/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q97E The following failure time obser... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The following failure time observations (\({\bf{1000s}}\)of hours) resulted from accelerated life testing of \(16\) integrated circuit chips of a certain type:

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{82.8 11.6 359.5 502.5 307.8 179.7}\\{242.0 26.5 244.8 304.3 379.1}\\{212.6 229.9 558.9 366.7 204.6}\end{array}\)

Use the corresponding percentiles of the exponential distribution to construct a probability plot. Then explain why the plot assesses the plausibility of the sample having been generated from an exponential distribution

Short Answer

Expert verified

The created exponential probability plot contains no strong curvature, thus the distribution of the observations could be approximately exponentially distributed. And it is plausible.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Plausibility

In contrast to probability and possibility, which provide some clues to objective reality, plausibility is simply a subject-related concept: plausibility can only exist because it is borne by human reasoning. To put it another way, something is only conceivable if someone asserts it to be so.

02

Explanation for the plausibility of the product.

Given: exponential distribution with \(\lambda = 1.\)

Given observations:

\(\begin{array}{l}82.8,11.6,359.5,502.5,307.8,179.7,242,26.5,244.8,304.3,379.1,212.6,\\229.9,558.9,366.7,204.6\end{array}\)

Sort the observations from smallest to largest:

\(\begin{array}{l}11.6,26.5,82.8,179.7,204.6,212.6,229.9,242,244.8,304.3,307.8,359.5,\\366.7,379.1,502.5,558.9\end{array}\)

We note that the data contains \(16\) data values.

We then need to determine the exponential -percentiles, which are the values of x for which the cumulative distribution function of the exponential distribution with \(\lambda = 1\)is equal to the probability

\(\frac{{i - 0.5}}{{16}}\) (or the closest probability). Note: These percentiles are the same as the Weibull percentiles (because the standard Weibull distribution is the exponential distribution with \(\lambda = 1)\)and thus the percentiles are \(\ln ( - \ln (1 - p))\)

03

Explanation for the plausibility of the product.

\(i = 1 \Rightarrow p = \frac{{1 - 0.5}}{{16}} = 0.03125 \Rightarrow z = - 3.45\)

\(\begin{array}{l}i = 2 \Rightarrow p = \frac{{2 - 0.5}}{{16}} = 0.09375 \Rightarrow z = - 2.32\\i = 3 \Rightarrow p = \frac{{3 - 0.5}}{{16}} = 0.15625 \Rightarrow z = - 1.77\\i = 4 \Rightarrow p = \frac{{4 - 0.5}}{{16}} = 0.21875 \Rightarrow z = - 1.40\\i = 5 \Rightarrow p = \frac{{5 - 0.5}}{{16}} = 0.28125 \Rightarrow z = - 1.11\end{array}\)

\(\begin{array}{l}i = 6 \Rightarrow p = \frac{{6 - 0.5}}{{16}} = 0.34375 \Rightarrow z = - 0.86\\i = 7 \Rightarrow p = \frac{{7 - 0.5}}{{16}} = 0.40625 \Rightarrow z = - 0.65\\i = 8 \Rightarrow p = \frac{{8 - 0.5}}{{16}} = 0.46875 \Rightarrow z = - 0.45\\i = 9 \Rightarrow p = \frac{{9 - 0.5}}{{16}} = 0.53125 \Rightarrow z = 0.45\\i = 10 \Rightarrow p = \frac{{10 - 0.5}}{{16}} = 0.59375 \Rightarrow z = 0.65\\i = 12 \Rightarrow p = \frac{{12 - 0.5}}{{16}} = 0.71875 \Rightarrow z = 1.11\end{array}\)

04

Explanation for the plausibility of the product.

\(\begin{array}{l}i = 13 \Rightarrow p = \frac{{13 - 0.5}}{{16}} = 0.78125 \Rightarrow z = 1.40\\i = 14 \Rightarrow p = \frac{{14 - 0.5}}{{16}} = 0.84375 \Rightarrow z = 1.77\\i = 15 \Rightarrow p = \frac{{15 - 0.5}}{{16}} = 0.90625 \Rightarrow z = 2.32\\i = 16 \Rightarrow p = \frac{{16 - 0.5}}{{16}} = 0.96875 \Rightarrow z = 3.45\end{array}\)

EXPONENTIAL PROBABILITY PLOT

To determine if the distribution of values is approximately exponentially distributed, we have to create an Exponential probability plot.

