/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q86E Two different professors have ju... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Two different professors have just submitted final exams for duplication. Let \({\rm{X}}\) denote the number of typographical errors on the first professor’s exam and \({\rm{Y}}\) denote the number of such errors on the second exam. Suppose \({\rm{X}}\) has a Poisson distribution with parameter \({{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{1}}}\), \({\rm{Y}}\) has a Poisson distribution with parameter \({{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{2}}}\), and \({\rm{X}}\) and \({\rm{Y}}\) are independent.

a. What is the joint pmf of \({\rm{X}}\) and\({\rm{Y}}\)?

b. What is the probability that at most one error is made on both exams combined?

c. Obtain a general expression for the probability that the total number of errors in the two exams is m (where \({\rm{m}}\) is a nonnegative integer). (Hint: \({\rm{A = }}\left\{ {\left( {{\rm{x,y}}} \right){\rm{:x + y = m}}} \right\}{\rm{ = }}\left\{ {\left( {{\rm{m,0}}} \right)\left( {{\rm{m - 1,1}}} \right){\rm{,}}.....{\rm{(1,m - 1),(0,m)}}} \right\}\)Now sum the joint pmf over \({\rm{(x,y)}} \in {\rm{A}}\)and use the binomial theorem, which says that

\({\rm{P(X + Y = m)}}\mathop {\rm{ = }}\limits^{{\rm{(1)}}} {\sum\limits_{{\rm{k = 0}}}^{\rm{m}} {\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{\rm{m}}\\{\rm{k}}\end{array}} \right){{\rm{a}}^{\rm{k}}}{{\rm{b}}^{{\rm{m - k}}}}{\rm{ = }}\left( {{\rm{a + b}}} \right)} ^{\rm{m}}}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The joint is \({\rm{\alpha = \beta = 3}}\)

(b) The probability is \(0.3651\)

(c) The probability is \(0.6349\)

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Probability

Probability is a metric for determining the possibility of an event occurring. Many things are impossible to forecast with \({\rm{100\% }}\)accuracy. Using it, we can only anticipate the probability of an event occurring, or how probable it is to occur. Probability can range from \({\rm{0}}\) to \({\rm{1}}\), with \({\rm{0}}\) indicating an improbable event and 1 indicating a certain event. Possibility of...

02

Find  the joint X and Y?

(a) It is specified \({\rm{Y}}\)as the distance from the left end of the bar at which it snaps. The beta distribution of \({\rm{Y/20}}\)is standard:

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{E(Y) = 10}}\\{\rm{V(Y) = }}\frac{{{\rm{100}}}}{{\rm{7}}}\end{array}\)

Let us take a look at following proposition:

Proposition : When \({\rm{h(X) = aX + b}}\), then \({\rm{h(X)}}\) anticipated value and standard deviation meet the following criteria.

\(\begin{aligned}E[h(X)] &= aE[X] + b \\{\sigma _{h(x)}} &= a{\sigma _x} \\\end{aligned} \)

We may write expected value and variance of using the above proposition\({\rm{Y/20}}\):

\(\begin{aligned}E\left( {\frac{Y}{{20}}} \right) &= \frac{1}{{20}} \times 10\\&= \frac{1}{2} \\ V\left( {\frac{Y}{{20}}}\right) &= \frac{1}{{{{20}^2}}} \times \frac{{100}}{7}\\&= \frac{1}{{28}} \\\end{aligned}\)

Since it is given that \({\rm{Y/20}}\) has a standard beta distribution then in terms of parametes \({\rm{\alpha }}\)and \({\rm{\beta }}\), expressions of it's expected value is :

\(\begin{aligned}E(X)&= \frac{\alpha }{{\alpha + \beta }} \\\frac{1}{2} &= \frac{\alpha }{{\alpha + \beta }} \\\alpha + \beta &= 2\alpha \\\beta &= \alpha \\\end{aligned} \)

Similarly variance \({\rm{V(X)}}\)can be written as:

\(\begin{aligned}V(X)&= \frac{{\alpha \beta }}{{{{(\alpha+\beta)}^2}(\alpha+\beta+ 1)}}\\\frac{5}{7}&= \frac{{\alpha \beta }}{{{{(\alpha+\beta)}^2}(\alpha+\beta+ 1)}}\\\end{aligned}\)

