/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q63E A consumer is trying to decide b... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

A consumer is trying to decide between two long-distance calling plans. The first one charges a flat rate of \({\rm{10}}\) per minute, whereas the second charges a flat rate of \({\rm{99}}\) for calls up to \({\rm{20}}\) minutes in duration and then \({\rm{10\% }}\)for each additional minute exceeding \({\rm{20}}\)(assume that calls lasting a non-integer number of minutes are charged proportionately to a whole-minute's charge). Suppose the consumer's distribution of call duration is exponential with parameter\({\rm{\lambda }}\).

a. Explain intuitively how the choice of calling plan should depend on what the expected call duration is.

b. Which plan is better if expected call duration is \({\rm{10}}\) minutes? \({\rm{15}}\)minutes? (Hint: Let \({{\rm{h}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{(x)}}\) denote the cost for the first plan when call duration is \({\rm{x}}\) minutes and let \({{\rm{h}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{(x)}}\)be the cost function for the second plan. Give expressions for these two cost functions, and then determine the expected cost for each plan.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

a) Expected call duration is \({\rm{10}}\) minutes:

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{E}}\left( {{{\rm{h}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{(x)}}} \right){\rm{ = 100 cents }}\\{\rm{E}}\left( {{{\rm{h}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{(x)}}} \right){\rm{ = 112}}{\rm{.53 cents }}\end{array}\)

plan-\({\rm{1}}\) is better when expected call duration is \({\rm{10}}\) minutes.

b) Expected call duration is \({\rm{15}}\) minutes:

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{E}}\left( {{{\rm{h}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{(x)}}} \right){\rm{ = 150 cents }}\\{\rm{E}}\left( {{{\rm{h}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{(x)}}} \right){\rm{ = 138}}{\rm{.54 cents }}\end{array}\)

plan-\({\rm{2}}\) is better when expected call duration is \({\rm{15}}\)minutes.

Step by step solution

01

Definition

Probability simply refers to the likelihood of something occurring. We may talk about the probabilities of particular outcomes鈥攈ow likely they are鈥攚hen we're unclear about the result of an event. Statistics is the study of occurrences guided by probability.

02

Given in question

Let \({\rm{X}}\) be the consumer's call duration. It is given that the call duration is exponentially distributed with parameter\({\rm{\lambda }}\). Which means that it's pdf is given as:

03

Explain intuitively how the choice of calling plan should depend on what the expected call duration is. 

(a) The first one charges a flat rate of \({\rm{10}}\) cents per minute, whereas the second charges a flat rate of \({\rm{99}}\) cents for calls up to \({\rm{20}}\) minutes in duration and then \({\rm{10}}\) cents for each additional minute exceeding \({\rm{20}}\).

If the call duration is less than \({\rm{10}}\) minutes than plan-\({\rm{1}}\) is better since it charges will be less than \({\rm{99}}\) cents.

If the call duration is more than or equal to \({\rm{10}}\) minutes than plan-\({\rm{2}}\) is better because for the next \({\rm{10}}\) minute plan-\({\rm{2}}\) doesn't charge anything while plan-\({\rm{1}}\) continues to charge \({\rm{10}}\) cents per minute. Hence for call duration of \({\rm{20}}\) or more, plan-\({\rm{2}}\) gives \({\rm{10}}\) free minutes.

Here we talked about call duration for a specific call. We can tell that plan-l is better when expected call duration is small but we will have to mathematically calculate the exact minutes at which both plans are equally economical. But it will surely be greater than \({\rm{10}}\) minutes.

04

Which plan is better if expected call duration is \({\rm{10}}\) minutes

(b) When call duration is \({\rm{x}}\) minutes then let \({{\rm{h}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{(x)}}\) and \({{\rm{h}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{(x)}}\)be the cost functions (in cents) for the first and second plan respectively.

Now we recall the following proposition:

Proposition: If \({\rm{Y}}\) is a continuous rv with pdf \({\rm{f(y)}}\) and \({\rm{g(y)}}\) is any function of\({\rm{y}}\), then

\({\rm{E(g(y)) = }}\int_{{\rm{ - \yen }}}^{\rm{\yen}} {\rm{g}} {\rm{(y) \times f(y) \times dy}}\)

Since \({{\rm{h}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{(x)}}\) and \({{\rm{h}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{(x)}}\) are functions of \({\rm{X}}\) (call duration) and \({\rm{X}}\) is exponentially distributed, hence it's pdf \({\rm{f(x)}}\)is given as :

05

Determining which plan is better

Expected value of \({{\rm{h}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{(x)}}\) is given as :

