/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q14E A sample of \({\rm{n}}\) capture... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 6: Q14E (page 263)

A sample of \({\rm{n}}\) captured Pandemonium jet fighters results in serial numbers\({{\rm{x}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{, \ldots ,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{n}}}\). The CIA knows that the aircraft were numbered consecutively at the factory starting with \({\rm{\alpha }}\)and ending with\({\rm{\beta }}\), so that the total number of planes manufactured is \({\rm{\beta - \alpha + 1}}\) (e.g., if \({\rm{\alpha = 17}}\) and\({\rm{\beta = 29}}\), then \({\rm{29 - 17 + 1 = 13}}\)planes having serial numbers \({\rm{17,18,19, \ldots ,28,29}}\)were manufactured). However, the CIA does not know the values of \({\rm{\alpha }}\) or\({\rm{\beta }}\). A CIA statistician suggests using the estimator \({\rm{max}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{i}}}} \right){\rm{ - min}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{i}}}} \right){\rm{ + 1}}\)to estimate the total number of planes manufactured.

a. If\({\rm{n = 5, x\_}}\left\{ {\rm{1}} \right\}{\rm{ = 237, x\_}}\left\{ {\rm{2}} \right\}{\rm{ = 375, x\_}}\left\{ {\rm{3}} \right\}{\rm{ = 202, x\_}}\left\{ {\rm{4}} \right\}{\rm{ = 525,}}\)and\({{\rm{x}}_{\rm{5}}}{\rm{ = 418}}\), what is the corresponding estimate?

b. Under what conditions on the sample will the value of the estimate be exactly equal to the true total number of planes? Will the estimate ever be larger than the true total? Do you think the estimator is unbiased for estimating\({\rm{\beta - \alpha + 1}}\)? Explain in one or two sentences.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a) The corresponding estimate is\({\rm{324}}\).

(b) If the sample includes both the plane with the highest serial number and the plane with the lowest serial number.

The greatest value can never exceed\({\rm{\beta }}\), and the smallest value can never be less than\({\rm{\alpha }}\).

Step by step solution

01

Definition

An estimator is a rule for computing an estimate of a given quantity based on observable data: the rule (estimator), the quantity of interest (estimate), and the output (estimate) are all distinct.

02

Finding corresponding estimate

(a)

Consider the given information and simplify,

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{n = 5}}\\{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{ = 237}}\\{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ = 375}}\\{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{ = 202}}\\{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{4}}}{\rm{ = 525}}\\{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{5}}}{\rm{ = 418}}\end{array}\)

We note that the smallest data value of the five data values is\({\rm{525}}\):

\({\rm{max}}\left( {{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{i}}}} \right){\rm{ = 525}}\)

We note that the largest data value of the five data values is\({\rm{202}}\):

\({\rm{min}}\left( {{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{i}}}} \right){\rm{ = 202}}\)

The value of the estimator then becomes:

\({\rm{max}}\left( {{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{i}}}} \right){\rm{ - min}}\left( {{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{i}}}} \right){\rm{ + 1 = 525 - 202 + 1 = 324}}\)

03

Finding corresponding estimate

(b)

The estimator will be exactly equal to the parameter if:

\(\begin{array}{l}{\rm{\beta = max}}\left( {{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{i}}}} \right)\\{\rm{\alpha = min}}\left( {{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{i}}}} \right)\end{array}\)

If the sample comprises the aircraft with the biggest serial number and the plane with the smallest serial number, the estimator is precisely equal to the parameter.

Because the maximum can never be higher than \({\rm{\beta }}\)and the minimum can never be lower than\({\rm{\alpha }}\), the difference between the maximum and minimum can never be more than\({\rm{\beta - \alpha + 1}}\), the estimate can never be greater than the real total.

If the sample comprises the aircraft with the biggest serial number and the plane with the smallest serial number, the estimator is precisely equal to the parameter.

Because the maximum can never be higher than \({\rm{\beta }}\)and the minimum can never be lower than\({\rm{\alpha }}\), the difference between the maximum and minimum can never be more than \({\rm{\beta - \alpha + 1}}\), the estimate can never be greater than the real total.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let\({\rm{X}}\)denote the proportion of allotted time that a randomly selected student spends working on a certain aptitude test. Suppose the pdf of\({\rm{X}}\)is

\({\rm{f(x;\theta ) = }}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{\rm{(\theta + 1)}}{{\rm{x}}^{\rm{\theta }}}}&{{\rm{0拢 x拢 1}}}\\{\rm{0}}&{{\rm{ otherwise }}}\end{array}} \right.\)

where\({\rm{ - 1 < \theta }}\). A random sample of ten students yields data\({{\rm{x}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.92,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.79,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{3}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.90,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{4}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.65,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{5}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.86}}\),\({{\rm{x}}_{\rm{6}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.47,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{7}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.73,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{8}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.97,}}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{9}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.94,}}{{\rm{x}}_{{\rm{10}}}}{\rm{ = }}{\rm{.77}}\).

a. Use the method of moments to obtain an estimator of\({\rm{\theta }}\), and then compute the estimate for this data.

b. Obtain the maximum likelihood estimator of\({\rm{\theta }}\), and then compute the estimate for the given data.

