/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q28 E As the population ages, there is... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

As the population ages, there is increasing concern about accident-related injuries to the elderly. The article "Age and Gender Differences in Single-Step Recovery from a Forward Fall" (J. of Gerontology, \(1999: M44 - M50\)) reported on an experiment in which the maximum lean angle-the farthest a subject is able to lean and still recover in one step-was determined for both a sample of younger females (\(21 - 29\)years) and a sample of older females (\(67 - 81\)years). The following observations are consistent with summary data given in the article:

YF:\(29,34,33,27,28,32,31,34,32,27\)

OF:\(18,15,23,13,12\)

Does the data suggest that true average maximum lean angle for older females is more than\(10\)degrees smaller than it is for younger females? State and test the relevant hypotheses at significance level . \(10\).

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average maximum lean angle for older females is more than degrees smaller than it is for younger females.

Step by step solution

01

Find the mean and standard deviation

Given:

\(\begin{array}{l}{n_1} = 10\\{n_2} = 5\\\alpha = 0.10\end{array}\)

The mean is the sum of all values divided by the number of values:

\(\begin{array}{l}{{\bar x}_1} = \frac{{29 + 34 + 33 + \ldots + 34 + 32 + 27}}{{10}} \approx 30.7\\{{\bar x}_2} = \frac{{18 + 15 + 23 + 13 + 12}}{5} \approx 16.2\end{array}\)

The variance is the sum of squared deviations from the mean divided by\(n - 1\). The standard deviation is the square root of the variance:

\(\begin{array}{l}{s_1} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(29 - 30.7)}^2} + \ldots . + {{(27 - 30.7)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}}} \approx 2.7508\\{s_2} = \sqrt {\frac{{{{(18 - 16.2)}^2} + \ldots . + {{(12 - 16.2)}^2}}}{{5 - 1}}} \approx 4.4385\end{array}\)

Given claim: more than \(10\)

The claim is either the null hypothesis or the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis state the opposite of each other. The null hypothesis needs to contain the value mentioned in the claim.

\(\begin{array}{l}{H_0}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} = 10\\{H_a}:{\mu _1} - {\mu _2} > 10\end{array}\)

02

Find the test stastistic and degrees of freedom

Determine the test statistic:

\(t = \frac{{{{\bar x}_1} - {{\bar x}_2}}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} }} = \frac{{30.7 - 16.2}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{{{2.7508}^2}}}{{10}} + \frac{{{{4.4385}^2}}}{5}} }} \approx 6.691\)

Determine the degrees of freedom (rounded down to the nearest integer):

\(\Delta = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{s_1^2}}{{{n_1}}} + \frac{{s_2^2}}{{{n_2}}}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {s_1^2/{n_1}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_1} - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {s_2^2/{n_2}} \right)}^2}}}{{{n_2} - 1}}}} = \frac{{{{\left( {\frac{{{{2.7508}^2}}}{{10}} + \frac{{{{4.4385}^2}}}{5}} \right)}^2}}}{{\frac{{{{\left( {{{2.7508}^2}/10} \right)}^2}}}{{10 - 1}} + \frac{{{{\left( {{{4.4385}^2}/5} \right)}^2}}}{{5 - 1}}}} \approx 5\)

The \({\rm{P}}\)-value is the probability of obtaining the value of the test statistic, or a value more extreme. The \({\rm{P}}\)-value is the number (or interval) in the column title of Student's T distribution in the appendix containing the t-value in the row \(df = 5\) :

\(0.0005 < P < 0.001\)

If the P-value is less than or equal to the significance level, then the null hypothesis is rejected:

\(P < 0.10 \Rightarrow {\rm{ Reject }}{H_0}\)

There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true average maximum lean angle for older females is more than degrees smaller than it is for younger females.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to Example 9.7. Does the data suggest that the standard deviation of the strength distribution for fused specimens is smaller than that for not-fused specimens? Carry out a test at significance level .01.

