/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 State the null and alternative h... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

State the null and alternative hvpotheses for the statistical test described. Testing to see if there is evidence that the correlation between two variables is negative

Short Answer

Expert verified
The null hypothesis is that the correlation between the two variables is equal to 0 (H0: 蟻=0). The alternative hypothesis is that the correlation between the two variables is less than 0 (Ha: 蟻<0), implying it's negative.

Step by step solution

01

Define Null Hypothesis (H0)

The null hypothesis asserts that there's no effect or relationship between the variables. In the context of testing for correlation, the null hypothesis is often that there's no correlation between the two variables, i.e., the correlation coefficient, 蟻, is equal to 0 (蟻=0).
02

Define Alternative Hypothesis (Ha or H1)

The alternative hypothesis claims that there's some effect or relationship between the variables. We are testing to see if there鈥檚 evidence that the correlation between two variables is negative. Therefore, the alternative hypothesis should be that the correlation is less than zero (蟻<0).
03

Summary of Null and Alternative Hypotheses

In summary, we have succinctly defined our null and alternative hypotheses as follows: Null hypothesis (H0): 蟻 = 0. Alternative hypothesis (Ha): 蟻 < 0. It鈥檚 important to note that when we say the correlation is less than zero, we mean it's negative.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient is a statistical measure that calculates the strength and direction of a relationship between two variables. The coefficient's value ranges from -1 to 1. A value of 1 implies a perfect positive correlation, meaning that as one variable increases, so does the other. Conversely, a correlation coefficient of -1 indicates a perfect negative correlation, where one variable increases as the other decreases. A value of 0 suggests that there is no linear relationship between the two.
To test the correlation, researchers often use Pearson's correlation coefficient (denoted as r) for linear relationships. Calculating r involves summarising the products of the standardized values of the data points from each of the variables. Simplistically, r measures how well a linear equation describes the relationship between two variables.
Understanding the correlation coefficient is crucial because it tells us not just the direction but also the magnitude of a correlation, allowing us to make predictions about one variable based on the other. When statisticians set out to analyze the relationship between two variables, they often consider both the value of the correlation coefficient and its significance to determine if the correlation observed is due to chance.
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical hypothesis testing is a cornerstone of empirical research, providing a formal process for decision-making that involves the evaluation of evidence from a sample. This process starts by postulating two competing hypotheses: the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative hypothesis (Ha). The null hypothesis typically represents a position of no effect or no difference, which in the context of relationships between variables, translates to no correlation.
On the other hand, the alternative hypothesis posits that there is a certain effect, difference, or relationship, which researchers aim to support. When conducting hypothesis testing for a correlation coefficient, the significance of the coefficient is assessed against a critical value from statistical tables that correspond to the desired level of confidence. Researchers use a variety of tests such as t-tests or z-tests depending on sample size and normality assumptions to determine if the null hypothesis can be rejected in favor of the alternative.
This process helps safeguard against random variations in data, and only findings that have a low probability of occurring randomly (typically less than 5% chance, denoted as p < 0.05) are considered statistically significant. While the workings of hypothesis testing can be complex, the fundamental goal is to make inferences about populations from samples and to determine the likelihood that observed effects are genuine and not due to chance.
Negative Correlation
A negative correlation represents a relationship between two variables in which one variable increases as the other decreases. In real-world applications, this could look like an inverse relationship between the amount of exercise one gets and their body weight鈥攖he more one exercises, the lower the body weight may become, if all other factors are constant.
Negative correlation can be observed across various domains, from finance to health, and understanding it is vital when making predictions. For instance, if market analysts notice that stocks and bond prices tend to have a negative correlation, they might diversify a portfolio as a strategy to mitigate risk. It's important to note, however, that correlation does not imply causation. Just because two variables move inversely in relation to each other doesn't mean that one causes the other to move. This is why researchers use hypothesis testing to rigorously evaluate the nature of the correlation, and statistical tests are applied to ensure the observed negative correlation is statistically significant and not a result of random chance.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercises 4.146 to \(4.149,\) hypotheses for a statistical test are given, followed by several possible confidence intervals for different samples. In each case, use the confidence interval to state a conclusion of the test for that sample and give the significance level used. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu_{1} \neq \mu_{2} .\) In addition, in each case for which the results are significant, state which group ( 1 or 2 ) has the larger mean. (a) \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}:\) $$ 0.12 \text { to } 0.54 $$ (b) \(99 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) : -2.1 to 5.4 (c) \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) : -10.8 to -3.7

Price and Marketing How influenced are consumers by price and marketing? If something costs more, do our expectations lead us to believe it is better? Because expectations play such a large role in reality, can a product that costs more (but is in reality identical) actually be more effective? Baba Shiv, a neuroeconomist at Stanford, conducted a study \(^{21}\) involving 204 undergraduates. In the study, all students consumed a popular energy drink which claims on its packaging to increase mental acuity. The students were then asked to solve a series of puzzles. The students were charged either regular price \((\$ 1.89)\) for the drink or a discount price \((\$ 0.89)\). The students receiving the discount price were told that they were able to buy the drink at a discount since the drinks had been purchased in bulk. The authors of the study describe the results: "the number of puzzles solved was lower in the reduced-price condition \((M=4.2)\) than in the regular-price condition \((M=5.8) \ldots p<0.0001 . "\) (a) What can you conclude from the study? How strong is the evidence for the conclusion? (b) These results have been replicated in many similar studies. As Jonah Lehrer tells us: "According to Shiv, a kind of placebo effect is at work. Since we expect cheaper goods to be less effective, they generally are less effective, even if they are identical to more expensive products. This is why brand-name aspirin works better than generic aspirin and why Coke tastes better than cheaper colas, even if most consumers can't tell the difference in blind taste tests." 22 Discuss the implications of this research in marketing and pricing.

In Exercises 4.112 to \(4.116,\) the null and alternative hypotheses for a test are given as well as some information about the actual sample(s) and the statistic that is computed for each randomization sample. Indicate where the randomization distribution will be centered. In addition, indicate whether the test is a left-tail test, a right-tail test, or a twotailed test. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu_{1} \neq \mu_{2}\) Sample: \(\bar{x}_{1}=2.7\) and \(\bar{x}_{2}=2.1\) Randomization statistic \(=\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2}\)

Watch Out for Lions after a Full Moon Scientists studying lion attacks on humans in Tanzania \(^{34}\) found that 95 lion attacks happened between \(6 \mathrm{pm}\) and \(10 \mathrm{pm}\) within either five days before a full moon or five days after a full moon. Of these, 71 happened during the five days after the full moon while the other 24 happened during the five days before the full moon. Does this sample of lion attacks provide evidence that attacks are more likely after a full moon? In other words, is there evidence that attacks are not equally split between the two five-day periods? Use StatKey or other technology to find the p-value, and be sure to show all details of the test. (Note that this is a test for a single proportion since the data come from one sample.)

In Exercises 4.146 to \(4.149,\) hypotheses for a statistical test are given, followed by several possible confidence intervals for different samples. In each case, use the confidence interval to state a conclusion of the test for that sample and give the significance level used. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) vs \(H_{a}: p \neq 0.5\) (a) \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(p: \quad 0.53\) to 0.57 (b) \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(p: \quad 0.41\) to 0.52 (c) 99\% confidence interval for \(p: \quad 0.35\) to 0.55

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.