Now we make use of (eq.l) here :

\(\begin{aligned}\frac{1}{{28}} &= \frac{{\alpha \alpha }}{{{{(\alpha + \alpha )}^2}(\alpha + \alpha + 1)}} \\\frac{1}{{28}} &= \frac{{{\alpha ^2}}}{{\left( {4{\alpha ^2}} \right)(2\alpha + 1)}} \\ 4(2\alpha + 1) &= 28 \\\alpha &= 3 \\\beta &= 3 \\\end{aligned} \)

Therefore, The joint is \({\rm{\alpha = \beta = 3}}\).

03

 Find the probability that at most one error is made on both exams combined?

(b) The standard beta distribution's pdf is as follows (let us denote \({\rm{Y/20}}\)as rv \({\rm{X}}\)):

\({\rm{f(x,\alpha ,\beta ) = }}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{\frac{{\Gamma ({\rm{\alpha + \beta )}}}}{{\Gamma (\alpha {\rm{) \times }}\Gamma (\beta )}}{\rm{ \times }}{{\rm{x}}^{{\rm{\alpha - 1}}}}{\rm{ \times (1 - x}}{{\rm{)}}^{{\rm{\beta - 1}}}}}&{0 \le x \le 1}\\0&{{\rm{ otherwise }}}\end{array}} \right.\)

Substituting the parameters' values \({\rm{\alpha = 3}}\)and \({\rm{\beta = 3}}\), we get:

\({\rm{f(x,3,3) = }}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{{\rm{30 \times }}{{\rm{x}}^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ \times (1 - x}}{)^2}}&{0 \le x \le 1}\\0&{{\rm{ otherwise }}}\end{array}} \right.\)

The \({\rm{P(8}} \le {\rm{Y}} \le 12)\)can be written as :

\(\begin{aligned}P(8 \leqslant Y \leqslant 12)&= P\left( {\frac{8}{{20}} \leqslant \frac{Y}{{20}} \leqslant \frac{{12}}{{20}}} \right) \\&= P(0.4 \leqslant X \leqslant 0.6) \\&= \int_{0.4}^{0.6} f (x) \times dx \\&= \int_{0.4}^{0.6} 3 0 \times {x^2} \times {(1 - x)^2} \times dx \\&= \int_{0.4}^{0.6} 3 0 \times {x^2} \times \left( {{x^2} - 2x + 1} \right) \times dx \\&= 30\int_{0.4}^{0.6} {\left( {{x^4} - 2{x^3} + {x^2}} \right)} \times dx \\\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}&= 30\left[ {\frac{{{x^5}}}{5} - 2\frac{{{x^4}}}{4} + \frac{{{x^3}}}{3}} \right]_{0.4}^{0.6} \hfill \\&= 30\left[ {\frac{{{x^5}}}{5} - \frac{{{x^4}}}{2} + \frac{{{x^3}}}{3}} \right]_{0.4}^{0.6} \hfill \\&= 30\left[ {\left( {\frac{{{{(0.6)}^5}}}{5} - \frac{{{{(0.6)}^4}}}{2} + \frac{{{{(0.6)}^3}}}{3}} \right) - \left( {\frac{{{{(0.4)}^5}}}{5} - \frac{{{{(0.4)}^4}}}{2} + \frac{{{{(0.4)}^3}}}{3}} \right)} \right] \hfill \\&= 30[0.02275 - 0.01058] = 0.3651 \hfill \\\end{aligned}\)

\({\rm{P(}}8 \le Y \le 12) = 0.3651\)

Therefore, The probability is \(0.3651\)

04

Find the probability that the total number of errors?

(c) We expect it to snap at \({\rm{10}}\) inches since \({\rm{E(Y) = 10}}\). As a result, the likelihood that the bar snaps more than \({\rm{2}}\) inches from where we expect it to can be expressed as \({\rm{P(X}} < 8\)or \({\rm{Y}} > 12)\).

