/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 State the null and alternative h... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

State the null and alternative hvpotheses for the statistical test described. Testing to see if there is evidence that the correlation between two variables is negative

Short Answer

Expert verified
The null hypothesis is that the correlation between the two variables is equal to 0 (H0: 蟻=0). The alternative hypothesis is that the correlation between the two variables is less than 0 (Ha: 蟻<0), implying it's negative.

Step by step solution

01

Define Null Hypothesis (H0)

The null hypothesis asserts that there's no effect or relationship between the variables. In the context of testing for correlation, the null hypothesis is often that there's no correlation between the two variables, i.e., the correlation coefficient, 蟻, is equal to 0 (蟻=0).
02

Define Alternative Hypothesis (Ha or H1)

The alternative hypothesis claims that there's some effect or relationship between the variables. We are testing to see if there鈥檚 evidence that the correlation between two variables is negative. Therefore, the alternative hypothesis should be that the correlation is less than zero (蟻<0).
03

Summary of Null and Alternative Hypotheses

In summary, we have succinctly defined our null and alternative hypotheses as follows: Null hypothesis (H0): 蟻 = 0. Alternative hypothesis (Ha): 蟻 < 0. It鈥檚 important to note that when we say the correlation is less than zero, we mean it's negative.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient is a statistical measure that calculates the strength and direction of a relationship between two variables. The coefficient's value ranges from -1 to 1. A value of 1 implies a perfect positive correlation, meaning that as one variable increases, so does the other. Conversely, a correlation coefficient of -1 indicates a perfect negative correlation, where one variable increases as the other decreases. A value of 0 suggests that there is no linear relationship between the two.
To test the correlation, researchers often use Pearson's correlation coefficient (denoted as r) for linear relationships. Calculating r involves summarising the products of the standardized values of the data points from each of the variables. Simplistically, r measures how well a linear equation describes the relationship between two variables.
Understanding the correlation coefficient is crucial because it tells us not just the direction but also the magnitude of a correlation, allowing us to make predictions about one variable based on the other. When statisticians set out to analyze the relationship between two variables, they often consider both the value of the correlation coefficient and its significance to determine if the correlation observed is due to chance.
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical hypothesis testing is a cornerstone of empirical research, providing a formal process for decision-making that involves the evaluation of evidence from a sample. This process starts by postulating two competing hypotheses: the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative hypothesis (Ha). The null hypothesis typically represents a position of no effect or no difference, which in the context of relationships between variables, translates to no correlation.
On the other hand, the alternative hypothesis posits that there is a certain effect, difference, or relationship, which researchers aim to support. When conducting hypothesis testing for a correlation coefficient, the significance of the coefficient is assessed against a critical value from statistical tables that correspond to the desired level of confidence. Researchers use a variety of tests such as t-tests or z-tests depending on sample size and normality assumptions to determine if the null hypothesis can be rejected in favor of the alternative.
This process helps safeguard against random variations in data, and only findings that have a low probability of occurring randomly (typically less than 5% chance, denoted as p < 0.05) are considered statistically significant. While the workings of hypothesis testing can be complex, the fundamental goal is to make inferences about populations from samples and to determine the likelihood that observed effects are genuine and not due to chance.
Negative Correlation
A negative correlation represents a relationship between two variables in which one variable increases as the other decreases. In real-world applications, this could look like an inverse relationship between the amount of exercise one gets and their body weight鈥攖he more one exercises, the lower the body weight may become, if all other factors are constant.
Negative correlation can be observed across various domains, from finance to health, and understanding it is vital when making predictions. For instance, if market analysts notice that stocks and bond prices tend to have a negative correlation, they might diversify a portfolio as a strategy to mitigate risk. It's important to note, however, that correlation does not imply causation. Just because two variables move inversely in relation to each other doesn't mean that one causes the other to move. This is why researchers use hypothesis testing to rigorously evaluate the nature of the correlation, and statistical tests are applied to ensure the observed negative correlation is statistically significant and not a result of random chance.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Beer and Mosquitoes Does consuming beer attract mosquitoes? A study done in Burkino Faso, Africa, about the spread of malaria investigated the connection between beer consumption and mosquito attraction. \(^{9}\) In the experiment, 25 volunteers consumed a liter of beer while 18 volunteers consumed a liter of water. The volunteers \({ }^{8}\) Bouchard, M., Bellinger, D., Wright, \(\mathrm{R}\), and Weisskopf, M. "Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Urinary Metabolites of Organophosphate Pesticides," Pediatrics, \(2010 ; 125:\) e1270-e1277. \({ }^{9}\) Lefvre, T., et al., "Beer Consumption Increases Human Attractiveness to Malaria Mosquitoes," PLoS ONE, 2010; 5(3): e9546.were assigned to the two groups randomly. The attractiveness to mosquitoes of each volunteer was tested twice: before the beer or water and after. Mosquitoes were released and caught in traps as they approached the volunteers. For the beer group, the total number of mosquitoes caught in the traps before consumption was 434 and the total was 590 after consumption. For the water group, the total was 337 before and 345 after. (a) Define the relevant parameter(s) and state the null and alternative hypotheses for a test to see if, after consumption, the average number of mosquitoes is higher for the volunteers who drank beer. (b) Compute the average number of mosquitoes per volunteer before consumption for each group and compare the results. Are the two sample means different? Do you expect that this difference is just the result of random chance? (c) Compute the average number of mosquitoes per volunteer after consumption for each group and compare the results. Are the two sample means different? Do you expect that this difference is just the result of random chance? (d) If the difference in part (c) is unlikely to happen by random chance, what can we conclude about beer consumption and mosquitoes? (e) If the difference in part (c) is statistically significant, do we have evidence that beer consumption increases mosquito attraction? Why or why not?

