/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 95 A friend claims he can predict t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A friend claims he can predict the suit of a card drawn from a standard deck of 52 cards. There are four suits and equal numbers of cards in each suit. The parameter, \(p\), is the probability of success, and the null hypothesis is that the friend is just guessing. a. Which is the correct null hypothesis? i. \(p=1 / 4\) ii. \(p=1 / 13\) iii. \(p>1 / 4\) iv. \(p>1 / 13\) b. Which hypothesis best fits the friend's claim? (This is the alternative hypothesis.) i. \(p=1 / 4\) ii. \(p=1 / 13\) iii. \(p>1 / 4\) iv. \(p>1 / 13\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The correct null hypothesis is \(p=1 / 4\) and the correct alternative hypothesis is \(p>1 / 4\).

Step by step solution

01

Define the Null Hypothesis

The null hypothesis in this case is that the friend is just guessing. This means that the probability of a correct guess (since a standard deck has 4 suits with equal cards) would be \(1/4\). So, the correct null hypothesis is \(p=1 / 4\).
02

Define the Alternative Hypothesis

The alternative hypothesis represents the friend's claim, that is, he can predict the suit of a card drawn from a standard deck of 52 cards. By claiming this, he's implying that his predictions are not random guesses and hence would have a probability that is greater than \(1/4\). So, the correct alternative hypothesis is \(p>1 / 4\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Probability
In the context of statistical analysis, probability is an essential concept that expresses the likelihood or chance of an event occurring. A probability can take any value between 0 and 1, with 0 indicating impossibility and 1 denoting certainty.

For example, when considering a standard deck of 52 cards, the chance of drawing a card from any one of the four suits—spades, hearts, diamonds, or clubs—is equally likely, assuming the deck is well-shuffled and there's no bias. If a friend purports the ability to guess the suit of a card correctly, probability helps us evaluate this claim mathematically. If the friend is simply guessing, the probability of a correct guess would be \(1/4\) or 25%, since there are four suits and thus a one in four chance of choosing the right one.

Understanding probability is not only critical to calculating odds in games, but it's also the basis for making inferences in hypothesis testing. It allows us to determine how likely a particular outcome is under a given hypothesis, which is crucial for drawing conclusions from data in fields as diverse as genetics, finance, and psychology.
Hypothesis Testing
The process of hypothesis testing involves making an assumption about a population parameter and then testing the validity of that assumption using sample data. It is a method used to determine whether there is enough evidence in a sample of data to infer that a certain condition is true for the entire population.

In our card prediction example, the null hypothesis is that the friend’s prediction is no better than random guessing, which is expressed statistically as \(p = 1/4\). The alternative hypothesis posits that the friend indeed has some predictive power, suggesting \(p > 1/4\). Hypothesis testing thus allows us to assess whether the friend’s claims are backed by statistical evidence or merely by chance. To do this scientifically, we collect data—such as the outcomes of multiple card guesses—and analyze it to see if the results significantly deviate from what we would expect under the null hypothesis.

Usually, the hypothesis testing process includes defining a significance level and then calculating a test statistic and p-value to determine whether the observed data are consistent with the null hypothesis or if we should reject it in favor of the alternative hypothesis.
Statistical Significance
The term statistical significance indicates whether the results of a study or an experiment are likely to be due to something other than random chance. It is often used to decide if a hypothesis should be accepted or rejected.

When conducting a hypothesis test, researchers will set a significance level, commonly denoted as \(\alpha\). This value represents the threshold for deciding whether the test results are significant. A common choice for \(\alpha\) is 0.05, meaning there's a 5% chance of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true (known as a Type I error). If the p-value, which measures the probability of obtaining a result at least as extreme as the one observed given that the null hypothesis is true, is less than the chosen \(\alpha\), the result is deemed statistically significant.

In our example with the predicting friend, if we were to conduct an experiment and find that the friend guesses correctly more often than what we would expect by random chance (with a probability less than 0.05), we could argue that there is statistical significance to support the alternative hypothesis that the friend actually has predictive power beyond guessing. Ultimately, assessing statistical significance helps in making informed decisions about the validity of research findings or the plausibility of claims based on empirical evidence.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

St. Louis County is \(24 \%\) African American. Suppose you are looking at jury pools, each with 200 members, in St. Louis County. The null hypothesis is that the probability of an African American being selected into the jury pool is \(24 \%\). a. How many African Americans would you expect on a jury pool of 200 people if the null hypothesis is true? b. Suppose pool A contains 40 African American people out of 200 , and pool B contains 26 African American people out of 200 . Which will have a smaller p-value and why?

Historically (from about 2001 to 2014 ), \(57 \%\) of Americans believed that global warming is caused by human activities. A March 2017 Gallup poll of a random sample of 1018 Americans found that 692 believed that global warming is caused by human activities. a. What percentage of the sample believed global warming was caused by human activities? b. Test the hypothesis that the proportion of Americans who believe global warming is caused by human activities has changed from the historical value of \(57 \%\). Use a significance level of \(0.01\). c. Choose the correct interpretation: i. In 2017 , the percentage of Americans who believe global warming is caused by human activities is not significantly different from \(57 \%\). ii. In 2017 , the percentage of Americans who believe global warming is caused by human activities has changed from the historical level of \(57 \%\).

The label on a can of mixed nuts says that the mixture contains \(40 \%\) peanuts. After opening a can of nuts and finding 22 peanuts in a can of 50 nuts, a consumer thinks the proportion of peanuts in the mixture differs from \(40 \%\). The consumer writes these hypotheses: \(\mathrm{H}_{0}: \mathrm{p} \neq 0.40\) and \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{a}}: \mathrm{p}=0.44\) where \(p\) represents the proportion of peanuts in all cans of mixed nuts from this company. Are these hypotheses written correctly? Correct any mistakes as needed.

In a Northeastern University/Gallup poll of 461 young Americans aged 18 to 35,152 reported they would be comfortable riding in a self-driving car. Suppose we are testing the hypothesis that more than \(30 \%\) of Americans in this age group would be comfortable riding in a self-driving car, using a significance level of \(0.05 .\) Which of the following figures correctly matches the alternative hypothesis \(p>0.30 .\) Report and interpret the correct p-value.

A taste test is done to see whether a person can tell Coke from Pepsi. In each case, 20 random and independent trials are done (half with Pepsi and half with Coke) in which the person determines whether she or he is drinking Coke or Pepsi. One person gets 13 right out of 20 trials. Which of the following is the correct figure to test the hypothesis that the person can tell the difference? Explain your choice.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.