/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 In Exercises 4.14 and \(4.15,\) ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In Exercises 4.14 and \(4.15,\) determine whether the sets of hypotheses given are valid hypotheses. State whether each set of hypotheses is valid for a statistical test. If not valid, explain why not. (a) \(H_{0}: \mu=15 \quad\) vs \(\quad H_{a}: \mu \neq 15\) (b) \(H_{0}: p \neq 0.5 \quad\) vs \(\quad H_{a}: p=0.5\) (c) \(H_{0}: p_{1}p_{2}\) (d) \(H_{0}: \bar{x}_{1}=\bar{x}_{2} \quad\) vs \(\quad H_{a}: \bar{x}_{1} \neq \bar{x}_{2}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Valid (b) Not valid, null hypothesis does not state the status quo (c) Not valid, hypotheses do not consider equality scenario (d) Valid

Step by step solution

01

Step 1

Analyze the first set of hypotheses: \(H_{0}: \mu=15\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu \neq 15\). In this case, the null hypothesis \(H_0\) states that the population mean \(\mu\) is equal to 15, and the alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) states that \(\mu\) is not equal to 15. Hence, this set of hypotheses is valid because it covers all possible scenarios.
02

Step 2

Check the second set of hypotheses: \(H_{0}: p \neq 0.5\) vs \(H_{a}: p=0.5\). Here, the null hypothesis \(H_0\) states that the proportion \(p\) is not equal to 0.5, and the alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) states that \(p\) is equal to 0.5. This set is not valid because the null hypothesis does not state the status quo or no change, which is against the standard approach.
03

Step 3

Evaluate the third set of hypotheses: \(H_{0}: p_{1}p_{2}\). The null hypothesis \(H_0\) states that the proportion \(p_1\) is less than \(p_2\), and the alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) states that \(p_1\) is greater than \(p_2\). This set is not valid because the hypotheses do not cover all possible scenarios. For instance, they don't consider the case where \(p_1\) could be equal to \(p_2\).
04

Step 4

Examine the final set of hypotheses: \(H_{0}: \bar{x}_{1}=\bar{x}_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: \bar{x}_{1} \neq \bar{x}_{2}\). In this case, the null hypothesis \(H_0\) states that the mean of group 1, \(\bar{x}_{1}\), is equal to the mean of group 2, \(\bar{x}_{2}\). The alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) states that \(\bar{x}_{1}\) is not equal to \(\bar{x}_{2}\). As such, this set of hypotheses is valid because it covers all possible outcomes.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, typically denoted as \( H_0 \), is a foundational concept in statistical hypothesis testing. It is a statement about a population parameter (such as the population mean) that implies no effect or no difference. In essence, the null hypothesis asserts that any observed differences in data are the result of random chance rather than a real effect.

For example, if we were testing whether a new teaching method is more effective than the current one, the null hypothesis would state that there is no difference in effectiveness between the two methods. By convention, the null hypothesis is stated in a way that it includes an equality sign, like \( \bar{x}_{1} = \bar{x}_{2} \) or \( \mu = 15 \). It sets the stage for statistical testing by providing a premise which can be challenged by evidence from sample data. The objective is to determine whether this hypothesis should be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, represented as \( H_a \) or \( H_1 \), proposes what we might believe to be true or hope to prove to be true if the null hypothesis is rejected. This hypothesis is a statement that directly contradicts the null hypothesis and represents a new theory or belief.

An alternative hypothesis could state that there is a difference, like \( \mu eq 15 \), indicating the population mean is not equal to 15. In some cases, it can be directional, for instance, suggesting that one population mean is greater than the other, such as \( p_{1} > p_{2} \). It's essential that the alternative hypothesis covers all possible alternative scenarios to the null which are not stated in the null hypothesis itself.
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical hypothesis testing is a methodological process used to make decisions about a population based on sample data. In a typical hypothesis test, we compare the null hypothesis against the alternative hypothesis to check the validity of an assumed effect or difference.

The testing involves several steps, starting with stating both hypotheses and then calculating a test statistic from the sample data. This statistic is then used to make a decision: if the test statistic falls into a pre-defined critical region, we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. The critical region is determined based on a significance level, usually denoted as \( \alpha \), which represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it's actually true—a Type I error. A common threshold for \( \alpha \) is 0.05. In hypothesis testing, a valid null hypothesis should state a condition of equality or no effect, and the alternative should cover all other possibilities.
Population Mean
The population mean, often symbolized by \( \mu \), is a measure of central tendency that represents the average value of a dataset for an entire population. It is predicted or estimated based on sample means (\( \bar{x} \)) taken from the population. In statistical hypothesis testing, the population mean is what is often being tested.