In medical investigations, the ratio \(\theta = {p_1}/{p_2}\)is often of more interest than the difference \({p_1} - {p_2}\)(e.g., individuals given treatment 1 are how many times as likely to recover as those given treatment\(2?)\). Let\(\hat \theta = {\hat p_1}/{\hat p_2}\). When \(m\)and n are both large, the statistic \(ln(\theta )\)has approximately a normal distribution with approximate mean value \(ln(\theta )\)and approximate standard deviation \({[(m - x)/(mx) + (n - y)/(ny)]^{1/2}}.\)

  1. Use these facts to obtain a large-sample 95 % CI formula for estimating\(ln(\theta )\), and then a CI for \(\theta \)itself.
  2. Return to the heart-attack data of Example 1.3, and calculate an interval of plausible values for \(\theta \)at the 95 % confidence level. What does this interval suggest about the efficacy of the aspirin treatment?

The article "Flexure of Concrete Beams Reinforced with Advanced Composite Orthogrids"\((J\). of Aerospace Engr., 1997: 7-15) gave the accompanying data on ultimate load\((kN)\)for two different types of beams.

\( - 7.0944\)

a. Assuming that the underlying distributions are normal, calculate and interpret a\(99\% \)CI for the difference between true average load for the fiberglass beams and that for the carbon beams.

b. Does the upper limit of the interval you calculated in part (a) give a\(99\% \)upper confidence bound for the difference between the two\(\mu \)'s? If not, calculate such a bound. Does it strongly suggest that true average load for the carbon beams is more than that for the fiberglass beams? Explain.

Reliance on solid biomass fuel for cooking and heating exposes many children from developing countries to high levels of indoor air pollution. The article 鈥淒omestic Fuels, Indoor Air Pollution, and Children鈥檚 Health鈥 (Annals of the N.Y. Academy of Sciences, \(2008:209 - 217\)) presented information on various pulmonary characteristics in samples of children whose households in India used either biomass fuel or liquefied petroleum gas (\(LPG\)). For the \(755\) children in biomass households, the sample mean peak expiratory flow (a person鈥檚 maximum speed of expiration) was \(3.30L/s\), and the sample standard deviation was \(1.20\). For the \(750\) children whose households used liquefied petroleum gas, the sample mean \(PEF\) was \(4.25\) and the sample standard deviation was \(1.75\).

a. Calculate a confidence interval at the \(95\% \) confidence level for the population mean \(PEF\) for children in biomass households and then do likewise for children in \(LPG\) households. What is the simultaneous confidence level for the two intervals?

b. Carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level \(.01\) to decide whether true average \(PEF\) is lower for children in biomass households than it is for children in \(LPG\) households (the cited article included a P-value for this test)

c. \(FE{V_1}\), the forced expiratory volume in \(1\) second, is another measure of pulmonary function. The cited article reported that for the biomass households the sample mean FEV1 was \(2.3L/s\) and the sample standard deviation was \(.5L/s\). If this information is used to compute a \(95\% \) \(CI\) for population mean \(FE{V_1}\), would the simultaneous confidence level for this interval and the first interval calculated in (a) be the same as the simultaneous confidence level determined there? Explain

Is there any systematic tendency for part-time college faculty to hold their students to different standards than do full-time faculty? The article 鈥淎re There Instructional Differences Between Full-Time and Part-Time Faculty?鈥 (College Teaching, \(2009: 23 - 26)\) reported that for a sample of \(125 \) courses taught by fulltime faculty, the mean course \(GPA\) was \(2.7186\) and the standard deviation was \(.63342\), whereas for a sample of \(88\) courses taught by part-timers, the mean and standard deviation were \(2.8639\) and \(.49241,\) respectively. Does it appear that true average course \(GPA\) for part-time faculty differs from that for faculty teaching full-time? Test the appropriate hypotheses at significance level \( .01\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.