/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 27 Suppose an investigator has data... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose an investigator has data on the amount of shelf space \(x\) devoted to display of a particular product and sales revenue \(y\) for that product. The investigator may wish to fit a model for which the true regression line passes through \((0,0)\). The appropriate model is \(Y=\beta_{1} x+\epsilon\). Assume that \(\left(x_{1}, y_{1}\right), \ldots,\left(x_{n}, y_{n}\right)\) are observed pairs generated from this model, and derive the least squares estimator of \(\beta_{1}\). [Hint: Write the sum of squared deviations as a function of \(b_{1}\), a trial value, and use calculus to find the minimizing value of \(b_{1}\).]

Short Answer

Expert verified
\( b_1 = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i}{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2} \)

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

We need to derive the least squares estimator for \( \beta_1 \) in the linear model \( Y = \beta_1 x + \epsilon \) where the regression line passes through the origin (\(0,0\)). Given observed pairs \( (x_1, y_1), \ldots, (x_n, y_n) \), our goal is to find the value of \( \beta_1 \) that minimizes the sum of squared errors (deviations) between the observed values and the line \( \beta_1 x \).
02

Formulating the Sum of Squared Errors

The sum of squared errors (SSE) is given by \[ SSE(b_1) = \sum_{i=1}^n (y_i - b_1 x_i)^2 \] where \(b_1\) is a trial value for \(\beta_1\). Our aim is to minimize this SSE by finding an optimal \(b_1\).
03

Taking the Derivative of SSE

To find the minimum of the SSE, we first take its derivative with respect to \(b_1\) and set it equal to zero. The derivative is: \[ \frac{d}{db_1} SSE(b_1) = -2 \sum_{i=1}^n x_i (y_i - b_1 x_i) \] Setting this derivative equal to zero helps us find the optimum value of \(b_1\).
04

Solving the Equation

Setting the derivative to zero: \[ -2 \sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i + 2b_1 \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 = 0 \] Simplifying this, we find: \[ \sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i = b_1 \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 \] Thus, the least squares estimator for \(\beta_1\) is: \[ b_1 = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i}{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2} \]
05

Conclusion

The least squares estimator for \(\beta_1\) in the model \( Y = \beta_1 x + \epsilon \) is \[ b_1 = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i}{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2} \]. This expression minimizes the sum of squared deviations from the true regression line passing through the origin.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Least Squares Estimator
The least squares estimator is a fundamental concept in linear regression, used to identify the best-fitting line through a set of data points. It minimizes differences between the data points and the line predicted by the model. In simpler terms, it finds the slope of the line that most accurately represents the data.
To derive the least squares estimator for the slope, denoted as \(\beta_1\), we minimize the **sum of squared deviations** between observed values and predicted values, \(y_i - b_1 x_i\). This minimizes the error that the line makes when predicting data.
The least squares estimator in our specific scenario is the trial value \(b_1\) which makes this error the smallest possible. We derive it using calculus by setting the derivative of the **sum of squared errors (SSE)** to zero. This gives us an optimal formula:
  • \(b_1 = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i}{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2}\)
This result ensures that the line fits the data through the origin \((0,0)\) with minimal error.
Sum of Squared Errors
Understanding the sum of squared errors (SSE) is essential when performing linear regression. The SSE measures how well the regression line fits the data. It is the sum of the squares of the differences between observed values \(y_i\) and predicted values \(b_1 x_i\), where \(b_1\) is the assumed slope.
The formula for SSE is as follows:
  • \( SSE(b_1) = \sum_{i=1}^n (y_i - b_1 x_i)^2 \)
Here, the goal is to find the value for \(b_1\) that makes the SSE as small as possible. This is crucial because a smaller SSE indicates a better fit to the data, meaning predictions of sales revenue are closer to actual values.
In practice, making this sum as small as possible means that the predicted line closely follows the trend of the data points, ensuring accuracy in our regression model.
Regression Through the Origin
In regression through the origin, the line of best fit is constrained to pass through the point \((0,0)\). This approach is often used when it is logical for the relationship to naturally go through the origin, for instance, when both variables should be zero if the input variable has no effect.
For this type of regression, the equation simplifies to \(Y=\beta_1 x+\epsilon\), omitting the intercept. The focus then solely lies on determining the correct slope \(\beta_1\), which tells us how much \(Y\) changes per unit change in \(x\).
By constraining this line through the origin, it often simplifies the calculations and provides straightforward interpretations.
  • This method assumes no other influencing factors at play when \(x\) equals zero.
  • The fit calculated through this form of regression helps in understanding pure relationships, often resulting in simpler models with confined parameters.
It is critical to consider whether a regression through the origin is appropriate for your data, as it removes the flexibility of adjusting for non-zero baselines.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The flow rate \(y\left(\mathrm{~m}^{3} / \mathrm{min}\right)\) in a device used for air-quality measurement depends on the pressure drop \(x\) (in. of water) across the device's filter. Suppose that for \(x\) values between 5 and 20 , the two variables are related according to the simple linear regression model with true regression line \(y=-.12+.095 x\). a. What is the expected change in flow rate associated with a 1-in. increase in pressure drop? Explain. b. What change in flow rate can be expected when pressure drop decreases by 5 in.? c. What is the expected flow rate for a pressure drop of 10 in.? A drop of 15 in.? d. Suppose \(\sigma=.025\) and consider a pressure drop of 10 in. What is the probability that the observed value of flow rate will exceed \(.835\) ? That observed flow rate will exceed \(.840\) ? e. What is the probability that an observation on flow rate when pressure drop is 10 in. will exceed an observation on flow rate made when pressure drop is 11 in.?