\(\begin{aligned}P(X < 8{\text{ }}or{\text{ }}Y > 12) & = 1 - P(8 \leqslant Y \leqslant 12) \\ &= 1 - 0.3651P(X < 8{\text{ }}or{\text{ }}Y > 12) \\&= 0.6349 \\\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, The probability is \(0.6349\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose Appendix Table \({\rm{A}}{\rm{.3}}\)contained \({\rm{\Phi (z)}}\)only for\({\rm{z}} \ge {\rm{0}}\). Explain how you could still compute

a.\({\rm{P( - 1}}{\rm{.72}} \le {\rm{Z}} \le {\rm{ - }}{\rm{.55)}}\)

b.\({\rm{P( - 1}}{\rm{.72}} \le {\rm{Z}} \le {\rm{.55)}}\)

Is it necessary to tabulate \({\rm{\Phi (z)}}\)for \({\rm{z}}\)negative? What property of the standard normal curve justifies your answer?

The authors of the article "A Probabilistic Insulation Life Model for Combined Thermal-Electrical Stresses" (IEEE Trans. on Elect. Insulation, \({\rm{1985: 519 - 522}}\)) state that "the Weibull distribution is widely used in statistical problems relating to aging of solid insulating materials subjected to aging and stress." They propose the use of the distribution as a model for time (in hours) to failure of solid insulating specimens subjected to \({\rm{AC}}\) voltage. The values of the parameters depend on the voltage and temperature; suppose \({\rm{\alpha = 2}}{\rm{.5}}\) and \({\rm{\beta = 200}}\) (values suggested by data in the article).

a. What is the probability that a specimen's lifetime is at most \({\rm{250}}\)? Less than\({\rm{250}}\)? More than\({\rm{300}}\)?

b. What is the probability that a specimen's lifetime is between \({\rm{100}}\) and \({\rm{250}}\)?

c. What value is such that exactly \({\rm{50\% }}\) of all specimens have lifetimes exceeding that value?

The following failure time observations (\({\bf{1000s}}\)of hours) resulted from accelerated life testing of \(16\) integrated circuit chips of a certain type:

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{82.8 11.6 359.5 502.5 307.8 179.7}\\{242.0 26.5 244.8 304.3 379.1}\\{212.6 229.9 558.9 366.7 204.6}\end{array}\)

Use the corresponding percentiles of the exponential distribution to construct a probability plot. Then explain why the plot assesses the plausibility of the sample having been generated from an exponential distribution

A consumer is trying to decide between two long-distance calling plans. The first one charges a flat rate of \({\rm{10}}\) per minute, whereas the second charges a flat rate of \({\rm{99}}\) for calls up to \({\rm{20}}\) minutes in duration and then \({\rm{10\% }}\)for each additional minute exceeding \({\rm{20}}\)(assume that calls lasting a non-integer number of minutes are charged proportionately to a whole-minute's charge). Suppose the consumer's distribution of call duration is exponential with parameter\({\rm{\lambda }}\).

a. Explain intuitively how the choice of calling plan should depend on what the expected call duration is.

b. Which plan is better if expected call duration is \({\rm{10}}\) minutes? \({\rm{15}}\)minutes? (Hint: Let \({{\rm{h}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{(x)}}\) denote the cost for the first plan when call duration is \({\rm{x}}\) minutes and let \({{\rm{h}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{(x)}}\)be the cost function for the second plan. Give expressions for these two cost functions, and then determine the expected cost for each plan.)

As in the case of the Weibull and Gamma distributions, the lognormal distribution can be modified by the introduction of a third parameter \({\rm{\gamma }}\) such that the pdf is shifted to be positive only for \({\rm{\chi > \gamma }}\)The article cited in Exercise \({\rm{4}}{\rm{.39}}\)suggested that a shifted lognormal distribution with shift (i.e., threshold) \({\rm{ = 1}}{\rm{.0}}\), mean value \({\rm{ = 2}}{\rm{.16, }}\), and standard deviation \({\rm{ = 1}}{\rm{.03}}\) would be an appropriate model for the \({\rm{rv X = }}\) maximum-to-average depth ratio of a corrosion defect in pressurized steel.

a. What are the values of \({\rm{\mu and \sigma }}\)for the proposed distribution?

b. What is the probability that depth ratio exceeds \({\rm{2}}\)?

c. What is the median of the depth ratio distribution?

d. What is the \({\rm{99th}}\) percentile of the depth ratio distribution?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.