/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 3 A Harris Poll press release date... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A Harris Poll press release dated November 1, 2016 summarized results of a survey of 2463 adults and 510 teens age 13 to 17 ("American Teens No Longer More Likely Than Adults to Believe in God, Miracles, Heaven, Jesus, Angels, or the Devil," www.theharrispoll.com, retrieved December 12 , 2016). It was reported that \(19 \%\) of the teens surveyed and \(26 \%\) of the adults surveyed indicated that they believe in reincarnation. The samples were selected to be representative of American adults and teens. Use the data from this survey to estimate the difference in the proportion of teens who believe in reincarnation and the proportion of adults who believe in reincarnation. Be sure to interpret your interval in context.

Short Answer

Expert verified
We can estimate with 95% confidence that the true difference in the proportion of teens and adults who believe in reincarnation is between -12.68% and -1.31%. This suggests that a lower proportion of teens believe in reincarnation compared to adults.

Step by step solution

01

Define the parameters

Let p1 be the proportion of teens that believe in reincarnation and p2 be the proportion of adults that believe in reincarnation
02

Find the point estimate

The point estimate for the difference in proportions is the difference in sample proportions: \(\widehat{p}_{1} - \widehat{p}_{2} = 0.19 - 0.26 = -0.07\)
03

Calculate the standard error

The standard error for the difference in proportions is given by: \(SE = \sqrt{\frac{\widehat{p}_1 (1 - \widehat{p}_1)}{n_1} + \frac{\widehat{p}_2 (1 - \widehat{p}_2)}{n_2}}\) Here, \(n_1 = 510\), \(n_2 = 2463\), \(\widehat{p}_1 = 0.19\), and \(\widehat{p}_2 = 0.26\) Plugging the values, we get: \(SE = \sqrt{\frac{0.19 (1 - 0.19)}{510} + \frac{0.26 (1 - 0.26)}{2463}} = 0.029\)
04

Find the critical z-value

Let's assume a 95% confidence level. Then, we can find the critical z-value by looking it up from the standard normal table: \(z^* = 1.96\)
05

Calculate the margin of error

The margin of error for the difference in proportions is given by: \(ME = z^* \times SE\) Plugging the values: \(ME = 1.96 \times 0.029 = 0.05684\)
06

Calculate the confidence interval

The 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions is given by: \((\widehat{p}_{1} - \widehat{p}_{2} - ME, \widehat{p}_{1} - \widehat{p}_{2} + ME)\) Using the values we have calculated: \((-0.07 - 0.05684, -0.07 + 0.05684) = (-0.12684, -0.01316)\)
07

Interpret the interval

We are 95% confident that the true difference in the proportion of teens and adults who believe in reincarnation in the population is between about -12.68% and -1.31%. Since the entire interval is negative, we can say that there is evidence to suggest that a lower proportion of teens believe in reincarnation compared to adults.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportion Difference Estimation
The analysis of differences between proportions is a fundamental concept used in statistics, especially when comparing groups. For example, if we are interested in understanding whether there is a significant difference in belief in reincarnation between two demographics, teens and adults, proportion difference estimation comes into play.

This estimation begins by identifying the proportions in each group—represented as \( p_1 \) for teens and \( p_2 \) for adults. These proportions are derived from survey data, which in the provided example are 19% for teens and 26% for adults. The point estimate of the difference is then simply the subtraction of these two values: \( \widehat{p}_1 - \widehat{p}_2 \).

In practical terms, if our calculated point estimate is negative (as in the example), this implies that the first group (teens) has a lower proportion with the belief in question compared to the second group (adults). Estimating this difference provides not just a point value but also a range of plausible values for this difference. This range is determined through the construction of a confidence interval, which accounts for sampling variability and provides a degree of certainty (usually 95%) that the true difference in populations lies within this interval.
Standard Error Calculation
The standard error (SE) is a crucial statistic, representing the variability or uncertainty associated with an estimate. When calculating the difference between two proportions, as in this case, the SE indicates how much we would expect the difference to vary from one random sample of data to another.

Mathematically, for two independent samples, the SE is calculated using the formula: \[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{\widehat{p}_1 (1 - \widehat{p}_1)}{n_1} + \frac{\widehat{p}_2 (1 - \widehat{p}_2)}{n_2}} \] where \( \widehat{p}_1 \) and \( \widehat{p}_2 \) are the sample proportions, and \( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) are the sample sizes of the groups being compared. It combines the variation within each group’s proportion relative to their sample sizes.

