14,570}&{2690}\\7&{13,400}&{11,220}&{2180}\\8&{13,900}&{11,100}&{2800}\\9&{13,630}&{11,420}&{2210}\\{10}&{13,260}&{10,910}&{2350}\\{11}&{14,370}&{12,110}&{2260}\\{12}&{11,700}&{8,620}&{3080}\\{13}&{15,470}&{12,590}&{2880}\\{14}&{17,840}&{15,090}&{2750}\\{15}&{14,070}&{10,550}&{3520}\\{16}&{14,760}&{12,230}&{2530}\end{array}\)

Calculate and interpret an upper confidence bound for the true average difference between\(1\)-minute modulus and\(4\)-week modulus; first check the plausibility of any necessary assumptions.

Scientists and engineers frequently wish to compare two different techniques for measuring or determining the value of a variable. In such situations, interest centers on testing whether the mean difference in measurements is zero. The article "Evaluation of the Deuterium Dilution Technique Against the Test Weighing Procedure for the Determination of Breast Milk Intake" (Amer: J. of Clinical Nutr., \(1983: 996 - 1003\)) reports the accompanying data on amount of milk ingested by each of\(14\)randomly selected infants.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;Infant\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;}\\{\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;1\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;2\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;3\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;4\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;5}\\{D method\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;1509\;\;\;\;\;1418\;\;\;\;\;1561\;\;\;\;\;1556\;\;\;\;\;2169}\\{W method\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;1498\;\;\;\;\;1254\;\;\;\;\;1336\;\;\;\;\;1565\;\;\;\;\;2000}\\{jifference\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;11\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;164\;\;\;\;\;\;\;225\;\;\;\;\;\;\; - 9\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;169}\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{}&{Infant}&{}&{}&{}&{}\\{}&6&7&8&9&{10}\\{DD method}&{1760}&{1098}&{1198}&{1479}&{1281}\\{TW method}&{1318}&{1410}&{1129}&{1342}&{1124}\\{Difference}&{442}&{ - 312}&{69}&{137}&{157}\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{}&{Infant}&{}&{}&{}\\{}&{11}&{12}&{13}&{14}\\{DD method}&{1414}&{1954}&{2174}&{2058}\\{TW method}&{1468}&{1604}&{1722}&{1518}\\{Difference}&{ - 54}&{350}&{452}&{540}\end{array}\)

a. Is it plausible that the population distribution of differences is normal?

b. Does it appear that the true average difference between intake values measured by the two methods is something other than zero? Determine the\(P\)-value of the test, and use it to reach a conclusion at significance level . \(05\).

Antipsychotic drugs are widely prescribed for conditions such as schizophrenia and bipolar disease. The article "Cardiometabolic Risk of SecondGeneration Antipsychotic Medications During First-Time Use in Children and Adolescents"\((J\). of the Amer. Med. Assoc., 2009) reported on body composition and metabolic changes for individuals who had taken various antipsychotic drugs for short periods of time.

a. The sample of 41 individuals who had taken aripiprazole had a mean change in total cholesterol (mg/dL) of\(3.75\), and the estimated standard error\({s_D}/\sqrt n \)was\(3.878\). Calculate a confidence interval with confidence level approximately\(95\% \)for the true average increase in total cholesterol under these circumstances (the cited article included this CI).

b. The article also reported that for a sample of 36 individuals who had taken quetiapine, the sample mean cholesterol level change and estimated standard error were\(9.05\)and\(4.256\), respectively. Making any necessary assumptions about the distribution of change in cholesterol level, does the choice of significance level impact your conclusion as to whether true average cholesterol level increases? Explain. (Note: The article included a\(P\)-value.)

c. For the sample of 45 individuals who had taken olanzapine, the article reported\(99\% CI\)as a\(95\% \)CI for true average weight gain\((kg)\). What is a $\(99\% CI\)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.