/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.3 Expensive ads Consumers who thin... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Expensive ads Consumers who think a product鈥檚 advertising is expensive often also think the product must be of high quality. Can other information undermine this effect? To find out, marketing researchers did an experiment. The subjects were 90 women from the clerical and administrative staff of a large organization. All subjects read an ad that described a fictional line of food products called 鈥淔ive Chiefs.鈥 The ad also described the major TV commercials that would soon be shown, an unusual expense for this type of product. The 45women who were randomly assigned to the control group read nothing else. The 45in the 鈥渦ndermine group鈥 also read a news story headlined 鈥淣o Link between Advertising Spending and New Product Quality.鈥 All the subjects then rated the quality of Five Chefs products on a seven-point scale. The study report said, 鈥淭he mean quality ratings were significantly lower in the undermine treatment (xA  4.56) than in the control treatment xC=5.05;t=2.64,P<0.01.

(a). Explain why the Random and Independent conditions are met in this case.

(b) The distribution of individual responses is not Normal, because there is only a seven-point scale. Why is it still proper to use a two-sample t-test?

(c) Interpret the P-value in context.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a). Independent and random conditions are met.

b). Normal requirement is met.

c). The possibility of the mean difference being predicted as in this or more extreme study is 1%.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1: Given Information

The mean quality ratings were significantly lower in the undermine treatment xA=4.56 than in the control treatmentxC=5.05;t=2.64,P<0.01.

02

Part (a) Step 2: Explanation

Random: 45 Women have been randomly assigned to the control group, while the remaining women have been assigned to the undermining group, thereby fulfilling the random criterion.

Independent: Satisfied, as the sample size is smaller than 10% of the population

03

Part (b) Step 1: Given Information

The mean quality ratings were significantly lower in the undermine treatment xA=4.56than in the control treatment xC=5.05;t=2.64,P<0.01.

04

Part (b) Step 2: Explanation

They both have a sample size of 45. Because both samples have a sample size of at least 30, it can be concluded that both samples are normally distributed and hence met the usual criterion.

05

Part (c) Step 1: Given Information

P<0.01=1%.

06

Part (c)  Step 2: Explanation

P<0.01=1%

This means that since all groups have a mean sample population, the possibility of the mean difference being predicted as in this or more extreme study is1%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A better drug? In a pilot study, a company's new cholesterol-reducing drug outperforms the currently available drug. If the data provide convincing

evidence that the mean cholesterol reduction with the new drug is more than 10 milligrams per deciliter of blood (mg/dl) greater than with the current drug, the company will begin the expensive process of mass-producing the new drug. For the 14 subjects who were assigned at random to the current drug, the mean cholesterol reduction was 54.1mg/dlwith a standard deviation of 11.93mg/dl.For the 15 subjects who were randomly assigned to the new drug, the mean cholesterol reduction was 68.7mg/dlwith a standard deviation of13.3mg/dl.Graphs of the data reveal no outliers or strong skewness.

(a) Carry out an appropriate significance test. What conclusion would you draw? (Note that the null hypothesis is notH0:1-2=0-

(b) Based on your conclusion in part (a), could you have made a Type I error or a Type Il error? Justify your answer.

Looking back on love How do young adults look back on adolescent romance? investigators interviewed couples in their mid-twenties. The female and male partners were interviewed separately. Each was asked about his or her current relationship and also about a romantic relationship that lasted at least two months when they were aged 15or16 . One response variable was a measure on a numerical scale of how much the attractiveness of the adolescent partner mattered. You want to compare the men and women on this measure.

Are teens or adults more likely to go online daily? The Pew Internet and American Life Project asked a random sample of 800 teens and a separate random sample of 2253 adults how often they use the Internet. In these two surveys, 63% of teens and 68%of adults said that they go online every day. Construct and interpret a 90% confidence interval for p1-p2?

Based on your answer to Question 1.3, would you be surprised if the difference in the mean amount of liquid dispensed in the two samples was12ounces? Explain

Thirty-five people from a random sample of 125workers from Company A admitted to using sick leave when they weren鈥檛 really ill. Seventeen employees from a random sample of 68workers from Company B admitted that they had used sick leave when they weren鈥檛 ill. A 95% confidence interval for the difference in the proportions of workers at the two companies who would admit to using sick leave when they weren鈥檛 ill is

(a) 0.03(0.28)(0.72)125+(0.25)(0.75)68

(b) localid="1650367573248" 0.031.96(0.28)(0.72)125+(0.25)(0.75)68

(c) 0.031.645(0.28)(0.72)125+(0.25)(0.75)68

(d)

0.031.96(0.269)(0.731)125+(0.269)(0.731)68

(e) 0.031.645(0.269)(0.731)125+(0.269)(0.731)68

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.