\(\begin{aligned}{\rm{E}}\left( {{{\rm{h}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{(x)}}} \right) & = \int_{{\rm{ - \yen}}}^{\rm{\yen }} {{{\rm{h}}_{\rm{1}}}} {\rm{(x) \times f(x) \times dx}}\\ & =\int_{\rm{0}}^{\rm{\yen }} {{\rm{(10x)}}} \left( {{\rm{\lambda \times }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda x}}}}} \right){\rm{ \times dx}}\\ &= \left( {{\rm{(10x)}}\left( {{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda x}}}}} \right)} \right)_{\rm{0}}^{\rm{\yen}}{\rm{ - }}\int_{\rm{0}}^{\rm{\yen }} {{\rm{(10)}}} {\rm{ \times }}\left( {{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda x}}}}} \right)\\&= 0 - 10 \left( {\int_{\rm{0}}^{\rm{\yen}} {\rm{ - }} {{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda x}}}}} \right)\\ &= - 10\left( {\frac{{{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda x}}}}}}{{\rm{\lambda }}}} \right)_{\rm{0}}^{\rm{\yen}}\\ &= - 10 \left( {{\rm{0 - }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{\rm{\lambda }}}} \right)\\{\rm{E}}\left( {{{\rm{h}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{(x)}}} \right) &= \frac{{{\rm{10}}}}{{\rm{\lambda }}}\end{aligned}\)

(Use partial fraction)

06

Which plan is better if expected call duration is \({\rm{15}}\) minutes

Expected value of \({{\rm{h}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{(x)}}\) is given as:

\(\begin{aligned}{\rm{E}}\left( {{{\rm{h}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{(x)}}} \right)&= \int_{{\rm{ - \yen }}}^{\rm{\yen }} {{{\rm{h}}_{\rm{2}}}} {\rm{(x) \times f(x) \times dx}}\\&= 99 + \int_{{\rm{20}}}^{\rm{\yen}} {{\rm{(10(}}} {\rm{x - 20))}}\left( {{\rm{\lambda \times }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda x}}}}} \right){\rm{ \times dx}}\\&= 99 + \left( {{\rm{(10(x - 20))}}\left( {{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda x}}}}} \right)} \right)_{{\rm{20}}}^{\rm{\yen}}{\rm{ - }}\int_{{\rm{20}}}^{\rm{\yen }} {{\rm{(10)}}} {\rm{ \times }}\left( {{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda x}}}}} \right)\\ &= 99 + (0 - 0) - 10\left( {\int_{{\rm{20}}}^{\rm{\yen }} {\rm{ - }} {{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda x}}}}} \right)\\&= 99 - 10\left( {\frac{{{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - \lambda x}}}}}}{{\rm{\lambda }}}} \right)_{{\rm{20}}}^{\rm{\yen}}{\rm{ (Use partial fraction) }}\\& = 99 - 10\left( {{\rm{0 - }}\frac{{{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 20\lambda }}}}}}{{\rm{\lambda }}}} \right)\\{\rm{E}}\left( {{{\rm{h}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{(x)}}} \right)&= 99 + \frac{{{\rm{10}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 20\lambda }}}}}}{{\rm{\lambda }}}\end{aligned}\)

Let the expected call duration be \({\rm{\mu }}\) minutes.

07

Determining which plan is better

It is already given that the call duration has exponential distribution. We know that the expected value for exponential

distribution is given as\({\rm{1/\lambda }}\). Since we have denoted it as \({\rm{\mu }}\), hence

\({\rm{\lambda = }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{\rm{\mu }}}\)

Expected call duration is \({\rm{10}}\) minutes:

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{\lambda = }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{\rm{\mu }}}{\rm{ = }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{10}}}}\\{\rm{ = 0}}{\rm{.1}}\\{\rm{E}}\left( {{{\rm{h}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{(x)}}} \right){\rm{ = }}\frac{{{\rm{10}}}}{{{\rm{0}}{\rm{.1}}}}{\rm{ = 100}}\\{\rm{E}}\left( {{{\rm{h}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{(x)}}} \right){\rm{ = 99 + }}\frac{{{\rm{10}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 20 \times 0}}{\rm{.1}}}}}}{{{\rm{0}}{\rm{.1}}}}\\{\rm{ = 112}}{\rm{.53}}\end{array}\)

Since the expected cost is lower for plan-\({\rm{1}}\), hence plan-\({\rm{1}}\) is better when expected call duration is \({\rm{10}}\) minutes.

Expected call duration is \({\rm{15}}\) minutes:

\(\begin{array}{c}{\rm{\lambda = }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{\rm{\mu }}}{\rm{ = }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{15}}}}\\{\rm{E}}\left( {{{\rm{h}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{(x)}}} \right){\rm{ = }}\frac{{{\rm{10}}}}{{\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{15}}}}}}{\rm{ = 150}}\\{\rm{E}}\left( {{{\rm{h}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{(x)}}} \right){\rm{ = 99 + }}\frac{{{\rm{10}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - 20/15}}}}}}{{\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{{\rm{15}}}}}}\\{\rm{ = 138}}{\rm{.54}}\end{array}\)

