/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 80 Suppose that \(x\) and \(y\) are... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose that \(x\) and \(y\) are positive variables and that a sample of \(n\) pairs results in \(r \approx 1\). If the sample correlation coefficient is computed for the \(\left(x, y^{2}\right)\) pairs, will the resulting value also be approximately 1 ? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
No, the correlation will not be approximately 1 due to the non-linear transformation.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

We need to determine whether the correlation of \((x, y^2)\) will remain approximately 1 given that the correlation of \((x, y)\) is approximately 1.
02

Recall the Definition of Correlation

The correlation coefficient \(r\) measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables. If \(r \approx 1\), it indicates a strong positive linear relationship between \(x\) and \(y\).
03

Consider Transformations Effect

When transforming data by squaring one variable, as is the case with \((x, y^2)\), the linearity of the relationship can be altered. Squaring \(y\) changes the relationship to a quadratic rather than a linear one.
04

Analyzing the Effect on Linear Correlation

Since the correlation coefficient is a measure of linearity, transforming \(y\) by squaring it breaks the linear relationship, potentially reducing \(r\) to a value different from 1.
05

Conclude the Solution

Given that squaring \(y\) introduces non-linearity, the new correlation between \(x\) and \(y^2\) will not be approximately 1. The squaring transformation likely reduces it.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Linear Relationships
In statistics, a linear relationship between two variables means that changes in one variable are proportional to changes in another. This relationship is usually expressed in the form of a straight line on a graph. The formula for a linear equation is typically written as \(y = mx + b\), where \(m\) is the slope and \(b\) is the y-intercept. A strong linear relationship implies that as one variable increases or decreases, the other does the same with a constant rate of change.

The correlation coefficient, denoted by \(r\), helps quantify this relationship. When \(r\) is close to 1 or -1, it indicates a strong linear relationship, positive or negative respectively, between two variables. This means you would see a roughly straight line if you plotted the data on a graph. When \(r = 1\), every change in \(x\) is perfectly matched by a change in \(y\). This strong correlation implies that the data points are exactly on a straight line as you move through the data set.

Understanding linearity is important in predicting outcomes and making decisions based on data trends. Linear relationships are foundational in many areas of study, including economics, engineering, and various sciences.
Non-linear Transformations
Non-linear transformations change the original data's structure, often altering the nature of the relationships among variables. Such transformations include operations like squaring, taking the square root, or applying exponential and logarithmic functions. These methods are used to address non-linearity, stabilize variance, or make data conform to normal distributions.

When discussing correlation, it is crucial to recognize that the correlation coefficient \(r\) primarily measures linear relationships. If we apply a non-linear transformation, like squaring a variable, the relationship between the variables can become non-linear, thus potentially altering the strength and direction of the correlation. For instance, transforming \(y\) to \(y^2\) changes the relationship from linear to non-linear, which can affect how the variability between \(x\) and \(y^2\) is perceived through the lens of linear correlation.
  • Non-linear transformations can distort existing linear trends, making it harder to interpret the correlation accurately.
  • They can also create new trends that require different methods for analysis, beyond simple correlation coefficients.
Understanding the implications of non-linear transformations is key, especially when analyzing datasets where variable transformations modify inherent relationships.
Quadratic Relationships
A quadratic relationship involves a squaring term and can be represented by a quadratic equation, typically in the form \(y = ax^2 + bx + c\), where \(a\), \(b\), and \(c\) are constants. These relationships create parabolic graphs, which are not straight lines but curves. Quadratic relationships occur frequently in physics, economics, and other sciences, describing phenomena where change is not constant, but instead accelerates or decelerates.

Unlike linear relationships, quadratic relationships mean that the change in one variable isn't uniform as the other variable changes. Instead, the change increases or decreases in a more complex pattern, such as acceleration due to gravity or population growth rates.

