/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q46 SE Let \(\alpha \) be a number betw... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(\alpha \) be a number between 0 and 1 , and define a sequence \({W_1},{W_2},{W_3}, \ldots \) by \({W_0} = \mu \)and \({W_t} = \alpha {\bar X_t} + (1 - \alpha ){W_{t - 1}}\) for \(t = 1,2, \ldots .\)Substituting for \({W_{t - 1}}\) its representation in terms of \({\bar X_{t - 1}}\) and \({W_{t - 2}}\), then substituting for \({W_{t - 2}}\), and so on, results in

\(\begin{array}{l}{W_t} = \alpha {{\bar X}_t} + \alpha (1 - \alpha ){{\bar X}_{t - 1}} + \ldots \\ + \alpha {(1 - \alpha )^{t - 1}}{{\bar X}_1} + {(1 - \alpha )^t}\mu \end{array}\)

The fact that \({W_t}\) depends not only on \({\bar X_t}\) but also on averages for past time points, albeit with (exponentially) decreasing weights, suggests that changes in the process mean will be more quickly reflected in the \({W_t}\) 's than in the individual \({\bar X_t}\) 's.

a. Show that \(E\left( {{W_t}} \right) = \mu \).

b. Let \(\sigma _t^2 = V\left( {{W_t}} \right)\), and show that

\(\sigma _t^2 = \frac{{\alpha \left( {1 - {{(1 - \alpha )}^{2\eta }}} \right)}}{{2 - \alpha }} \times \frac{{{\sigma ^2}}}{n}\)

c. An exponentially weighted moving-average control chart plots the \({W_t}\)'s and uses control limits \({\mu _0} \pm 3{\sigma _t}\) (or \(\bar \bar x\) in place of \({\mu _0}\) ). Construct such a chart for the data of Example 16.9, using \({\mu _0} = 40\).

Short Answer

Expert verified

Use different charts and methods.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1:To Find the determine required values

Show that expected value is\(\mu \)using independence and the fact that

\(E\left( {{{\bar X}_i}} \right) = \mu ,\;\;\;i = 1,2, \ldots ,\)

as follows

\(\begin{array}{l}E\left( {{W_t}} \right) = E\left( {\alpha {{\bar X}_t} + \alpha (1 - \alpha ){{\bar X}_{t11}} + \ldots + \alpha {{(1 - \alpha )}^{t - 1}}{{\bar X}_1} + {{(1 - \alpha )}^t}\mu } \right)\\ = \alpha E\left( {{{\bar X}_t}} \right) + \alpha (1 - \alpha )E\left( {{{\bar X}_{t - 1}}} \right) + \ldots + \alpha {(1 - \alpha )^{t - 1}}E\left( {{{\bar X}_1}} \right)\\ + {(1 - \alpha )^t}\mu \\ = \mu \left( {\alpha + \alpha (1 - \alpha ) + \ldots + \alpha {{(1 - \alpha )}^{t - 1}} + {{(1 - \alpha )}^t}} \right)\\ = \mu \left( {\alpha \left( {1 + (1 - \alpha ) + \ldots + {{(1 - \alpha )}^{t - 1}}} \right) + {{(1 - \alpha )}^t}} \right)\\ = \mu \left( {\alpha \sum\limits_{i = 0}^\infty {{{(1 - \alpha )}^i}} - \alpha \sum\limits_{i = t}^\infty {{{(1 - \alpha )}^i}} + {{(1 - \alpha )}^t}} \right)\\ = \mu \left( {\frac{\alpha }{{1 - (1 - \alpha )}} - \alpha {{(1 - \alpha )}^t} \cdot \frac{1}{{1 - (1 - \alpha )}} + {{(1 - \alpha )}^t}} \right)\\ = \mu \end{array}\)

Where the geometric series were used.

02

mentioned independence

Here, use mentioned independence to obtain the following

\(\begin{array}{l}V\left( {{W_t}} \right) = V\left( {\alpha {{\bar X}_t} + \alpha (1 - \alpha ){{\bar X}_{t1}} + \ldots + \alpha {{(1 - \alpha )}^{t - 1}}{{\bar X}_1} + {{(1 - \alpha )}^t}\mu } \right)\\ = {\alpha ^2}V\left( {{{\bar X}_t}} \right) + {\alpha ^2}{(1 - \alpha )^2}V\left( {{{\bar X}_t}1} \right) + \ldots + {\alpha ^2}{(1 - \alpha )^{2(t - 1)}}V\left( {{{\bar X}_1}} \right) + {(1 - \alpha )^t}\mu \\ = {\alpha ^2}V\left( {{{\bar X}_1}} \right) \times \left( {1 + {{(1 - \alpha )}^2} + \ldots + {{(1 - \alpha )}^{2(t - 1)}}} \right)\\ = {\alpha ^2}\frac{{1 - {{\left( {{{(1 - \alpha )}^2}} \right)}^t}}}{{1 - {{(1 - \alpha )}^2}}} \times \frac{{{\sigma ^2}}}{n} = \frac{{\alpha \left( {1 - {{(1 - \alpha )}^{2t}}} \right)}}{{2 - \alpha }} \times \frac{{{\sigma ^2}}}{n}\end{array}\)

