/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q45E A random sample of \(150\) recen... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

A random sample of \(150\) recent donations at a certain blood bank reveals that \(82\) were type A blood. Does this suggest that the actual percentage of type A donations differs from \(40\% \), the percentage of the population having type A blood? Carry out a test of the appropriate hypotheses using a significance level of \(.01\). Would your conclusion have been different if a significance level of \(.05\) had been used?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The null hypothesis has been rejected.

Step by step solution

01

Define p-value in hypothesis testing.

The null hypothesis states that the population mean is equal to the value mentioned in the claim. If the null hypothesis is the claim, then the alternative hypothesis states the opposite of the null hypothesis.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:p = 0\\{H_a}:p \ne 0\end{array}\)

The formula for the value of the test statistic is given by,\(z = \frac{{\hat p - {p_0}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{{p_0}\left( {1 - {p_0}} \right)}}{n}} }}\).

The sample proportion is calculated by dividing the number of successes by the sample size. \(\hat p = \frac{x}{n}\)

02

Test the appropriate hypothesis.

Let the appropriate hypotheses be\({H_0}:p = 0.4\)versus\({H_0}:p \ne 0.4\).

Let the given be:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{p_0} &= 0.4\\n &= 150\end{aligned}\)

Sample proportion:

\(\hat p = \frac{{82}}{{150}}\)

The value of the test-statistic:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}z &= \frac{{82/150 - 0.4}}{{\sqrt {0.4(1 - 0.4)/150} }}\\ &= \frac{{0.147}}{{0.04}}\\ &= 3.667\end{aligned}\)

The P-value of the alternative hypothesis\({H_a}:p \ne {p_0}\)is,

\(\begin{array}{l} = 2 \times (Area under the standard normal curve to the right of|z|)\\ = 2 \times P(z \ge 3.667)\\ = 2 \times 0\\ = 0\end{array}\)

Hence, the null hypothesis has been rejected because \(0 < 0.01\). The percentage of all donors with blood type A differs from \(40\% \). The same conclusions would be the same for \(\alpha = 0.05\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

To obtain information on the corrosion-resistance properties of a certain type of steel conduit, 45 specimens are buried in soil for a 2-year period. The maximum penetration (in mils) for each specimen is then measured, yielding a sample average penetration of \(\overline x = 52.7\) and a sample standard deviation of s = 4.8. The conduits were manufactured with the specification that true average penetration be at most 50 mils. They will be used unless it can be demonstrated conclusively that the specification has not been met. What would you conclude?

A random sample of soil specimens was obtained, and the amount of organic matter (%) in the soil was determined for each specimen, resulting in the accompanying data (from 鈥淓ngineering Properties of Soil,鈥 Soil Science, 1998: 93鈥102).

\(\begin{array}{l}1.10 5.09 0.97 1.59 4.60 0.32 0.55 1.45\\0.14 4.47 1.20 3.50 5.02 4.67 5.22 2.69\\3.98 3.17 3.03 2.21 0.69 4.47 3.31 1.17\\0.76 1.17 1.57 2.62 1.66 2.05\end{array}\)

The values of the sample mean, sample standard deviation, and (estimated) standard error of the mean are \(2.481,1.616,\) and \(.295,\) respectively. Does this data suggest that the true average percentage of organic matter in such soil is something other than \(3\% \)? Carry out a test of the appropriate hypotheses at significance level \(.10\). Would your conclusion be different if a \(\alpha = .05\) had been used? (Note: A normal probability plot of the data shows an acceptable pattern in light of the reasonably large sample size.)

Pairs of P-values and significance levels, 伪, are given.

For each pair, state whether the observed P-value would lead to rejection of H0 at the given significance level.

a.P颅-value = .084, 伪= .05

b.P颅-value = .003, 伪= .001

c.P-颅value = .498, 伪= .05

d.P-颅value = .084, 伪= .10

e.P-颅value = .039, 伪= .01

f.P-颅value = .218, 伪 = .10

The accompanying data on cube compressive strength (MPa) of concrete specimens appeared in the article 鈥淓xperimental Study of Recycled Rubber-Filled High-Strength Concrete鈥 (Magazine of Concrete Res., 2009: 549鈥556):

\(\begin{array}{l}112.3 97.0 92.7 86.0 102.0\\99.2 95.8 103.5 89.0 86.7\end{array}\)

a. Is it plausible that the compressive strength for this type of concrete is normally distributed?

b. Suppose the concrete will be used for a particular application unless there is strong evidence that true average strength is less than \(100MPa\). Should the concrete be used? Carry out a test of appropriate hypotheses.

For the following pairs of assertions, indicate which with our rules for setting up hypotheses and why (the subscripts 1 and 2 differentiate between quantities for two different populations or samples):

a. H0: 碌= 100, Ha: 碌 > 100

b.H0: 蟽= 20, Ha: \(\sigma \le 20\)

c.H0: p鈮 .25, Ha: p= .25

d.H0: 碌1 - 碌2 = 25, Ha: 碌1 - 碌2 > 100

e.H0: \(S_1^2 = S_2^2\) , Ha: \(S_1^2 \ne S_2^2\)

f.H0: 碌= 120, Ha: 碌= 150

g.H0: 蟽1,/蟽2 =1,Ha: 蟽1,/ 蟽2 鈮1

h.H0p1 鈥 p2 = -.1, Ha: p1 鈥 p2 < -.1

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.