The article from which the data in Exercise 1 was extracted also gave the accompanying strength observations for cylinders:

\(\begin{array}{l}\begin{array}{*{20}{r}}{{\rm{6}}{\rm{.1}}}&{{\rm{5}}{\rm{.8}}}&{{\rm{7}}{\rm{.8}}}&{{\rm{7}}{\rm{.1}}}&{{\rm{7}}{\rm{.2}}}&{{\rm{9}}{\rm{.2}}}&{{\rm{6}}{\rm{.6}}}&{{\rm{8}}{\rm{.3}}}&{{\rm{7}}{\rm{.0}}}&{{\rm{8}}{\rm{.3}}}\\{{\rm{7}}{\rm{.8}}}&{{\rm{8}}{\rm{.1}}}&{{\rm{7}}{\rm{.4}}}&{{\rm{8}}{\rm{.5}}}&{{\rm{8}}{\rm{.9}}}&{{\rm{9}}{\rm{.8}}}&{{\rm{9}}{\rm{.7}}}&{{\rm{14}}{\rm{.1}}}&{{\rm{12}}{\rm{.6}}}&{{\rm{11}}{\rm{.2}}}\end{array}\\\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{{\rm{7}}{\rm{.8}}}&{{\rm{8}}{\rm{.1}}}&{{\rm{7}}{\rm{.4}}}&{{\rm{8}}{\rm{.5}}}&{{\rm{8}}{\rm{.9}}}&{{\rm{9}}{\rm{.8}}}&{{\rm{9}}{\rm{.7}}}&{{\rm{14}}{\rm{.1}}}&{{\rm{12}}{\rm{.6}}}&{{\rm{11}}{\rm{.2}}}\end{array}\end{array}\)

Prior to obtaining data, denote the beam strengths by X1, 鈥� ,Xm and the cylinder strengths by Y1, . . . , Yn. Suppose that the Xi 鈥檚 constitute a random sample from a distribution with mean m1 and standard deviation s1 and that the Yi 鈥檚 form a random sample (independent of the Xi 鈥檚) from another distribution with mean m2 and standard deviation\({{\rm{\sigma }}_{\rm{2}}}\).

a. Use rules of expected value to show that \({\rm{\bar X - \bar Y}}\)is an unbiased estimator of \({{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{\mu }}_{\rm{2}}}\). Calculate the estimate for the given data.

b. Use rules of variance from Chapter 5 to obtain an expression for the variance and standard deviation (standard error) of the estimator in part (a), and then compute the estimated standard error.

c. Calculate a point estimate of the ratio \({{\rm{\sigma }}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{/}}{{\rm{\sigma }}_{\rm{2}}}\)of the two standard deviations.

d. Suppose a single beam and a single cylinder are randomly selected. Calculate a point estimate of the variance of the difference \({\rm{X - Y}}\) between beam strength and cylinder strength.

The shear strength of each of ten test spot welds is determined, yielding the following data (psi):

\(\begin{array}{*{20}{l}}{{\rm{392}}}&{{\rm{376}}}&{{\rm{401}}}&{{\rm{367}}}&{{\rm{389}}}&{{\rm{362}}}&{{\rm{409}}}&{{\rm{415}}}&{{\rm{358}}}&{{\rm{375}}}\end{array}\)

a. Assuming that shear strength is normally distributed, estimate the true average shear strength and standard deviation of shear strength using the method of maximum likelihood.

b. Again assuming a normal distribution, estimate the strength value below which\({\rm{95\% }}\)of all welds will have their strengths. (Hint: What is the\({\rm{95 th}}\)percentile in terms of\({\rm{\mu }}\)and\({\rm{\sigma }}\)? Now use the invariance principle.)

c. Suppose we decide to examine another test spot weld. Let\({\rm{X = }}\)shear strength of the weld. Use the given data to obtain the mle of\({\rm{P(X拢400)}}{\rm{.(Hint:P(X拢400) = \Phi ((400 - \mu )/\sigma )}}{\rm{.)}}\)

Let\({\rm{X}}\)represent the error in making a measurement of a physical characteristic or property (e.g., the boiling point of a particular liquid). It is often reasonable to assume that\({\rm{E(X) = 0}}\)and that\({\rm{X}}\)has a normal distribution. Thus, the pdf of any particular measurement error is

\({\rm{f(x;\theta ) = }}\frac{{\rm{1}}}{{\sqrt {{\rm{2\pi \theta }}} }}{{\rm{e}}^{{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{x}}^{\rm{2}}}{\rm{/2\theta }}}}\quad {\rm{ - \yen < x < \yen}}\)

(Where we have used\({\rm{\theta }}\)in place of\({{\rm{\sigma }}^{\rm{2}}}\)). Now suppose that\({\rm{n}}\)independent measurements are made, resulting in measurement errors\({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{ = }}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{,}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{ = }}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{2}}}{\rm{, \ldots ,}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{n}}}{\rm{ = }}{{\rm{x}}_{\rm{n}}}{\rm{.}}\)Obtain the mle of\({\rm{\theta }}\).

a. Let \({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{1}}}{\rm{, \ldots ,}}{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{n}}}\) be a random sample from a uniform distribution on \({\rm{(0,\theta )}}\). Then the mle of \({\rm{\theta }}\) is \({\rm{\hat \theta = Y = max}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{i}}}} \right)\). Use the fact that \({\rm{Y}} \le {\rm{y}}\) if each \({{\rm{X}}_{\rm{i}}} \le {\rm{y}}\) to derive the cdf of Y. Then show that the pdf of \({\rm{Y = max}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{i}}}} \right)\) is \({{\rm{f}}_{\rm{Y}}}{\rm{(y) = }}\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{\frac{{{\rm{n}}{{\rm{y}}^{{\rm{n - 1}}}}}}{{{{\rm{\theta }}^{\rm{n}}}}}}&{{\rm{0}} \le {\rm{y}} \le {\rm{\theta }}}\\{\rm{0}}&{{\rm{ otherwise }}}\end{array}} \right.\)

b. Use the result of part (a) to show that the mle is biased but that \({\rm{(n + 1)}}\)\({\rm{max}}\left( {{{\rm{X}}_{\rm{i}}}} \right){\rm{/n}}\) is unbiased.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Calculus

Read Explanation

Pure Maths

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation

Statistics

Read Explanation

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.