Guilty Verdicts in Court Cases A reporter on cnn.com stated in July 2010 that \(95 \%\) of all court cases that go to trial result in a guilty verdict. To test the accuracy of this claim, we collect a random sample of 2000 court cases that went to trial and record the proportion that resulted in a guilty verdict. (a) What is/are the relevant parameter(s)? What sample statistic(s) is/are used to conduct the test? (b) State the null and alternative hypotheses. (c) We assess evidence by considering how likely our sample results are when \(H_{0}\) is true. What does that mean in this case?

Indicate whether the analysis involves a statistical test. If it does involve a statistical test, state the population parameter(s) of interest and the null and alternative hypotheses. Polling 1000 people in a large community to determine if there is evidence for the claim that the percentage of people in the community living in a mobile home is greater than \(10 \%\)

Classroom Games Two professors \(^{18}\) at the University of Arizona were interested in whether having students actually play a game would help them analyze theoretical properties of the game. The professors performed an experiment in which students played one of two games before coming to a class where both games were discussed. Students were randomly assigned to which of the two games they played, which we'll call Game 1 and Game \(2 .\) On a later exam, students were asked to solve problems involving both games, with Question 1 referring to Game 1 and Question 2 referring to Game 2 . When comparing the performance of the two groups on the exam question related to Game 1 , they suspected that the mean for students who had played Game 1 ( \(\mu_{1}\) ) would be higher than the mean for the other students \(\mu_{2},\) so they considered the hypotheses \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu_{1}>\mu_{2}\) (a) The paper states: "test of difference in means results in a p-value of \(0.7619 . "\) Do you think this provides sufficient evidence to conclude that playing Game 1 helped student performance on that exam question? Explain. (b) If they were to repeat this experiment 1000 times, and there really is no effect from playing the game, roughly how many times would you expect the results to be as extreme as those observed in the actual study? (c) When testing a difference in mean performance between the two groups on exam Question 2 related to Game 2 (so now the alternative is reversed to be \(H_{a}: \mu_{1}<\mu_{2}\) where \(\mu_{1}\) and \(\mu_{2}\) represent the mean on Question 2 for the respective groups), they computed a p-value of \(0.5490 .\) Explain what it means (in the context of this problem) for both p-values to be greater than \(0.5 .\)

A situation is described for a statistical test and some hypothetical sample results are given. In each case: (a) State which of the possible sample results provides the most significant evidence for the claim. (b) State which (if any) of the possible results provide no evidence for the claim. Testing to see if there is evidence that the proportion of US citizens who can name the capital city of Canada is greater than \(0.75 .\) Use the following possible sample results: Sample A: \(\quad 31\) successes out of 40 Sample B: \(\quad 34\) successes out of 40 Sample C: \(\quad 27\) successes out of 40 Sample \(\mathrm{D}: \quad 38\) successes out of 40

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.