In the provided exercise, hypotheses are formulated regarding population means, such as in example (d) where the null hypothesis states that the mean of one sample is equal to the mean of another \( (H_0: \bar{x}_{1} = \bar{x}_{2}) \). It's crucial that when testing for the population mean, the null hypothesis should be stated precisely to reflect no change or effect because it sets the default condition against which actual sample means will be tested.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

State the null and alternative hvpotheses for the statistical test described. Testing to see if there is evidence that the correlation between two variables is negative

Beer and Mosquitoes Does consuming beer attract mosquitoes? Exercise 4.17 on page 232 discusses an experiment done in Africa testing possible ways to reduce the spread of malaria by mosquitoes. In the experiment, 43 volunteers were randomly assigned to consume either a liter of beer or a liter of water, and the attractiveness to mosquitoes of each volunteer was measured. The experiment was designed to test whether beer consumption increases mosquito attraction. The report \(^{27}\) states that "Beer consumption, as opposed to water consumption, significantly increased the activation... of An. gambiae [mosquitoes]... \((P<0.001)\) (a) Is this convincing evidence that consuming beer is associated with higher mosquito attraction? Why or why not? (b) How strong is the evidence for the result? Explain. (c) Based on these results, is it reasonable to conclude that consuming beer causes an increase in mosquito attraction? Why or why not?

Rolling Dice You roll a die 60 times and record the sample proportion of fives, and you want to test whether the die is biased to give more fives than a fair die would ordinarily give. To find the p-value for your sample data, you create a randomization distribution of proportions of fives in many simulated samples of size 60 with a fair die. (a) State the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Where will the center of the distribution be? Why? (c) Give an example of a sample proportion for which the number of 5 's obtained is less than what you would expect in a fair die. (d) Will your answer to part (c) lie on the left or the right of the center of the randomization distribution? (e) To find the p-value for your answer to part (c), would you look at the left, right, or both tails? (f) For your answer in part (c), can you say anything about the size of the p-value?

Watch Out for Lions after a Full Moon Scientists studying lion attacks on humans in Tanzania \(^{34}\) found that 95 lion attacks happened between \(6 \mathrm{pm}\) and \(10 \mathrm{pm}\) within either five days before a full moon or five days after a full moon. Of these, 71 happened during the five days after the full moon while the other 24 happened during the five days before the full moon. Does this sample of lion attacks provide evidence that attacks are more likely after a full moon? In other words, is there evidence that attacks are not equally split between the two five-day periods? Use StatKey or other technology to find the p-value, and be sure to show all details of the test. (Note that this is a test for a single proportion since the data come from one sample.)

Exercise and the Brain It is well established that exercise is beneficial for our bodies. Recent studies appear to indicate that exercise can also do wonders for our brains, or, at least, the brains of mice. In a randomized experiment, one group of mice was given access to a running wheel while a second group of mice was kept sedentary. According to an article describing the study, "The brains of mice and rats that were allowed to run on wheels pulsed with vigorous, newly born neurons, and those animals then breezed through mazes and other tests of rodent IQ"10 compared to the sedentary mice. Studies are examining the reasons for these beneficial effects of exercise on rodent (and perhaps human) intelligence. High levels of BMP (bone- morphogenetic protein) in the brain seem to make stem cells less active, which makes the brain slower and less nimble. Exercise seems to reduce the level of BMP in the brain. Additionally, exercise increases a brain protein called noggin, which improves the brain's ability. Indeed, large doses of noggin turned mice into "little mouse geniuses," according to Dr. Kessler, one of the lead authors of the study. While research is ongoing in determining which effects are significant, all evidence points to the fact that exercise is good for the brain. Several tests involving these studies are described. In each case, define the relevant parameters and state the null and alternative hypotheses. (a) Testing to see if there is evidence that mice allowed to exercise have lower levels of BMP in the brain on average than sedentary mice (b) Testing to see if there is evidence that mice allowed to exercise have higher levels of noggin in the brain on average than sedentary mice (c) Testing to see if there is evidence of a negative correlation between the level of BMP and the level of noggin in the brains of mice

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.