03

Step 3:From the data in the mentioned

The formula of how to compute\(w_i^\prime \)s is given in the exercise; however,\(\alpha \)is not specified. From the data in the mentioned example, one could use\(\bar s\)or, e.g.\(\sigma = 0.5\). The value\({\mu _0} = 40\)is given in the exercise. Assume that\(\alpha = 0.6\)(one could use any, it is not specified). Compute all control limits, and\(\sigma _i^2\)s using formula in\((b)\). Start with\(w_i^\prime s\)

\(\begin{array}{l}{w_0} = {\mu _0} = 40;\\{w_1} = 0.6{{\bar x}_1} + 0.4{w_0} = 0.6 \cdot 40.20 + 0.4 \cdot 40 = 40.12;\\{w_2} = 0.6{{\bar x}_2} + 0.4{w_1} = 0.6 \cdot 39.72 + 0.4 \cdot 40.12 = 39.88;\\ \vdots \\{w_{16}} = 40.29.\end{array}\)

The values of\({w_i}\)are, respectively,

\(40,39.88,40.20,40.07,40.06,39.88,39.74,40.14,40.25,40.00,40.29,40.36,40.51,40.19,40.21,40.29\)

Using formula

\(\sigma _i^2 = \frac{{\alpha \left( {1 - {{(1 - \alpha )}^{2t}}} \right)}}{{2 - \alpha }} \cdot \frac{{{\sigma ^2}}}{n}\)

the values of\({\sigma _i}\)'s are square root of the value above; thus

\(\begin{array}{l}\sigma _1^2 = \frac{{0.6 \cdot \left( {1 - {{(1 - 0.6)}^2}} \right)}}{{2 - 0.6}} \cdot \frac{{0.25}}{4} = 0.0225\\\sigma _2^2 = \frac{{0.6 \cdot \left( {1 - {{(1 - 0.6)}^4}} \right)}}{{2 - 0.6}} \cdot \frac{{0.25}}{4} = 0.0261\\ \vdots \\\sigma _5^2 = \sigma _6^2 = \ldots = \sigma _{16}^2\end{array}\)

which results in\({\sigma _i}\)'s, respectively

\(\begin{array}{l}{\sigma _1} = 0.1500\\{\sigma _2} = 0.1616\\{\sigma _3} = 0.1633\\{\sigma _4} = 0.1636\\{\sigma _5} = \sigma _6^2 = \ldots = \sigma _{16}^2 = 0.1636\end{array}\)

The control limits for\(t = 1\)are

\(\begin{array}{l}LCL = 40 - 3 \times 0.1500 = 39.55\\UCL = 40 + 3 \times 0.1500 = 40.45,\end{array}\)

The control limits for\(t = 2\)are

\(\begin{array}{l}LCL = 40 - 3 \times 0.1616 = 39.52\\UCL = 40 + 3 \times 0.1616 = 40.48\end{array}\)

The control limits for\(t = 3,4, \ldots ,16\)are

\(\begin{array}{l}LCL = 40 - 3 \times 0.1636 = 39.51\\UCL = 40 + 3 \times 0.1636 = 40.49\end{array}\)

Compare\({w_i}\)with corresponding\(LCL\)and\(UCL\)and see if the value is between those values. There is an out-of-control limit which is\({w_{13}}\)because

\(UCL = 40.49 < 40.51 = {w_{13}}\)

04

Step 4:Final proof

a. Use properties of expectation; b. Use properties of variance; c. An out-of-control limit \({w_{13}}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Develop a single-sample plan for which \(AQL = .02\) and LTPD \( = .07\) in the case \(\alpha = .05,\beta = .10\). Once values of \(n\) and \(c\) have been determined, calculate the achieved values of \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) for the plan.

Refer to Exercise 1 and suppose the ten most recent values of the quality statistic are .0493, .0485, .0490, .0503, .0492, .0486, .0495, .0494, .0493, and .0488. Construct the relevant portion of the corresponding control chart, and comment on its appearance.

Resistance observations (ohms) for subgroups of a certain type of register gave the following summary quantities:

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}i&{{n_i}}&{{{\overline x }_i}}&{{s_i}}&i&{{n_i}}&{{{\overline x }_i}}&{{s_i}}\\1&4&{430.0}&{22.5}&{11}&4&{445.2}&{27.3}\\2&4&{418.2}&{20.6}&{12}&4&{430.1}&{22.2}\\3&3&{435.5}&{25.1}&{13}&4&{427.2}&{24.0}\\4&4&{427.6}&{22.3}&{14}&4&{439.6}&{23.3}\\5&4&{444.0}&{21.5}&{15}&3&{415.9}&{31.2}\\6&3&{431.4}&{28.9}&{16}&4&{419.8}&{27.5}\\7&4&{420.8}&{25.4}&{17}&3&{447.0}&{19.8}\\8&4&{431.4}&{24.0}&{18}&4&{434.4}&{23.7}\\9&4&{428.7}&{21.2}&{19}&4&{422.2}&{25.1}\\{10}&4&{440.1}&{25.8}&{20}&4&{425.7}&{24.4}\\{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}&{}\end{array}\)

Refer to the data given in Exercise\(8\), and construct a control chart with an estimated center line and limits based on using the sample standard deviations to estimate\(\sigma \). Is there any evidence that the process is out of control?

When the out-of-control ARL corresponds to a shift of 1 standard deviation in the process mean, what are the characteristics of the CUSUM procedure that has ARLs of 250 and \(4.8\), respectively, for the in-control and out of-control conditions?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.