In the context of correlation, introducing a quadratic form like \(y^2\) alters the nature of potential realizations from a data set drastically. The move from a linear to a quadratic relationship can significantly change the correlation coefficient, deviating it from the correlation close to 1 observed for a linear relationship. This is because the correlation coefficient only measures linear alignment, not the fit of non-linear models like quadratics. Thus, understanding quadratic relationships is vital when interpreting correlation results after transformations, making it essential to use appropriate methods for analyzing and visualizing these relationships.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Astringency is the quality in a wine that makes the wine drinker's mouth feel slightly rough, dry, and puckery. The paper "Analysis of Tannins in Red Wine Using Multiple Methods: Correlation with Perceived Astringency" (Amer. J. of Enol. and Vitic., 2006: 481-485) reported on an investigation to assess the relationship between perceived astringency and tannin concentration using various analytic methods. Here is data provided by the authors on \(x=\operatorname{tannin}\) concentration by protein precipitation and \(y=\) perceived astringency as determined by a panel of tasters. $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrrrr} x & .718 & .808 & .924 & 1.000 & .667 & .529 & .514 & .559 \\ \hline y & .428 & .480 & .493 & .978 & .318 & .298 & -.224 & .198 \\ x & .766 & .470 & .726 & .762 & .666 & .562 & .378 & .779 \\ \hline y & .326 & -.336 & .765 & .190 & .066 & -.221 & -.898 & .836 \\ x & .674 & .858 & .406 & .927 & .311 & .319 & .518 & .687 \\ \hline y & .126 & .305 & -.577 & .779 & -.707 & -.610 & -.648 & -.145 \\ x & .907 & .638 & .234 & .781 & .326 & .433 & .319 & .238 \\ \hline y & 1.007 & -.090 & -1.132 & .538 & -1.098 & -.581 & -.862 & -.551 \end{array} $$ Relevant summary quantities are as follows: $$ \begin{gathered} \sum x_{i}=19.404, \sum y_{i}=-.549, \sum x_{i}^{2}=13.248032 \\ \sum y_{i}^{2}=11.835795, \sum x_{i} y_{i}=3.497811 \\ S_{x x}=13.248032-(19.404)^{2} / 32=1.48193150 \\ S_{y y}=11.82637622 \\ S_{x y}=3.497811-(19.404)(-.549) / 32 \\ =3.83071088 \end{gathered} $$ a. Fit the simple linear regression model to this data. Then determine the proportion of observed variation in astringency that can be attributed to the model relationship between astringency and tannin concentration. b. Calculate and interpret a confidence interval for the slope of the true regression line. c. Estimate true average astringency when tannin concentration is .6, and do so in a way that conveys information about reliability and precision. d. Predict astringency for a single wine sample whose tannin concentration is \(.6\), and do so in a way that conveys information about reliability and precision. e. Does it appear that true average astringency for a tannin concentration of . 7 is something other than 0 ? State and test the appropriate hypotheses.

Bivariate data often arises from the use of two different techniques to measure the same quantity. As an example, the accompanying observations on \(x=\) hydrogen concentration (ppm) using a gas chromatography method and \(y=\) concentration using a new sensor method were read from a graph in the article "'A New Method to Measure the Diffusible Hydrogen Content in Steel Weldments Using a Polymer Electrolyte-Based Hydrogen Sensor" (Welding Res., July 1997: \(251 \mathrm{~s}-256 \mathrm{~s})\). $$ \begin{array}{c|cccccccccc} x & 47 & 62 & 65 & 70 & 70 & 78 & 95 & 100 & 114 & 118 \\ \hline y & 38 & 62 & 53 & 67 & 84 & 79 & 93 & 106 & 117 & 116 \\ x & 124 & 127 & 140 & 140 & 140 & 150 & 152 & 164 & 198 & 221 \\ \hline y & 127 & 114 & 134 & 139 & 142 & 170 & 149 & 154 & 200 & 215 \end{array} $$ Construct a scatterplot. Does there appear to be a very strong relationship between the two types of concentration measurements? Do the two methods appear to be measuring roughly the same quantity? Explain your reasoning.

The invasive diatom species Didymosphenia geminata has the potential to inflict substantial ecological and economic damage in rivers. The article "Substrate Characteristics Affect Colonization by the BloomForming Diatom Didymosphenia geminata (Aquatic Ecology, 2010: 33-40) described an investigation of colonization behavior. One aspect of particular interest was whether \(y=\) colony density was related to \(x=\) rock surface area. The article contained a scatterplot and summary of a regression analysis. Here is representative data: $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrrrr} x & 50 & 71 & 55 & 50 & 33 & 58 & 79 & 26 \\ \hline y & 152 & 1929 & 48 & 22 & 2 & 5 & 35 & 7 \\ x & 69 & 44 & 37 & 70 & 20 & 45 & 49 & \\ \hline y & 269 & 38 & 171 & 13 & 43 & 185 & 25 & \end{array} $$ a. Fit the simple linear regression model to this data, predict colony density when surface area \(=70\) and when surface area \(=71\), and calculate the corresponding residuals. How do they compare? b. Calculate and interpret the coefficient of determination. c. The second observation has a very extreme \(y\) value (in the full data set consisting of 72 observations, there were two of these). This observation may have had a substantial impact on the fit of the model and subsequent conclusions. Eliminate it and recalculate the equation of the estimated regression line. Does it appear to differ substantially from the equation before the deletion? What is the impact on \(r^{2}\) and \(s\) ?

You are told that a \(95 \%\) CI for expected lead content when traffic flow is 15 , based on a sample of \(n=10\) observations, is \((462.1,597.7)\). Calculate a CI with confidence level \(99 \%\) for expected lead content when traffic flow is \(15 .\)

Suppose an investigator has data on the amount of shelf space \(x\) devoted to display of a particular product and sales revenue \(y\) for that product. The investigator may wish to fit a model for which the true regression line passes through \((0,0)\). The appropriate model is \(Y=\beta_{1} x+\epsilon\). Assume that \(\left(x_{1}, y_{1}\right), \ldots,\left(x_{n}, y_{n}\right)\) are observed pairs generated from this model, and derive the least squares estimator of \(\beta_{1}\). [Hint: Write the sum of squared deviations as a function of \(b_{1}\), a trial value, and use calculus to find the minimizing value of \(b_{1}\).]

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.