/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 Determine whether the sets of hy... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Determine whether the sets of hypotheses given are valid hypotheses. State whether each set of hypotheses is valid for a statistical test. If not valid, explain why not. (a) \(H_{0}: \rho=0 \quad\) vs \(\quad H_{a}: \rho<0\) (b) \(H_{0}: \hat{p}=0.3 \quad\) vs \(\quad H_{a}: \hat{p} \neq 0.3\) (c) \(H_{0}: \mu_{1} \neq \mu_{2} \quad\) vs \(\quad H_{a}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) (d) \(H_{0}: p=25 \quad\) vs \(\quad H_{a}: p \neq 25\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The hypotheses sets (a), (b), and (d) are valid. Hypotheses set (c) is not valid because the null hypothesis isn't asserting a lack of effect.

Step by step solution

01

Evaluate Hypothesis (a)

For the hypothesis (a) \(H_{0}: \rho=0 \) vs \(H_{a}: \rho<0 \). This is a valid set of hypotheses. The null hypothesis assumes no effect (that is, no correlation), while the alternative hypothesis assumes that there is a negative correlation.
02

Evaluate Hypothesis (b)

For the hypothesis (b) \(H_{0}: \hat{p}=0.3 \) vs \(H_{a}: \hat{p} \neq 0.3 \). This is a valid set of hypotheses. The null hypothesis assumes the proportion is equal to 0.3, while the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion isn't equal to 0.3.
03

Evaluate Hypothesis (c)

The hypothesis (c) \(H_{0}: \mu_{1} \neq \mu_{2} \) vs \(H_{a}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2} \) isn't valid. This is because the null hypothesis isn't asserting a lack of effect or difference, instead, it's asserting a difference exists. This goes against the standard practice of hypothesis testing, where the null hypothesis is about the lack of effect or difference.
04

Evaluate Hypothesis (d)

For the hypothesis (d) \(H_{0}: p=25 \) vs \(H_{a}: p \neq 25 \). This is a valid set of hypotheses. The null hypothesis asserts that some parameter p is equal to 25. The alternative asserts that p isn't equal to 25, covering all other possible outcomes. However, keep in mind that p must represent a parameter that could reasonably have a value of 25 in the context of the experiment; otherwise, these hypotheses wouldn't make sense.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Watch Out for Lions after a Full Moon Scientists studying lion attacks on humans in Tanzania \(^{34}\) found that 95 lion attacks happened between \(6 \mathrm{pm}\) and \(10 \mathrm{pm}\) within either five days before a full moon or five days after a full moon. Of these, 71 happened during the five days after the full moon while the other 24 happened during the five days before the full moon. Does this sample of lion attacks provide evidence that attacks are more likely after a full moon? In other words, is there evidence that attacks are not equally split between the two five-day periods? Use StatKey or other technology to find the p-value, and be sure to show all details of the test. (Note that this is a test for a single proportion since the data come from one sample.)

In Exercises 4.112 to \(4.116,\) the null and alternative hypotheses for a test are given as well as some information about the actual sample(s) and the statistic that is computed for each randomization sample. Indicate where the randomization distribution will be centered. In addition, indicate whether the test is a left-tail test, a right-tail test, or a twotailed test. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: p_{1}=p_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: p_{1}>p_{2}\) Sample: \(\hat{p}_{1}=0.3, n_{1}=20\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=0.167, n_{2}=12\) Randomization statistic \(=\hat{p}_{1}-\hat{p}_{2}\)

In Exercises 4.71 to \(4.74,\) using the p-value given, are the results significant at a \(10 \%\) level? At a \(5 \%\) level? At a 1\% level? $$ \text { p-value }=0.0320 $$

Mercury Levels in Fish Figure 4.26 shows a scatterplot of the acidity (pH) for a sample of \(n=53\) Florida lakes vs the average mercury level (ppm) found in fish taken from each lake. The full dataset is introduced in Data 2.4 on page 68 and is available in FloridaLakes. There appears to be a negative trend in the scatterplot, and we wish to test whether there is significant evidence of a negative association between \(\mathrm{pH}\) and mercury levels. (a) What are the null and alternative hypotheses? (b) For these data, a statistical software package produces the following output: $$ r=-0.575 \quad p \text { -value }=0.000017 $$ Use the p-value to give the conclusion of the test. Include an assessment of the strength of the evidence and state your result in terms of rejecting or failing to reject \(H_{0}\) and in terms of \(\mathrm{pH}\) and mercury. (c) Is this convincing evidence that low pH causes the average mercury level in fish to increase? Why or why not?

A situation is described for a statistical test. In each case, define the relevant parameter(s) and state the null and alternative hypotheses. Testing to see if there is evidence that the percentage of a population who watch the Home Shopping Network is less than \(20 \%\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.