Since the expected cost is lower for plan-\({\rm{2}}\), hence plan-\({\rm{2}}\) is better when expected call duration is \({\rm{15}}\) minutes.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \({\rm{X}}\) denote the vibratory stress (psi) on a wind turbine blade at a particular wind speed in a wind tunnel. The article 鈥淏lade Fatigue Life Assessment with Application to VAWTS鈥 (J. of Solar Energy Engr., \({\rm{1982: 107 - 111}}\)) proposes the Rayleigh distribution, with pdf

\({\rm{f(x;\theta ) = \{ }}\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{\frac{{\rm{x}}}{{{{\rm{\theta }}^{\rm{2}}}}}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{x}}^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{/(2}}{{\rm{\theta }}^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{)}}}}}&{{\rm{x > 0}}}\\{\rm{0}}&{{\rm{otherwise}}}\end{array}\)

otherwise as a model for the \({\rm{X}}\) distribution.

a. Verify that \({\rm{f(x;\theta )}}\) is a legitimate pdf.

b. Suppose \({\rm{\theta = 100}}\) (a value suggested by a graph in the article). What is the probability that \({\rm{X}}\) is at most \({\rm{200}}\)? Less than \({\rm{200}}\)? At least \({\rm{200}}\)?

c. What is the probability that \({\rm{X}}\) is between \({\rm{100}}\) and \({\rm{200}}\) (again assuming \({\rm{\theta = 100}}\))?

d. Give an expression for \({\rm{P(X}} \le {\rm{x)}}\).

The article suggests the lognormal distribution as a model for \({\rm{S}}{{\rm{O}}_{\rm{2}}}\)concentration above a certain forest. Suppose the parameter values are \({\rm{\mu = 1}}{\rm{.9}}\)and \({\rm{\sigma = 0}}{\rm{.9}}\).

a. What are the mean value and standard deviation of concentration?

b. What is the probability that concentration is at most \({\rm{10}}\)? Between \({\rm{5}}\) and \({\rm{10}}\)?

Consider babies born in the 鈥渘ormal鈥 range of\(37 - 43\)weeks gestational age. Extensive data support the assumption that for such babies born in the United States, birth weight is normally distributed with a mean of\(3432 g\)and a standard deviation of\(482\)g. (The article 鈥淎re Babies Normal?鈥 analyzed data from a particular year; for a sensible choice of class intervals, a histogram did not look at all normal, but after further investigations it was determined that this was due to some hospitals measuring weight in grams and others measuring to the nearest ounce and then converting to grams. A modified choice of class intervals that allowed for this gave a histogram that was well described by a normal distribution.) a. What is the probability that the birth weight of a randomly selected baby of this type exceeds\(4000 g\)? Is between\(3000 and 4000 g\)? b. What is the probability that the birth weight of a randomly selected baby of this type is either less than\(2000 g\)or greater than\(5000 g\)? c. What is the probability that the birth weight of a randomly selected baby of this type exceeds\(7\)lb? d. How would you characterize the most extreme\(.1\% \)of all birth weights? e. If X is a random variable with a normal distribution and a is a numerical constant, then Y = X also has a normal distribution. Use this to determine the distribution of birth weight expressed in pounds (shape, mean, and standard deviation), and then recalculate the probability from part (c). How does this compare to your previous answer?

The article "The Load-Life Relationship for M50 Bearings with Silicon Nitride Ceramic Balls" (Lubrication Engr., \({\rm{1984: 153 - 159}}\)) reports the accompanying data on bearing load life (million revs.) for bearings tested at a \({\rm{6}}{\rm{.45kN}}\) load.

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{\rm{47}}{\rm{.1}}}&{{\rm{68}}{\rm{.1}}}&{{\rm{68}}{\rm{.1}}}&{{\rm{90}}{\rm{.8}}}&{{\rm{103}}{\rm{.6}}}&{{\rm{106}}{\rm{.0}}}&{{\rm{115}}{\rm{.0}}}\\{{\rm{126}}{\rm{.0}}}&{{\rm{146}}{\rm{.6}}}&{{\rm{229}}{\rm{.0}}}&{{\rm{240}}{\rm{.0}}}&{{\rm{240}}{\rm{.0}}}&{{\rm{278}}{\rm{.0}}}&{{\rm{278}}{\rm{.0}}}\\{{\rm{289}}{\rm{.0}}}&{{\rm{289}}{\rm{.0}}}&{{\rm{367}}{\rm{.0}}}&{{\rm{385}}{\rm{.9}}}&{{\rm{392}}{\rm{.0}}}&{{\rm{505}}{\rm{.0}}}&{}\end{array}\)

a. Construct a normal probability plot. Is normality plausible?

b. Construct a Weibull probability plot. Is the Weibull distribution family plausible?

Determine \({{\rm{z}}_{\rm{\alpha }}}\) for the following values of \({\rm{\alpha }}\): a. \({\rm{\alpha = }}{\rm{.0055}}\) b. \({\rm{\alpha = }}{\rm{.09}}\) c. \({\rm{\alpha = }}{\rm{.663}}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.