A normal probability plot is basically a scatterplot with the observations on the horizontal axis and the exponential percentiles on the vertical axis.

05

Explanation for the plausibility of the product.

If the pattern in the exponential probability plot is roughly linear and does not contain strong curvature, then it is safe to assume that the distribution of the observations is approximately exponential.

The created exponential probability plot contains no strong curvature, thus the distribution of the observations could be approximately exponentially distributed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \({\rm{t = }}\) the amount of sales tax a retailer owes the government for a certain period. The article "Statistical Sampling in Tax Audits" (Statistics and the Law,\({\rm{2008: 320 - 343}}\)) proposes modeling the uncertainty in \({\rm{t}}\) by regarding it as a normally distributed random variable with mean value \({\rm{\mu }}\) and standard deviation \({\rm{\sigma }}\) (in the article, these two parameters are estimated from the results of a tax audit involving \({\rm{n}}\) sampled transactions). If \({\rm{a}}\) represents the amount the retailer is assessed, then an under-assessment results if \({\rm{t > a}}\) and an over-assessment result if\({\rm{a > t}}\). The proposed penalty (i.e., loss) function for over- or under-assessment is \({\rm{L(a,t) = t - a}}\) if \({\rm{t > a}}\) and \({\rm{ = k(a - t)}}\) if \(t£a(k > 1\) is suggested to incorporate the idea that over-assessment is more serious than under-assessment).

a. Show that \({{\rm{a}}^{\rm{*}}}{\rm{ = \mu + \sigma }}{{\rm{\Phi }}^{{\rm{ - 1}}}}{\rm{(1/(k + 1))}}\) is the value of \({\rm{a}}\) that minimizes the expected loss, where \({{\rm{\Phi }}^{{\rm{ - 1}}}}\) is the inverse function of the standard normal cdf.

b. If \({\rm{k = 2}}\) (suggested in the article), \({\rm{\mu = \$ 100,000}}\), and\({\rm{\sigma = \$ 10,000}}\), what is the optimal value of\({\rm{a}}\), and what is the resulting probability of over-assessment?

Let X denote the distance \({\rm{(m)}}\) that an animal moves from its birth site to the first territorial vacancy it encounters. Suppose that for banner-tailed kangaroo rats, X has an exponential distribution with parameter \({\rm{\lambda = }}{\rm{.01386}}\) (as suggested in the article "Competition and Dispersal from Multiple Nests," Ecology, 1997: 873-883).

a. What is the probability that the distance is at most \({\rm{100\;m}}\)? At most \({\rm{200\;m}}\) ? Between 100 and\({\rm{200\;m}}\)?

b. What is the probability that distance exceeds the mean distance by more than 2 standard deviations?

c. What is the value of the median distance?

Suppose the reaction temperature \({\rm{X}}\) (in \(^{\rm{o}}{\rm{C}}\)) in a certain chemical process has a uniform distribution with \({\rm{A = - 5}}\) and \({\rm{B = 5}}\).

a. Compute \({\rm{P(X < 0)}}\).

b. Compute \({\rm{P( - 2}}{\rm{.5 < X < 2}}{\rm{.5)}}\).

c. Compute \({\rm{P( - 2}} \le {\rm{X}} \le {\rm{3)}}\).

d. For \({\rm{k}}\) satisfying \({\rm{ - 5 < k < k + 4 < 5}}\), compute \({\rm{P(k < X < k + 4)}}\).

Suppose that when a transistor of a certain type is subjected to an accelerated life test, the lifetime X (in weeks) has a gamma distribution with mean \({\bf{24}}\) weeks and standard deviation \({\bf{12}}\) weeks.

a. What is the probability that a transistor will last between \({\bf{12}}\) and \({\bf{24}}\) weeks?

b. What is the probability that a transistor will last at most 24 weeks? Is the median of the lifetime distribution less than 24? Why or why not?

c. What is the 99th percentile of the lifetime distribution?

d. Suppose the test will actually be terminated after t weeks. What value of t is such that only .5% of all transistors would still be operating at termination?

Determine \({{\rm{z}}_{\rm{\alpha }}}\) for the following values of \({\rm{\alpha }}\): a. \({\rm{\alpha = }}{\rm{.0055}}\) b. \({\rm{\alpha = }}{\rm{.09}}\) c. \({\rm{\alpha = }}{\rm{.663}}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.