Toughness and fibrousness of asparagus are major determinants of quality. This was the focus of a study reported in "Post-Harvest Glyphosphate Application Reduces Toughening, Fiber Content, and Lignification of Stored Asparagus Spears" (J. of the Amer. Soc. of Hort. Science, 1988: 569-572). The article reported the accompanying data (read from a graph) on \(x=\) shear force \((\mathrm{kg})\) and \(y=\) percent fiber dry weight. $$ \begin{array}{c|ccccccccc} x & 46 & 48 & 55 & 57 & 60 & 72 & 81 & 85 & 94 \\ \hline y & 2.18 & 2.10 & 2.13 & 2.28 & 2.34 & 2.53 & 2.28 & 2.62 & 2.63 \\ x & 109 & 121 & 132 & 137 & 148 & 149 & 184 & 185 & 187 \\ \hline y & 2.50 & 2.66 & 2.79 & 2.80 & 3.01 & 2.98 & 3.34 & 3.49 & 3.26 \end{array} $$ \(n=18, \Sigma x_{i}=1950, \Sigma x_{i}^{2}=251,970\) \(\Sigma y_{i}=47.92, \Sigma y_{i}^{2}=130.6074, \Sigma x_{i} y_{i}=5530.92\) a. Calculate the value of the sample correlation coefficient. Based on this value, how would you describe the nature of the relationship between the two variables? b. If a first specimen has a larger value of shear force than does a second specimen, what tends to be true of percent dry fiber weight for the two specimens? c. If shear force is expressed in pounds, what happens to the value of \(r\) ? Why? d. If the simple linear regression model were fit to this data, what proportion of observed variation in percent fiber dry weight could be explained by the model relationship? e. Carry out a test at significance level .01 to decide whether there is a positive linear association between the two variables.

The article "Some Field Experience in the Use of an Accelerated Method in Estimating 28-Day Strength of Concrete" ( \(J\). of Amer. Concrete Institute, 1969: 895 ) considered regressing \(y=28\)-day standard-cured strength (psi) against \(x=\) accelerated strength (psi). Suppose the equation of the true regression line is \(y=1800+1.3 x\) a. What is the expected value of 28-day strength when accelerated strength \(=2500\) ? b. By how much can we expect 28-day strength to change when accelerated strength increases by 1 psi? c. Answer part (b) for an increase of 100 psi. d. Answer part (b) for a decrease of 100 psi.

Bivariate data often arises from the use of two different techniques to measure the same quantity. As an example, the accompanying observations on \(x=\) hydrogen concentration (ppm) using a gas chromatography method and \(y=\) concentration using a new sensor method were read from a graph in the article "'A New Method to Measure the Diffusible Hydrogen Content in Steel Weldments Using a Polymer Electrolyte-Based Hydrogen Sensor" (Welding Res., July 1997: \(251 \mathrm{~s}-256 \mathrm{~s})\). $$ \begin{array}{c|cccccccccc} x & 47 & 62 & 65 & 70 & 70 & 78 & 95 & 100 & 114 & 118 \\ \hline y & 38 & 62 & 53 & 67 & 84 & 79 & 93 & 106 & 117 & 116 \\ x & 124 & 127 & 140 & 140 & 140 & 150 & 152 & 164 & 198 & 221 \\ \hline y & 127 & 114 & 134 & 139 & 142 & 170 & 149 & 154 & 200 & 215 \end{array} $$ Construct a scatterplot. Does there appear to be a very strong relationship between the two types of concentration measurements? Do the two methods appear to be measuring roughly the same quantity? Explain your reasoning.

The Turbine Oil Oxidation Test (TOST) and the Rotating Bomb Oxidation Test (RBOT) are two different procedures for evaluating the oxidation stability of steam turbine oils. The article "Dependence of Oxidation Stability of Steam Turbine Oil on Base Oil Composition" ( \(J\). of the Society of Tribologists and Lubrication Engrs., Oct. 1997: 19-24) reported the accompanying observations on \(x=\) TOST time (hr) and \(y=\) RBOT time (min) for 12 oil specimens. $$ \begin{array}{l|rrrrrr} \text { TOST } & 4200 & 3600 & 3750 & 3675 & 4050 & 2770 \\ \hline \text { RBOT } & 370 & 340 & 375 & 310 & 350 & 200 \\ \text { TOST } & 4870 & 4500 & 3450 & 2700 & 3750 & 3300 \\ \hline \text { RBOT } & 400 & 375 & 285 & 225 & 345 & 285 \end{array} $$ a. Calculate and interpret the value of the sample correlation coefficient (as do the article's authors). b. How would the value of \(r\) be affected if we had let \(x=\) RBOT time and \(y=\) TOST time? c. How would the value of \(r\) be affected if RBOT time were expressed in hours? d. Construct normal probability plots and comment. e. Carry out a test of hypotheses to decide whether RBOT time and TOST time are linearly related.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.