/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 7 At a baseball game, 42聽of 65聽r... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

At a baseball game, 42of 65randomly selected people report owning an iPod. At a rock concert occurring at the same time across town, 34of 52randomly selected people to report owning an iPod. A researcher wants to test the claim that the proportion of iPod owners at the two venues is different. A 90%confidence interval for the difference in population proportions is ( 0.154, 0.138). Which of the following gives the correct outcome of the researcher鈥檚 test of the claim?

(a) Since the confidence interval includes 0, the researcher can conclude that the proportion of iPod owners at the two venues is the same.

(b) Since the confidence interval includes 0, the researcher can conclude that the proportion of iPod owners at the two venues is different.

(c) Since the confidence interval includes 0, the researcher cannot conclude that the proportion of iPod owners at the two venues is different.

(d) Since the confidence interval includes more negative than positive values, the researcher can conclude that a higher proportion of people at the rock concert own iPods than at the baseball game.

(e) The researcher cannot draw a conclusion about a claim without performing a significance test.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The correct outcome of the researcher鈥檚 test of the claim is option (c) Since the confidence interval includes 0, the researcher cannot conclude that the proportion of iPod owners at the two venues is different.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The number of people at baseball owning iPod is 42of65

The number of people at rock concerts owning iPod is 34of52

Confidence interval(-0.154,0.138)

Find the correct outcome of the researcher鈥檚 test of the claim.

02

Explanation

The given confidence interval is

(-0.154,0.138)

The presence of 0in the confidence interval suggests that the population proportions are extremely likely to be equal, therefore we cannot conclude that they are different.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

40. Household size How do the numbers of people living in households in the United Kingdom (U.K.) and South Africa compare? To help answer this question, we used Census At School鈥檚 random data selector to choose independent samples of 50 students from each country. Here is a Fathom dotplot of the household sizes reported by the students in the survey.

You can find the Excite Poll online at poll.excite.com. You simply click on a response to become part of the sample. The poll question for June 19,2005, was 鈥淒o you prefer watching first-run movies at a movie theater, or waiting until they are available on home video or pay-per-view?鈥 In all, 8896people responded, with only 12%(1118people) saying they preferred theaters. You can conclude that

(a) American adults strongly prefer home videos or pay-per-view.

(b) the high nonresponse rate prevents us from drawing a conclusion.

(c) the sample is too small to draw any conclusion.

(d) the poll uses voluntary response, so the results tell us little about all American adults.

(e) American adults strongly prefer seeing movies at a movie theater.

Expensive ads Consumers who think a product鈥檚 advertising is expensive often also think the product must be of high quality. Can other information undermine this effect? To find out, marketing researchers did an experiment. The subjects were 90 women from the clerical and administrative staff of a large organization. All subjects read an ad that described a fictional line of food products called 鈥淔ive Chiefs.鈥 The ad also described the major TV commercials that would soon be shown, an unusual expense for this type of product. The 45women who were randomly assigned to the control group read nothing else. The 45in the 鈥渦ndermine group鈥 also read a news story headlined 鈥淣o Link between Advertising Spending and New Product Quality.鈥 All the subjects then rated the quality of Five Chefs products on a seven-point scale. The study report said, 鈥淭he mean quality ratings were significantly lower in the undermine treatment (xA  4.56) than in the control treatment xC=5.05;t=2.64,P<0.01.

(a). Explain why the Random and Independent conditions are met in this case.

(b) The distribution of individual responses is not Normal, because there is only a seven-point scale. Why is it still proper to use a two-sample t-test?

(c) Interpret the P-value in context.

According to sleep researchers, if you are between the ages of 12and18years old, you need 9hours of sleep to be fully functional. A simple random sample of 28students was chosen from a large high school, and these students were asked how much sleep they got the previous night. The mean of the responses was 7.9hours, with a standard deviation of 2.1hours.If we are interested in whether students at this high school are getting too little sleep, which of the following represents the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses?

(a) H0:=7.9andHa:<7.9

(b) H0:=7.9andHa:7.9

(c) H0:=9andHa:9

(d)H0:=9andHa:<9

(e)H0:9andHa:9

A driving school wants to find out which of its two instructors is more effective at preparing students to pass the state鈥檚 driver鈥檚 license exam. An incoming class of 100students is randomly assigned to two groups, each of size 50. One group is taught by Instructor A; the other is taught by Instructor B. At the end of the course, 30of Instructor A鈥檚 students and 22of Instructor B鈥檚 students pass the state exam. Do these results give convincing evidence that Instructor A is more effective?

Min Jae carried out the significance test shown below to answer this question. Unfortunately, he made some mistakes along the way. Identify as many mistakes as you can, and tell how to correct each one.

State: I want to perform a test of

H0:p1-p2=0

Ha:p1-p2>0

where p1=the proportion of Instructor A's students that passed the state exam and p2=the proportion of Instructor B's students that passed the state exam. Since no significance level was stated, I'll use =0.05

Plan: If conditions are met, I鈥檒l do a two-sample ztest for comparing two proportions.

Random The data came from two random samples of 50students.

- Normal The counts of successes and failures in the two groups -30,20,22, and 28-are all at least 10.

- Independent There are at least 1000 students who take this driving school's class.

Do: From the data, p^1=2050=0.40and p^2=3050=0.60. So the pooled proportion of successes is

p^C=22+3050+50=0.52

- Test statistic

localid="1650450621864" z=(0.40-0.60)-00.52(0.48)100+0.52(0.48)100=-2.83

- p-value From Table A, localid="1650450641188" P(z-2.83)=1-0.0023=0.9977.

Conclude: The p-value, 0.9977, is greater than =0.05, so we fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is no convincing evidence that Instructor A's pass rate is higher than Instructor B's.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.