/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 54 DDT in rats Poisoning by the pes... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

DDT in rats Poisoning by the pesticide DDT causes convulsions in humans and other mammals. Researchers seek to understand how convulsions are caused. In a randomized comparative experiment, they compared 6 white rats poisoned with DDT with a control group of 6 unpoisoned rats. Electrical measurements of nerve activity are the main clue to the nature of DDT poisoning. When a nerve is stimulated, its electrical response shows a sharp spike followed by a much smaller second spike. The researchers measured the height of the second spike as a percent of the first spike when a nerve in the rat's leg was stimulated. 78 For the poisoned rats the results were

12.20716.86925.05022.4298.45620.589

The control group data were

11.0749.68612.0649.3518.1826.642

Computer output for a two-sample t-test on these data from software is shown below. (Note that SAS provides two-sided P-values.)

(a) Do these data provide convincing evidence that DDT affects the mean height of the second spike's electrical response? Carry out a significance test to help answer this question.

(b) Interpret the P-value from part (a) in the context

Short Answer

Expert verified

a) Yes

b) If the population means are equal, then the probability of obtaining a sample with a mean difference of 17.6-9.5=8.1or more extreme is equal to 2.47%

Step by step solution

01

Part(a) Step 1: Given Information

x1=17.6x2=9.5s1=6.34s2=1.95n1=6n2=6

02

Part(a) Step 2: Explanation

Determine the hypothesis:

H0:1=2

Ha:12

Determine the test statistic:

localid="1650519030821" t=x1-x2s12n1+s22n2=17.6-9.56.3426+1.95262.291

Determine the degrees of freedom:

localid="1650519055597" df=minn1-1,n2-1=min(6-1,6-1)=5

The P-value is the probability of obtaining the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme. The P-value is the number (or interval) in the column title of Table B containing the t-value in the row df=5:

0.02=20.01<P<20.02=0.04

(In the output we note that the exact P-value is0.0247).

If the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, then the null hypothesis is rejected:

P<0.05RejectH0

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim of a difference.

03

Part(b) Step 1: Given Information

x1=17.6x2=9.5s1=6.34s2=1.95n1=6n2=6

04

Part(b) Step 2: Explanation

Determine the hypothesis:

H0:1=2

Ha:12

Determine the test statistic:

localid="1650519139340" t=x1-x2s12n1+s22n2=17.6-9.56.3426+1.95262.29

Determine the degrees of freedom:

localid="1650519154640" df=minn1-1,n2-1=min(6-1,6-1)=5

The P-value is the probability of obtaining the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme. The P-value is the number (or interval) in the column title of Table B containing the t-value in the row df=20:

0.02=20.01<P<20.02=0.04

In the output, we note that the exact P-value is localid="1651483737374" 0.0247=2.47%.

This means that the probability of obtaining a sample with a mean difference of 17.6-9.5=8.1or more extreme is equal to 2.47%, if the population means are equal.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Dr Teresa Amabile conducted a study involving 47college students, who were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. The 23students in one group were given a list of statements about external reasons (E) for writing, such as public recognition, making money, or pleasing their parents. The 24students in the other group were given a list of statements about internal reasons (I) for writing, such as expressing yourself and enjoying playing with words. Both groups were then instructed to write a poem about laughter. Each student鈥檚 poem was rated separately by 12different poets using a creativity scale. The 12poets鈥 ratings of each student鈥檚 poem were averaged to obtain an overall creativity score. We used Fathom software to randomly reassign the 47subjects to the two groups 1000times, assuming the treatment received doesn鈥檛 affect each individual鈥檚 average creativity rating. The dot plot shows the approximate randomization distribution of x1-xE

(a) Why did researchers randomly assign the subjects to the two treatment groups?

(b) In the actual experiment, x1-xE=4.15. What conclusion would you draw? Justify your answer with appropriate evidence.

(c) Based on your conclusion in part (b), could you have made a Type I error or a Type II error? Justify your answer.

Researchers are interested in evaluating the effect of a natural product on reducing blood pressure. This will be done by comparing the mean reduction in blood pressure of a treatment (natural product) group and a placebo group using a two-sample t-test. The researchers would like to be able to detect whether the natural product reduces blood pressure by at least 7points more, on average than the placebo. If groups of size 50are used in the experiment, a two-sample t-test using role="math" localid="1650436089340" =0.01will have a power of 80%to detect a 7-point difference in mean blood pressure reduction. If the researchers want to be able to detect a 5-point difference instead, then the power of test

(a) would be less than 80%.

(b) would be greater than 80%.

(c) would still be 80%.

(d) could be either less than or greater than 80%, depending on whether the natural product is effective.

(e) would vary depending on the standard deviation of the data.

Coaching and SAT scores (10.2) What we really want to know is whether coached students improve more than uncoached students and whether any advantage is large enough to be worth paying for. Use the information above to answer these questions:

(a) Is there good evidence that coached students gained more on average than uncoached students? Carry out a significance test to answer this question.

(b) How much more do coach students gain on the average? Construct and interpret a 99% confidence interval.

(c) Based on your work, what is your opinion: do you think coaching courses are worth paying for?

To study the long-term effects of preschool programs for poor children, researchers designed an experiment. They recruited 123children who had never attended preschool from low-income families in Michigan. Researchers randomly assigned 62of the children to attend preschool (paid for by the study budget) and the other 61 to serve as a control group who would not go to preschool. One response variable of interest was the need for social services as adults. In the past 10years, 38children in the preschool group and 49in the control group have needed social services.

The Minitab output below gives a 95% con铿乨ence interval for p1-p2. Interpret this interval in context. Then explain what additional information the con铿乨ence interval provides.

A fast-food restaurant uses an automated filling machine to pour its soft drinks. The machine has different settings for small, medium, and large drink cups. According to the machine鈥檚 manufacturer, when the large setting is chosen, the amount of liquid dispensed by the machine follows a Normal distribution with mean 27ounces and standard deviation0.8ounces. When the medium setting is chosen, the amount of liquid dispensed follows a Normal distribution with mean 17ounces and standard deviation 0.5ounces. To test the manufacturer鈥檚 claim, the restaurant manager measures the amount of liquid in a random sample of 25cups filled with the medium setting and a separate random sample of 20cups filled with the large setting. Let x1-x2be the difference in the sample mean amount of liquid under the two settings (large 鈥 medium). Find the mean and standard deviation of the sampling distribution.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.