A smaller standard error implies greater precision in our estimation process, indicating that if we were to conduct the survey repeatedly, we would expect less variation in the difference of the proportions.

Understanding Standard Error in Context

When interepreting the standard error in the context of our example, a standard error of 0.029 on the difference in belief in reincarnation between teens and adults suggests that if multiple samples were taken, the computed differences from those samples would typically be within ±0.029 of our estimated difference most of the time.
Survey Data Analysis
Survey data analysis is the process of examining, interpreting, and drawing conclusions from collected survey data. It involves statistical techniques that enable us to make inferences about a larger population based on sample data. In our example, the survey of American teens and adults about belief in reincarnation serves as a tool to understand broader social or cultural patterns.

The data analysis starts with defining the population of interest and the sample that represents this population. The Harris Poll targeted American teens and adults, with respective sample sizes crucial for calculating estimates, such as proportions and standard errors. The accuracy of conclusions drawn from survey data heavily relies on sample representativeness, response rates, and the phrasing of survey questions.

Beyond the Numbers

Beyond pure numerical analysis, survey data also necessitates careful consideration of context. The interpretation of our survey results implies that a lower percentage of teens, compared to adults, believe in reincarnation. Such findings can influence further sociological research or inform discussions on cultural trends and generational shifts in beliefs. The ultimate goal of survey data analysis is not just to identify statistical differences but to understand what those differences may signify about the populations in question.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A hotel chain is interested in evaluating reservation processes. Guests can reserve a room by using either a telephone system or an online system that is accessed through the hotel's web site. Independent random samples of 80 guests who reserved a room by phone and 60 guests who reserved a room online were selected. Of those who reserved by phone, 57 reported that they were satisfied with the reservation process. Of those who reserved online, 50 reported that they were satisfied. Based on these data, is it reasonable to conclude that the proportion who are satisfied is greater for those who reserve a room online? Test the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(0.05 .\) (Hint: See Example \(11.4 .)\)

The report "Young People Living on the Edge" (Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, 2008) summarizes a survey of people in two independent random samples. One sample consisted of 600 young adults (age 19 to 35 ), and the other sample consisted of 300 parents of young adults age 19 to \(35 .\) The young adults were presented with a variety of situations (such as getting married or buying a house) and were asked if they thought that their parents were likely to provide financial support in that situation. The parents of young adults were presented with the same situations and asked if they would be likely to provide financial support in that situation. When asked about getting married, \(41 \%\) of the young adults said they thought parents would provide financial support and \(43 \%\) of the parents said they would provide support. Carry out a hypothesis test to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion of young adults who think their parents would provide financial support and the proportion of parents who say they would provide support are different.

Women diagnosed with breast cancer whose tumors have not spread may be faced with a decision between two surgical treatments -mastectomy (removal of the breast) or lumpectomy (only the tumor is removed). In a long-term study of the effectiveness of these two treatments, 701 women with breast cancer were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One group received mastectomies and the other group received lumpectomies and radiation. Both groups were followed for 20 years after surgery. It was reported that there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion surviving for 20 years for the two treatments (Associated Press, October \(17,\) 2002). What hypotheses do you think the researchers tested in order to reach the given conclusion? Did the researchers reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis?

The article "Most Women Oppose Having to Register for the Draft" (February \(10,2016,\) www.rasmussenreports. com, retrieved December 15,2016 ) describes a survey of likely voters in the United States. The article states that \(36 \%\) of those in a representative sample of male likely voters and \(21 \%\) of those in a representative sample of female likely voters said that they thought the United States should have a military draft. Suppose that these percentages were based on independent random samples of 500 men and 500 women. Use a significance level of 0.01 to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion of male likely voters who think the United States should have a military draft is different from this proportion for female likely voters.

Some fundraisers believe that people are more likely to make a donation if there is a relatively quick deadline given for making the donation. The paper "Now or Never! The Effect of Deadlines on Charitable Giving: Evidence from Two Natural Field Experiments" (Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics [2016]: \(1-10\) ) describes an experiment to investigate the influence of deadlines. In this experiment, \(1.2 \%\) of those who received an e-mail request for a donation that had a three-day deadline to make a donation and \(0.8 \%\) of those who received the same e-mail request but without a deadline made a donation. The people who received the e-mail request were randomly assigned to one of the two groups (e-mail with deadline and e-mail without deadline). Suppose that the given percentages are based on sample sizes of 2000 (the actual sample sizes in the experiment were much larger). Use a \(90 \%\) confidence interval to estimate the difference in the proportion who donate for the two different treatments.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.